Cyclic alternating pattern

Carlotta Mutti MD

Sleep Disorders

Updated 11.11.2023
Released 02.09.2014
Expires For CME 11.11.2026

Cyclic alternating pattern

Author: Carlotta Mutti MD

See Contributor Disclosures

Editor: Antonio Culebras MD FAAN FAHA FAASM

Cyclic alternating pattern

In This Article

Quick Link

Introduction

Overview

Cyclic alternating pattern is an EEG marker of sleep instability that modulates the flexibility of sleep in both physiological conditions and in sleep disorders. Together with sleep duration, sleep intensity, and sleep continuity, cyclic alternating pattern represents a topical pillar of sleep quality. The analysis of the cyclic alternating pattern metric can provide meaningful information on the health and dynamic organization of sleep at the individual level.

Key points

	• Expressed by the physiological phasic events of NREM sleep, including arousals, cyclic alternating pattern represents the most complex arrangement of sleep microstructure.
	• Cyclic alternating pattern is organized in sequences organized in successive cycles. Each cyclic alternating pattern cycle is composed of a phase A (phasic events) and a phase B (background rhythm).
	• Cyclic alternating pattern involves not only cerebral activities during sleep, but paces, and is reciprocally influenced by ongoing autonomic and motor functions, with activation during phase A and deactivation during phase B.
	• The interaction between cyclic alternating pattern, neurovegetative fluctuations, and motor events determines the pathophysiology of several sleep disorders and the effect of medication and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment.
	• Studies indicate the possibility of scoring cyclic alternating pattern automatically, opening new perspectives for a wider exploitation of this fundamental mechanism of the sleeping brain.

Sleep staging: the conventional scoring rules

The standardized Rechtschaffen and Kales criteria for sleep staging have constituted the internationally accepted system of sleep scoring for 45 years (73). An enormous body of data has been produced and published in the scientific literature using this system. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) manual introduced in 2007 revised Rechtschaffen and Kales sleep staging to address digital methodology as well as the scoring of arousals, respiratory events, sleep-related movement disorders, and cardiac abnormalities, with consideration of pediatric and geriatric age groups (33). In particular, the new visual scoring of sleep expands the number of channels indicated in the Rechtschaffen and Kales rules (single central derivation), allowing a more extensive coverage of scalp areas where significant sleep-wake rhythms and waveforms are better represented.

In the AASM system, the distinction between wakefulness (W), non-REM sleep (N), and REM sleep (R) is maintained, but the non-REM stages are reduced to 3: N1 (previous stage 1), N2 (previous stage 2), and N3 (previous stages 3 + 4). Unfortunately, the lumping of stages 3 and 4 in a single stage N3 downsizes the nocturnal development of the process “S,” characterized by decreasing peaks across the night, according to the decreasing power of the EEG delta band (05). Instead of providing additional information on the power of the EEG signal, the adopted solution is a reductive simplification of the previous sleep stages. Moreover, obliterating the exponential profile of process “S,” the restorative function of slow-wave sleep, and its direct relationship with waking activities are shadowed.

In the Rechtschaffen and Kales rules, EEG arousals were excluded from conventional staging procedures. In 1992, the American Sleep Disorders Association (ASDA; later named the AASM) defined arousals as markers of sleep disruption representing a detrimental and harmful feature for sleep (01). Essentially, a 3- to 15-second EEG frequency increase to theta, alpha, or beta activity during non-REM sleep (sleep spindle excluded) is scored as arousal. Although historically considered as electrophysiological biomarkers for central nervous system activation, a number of studies clarified that spontaneous arousals are natural guests of sleep and undergo a linear increase along the lifespan following the profile of maturation and aging (06). Moreover, the spectral composition of arousals and their ultradian distribution throughout the sleep cycles reveal that arousals are endowed within the texture of physiologic sleep under the biological control of REM-on and REM-off mechanisms (92). Arousal scoring is now considered a fundamental process in staging classification as well as spindles and K-complexes. In the Rechtschaffen and Kales system, a K-complex was unmistakably a marker of sleep stage 2. According to the AASM manual, if a K-complex is associated with an arousal the epoch is scored as N1. In other words, the Rechtschaffen and Kales approach privileged the role of EEG synchrony in the scoring process, whereas the AASM manual enhances the impact of EEG desynchrony (61).

In spite of the differences regarding sleep stages, arousals, and K-complexes, the two scoring systems share the same cultural frameworks, ie, rigid epochs of 30 seconds, neglecting evidence that sleep is a continuous function that cannot be restricted to a static sequence of artificial segments. In effect, each 30-sec epoch encompasses several short-time events that carry important information that does not show up in the classical sleep staging reports. These features have been grouped under the general label of sleep phasic events and detailed as K-complexes, sleep spindles, delta bursts, arousals, and K-alpha. The most comprehensive method for their analysis and report is the so-called cyclic alternating pattern (81). Because cyclic alternating pattern spans across long periods of NREM sleep, it overcomes the boundaries of rigid epochs and offers a dynamic contribution to the static framework of conventional scoring.

Scoring rules and significance of cyclic alternating pattern

Cyclic alternating pattern is a well-defined marker of the physiological cerebral activity occurring under conditions of reduced vigilance (sleep, coma), translating a state of arousal instability and involving muscle, behavioral, and autonomic functions (91; 63; 59).

During NREM sleep, cyclic alternating pattern is organized in sequences. A cyclic alternating pattern sequence is composed of a succession of cyclic alternating pattern cycles.

Cyclic alternating pattern cycle

A highlighted cyclic alternating pattern cycle composed of a phase A and a phase B. (Contributed by Dr. Liborio Parrino.)

The cyclic alternating pattern cycle is composed of a phase A (lumps of sleep phasic events) followed by a phase B (return to EEG background). All cyclic alternating pattern sequences begin with a phase A and end with a phase B. Each phase of cyclic alternating pattern is 2 to 60 seconds in duration. This cut-off relies on the consideration that the great majority (about 90%) of A phases occurring during sleep are separated by an interval of less than 60 seconds (82).

The absence of cyclic alternating pattern for more than 60 seconds is scored as non-cyclic alternating pattern and coincides with a condition of sustained physiological stability (89). An isolated phase A, ie, a phase A separated from another phase A by more than 60 s, is classified as non-cyclic alternating pattern.

Non-cyclic alternating pattern

A long stretch of stable NREM sleep (non-CAP) characterized by absent or isolated phasic events. (Contributed by Dr. Liborio Parrino.)

The reactivity of cyclic alternating pattern. Cyclic alternating pattern and non-cyclic alternating pattern can be consistently manipulated by sensorial inputs.

Applying separately the same arousing stimulus during the two EEG components of cyclic alternating pattern, phase B is the one that immediately assumes the morphology of the other component, whereas the inverse transformation never occurs when the stimulus is delivered during phase A. This stereotyped reactivity persists throughout the successive phases of cyclic alternating pattern with lack of habituation. In contrast, when the same stimulus is presented during non-cyclic alternating pattern, the EEG responses are generally brief, hypersynchronized (slow-waves), and proceed toward progressive habituation (93; 82).

However, a robust or sustained stimulus delivered during non-cyclic alternating pattern induces the immediate appearance of repetitive cyclic alternating pattern cycles that display the same morphology and reactive behavior of spontaneous cyclic alternating pattern sequences. The evoked cyclic alternating pattern sequence may herald a lightening of sleep depth or continue as a damping oscillation before the complete recovery of non-cyclic alternating pattern.

General rule. Cyclic alternating pattern cannot be measured without having scored sleep stages in advance; however, it is not limited to epoch fragmentation and spans over long periods of NREM sleep.

An A phase is scored within a cyclic alternating pattern sequence only if it precedes and/or follows another phase A in the 2 to 60 seconds temporal range.

At least two consecutive cyclic alternating pattern cycles are required to define a cyclic alternating pattern sequence.

Sequence of cyclic alternating pattern cycles)

A sequence of cyclic alternating pattern cycles. Notice that A phases are chronologically associated with transient autonomic activation (heart rate acceleration). (Contributed by Dr. Liborio Parrino.)

Consequently, three or more consecutive A phases must be identified with each of the first two A phases followed by a phase B (interval < 60 s), and the third phase A followed by a non-cyclic alternating pattern interval of more than 60 s.

Cyclic alternating pattern sequence onset must be preceded by non-cyclic alternating pattern (a continuous non-REM sleep EEG pattern for > 60 s), with the following three exceptions. There is no temporal limitation: (1) before the first cyclic alternating pattern sequence arising in non-REM sleep; (2) after a wake to sleep transition; and (3) after a REM to non-REM sleep transition (91).

Cyclic alternating pattern sequences have no upper limits for duration and number of cyclic alternating pattern cycles. In normal young adults, 2.5 minutes is the approximate mean duration of a cyclic alternating pattern sequence, containing an average of six cyclic alternating pattern cycles (78).

Cyclic alternating pattern rate. Among the various cyclic alternating pattern parameters, cyclic alternating pattern rate is the most extensively used for clinical purposes. Calculated as the percentage ratio of total cyclic alternating pattern time to non-REM sleep time, cyclic alternating pattern rate is the measure of arousal instability; it can be enhanced when sleep is disturbed by internal or external factors, and its variations correlate with the subjective appreciation of sleep quality with higher values of cyclic alternating pattern rate associated with poorer sleep quality (93).

Stage shifts. Within non-REM sleep, a cyclic alternating pattern sequence is not interrupted by a sleep stage shift if cyclic alternating pattern scoring requirements are satisfied. Consequently, because cyclic alternating pattern sequences can extend across adjacent sleep stages, a cyclic alternating pattern sequence can contain a variety of different phase A and phase B activities.

Cyclic alternating pattern in REM sleep. Cyclic alternating pattern sequences commonly precede the transition from non-REM to REM sleep and end just before REM sleep onset. REM sleep is characterized by the lack of EEG synchronization; thus, phase A features in REM sleep consist mainly of desynchronized patterns (fast low-amplitude rhythms), which are separated by a mean interval of 3 to 4 minutes (75). Consequently, under normal circumstances, cyclic alternating pattern does not occur in REM sleep. However, pathologic conditions characterized by repetitive A phases recurring at intervals less than 60 seconds (eg, periodic REM-related sleep apnea events), can produce cyclic alternating pattern sequences in REM sleep (88).

Recording techniques and montages. Cyclic alternating pattern is a global EEG phenomenon involving extensive cortical areas. Therefore, A phases should be visible on all or most EEG leads. Bipolar derivations such as Fp1-F3, F3-C3, C3-P3, P3-O1 or Fp2-F4, F4-C4, C4-P4, and P4-O2 guarantee a favorable detection of the phenomenon. A calibration of 50 mV/7 mm with a time constant of 0.1 seconds and a high-frequency filter in the 30 Hz range is recommended for EEG channels. Monopolar EEG derivations (C3-A2 or C4-A1 and O1-A2 or O2-A1), eye movement channels, and submentalis EMG, currently used for the conventional sleep staging and arousal scoring, are also essential for scoring cyclic alternating pattern.

Amplitude limits. Changes in EEG amplitude are crucial for scoring cyclic alternating pattern. Phasic activities initiating a phase A must be a third higher than the background voltage (calculated during the 2 seconds before onset and 2 seconds after offset of a phase A). However, in some cases, a phase A can present ambiguous limits due to inconsistent voltage changes. Onset and termination of a phase A are established on the basis of an amplitude/frequency concordance in the majority of EEG leads. The monopolar derivation is mostly indicated when scoring is carried out on a single derivation. All EEG events that do not clearly meet the phase A characteristics cannot be scored as part of phase A.

Time limits. The minimal duration of a phase A or a phase B is 2 seconds. If two consecutive A phases are separated by an interval of less than 2 seconds, they are combined as a single phase A. If they are separated by an interval of 2 seconds or more, they are scored as independent events.

The A phases of cyclic alternating pattern

Subtype classification. Phase A activities can be classified into three subtypes.

Phase A subtypes

Phase A subtypes classified on the basis of EEG desynchronization. (Contributed by Dr. Liborio Parrino.)

Subtype classification is based on the reciprocal proportion of high-voltage slow waves (EEG synchrony) and low-amplitude fast rhythms (EEG desynchrony) throughout the entire phase A duration. The three phase A subtypes are described as follows (91).

Subtype A1. EEG synchrony (high-amplitude slow waves) is the predominant activity. If present, EEG desynchrony (low-amplitude fast waves) occupies less than 20% of the entire phase A duration. Subtype A1 specimens include delta bursts, K-complex sequences, vertex sharp transients, and polyphasic bursts with less than 20% of EEG desynchrony.

Subtype A2. The EEG activity is a mixture of slow and fast rhythms with 20% to 50% of phase A occupied by EEG desynchrony. Subtype A2 specimens include EEG arousals and polyphasic bursts with more than 20%, but less than 50%, of EEG desynchrony.

Subtype A3. The EEG activity is dominated by rapid low-voltage rhythms with more than 50% of phase A occupied by EEG desynchrony. Subtype A3 specimens include K-alpha, EEG arousals, and polyphasic bursts with more than 50% of EEG desynchrony. A movement artifact within a cyclic alternating pattern sequence is also classified as subtype A3.

Cyclic alternating pattern sequences include different phase A subtypes. The majority of EEG arousals occurring in non-REM sleep (87%) is inserted within the cyclic alternating pattern sequences and basically coincides with a phase A2 or A3. In particular, 95% of subtype A3 and 62% of subtype A2 meet the AASM criteria for arousals (67; 90). The broad overlap between arousals and subtypes A2 and A3 is further supported by their similar evolution in relation to age and to their positive correlation with the amount of light NREM sleep and negative correlation with the amount of deep NREM sleep.

Spectral composition. Power spectral analysis of cyclic alternating pattern components shows that the different phase A subtypes in non-REM sleep are variants of a continuous 2-fold process: an initial high-voltage slow-wave component, which predisposes the cerebral cortex to a greater readiness and opens the way to the more rapid activity, correlated with strong activating effects (13; 21). What distinguishes the single event is the build-up and reciprocal distribution of the EEG components. In the A1 phases of cyclic alternating pattern, which exclusively host K-complexes and equivalent slow-wave activities (vertex potentials and delta bursts), the starting delta power increase is maintained and prevails throughout the entire activation process. A balanced representation of slow and fast EEG frequency bands is the main characteristic of A2 phases, whereas rapid EEG activities are the dominant feature of A3 subtypes and arousals. This does not mean that all activating complexes exert equivalent effects on sleep structure and on autonomic functions. A hierarchical activation from the slower EEG patterns (moderate autonomic activation without sleep disruption) to the faster EEG patterns (robust autonomic activation associated with visible sleep fragmentation) has been described in different studies (28; 24; 76; 31; 97). If AASM arousal is a sign of transient sleep discontinuity, the finding of phasic EEG delta activities during enhancement of autonomic functions indicates the possibility of physiological activation without sleep disruption (29). In effect, non-visible sleep fragmentation induced by acoustic tones has been associated with increased daytime sleepiness, indicating that the processes of sleep consolidation may be impaired (in this case by sensorial stimulation) without evidence of sleep discontinuity (46).

Description

Cyclic alternating pattern and the gating mechanisms of sleep. Despite their EEG differences, slow EEG events (K-complexes and delta bursts) and AASM arousals (fast rhythms) share functional properties and, therefore, may be included in the comprehensive term “activating complexes.”

Such a variety of EEG manifestations relies on specific gates controlling the flow of internal and external inputs. The thalamic-basal forebrain gate is an ultimate step of resistance against arousing impulses. Initially the cortex tries to preserve sleep continuity with reinforcement of its gates that are indicated by the occurrence of K-complexes and delta bursts in sleep EEG. However, when the thalamic gate cannot control the afferent inputs, a cortical change is seen, translated by an alpha mixed or an alpha/beta frequency burst (32). The initial reaction of the cerebral cortex is a sleep-protective response as the majority of transient rapid activities are preceded by a slow high-amplitude EEG burst (29). Slow EEG events during non-REM sleep are an emergent property of cortico-thalamo-cortical networks. In particular, they originate from the dynamic interplay of three cardinal oscillators: the synaptically based cortical oscillator and two thalamic oscillators, ie, thalamocortical neurons and nucleus reticularis thalami. The functional implications of this dialogue provide permissive windows for cellular excitability and network plasticity during slow-wave sleep (12).

Cyclic alternating pattern sequences reflect the balance between sleep- and wake-promoting systems. Subtype A1 is a natural “delta injection” fueling the build-up and consolidation of deep NREM stages and defending sleep against perturbations. In contrast, cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A2 and A3 drive the sleeper toward more superficial vigilance states. Therefore, cyclic alternating pattern sequences represent a protective, short-term homeostatic mechanism of non-REM sleep in which the amount of slow-wave activity is buffered and sleep continuity preserved (30). When delta power increases in sleep after sleep deprivation, the cyclic alternating pattern system reacts with a robust decrease of cyclic alternating pattern rate (14). Supplementation of sleep with slow waves after deprivation counteracts the production of cyclic alternating pattern sequences, probably because the sleep promoting system is under saturation.

Cyclic alternating pattern and oscillation below 1 Hz. Besides cyclic alternating pattern, the other major EEG activity in the frequency range below 1 Hz is the so-called slow oscillation (02). This 0.5 to 0.9 Hz EEG rhythm, which characterizes states of reduced tonic arousal, was outlined during anesthesia and NREM sleep in both animals (cats and rats) and human subjects. The slow oscillation is generated in cortical neurons and consists of phases of depolarization characterized by intensive neural firing, followed by long-lasting hyperpolarization. Hence, the two phases of the slow oscillation are characterized by opposite neural phenomena: cortical excitation made up of synaptic potentials and cortical inhibition mainly due to disfacilitation in the network. The excitatory component of the slow oscillation is effective in grouping the K-complexes and delta waves, which do not occur in isolation, but are grouped into complex wave sequences. The coalescence of slow rhythms is especially visible during NREM sleep. In particular, high-voltage slow waves rarely appear as isolated features during slow-wave sleep, but in most cases they converge into collectives resulting in the phase A1 subtypes of cyclic alternating pattern. As NREM sleep progresses from stage 1 to stage 4, the differences in morphology and voltage between phase A (clusters of K-complexes and delta bursts) and the successive phase B (sleep stage background) become gradually less evident until the EEG is dominated by the uniform pattern of non-cyclic alternating pattern with the high amplitude slow waves recurring in the frequency range of oscillation below 1 Hz. Neurophysiological investigation has ascertained that the slow cortical oscillation (< 1 Hz) is absent at sleep onset but begins to organize in small territories, thereafter recruiting larger ones through coupling mechanisms as sleep deepens. Consolidated slow-wave sleep is characterized by a sustained oscillation below 1 Hz, which reflects a stable non-cyclic alternating pattern condition (85; 59).

Cyclic alternating pattern and the structure of sleep. Sleep architecture is based on the cyclic alternation of two major neurophysiological states: NREM and REM sleep. NREM sleep is composed of 3 or 4 stages in which EEG synchrony grows with the increasing depth of sleep. In contrast, EEG desynchrony is the dominant feature of REM sleep. The alternation of NREM and REM sleep constitutes the sleep cycle, and its recurrence during the night determines the classical stepwise profile of sleep macrostructure. The NREM portion of the sleep cycle starts with a slow descending branch sloping from the more superficial to the deeper NREM stages; continues with a central trough that represents the deepest stages of the sleep cycle; and ends with a rapid reverse ascending branch, expressed by the more superficial NREM stages that precede REM sleep. Accordingly, the NREM sleep architecture delineates a continuous pattern of build-up (descending branch), maintenance (trough), and resolution (ascending branch) of EEG synchrony. A detailed investigation has ascertained that the spontaneous EEG fluctuations centered on the 20 to 40 seconds periodicity of cyclic alternating pattern are involved in the subtle mechanisms that regulate the production and attenuation of slow-wave activities during sleep. There is evidence that the different components of cyclic alternating pattern have a sculpturing effect on the profile of the sleep cycle. Comparing spectral assessment and EEG visual scoring of NREM sleep in normal healthy subjects, the amount of slow rhythmic oscillations (spectral analysis) parallels the number of cyclic alternating pattern cycles (visual detection), with a striking agreement between spectral power gatherings and visually scored A phases (92). The regular EEG oscillations that accompany the transition from light sleep to deep stable sleep are basically expressed by the A1 subtypes (87). Within the sleep cycle, 90% of the A phases detected in the descending branches and 92% of the A phases detected in the troughs are subtype A1, whereas 64% of the A phases identified in the ascending branches are subtypes A2 (45%) or A3 (19%). These findings indicate that both slow and rapid EEG activating complexes are involved in the structural organization of sleep. The abundance of A1 subtypes in the descending branches and troughs can be the EEG expression of the cerebral mechanisms involved in REM-off activity, whereas the predominance of subtypes A2 and A3 (and arousals) in the ascending branches reflects the REM-on drive (92). As a confirmation, the A1 index and percentage positively correlate with slow wave sleep percentage and, overall, this cyclic alternating pattern subtype occurs more frequently during stage N3 of non-REM sleep (50). Therefore, besides their manifold EEG features, activating complexes are also characterized by a non-random distribution across the night, which assumes a clear-cut periodicity during NREM sleep within the framework of cyclic alternating pattern. For this reason, cyclic alternating pattern is considered the main expression of sleep microstructure (19).

The measures of cyclic alternating pattern: ontogenetic aspects. EEG features are highly sensitive markers of brain development. Accordingly, sleep reflects the physiological changes that accompany the different ages of the lifespan. In particular, slow-wave sleep dominates in the younger decades in contrast to superficial NREM sleep, which increases with the aging process. Cyclic alternating pattern parameters, as all the other measures of sleep microstructure such as K-complexes and sleep spindles, undergo dynamic changes across the maturational phases of life (52). The age-related values of cyclic alternating pattern have been measured and defined in order to establish the physiological ranges of normal sleep (57). Cyclic alternating pattern rate follows a U-shape dynamic course with aging; this sleep parameter is higher during the first years after birth (mainly during the first 2 years of life), subsequentially drops in middle age, and finally reaches a steep increase during advanced adulthood and senescence (57; 07; 08; 39; 49). Cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A1 gradually decrease with aging, whereas subtypes A2 and A3 progressively increase, contributing to the paraphysiological sleep lightening that occurs with aging. These data have been synthesized in a systematic review with meta-analysis (50).

Clinical applications

Clinical applications of cyclic alternating pattern

Cyclic alternating pattern and sleep disorders in adults. The cyclic oscillations of cyclic alternating pattern are physiological components of sleep structure in which they act as dynamic segments, pacing the state transition between different NREM sleep stages according to homeostatic and ultradian processes. However, cyclic alternating pattern sequences can occur also in response to external stimuli of different sensorial modality (tactile, thermal, acoustic, painful, etc.). Accordingly, the amount of cyclic alternating pattern increases when sleep is achieved under conditions of noise stimulation or in situations of sleep disruption, such as insomnia, depression, eating disorders, sleep apnea syndrome, periodic limb movements, nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, primary generalized and focal lesional epilepsy, and Prader-Willi syndrome in adults (86; 93; 88; 82; 83; 70; 55; 65; 58; 103; 18; 15; 72; 27). It is lowered by sleep-promoting conditions such as narcolepsy, multiple system atrophy, drug administration, CPAP treatment in obstructive sleep apnea, and nighttime recovery sleep after prolonged sleep deprivation (83; 69; 70; 56; 65; 71; 14; 23; 95; 99; 79; 16).

Cyclic alternating pattern is not only influenced by sleep disorders, but, in turn, modulates the occurrence and distribution of sleep-related events. In particular, phase A of cyclic alternating pattern triggers and paces the allocation of bruxism, sleepwalking, epileptic events, periodic limb jerks, and rhythmic movements during NREM sleep (102; 55; 60; 40; 68; 42; 26; 53; 36). In contrast, phase B of cyclic alternating pattern is closely related to the repetitive respiratory events of sleep-disordered breathing, and only the powerful autonomic activation during the following cyclic alternating pattern A phase can restore post-apnea breathing (88). Like an alternatively opening (phase A) and closing (phase B) gate, cyclic alternating pattern phases act as periodic permissive windows in NREM sleep, offering a favorable background for phasic and/or repetitive sleep-related manifestations, ie, periodic limb movements, epileptic seizures, sleep apneas.

Sequence of cyclic alternating pattern cycles)

Accordingly, a number of sleep disorders can be classified pathophysiologically on the basis of their relationship with cyclic alternating pattern and non-cyclic alternating pattern. In particular, periodic limb movement disorder, sleep bruxism, and epileptic manifestations can be considered as phase A-related disorders, whereas sleep apneas are a typical expression of a phase B-related disturbance (84).

The role of cyclic alternating pattern in primary insomnia. Primary insomnia appears to be the exaggeration of a physiological rhythm ordinarily involved in the sleep process. Previous studies have ascertained that acoustic stimuli enhance the physiological amount of cyclic alternating pattern rate and determine poor sleep and daytime dysfunction even without an increase of sleep fragmentation. In this perspective, cyclic alternating pattern operates as a double-edged sword. Although limited quantities of cyclic alternating pattern mediate physiological effects, larger amounts reflect the brain’s difficulties to consolidate and preserve sleep and, therefore, may be associated with detrimental consequences. Because primary insomnia is not supported by any other sleep, medical, psychiatric, or substance-induced problem, there is no evidence of an organ disorder. In any case, whatever the nature of disturbance, the outcome is the amplification of an otherwise physiological process.

Polysomnography investigation based on an extensive sample of Caucasian patients affected by primary insomnia have demonstrated that cyclic alternating pattern parameters consistently reflect the reduced quality of sleep in insomnia complainers and can substantiate the efficacy of hypnotic medication (62). Discriminant analysis indicates that cyclic alternating pattern rate is the most sensitive sleep measure of effective drug treatment, whereas correlation analysis shows that cyclic alternating pattern rate is the polysomnography parameter that better reflects subjective sleep quality (94). Similar findings have been confirmed in non-Caucasian subjects. In Japanese patients with psychophysiological insomnia, a randomized crossover comparative study with placebo showed that hypnotic treatment (zolpidem) increased sleep stability by significantly improving the overnight cyclic alternating pattern rate as well as subjective sleep quality (54).

Cyclic alternating pattern parameters are also useful tools to monitor the effects of intermittent hypnotic treatment. In a double-blind study carried out on adults with primary sleep maintenance insomnia lasting longer than 1 month, polysomnography measures and perception of sleep quality were assessed at baseline and during the following six consecutive nights of alternating treatment with zolpidem (10 mg) or placebo. Compared to baseline values, cyclic alternating pattern rate, cyclic alternating pattern time, subtype A2, and subtype A1 were significantly reduced with zolpidem treatment and correlated with sleep quality, whereas they did not rebound above baseline with placebo (66).

An intriguing aspect of insomnia is the established finding that people with this disorder often overestimate the time they take to get to sleep and underestimate the total amount of time they actually sleep. To investigate this mismatching phenomenon, a polysomnography study was carried out in 20 patients with a diagnosis of sleep state misperception or paradoxical insomnia (64). Recruitment of misperceptors without coexisting neurologic, medical, or psychiatric disorders was based on objective total sleep time (TST) of at least 6.5 h, objective sleep latency shorter than 30 minutes, underestimated difference between objective and subjective TST of at least 120 minutes, and subjective estimation of sleep latency more than 20% of objective sleep latency. Polysomnography data of misperceptors were compared with those of 20 normal gender- and age-matched subjects (controls). Patients and controls presented nonsignificant differences in the amounts of objective sleep time (464 vs. 447 minutes) and objective sleep latency (9 vs. 8 minutes). However, compared to controls, misperceptors reported a significantly shorter time of perceived sleep (285 vs. 461 minutes; p < 0.0001), and a significantly longer duration of perceived sleep latency (51 vs. 22 minutes; p < 0.0001). Arousal index (32/hour vs. 19/hour; p < 0.0001) and total cyclic alternating pattern rate (58% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in insomniacs. In the sleep period between objective and subjective sleep onset, cyclic alternating pattern rate was 64.4% in misperceptors and 45.1% in controls (p < 0.002). Insomniacs showed significantly higher amounts of cyclic alternating pattern rate in stage 1 (62.7% vs. 37.5%; p < 0.0001) and in stage 2 (53.3% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.0001), but not in slow-wave sleep. The percentage of subtypes A2, which include both sleep promoting and wake-promoting EEG features, was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in misperceptors (31%) compared to controls (24%). Interestingly, misperceptors reported a limited amount of subjective awakenings (mean: 4) in contrast to objective findings (mean: 11). The mismatch could be explained in part by the high amounts of cyclic alternating pattern between successive awakenings, which were merged together in a single experience. In other words, if sleep between two successive awakenings is superficial (expressed by sleep stages 1 and 2), unstable (as reflected by increased amounts of cyclic alternating pattern), and fragmented (increased arousal index), time separating the two events is perceived as continuous wake. These findings suggest that difficulty to maintain consolidated sleep is interpreted as wakefulness in misperceptors.

Sleep is a dynamic process with a self-regulating character. The nightly recurring sleep process is organized into consecutive cycles in which the sequence of NREM stages and the alternation between NREM and REM sleep show a quite stable tendency and a largely predictable pattern. These constraints produce the macrostructural development of sleep. However, transient EEG changes can interact with the expected development of sleep and ensure adaptation to both internal and external conditions. Cyclic alternating pattern and arousals represent rapid adaptive adjustments of vigilance during sleep. Failure of these compensatory processes conducts to non-restorative sleep. Therefore, assessment of sleep quality relies on a variety of polysomnography measures, including sleep duration (quantified by total sleep time and sleep efficiency), sleep intensity (reflected by stages 3 and 4), sleep continuity (altered by nocturnal awakenings and arousals), and sleep stability (impaired by excessive amounts of cyclic alternating pattern). These polysomnography measures are susceptible to deterioration in varying ways and proportions in accordance to the manifold clinical manifestations of insomnia. In the hierarchy of polysomnography measures, cyclic alternating pattern variables appear to be the most sensitive to any source of internal or external perturbation during sleep. Regardless of the specific characteristics of sleep alteration, insomnia ceases to be an indefinite mental disorder, but emerges as a subjective disturbance supported by measurable neurophysiological changes (62).

The importance of sleep instability. Objection could be raised on the usefulness of cyclic alternating pattern in routine clinical practice. Besides the consideration that the authors apply cyclic alternating pattern in their daily activities, attention should be focused on the philosophy that lies behind the cyclic alternating pattern scoring methodology. The main assumption of cyclic alternating pattern is that we must consider that during certain periods of the night the arousal level is unstable. The concept of instability is a basic issue of all complex systems and supports the dynamics of biological variability. Within certain ranges, instability warrants flexible and adaptive features to the complex system. In normal sleep, cyclic alternating pattern accompanies the stage transitions maintaining in-phase both the EEG and autonomic functions through regular fluctuations. This means that what we observe on the peripheral sensors (respiratory events, heart rate variations, blood pressure shifts, myoclonic jerks) has a consistent and synchronous expression on the EEG and vice versa. In other words, cyclic alternating pattern allows us to read sleep as a musical score where all the instruments play a coordinated harmony. This means that even without the EEG leads, the detection of an unstable cardiorespiratory pattern is certainly associated with an oscillatory behavior of the cerebral activities. To guarantee survival during prolonged unconsciousness (ie, sleep), a strong interaction among all the biological subsystems is mandatory.

Accordingly, life-threatening events, eg, repetitive apneas, enhance the brain’s necessity to increase the number of protective arousals determining a metronomic setting of oscillations expressed by prolonged cyclic alternating pattern sequences. Cyclic alternating pattern scoring incorporates all the conventional EEG arousals in NREM sleep and provides additional information supplied by the frontal EEG arousals (subtype A1), which are omitted by the official classification. All this remains unexplored using only the stepwise description of sleep stages. In particular, the new AASM rules have oversimplified the sleep process, merging stages 3 and 4 into stage N3 and overemphasizing the role of single arousals in stage scoring; the new AAMS rules are simply tools offered to accelerate scoring procedures in routine practice. However, it is a common experience that a number of patients remain inadequately diagnosed and treated in spite of an apparently normal sleep structure. A study carried out in patients with restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movements during sleep demonstrates that dopamine-agonist medication reduces the amount of leg jerks but maintains high levels of cyclic alternating pattern with persistence of non-restorative sleep (22). Similar controversies happen daily in sleep labs that ascertain maintenance of excessive sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome even when CPAP restores normal apnea-hypopnea index measures. An exploratory approach using the cyclic alternating pattern framework would probably shed light on these controversial cases. It is known that CPAP titration detached from the concomitant assessment of cyclic alternating pattern can jeopardize the effectiveness of ventilatory treatment (96). The persistence of cyclic alternating pattern and arousals even when respiratory events are controlled by autoadjusting equipment indicates an inadequate titration procedure.

Finally, the sensitivity of cyclic alternating pattern to medication in insomniac patients could be exploited in the evaluation of new sleep-promoting drugs. So far, hypnotic compounds have based their effectiveness on the paradigm of sleep-onset promotion, sleep-time enhancement, and wake after sleep onset (WASO) reduction. All the available hypnotic agents, especially those belonging to the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) family, share these features, which paradoxically offer a flat undifferentiated therapeutic scenario. The new sleep drugs in the pipeline, acting on alternative targets (melatonin, orexin, serotonin), need a new cultural framework that cannot be limited to sleep latency and sleep duration, but also needs to incorporate the issue of sleep and autonomic stability.

So far, these objectives have been neglected by most clinical trials for drug approval. Comparing gaboxadol and zolpidem in a model of situational insomnia, cyclic alternating pattern parameters showed a significant independence from other electrophysiological measures (including spectral analysis), disclosed a strong association with subjective sleep quality, and allowed discrimination between the administered drugs. Zolpidem has also been used in a non-insomnia setting. In one trial, most patients with idiopathic central sleep apnea experienced a decrease in central apnea/hypopneas with zolpidem. They also had improved sleep continuity, reduced total number of arousals, and decreased subjective daytime sleepiness, without worsening of oxygenation or obstructive events. In obstructive sleep apnea, trazodone increased respiratory effort–related arousal threshold in response to hypercapnia and allowed patients to tolerate a higher CO2 level. According to Younes, “the percentage of time spent in instability is related to how far removed from stability the system is, relative to how much changes in the stability factors can occur spontaneously during the night. Some of the factors that determine stability change from time to time during sleep. Chief among these is arousal threshold” (101). A study established that trazodone increases the respiratory arousal threshold in obstructive sleep apnea patients with low arousal threshold indicating the potential inclusion of non-GABAergic agents in the management of sleep-related breathing disorders (17).

Cyclic alternating pattern and obstructive sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea can be considered as prototypical example of a cyclic alternating pattern phase-B disorder. In obstructive sleep apnea patients, the “deactivation” role of cyclic alternating pattern phase B creates the permissive framework for a transient (partial of complete) airflow interruption, whereas the more “interventionist” phase A guarantees respiratory restoration.

This condition exerts a profound effect on sleep stability, which can be measured at both macro- and microstructural sleep levels. Apneic patients frequently present decreased amounts of the deepest sleep stages, in a framework of a deeply fragmented sleep, as expressed by higher cyclic alternating pattern rate. However, the impact of the disorder on sleep profile strongly varies depending on obstructive sleep apnea severity; in fact, patients with milder obstructive sleep apnea present higher values of cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A1, whereas in moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea patients, cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A2 and A3 prevail. In other words, if in milder obstructive sleep apnea cases sleep is still trying to reinforce its continuity with the cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A1 appearance, this balance is definitely lost in the more severe obstructive sleep apnea phenotypes, where the more disturbing subtypes A2 and A3 disrupt sleep continuity (25).

Sleep microstructure can also support a deeper understanding of mechanisms beneath excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in obstructive sleep apnea patients. It is well known that excessive daytime sleepiness does not necessarily correlate with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) nor with disease severity. It has been demonstrated that obstructive sleep apnea patients with excessive daytime sleepiness presented higher level of cyclic alternating pattern oscillations, which is indicative of highly fragmented sleep, compared to those with a more refreshing sleep (34). This observation is not trivial, as it has been proved that excessively sleepy patients with obstructive sleep apnea are at higher risk for incident cardiovascular disorders. They frequently have higher autonomic imbalance and lower baroreflex sensitivity and abnormal nocturnal hearth rate variability (38). As cyclic alternating pattern oscillations have a strong bidirectional link with autonomic dynamics, the role of sleep microstructure towards patients’ health takes on a whole new meaning (24).

Finally, the cyclic alternating pattern “language” can confirm the correctness of obstructive sleep apnea therapy, as the utilization of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment significantly modifies the sleep microstructure, with a decrease of cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A2 and A3 and a parallel increase of noncyclic alternating pattern sleep and subtype A1 during sleep stage N3 (10).

Cyclic alternating pattern, sleep-related epilepsy, and non-REM sleep parasomnias. Non-REM sleep parasomnias and sleep-related hypermotor (SHE) epilepsy share numerous semiological similarities, and their proper identification can be challenging for clinicians.

Although various aspects in the motor manifestation of these conditions can support the sleep-experts work-up, some intriguing information can be collected by the sleep texture as well (37). Both parasomnias and sleep-related hypermotor share an increase of cyclic alternating pattern oscillations, with a preponderance of cyclic alternating pattern subtypes A1, in a framework of increased slow-wave sleep instability (51). Notably, both paroxysmal and parasomniac events are frequently heralded by a cyclic alternating pattern sequence and commonly appear time-locked with cyclic alternating pattern phase A, confirming the permissive nature of these strongly synchronized events for the occurrence of (hypermotor) nocturnal events. The semiological commonalities between the two pathologies suggest the involvement of similar cortico-subcortical circuits, which find in the cyclic alternating pattern synthesis the common denominator of an arousal-related motor disinhibition, whether or not epileptic in origin.

These aspects collected from sleep microstructure highlight some pathophysiological clues on non-REM sleep parasomnias and sleep-related hypermotor, such as the derailment of the arousal system in NREM sleep.

Details on the cyclic alternating pattern variations in patients affected by epilepsy have been synthesized in a systematic review with meta-analysis (100).

Cyclic alternating pattern and neurodegeneration. The cyclic alternating pattern metric can be used to predict the risk of conversion to alpha-synucleinopathies in patients affected by REM-sleep behavior disorder (RBD), with lower values of cyclic alternating pattern rate and index being associated with stronger risk for early neurodegeneration (47). This observation reveals that REM-sleep behavior disorder cannot be considered as an exclusively “REM sleep-related” sleep disorder, as it has some deep consequences in the non-REM sleep features as well, confirming once again that sleep must be evaluated in its overall complexity, which is based on the reciprocal influence between REM and non-REM sleep stages.

The drop of cyclic alternating pattern rate below normal values had been observed in other neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease and mild amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, revealing that the impoverishment of sleep oscillations can provide important information on brain health (41; 09; 11).

The association between non-REM sleep fragmentation, arousal-related disorders (including both REM and non-REM sleep parasomnias), and neurodegeneration have been suggested as markers of decline in Parkinson disease (80).

Brain criticality, avalanches, and cyclic alternating pattern. According to the neural criticality hypothesis the brain, as other complex systems, operates close to a phase transition to optimize information processing (98). Criticality is a property maximizing systems’ computational capabilities, enabling their flexibility and ameliorating their functional performances (77). In this framework, sleep plays a key role in tuning the brain towards criticality with scale-free cascades of spatiotemporal activity called “avalanches” following its inner physiological fluctuations (04). It has been demonstrated that the avalanche dynamic is largely modulated by the NREM/REM sleep cycles and that, during NREM sleep, there is a tight association between avalanches and CAP phase A (74). There is a strong correlation between avalanche occurrence and the CAP A1 subtype and weaker positive correlation with subtypes A2 and A3. Also, avalanche density partially overlaps with CAP subtype A1 distribution as it progressively decreases from the first to the last sleep cycle following the homeostatic decay of slow-wave sleep throughout the night (74). This strong association between brain criticality and CAP suggests some novel fascinating hypotheses to understand the neurobiological significance of sleep-related brain functions, including learning mechanisms and consciousness manifestation.

Automatic analysis of cyclic alternating pattern. There is consolidated evidence that cyclic alternating pattern parameters provide more detailed information and are significantly more sensitive than conventional sleep measures. However, the visual scoring of cyclic alternating pattern is time-consuming, and this can compromise an extensive utilization of the method. In other words, only the availability of an adequate system for the automatic detection of cyclic alternating pattern can really make it an easily exploitable tool. The problem of automatic cyclic alternating pattern recognition has been addressed in several studies, with interesting results (03; 20; 35). However, most proposed classification methods required the preliminary measurement of sleep macrostructure, making it necessary for the human scorer to visually classify the sleep profile. Moreover, they relied on the extraction of spectral parameters from the EEG signal to compute descriptors on time-windows and on the application of machine-learning algorithms for classifying each window as belonging to a phase A of cyclic alternating pattern or not. A preliminary study investigated a set of descriptors computed on 1-second-long windows with different techniques, and the information content of each descriptor was evaluated by means of ROC curves (44). Those descriptors were used in a subsequent work training four different classifiers for the classification of cyclic alternating pattern A phases, where the linear discriminant resulted to be the most accurate, with an average accuracy equal to 83% (45). However, due to the intrinsic characteristics of cyclic alternating pattern phases A, which consist of transient, non-stationary phenomena, it is likely that the signal will vary its characteristics over time, and it is not convenient to define a fixed window length. A dataset of 16 polysomnographic recordings from healthy subjects was employed, and the EEG traces first underwent an automatic isolation of NREM sleep portions by means of an Artificial Neural Network and then a segmentation process based on the Spectral Error Measure. The information content of the descriptors was evaluated by means of ROC curves and compared with that of descriptors obtained without the use of segmentation. Finally, the descriptors were used to train a discriminant function for the automatic classification of cyclic alternating pattern phases A. With respect to previous scoring methods, a significant improvement in terms of both information content carried by the descriptors and accuracy of the classification was obtained. Average cyclic alternating pattern rate obtained with automatic scoring was 44.83±12.41 vs. 43.83±10.13 measured with visual analysis. The correlation coefficient between the two series of cyclic alternating pattern rates was 0.73, and the P-value for the null hypothesis that the two populations had the same distribution was 0.62 (43). Although the sensitivity was still not very high (69.55±6.6), the specificity (90.49±2.8) and the accuracy (87.19±2.48) had a significant increase with respect to the previous study, indicating that EEG segmentation proves to be a useful step in the computation of descriptors for cyclic alternating pattern scoring (45). According to a systematic review, the median accuracy of the state-of-the-art methods for automatic CAP scoring is comparable to the upper limit of the specialist agreement range (ranging from 69% to 78%), implying that the automatic CAP analysis could be performed (48).

Conclusion. A certain amount of information remains uncovered if we limit our assessment to macrostructural events. As a marker of sleep instability, cyclic alternating pattern rate may be enhanced by a number of internal or external factors. Cyclic alternating pattern rate is a highly sensitive, poorly specific index as it cannot reveal the nature of perturbation. However, it certainly indicates that one or more factors are interfering with the processes of sleep consolidation and quantifies the magnitude of perturbation. Specificity of the disturbance factor is mainly supplied by the phase A subtype, which is differently modified by sleep disorders and medication. In contrast, the presence of non-cyclic alternating pattern is closely related to a global condition of stability when all the subsystems that control and influence sleep mechanisms have achieved a reciprocally balanced interaction.

From the cyclic alternating pattern/non-cyclic alternating pattern perspective, analysis of sleep microstructure is not limited to the finding of a single event (eg, an isolated arousal), but to the identification of a pattern (presence or absence of a cyclic alternating pattern sequence) that translates a physiological state involving cerebral activities, autonomic functions, and behavioral features. In other words, what happens upstairs (brain) is reflected at the lower levels (autonomic and muscle parameters) and vice versa. Once we attribute an activation relevance to all cyclic alternating pattern A phases (including K-complexes and delta bursts), we overcome the barren contrast between visible and non-visible arousals, which for years has frozen the possibility of understanding the flexible capacity of the brain to use different EEG features in different neurophysiological situations. Conventional EEG arousals are the peak of an iceberg composed of other more subtle, but equally powerful, activating events.

Media

References

01: American Sleep Disorders Association. EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples: a preliminary report from the Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep 1992;15(2):173-84. PMID 11032543
02: Amzica F, Steriade M. The K-complex: its slow (<1-Hz) rhythmicity and relation to delta waves. Neurology 1997;49(4):952-9. PMID 9339673
03: Barcaro U, Bonanni E, Maestri M, Murri L, Parrino L, Terzano MG. A general automatic method for the analysis of NREM sleep microstructure. Sleep Med 2004;5(6):567-76. PMID 15511703
04: Bocaccio H, Pallavicini C, Castro MN, et al. The avalanche-like behaviour of large-scale haemodynamic activity from wakefulness to deep sleep. J R Soc Interface 2019;16(158):20190262. PMID 31506046
05: Borbely A. A two-process model of sleep regulation. Hum Neurobiol 1982;1(3):195-204. PMID 7185792
06: Boselli M, Parrino L, Smerieri A, Terzano MG. Effect of age on EEG arousals in normal sleep. Sleep 1998;21(4):351-7. PMID 9646379
07: Bruni O, Ferri R, Miano S, et al. Sleep cyclic alternating pattern in normal school-age children. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113(11):1806-14. PMID 12417235
08: Bruni O, Ferri R, Miano S, et al. Sleep cyclic alternating pattern in normal preschool-aged children. Sleep 2005;28(2):220-30. PMID 16171247
09: Carnicelli L, Maestri M, Di Coscio E, et al. A longitudinal study of polysomnographic variables in patients with mild cognitive impairment converting to Alzheimer's disease. J Sleep Res 2019;28(5):e12821. PMID 30724408
10: Chen S, Li Q, Zou X, et al. Effects of CPAP treatment on electroencephalographic activity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during deep sleep with consideration of cyclic alternating pattern. Nat Sci Sleep 2022;14:2075-89. PMID 36440180
11: Congiu P, Mariani S, Milioli G, et al. Sleep cardiac dysautonomia and EEG oscillations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sleep 2019;42(11):zsz164. PMID 31312838
12: Crunelli V, Hughes SW. The slow (<1 Hz) rhythm of non-REM sleep: a dialogue between three cardinal oscillators. Nat Neurosci 2010;13(1):9-17. PMID 19966841
13: De Carli F, Nobili L, Beelke M, et al. Quantitative analysis of sleep EEG microstructure in the time-frequency domain. Brain Res Bull 2004;63(5):399-405. PMID 15245767
14: De Gennaro L, Ferrara M, Spadini V, Curcio G, Cristiani R, Bertini M. The cyclic alternating pattern decreases as a consequence of total sleep deprivation and correlates with EEG arousals. Neuropsychobiology 2002;45(2):95-8. PMID 11893866
15: Della Marca G, Farina B, Mennuni GF, et al. Microstructure of sleep in eating disorders: preliminary results. Eat Weight Disord 2004;9(1):77-80. PMID 15185838
16: De Paolis F, Colizzi E, Milioli G, et al. Effects of antiepileptic treatment on sleep and seizures in nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. Sleep Med 2013;14(7):597-604. PMID 23746822
17: Eckert DJ, Malhotra A, Wellman A, White DP. Trazodone increases the respiratory arousal threshold in obstructive sleep apnea patients with a low arousal threshold. Sleep 2014;37(4):811-9. PMID 24899767
18: Farina B, Della Marca G, Grochocinski VJ, et al. Microstructure of sleep in depressed patients according to the cyclic alternating pattern. J Affect Disord 2003;77(3):227-35. PMID 14612222
19: Ferri R, Bruni O, Miano S, et al. The time structure of the cyclic alternating pattern during sleep. Sleep 2006;29(5):693-9. PMID 16774160
20: Ferri R, Bruni O, Miano S, Smerieri A, Spruyt K, Terzano MG. Inter-rater reliability of sleep cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring and validation of a new computer-assisted CAP scoring method. Clin Neurophysiol 2005c;116(3):696-707. PMID 15721084
21: Ferri R, Bruni O, Miano S, Terzano MG. Topographic mapping of the spectral components of the cyclic alternating pattern (CAP). Sleep Med 2005a;6(1):29-36. PMID 15680292
22: Ferri R, Manconi M, Arico D, et al. Acute dopamine-agonist treatment in restless legs syndrome: effects on sleep architecture and NREM sleep instability. Sleep 2010;33(6):793-800. PMID 20550020
23: Ferri R, Miano S, Bruni O, et al. NREM sleep alterations in narcolepsy/cataplexy. Clin Neurophysiol 2005b;116(11):2675-84. PMID 16221567
24: Ferri R, Parrino L, Smerieri A, et al. Cyclic alternating pattern and spectral analysis of heart rate variability during normal sleep. J Sleep Res 2000;9(1):13-8. PMID 10733684
25: Gnoni V, Drakatos P, Higgins S, et al. Cyclic alternating pattern in obstructive sleep apnea: a preliminary study. J Sleep Res 2021;30(6):e13350. PMID 33939202
26: Guilleminault C. Hypersynchronous slow delta, cyclic alternating pattern and sleepwalking. Sleep 2006;29(1):14-5. PMID 16453974
27: Guilleminault C, Lopes MC, Hagen CC, da Rosa A. The cyclic alternating pattern demonstrates increased sleep instability and correlates with fatigue and sleepiness in adults with upper airway resistance syndrome. Sleep 2007;30(5):641-7. PMID 17552380
28: Guilleminault C, Stoohs R. Arousal, increased respiratory efforts, blood pressure and obstructive sleep apnoea. J Sleep Res 1995;4(S1):117-24. PMID 10607187
29: Halasz P. Arousals without awakening--dynamic aspect of sleep. Physiol Behav 1993;54(4):795-802. PMID 8248359
30: Halasz P. Hierarchy of micro-arousals and the microstructure of sleep. Neurophysiol Clin 1998;28(6):461-75. PMID 9894227
31: Halasz P, Terzano MG, Parrino L, Bodizs R. The nature of arousal in sleep. J Sleep Res 2004;13(1):1-23. PMID 14996030
32: Hirshkowitz M. Arousals and anti-arousals. Sleep Med 2002;3(3):203-4. PMID 14592208
33: Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson AL, Quan SF. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology, and technical specifications. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2007.
34: Korkmaz S, Bilecenoglu NT, Aksu M, Yoldas TK. Cyclic alternating pattern in obstructive sleep apnea patients with versus without excessive sleepiness. Sleep Disord 2018;2018:8713409. PMID 29862087
35: Largo R, Munteanu C, Rosa A. CAP event detection by wavelets and GA tuning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing; 2005 Sept 1-3; Portugal. IEEE, 44-8.
36: Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(7):476-94. PMID 18557915
37: Loddo G, Baldassarri L, Zenesini C, et al. Seizures with paroxysmal arousals in sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE): dissecting epilepsy from NREM parasomnias. Epilepsia 2020;61(10):2194-202. PMID 32949468
38: Lombardi C, Parati G, Cortelli P, et al. Daytime sleepiness and neural cardiac modulation in sleep-related breathing disorders. J Sleep Res 2008;17(3):263-70. PMID 18503513
39: Lopes MC, Rosa A, Roizenblatt S, et al. Cyclic alternating pattern in peripubertal children. Sleep 2005;28(2):215-9. PMID 16171246
40: Macaluso GM, Guerra P, Di Giovanni G, Boselli M, Parrrino L, Terzano MG. Sleep bruxism is a disorder related to periodic arousals during sleep. J Dent Res 1998;77(4):565-73. PMID 9539459
41: Maestri M, Carnicelli L, Tognoni G, et al. Non-rapid eye movement sleep instability in mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. Sleep Med 2015;16(9):1139-45. PMID 26298791
42: Manni R, Terzaghi M, Sartori I, Veggiotti P, Parrino L. Rhythmic movement disorder and cyclic alternating pattern during sleep: a video-polysomnographic study in a 9-year-old boy. Mov Disord 2004;19(10):1186-90. PMID 15390015
43: Mariani S, Grassi A, Mendez MO, et al. EEG segmentation for improving automatic CAP detection. Clin Neurophysiology 2013;124(9):1815-23. PMID 23643311
44: Mariani S, Manfredini E, Rosso V, et al. Characterization of A phases during the cyclic alternating pattern of sleep. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122(10):2016-24. PMID 21439902
45: Mariani S, Manfredini E, Rosso V, et al. Efficient automatic classifiers for the detection of A phases of the cyclic alternating pattern in sleep. Med Biol Eng Comput 2012;50(4):359-72. PMID 22430617
46: Martin SE, Wraith PK, Deary IJ, Douglas NJ. The effect of nonvisible sleep fragmentation on daytime function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155(5):1596-601. PMID 9154863
47: Melpignano A, Parrino L, Santamaria J, et al. Isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and cyclic alternating pattern: is sleep microstructure a predictive parameter of neurodegeneration? Sleep 2019;42(10):zsz142. PMID 31323084
48: Mendonca F, Mostafa SS, Morgado-Dias F, Ravelo-García AG, Rosenzweig I. Towards automatic EEG cyclic alternating pattern analysis: a systematic review. Biomed Eng Lett 2023;13(3):273-91. PMID 37519874
49: Miano S, PiaVilla M, Blanco D, et al. Development of NREM sleep instability-continuity (cyclic alternating pattern) in healthy term infants aged 1 to 4 months. Sleep 2009;32(1):83-90. PMID 19189782
50: Migueis DP, Lopes MC, Ignacio P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cyclic alternating 1156 pattern across the lifespan. Sleep Med 2021;85:25-37. PMID 34271180
51: Mutti C, Bernabè G, Barozzi N, et al. Commonalities and differences in NREM parasomnias and sleep-related epilepsy: Is there a continuum between the two conditions? Front Neurol 2020;11:600026. PMID 33362702
52: Mutti C, Misirocchi F, Zilioli A, et al. Sleep and brain evolution across the human lifespan: a mutual embrace. Front Netw Physiol 2022;2:938012. PMID 36926070
53: Nobili L, Sartori I, Terzaghi M, et al. Relationship of epileptic discharges to arousal instability and periodic leg movements in a case of nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy: a stereo-EEG study. Sleep 2006;29(5):701-4. PMID 16774161
54: Ozone M, Yagi T, Itoh H, et al. Effects of zolpidem on cyclic alternating pattern, an objective marker of sleep instability, in Japanese patients with psychophysiological insomnia: a randomized crossover comparative study with placebo. Pharmacopsychiatry 2008;41(3):106-14. PMID 18484552
55: Parrino L, Boselli M, Buccino GP, Spaggiari MC, Di Giovanni G, Terzano MG. The cyclic alternating pattern plays a gate-control on periodic limb movements during non-rapid eye movement sleep. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996;13(4):314-23. PMID 8858493
56: Parrino L, Boselli M, Spaggiari MC, Smerieri A, Terzano MG. Multidrug comparison (lorazepam, triazolam, zolpidem, zopiclone) in situational insomnia: polysomnographic analysis by means of the cyclic alternating pattern. Clin Neuropharmacol 1997;20(3):253-63. PMID 9197949
57: Parrino L, Boselli M, Spaggiari MC, Smerieri A, Terzano MG. Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in normal sleep: polysomnographic parameters in different age groups. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;107(6):439-50. PMID 9922091
58: Parrino L, De Paolis F, Milioli G, et al. Distinctive polysomnographic traits in nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2012b;53(7):1178-84. PMID 22578113
59: Parrino L, Ferri R, Bruni O, Terzano MG. Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP): the marker of sleep instability. Sleep Med Rev 2012a;16(1):27-45. PMID 21616693
60: Parrino L, Ferri R, Bruni O, Terzano MG. Cyclic Alternating Pattern in Sleep. Measurement and Clinical Significance. In: Chokroverty S, Allen RP, Walters AS, Montagna P, editors. Sleep and Movement Disorders. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013:179-93.
61: Parrino L, Ferri R, Zucconi M, Fanfulla F. Commentary from the Italian Association of Sleep Medicine on the AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: for debate and discussion. Sleep Med 2009a;10(7):799-808. PMID 19564132
62: Parrino L, Ferrillo F, Smerieri A, et al. Is insomnia a neurophysiological disorder. The role of sleep EEG microstructure. Brain Res Bull 2004;63(5):377-83. PMID 15245764
63: Parrino L, Halasz P, Tassinari CA, Terzano MG. CAP, epilepsy and motor events during sleep: the unifying role of arousal. Sleep Med Rev 2006;10(4):267-85. PMID 16809057
64: Parrino L, Milioli G, De Paolis F, Grassi A, Terzano MG. Paradoxical insomnia; the role of CAP and arousals in sleep misperception. Sleep Med 2009b;10(10):1139-45. PMID 19595628
65: Parrino L, Smerieri A, Boselli M, Spaggiari MC, Terzano MG. Sleep reactivity during acute nasal CPAP in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Neurology 2000b;54(8):1633-40. PMID 10762505
66: Parrino L, Smerieri A, Giglia F, Milioli G, De Paolis F, Terzano MG. Polysomnographic study of intermittent zolpidem treatment in primary sleep maintenance insomnia. Clin Neuropharmacol 2008;31(1):40-50. PMID 18303490
67: Parrino L, Smerieri A, Rossi M, Terzano MG. Relationship of slow and rapid EEG components of CAP to ASDA arousals in normal sleep. Sleep 2001;24(8):881-5. PMID 11766157
68: Parrino L, Smerieri A, Spaggiari MC, Terzano MG. Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) and epilepsy during sleep: how a physiological rhythm modulates a pathological event. Clin Neurophysiol 2000a;111(Suppl 2):S39-46. PMID 10996553
69: Parrino L, Spaggiari MC, Boselli M, Barusi R, Terzano MG. Effects of prolonged wakefulness on cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) during sleep recovery at different circadian phases. J Sleep Res 1993;2(2):91-5. PMID 10607077
70: Parrino L, Spaggiari MC, Boselli M, Di Giovanni G, Terzano MG. Clinical and polysomnographic effects of trazodone CR in chronic insomnia associated with dysthymia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994;116(4):389-95. PMID 7701038
71: Parrino L, Thomas RJ, Smerieri A, Spaggiari MC, Del Felice A, Terzano MG. Reorganization of sleep patterns in severe OSAS under prolonged CPAP treatment. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116(9):2228-39. PMID 16040272
72: Priano L, Grugni G, Miscio G, et al. Sleep cycling alternating pattern (CAP) expression is associated with hypersomnia and GH secretory pattern in Prader-Willi syndrome. Sleep Med 2006;7(8):627-33. PMID 17023209
73: Rechtschaffen A, Kales A, editors. A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. Brain information service/brain research institute. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles, 1968.
74: Scarpetta S, Morisi N, Mutti C, et al. Criticality of neuronal avalanches in human sleep and their relationship with sleep macro- and micro-architecture. iScience 2023;26(10):107840. PMID 37766992
75: Schieber JP, Muzet A, Ferriere PJ. [Phrases of spontaneous transitory activation during normal sleep in humans] [Article in French]. Arch Sci Physiol (Paris) 1971;25(4):443-65. PMID 4345798
76: Sforza E, Jouny C, Ibanez V. Cardiac activation during arousal in humans: further evidence for hierarchy in the arousal response. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111(9):1611-9. PMID 10964073
77: Shew WL, Plenz D. The functional benefits of criticality in the cortex. Neuroscientist 2013;19(1):88-100. PMID 22627091
78: Smerieri A, Parrino L, Agosti M, Ferri R, Terzano MG. Cyclic alternating pattern sequences and non-cyclic alternating pattern periods in human sleep. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118(10):2305-13. PMID 17709292
79: Svetnik V, Ferri R, Ray S, et al. Alterations in cyclic alternating pattern associated with phase advanced sleep are differentially modulated by gaboxadol and zolpidem. Sleep 2010;33(11):1562-70. PMID 21102998
80: Terzaghi M, Minafra B, Zangaglia R, et al. NREM sleep arousal-related disorders reflect cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Sleep Med 2020;75:491-6. PMID 33011475
81: Terzano MG, Mancia D, Salati MR, Costani G, Decembrino A, Parrino L. The cyclic alternating pattern as a physiologic component of normal NREM sleep. Sleep 1985;8(2):137-45. PMID 4012156
82: Terzano MG, Parrino L. Functional relationship between micro- and macrostructure of sleep. In: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Garofalo PG, Durisotti C, Filati-Roso C, editors. Activation of partial seizures with motor signs during cyclic alternating pattern in human sleep. Epilepsy Res 1991;10:166-73. PMID 1817956
83: Terzano MG, Parrino L. Evaluation of EEG cyclic alternating pattern during sleep in insomniacs and controls under placebo and acute treatment with zolpidem. Sleep 1992;15(1):64-70. PMID 1557595
84: Terzano MG, Parrino L. Clinical applications of cyclic alternating pattern. Physiol Behav 1993;54(4):807-13. PMID 8248361
85: Terzano MG, Parrino L. Origin and significance of the cyclic alternating pattern (CAP). Review article. Sleep Med Rev 2000;4(1):101-23. PMID 12531162
86: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Anelli S, Halasz P. Modulation of generalized spike-and-wave discharges during sleep by cyclic alternating pattern. Epilepsia 1989;30(6):772-81. PMID 2591344
87: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Boselli M, Smerieri A, Spaggiari MC. CAP components and EEG synchronization in the first 3 sleep cycles. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111(2):283-90. PMID 10680563
88: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Boselli M, Spaggiari MC, Di Giovanni G. Polysomnographic analysis of arousal responses in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome by means of the cyclic alternating pattern. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996;13(2):145-55. PMID 8849969
89: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Fioriti G, Spaggiari MC, Piroli A. Morphologic and functional features of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) sequences in normal NREM sleep. Funct Neurol 1986;1(1):29-41. PMID 3609843
90: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Rosa A, Palomba V, Smerieri A. CAP and arousals in the structural development of sleep: an integrative perspective. Sleep Med 2002a;3(3):221-9. PMID 14592211
91: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Smerieri A, et al. Atlas, rules, and recording techniques for the scoring of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in human sleep. Sleep Med 2002b;3(2):187-99. PMID 14592244
92: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Smerieri A, et al. CAP and arousals are involved in the homeostatic and ultradian sleep processes. J Sleep Res 2005;14(4):359-68. PMID 16364136
93: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Spaggiari MC, Barusi R, Simeoni S. Mutual cooperation between cyclic alternating pattern and major dynamic events of sleep. In: Barthouil P, editor. Insomnie et Imidazopyridines. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1990:262-70.
94: Terzano MG, Parrino L, Spaggiari MC, Palomba V, Rossi M, Smerieri A. CAP variables and arousals as sleep electroencephalogram markers for primary insomnia. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114(9):1715-23. PMID 12948801
95: Terzano MG, Smerieri A, Del Felice A, Giglia F, Palomba V, Parrino L. Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) alterations in narcolepsy. Sleep Med 2006;7(8):619-26. PMID 16740406
96: Thomas RJ. Cyclic alternating pattern and positive airway pressure titration. Sleep Med 2002;3(4):315-22. PMID 14592193
97: Togo F, Cherniack NS, Natelson BH. Electroencephalogram characteristics of autonomic arousals during sleep in healthy men. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117(12):2597-603. PMID 17011823
98: Valverde S, Ohse S, Turalska M, West BJ, Garcia-Ojalvo J. Structural determinants of criticality in biological networks. Front Physiol 2015;6:127. PMID 26005422
99: Vetrugno R, D’Angelo R, Cortelli P, Plazzi G, Vignatelli L, Montagna P. Impaired cortical and autonomic arousal during sleep in multiple system atrophy. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118(11):2512-8. PMID 17897876
100: Yeh WC, Lin HJ, Li YS, et al. Non-rapid eye movement sleep instability in adults with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cyclic alternating pattern. Sleep 2022;45(4):zsac041. PMID 35192721
101: Younes M. Role of respiratory control mechanisms in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep disorders. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2008;105(5):1389-405. PMID 18787092
102: Zucconi M, Oldani A, Ferini-Strambi L, Smirne S. Arousal fluctuations in nonrapid eye movement parasomnias: the role of cyclic alternating pattern as a measure of sleep instability. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12(2):147-54. PMID 7797629
103: Zucconi M, Oldani A, Smirne S, Ferini-Strambi L. The macrostructure and microstructure of sleep in patients with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2000;17(1):77-86. PMID 10709813

Contributors

All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.

Author

Carlotta Mutti MD

Dr. Mutti of the University Hospital of Parma has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile

Editor

Antonio Culebras MD FAAN FAHA FAASM

Dr. Culebras of SUNY Upstate Medical University at Syracuse has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile

Former Authors

Liborio Parrino MD

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125

Cyclic alternating pattern

Also Relevant

Insomnia
Sleep disorders

Clinical Categories

Sleep Disorders

Cyclic alternating pattern

Cyclic alternating pattern

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Sleep staging: the conventional scoring rules

Scoring rules and significance of cyclic alternating pattern

The A phases of cyclic alternating pattern

Description

Clinical applications

Clinical applications of cyclic alternating pattern

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Editor

Former Authors

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Telehealth and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I)

NonREM parasomnias

Neurologic disorders associated with obesity

Hypersomnolence

Sleep disorders in women

Sleep, stroke, and vascular dementia

Parasomnia overlap disorder and status dissociatus

Stimulant-dependent sleep disorder

Cyclic alternating pattern

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Sleep staging: the conventional scoring rules

Scoring rules and significance of cyclic alternating pattern

The A phases of cyclic alternating pattern

Description

Clinical applications

Clinical applications of cyclic alternating pattern

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Editor

Former Authors

This is an article preview. Start a Free Account to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Telehealth and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I)

NonREM parasomnias

Neurologic disorders associated with obesity

Hypersomnolence

Sleep disorders in women

Sleep, stroke, and vascular dementia

Parasomnia overlap disorder and status dissociatus

Stimulant-dependent sleep disorder

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.