Brachial plexus palsy in neonates …

Douglas J Lanska MD MS MSPH

General Child Neurology

Updated 05.27.2024
Released 06.02.2003
Expires For CME 05.27.2027

Brachial plexus palsy in neonates

Author: Douglas J Lanska MD MS MSPH

See Contributor Disclosures

Brachial plexus palsy in neonates

In This Article

Quick Link

Introduction

Overview

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy can be a debilitating injury that leads to long-term disability in the infant. Although the majority of cases do recover full function of their arm, others must undergo surgery or other treatments to improve function. This article describes the pathology and anatomy of brachial plexus palsy, provides tips to examine an affected patient, and reviews the available treatment options.

Key points

	• The most common brachial plexus palsy involves the upper roots, C5 and C6, and is called Erb palsy.
	• The spontaneous recovery rate is 60%, and some children suffer permanent impairment.
	• Surgical treatment is usually offered between 3 to 6 months of age for primary repair; otherwise, patients can undergo secondary procedures around 12 to 18 months of age.
	• A multidisciplinary approach with the pediatrician, physical and occupational therapists, and the surgeon is very helpful when treating an infant with brachial plexus palsy.

Historical note and terminology

Several authors have suggested that German artist Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528) painted a case of Erb palsy in his Haller Madonna (before 1505), in part because of the internal rotation and pronation of the left arm, with accentuation of the skin folds of the anterior axillary region and drooping of the left shoulder (92; 139; 146). A suggested alternative diagnosis is pseudoparalysis from a fractured clavicle or humerus, which can resemble a brachial plexus palsy (139), although clavicular fractures can coexist with neonatal brachial plexopathies in about 10% of cases of obstetric brachial plexus palsy. However, despite the common modern practice of assigning putative diagnoses to centuries-old art, the child is holding a piece of fruit in his left hand, with the same posture that Dürer painted Eve holding a piece of fruit in her left hand (139). A child with an Erb palsy would be very unlikely to hold a piece of fruit in the pathologic hand. The posture of the child is typical of the Mannerism style of northern European paintings at the time, which featured hyper-idealization, exaggerated poses, distorted human forms, and awkward movement.

Self portrait (1498) of German artist Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528)

(Source: Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, España. Public domain.)
Madonna and Child (Haller Madonna; circa 1496/1499), oil on panel

(Source: The National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. Public domain.)
Adam and Eve (n.d.), engraving after 1504 engraving by Albrecht Dürer

(Source: The MET, New York. Public domain.)

William Smellie. Neonates who have neurologic deficits have been observed since the time of the ancient Greeks and Hippocrates (76). Brachial plexus palsy related to the birth process, “obstetric brachial palsy,” was described by Scottish obstetrician William Smellie (1697–1763) in a textbook originally published in 1754 titled A sett of anatomical tables, with explanations, and an abridgment, of the practice of midwifery (158; 160; 161; 162; 111; 134; 150; 157).

William Smellie (1697–1763)

Scottish obstetrician William Smellie (1697–1763). Smellie described obstetrical brachial plexus palsy in 1654. Line engraving by R Anderson. (Courtesy of Wellcome Images and Wikimedia Commons. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Int...

Smellie was highly regarded for his obstetrical skills and for his monographs and atlas showing elaborate depictions of the development of the fetus, the birth process, and obstetric problems (158; 160; 161; 159; 162). Smellie is particularly known for his incredible illustrations of pregnant women and fetuses, drawn from cadavers. Some of his illustrations vividly show the circumstances that often led to obstetrical brachial plexus palsies in neonates. However, the large number of pregnant cadavers that Smellie was able to amass for his huge atlas led to recent allegations that he and the Hunter brothers encouraged or arranged for the murder of pregnant women to complete their projects (150).

Fetus with a shoulder presentation during delivery with the left arm extending from the birth canal

Traction on the arm at this point can lead to severe traction on the brachial plexus and cervical nerve roots. (Source: Smellie W. A treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery, to which is added, a set of anatomical plate...
Fetus being delivered with extreme neck hyperextension and use of forceps

(Source: Smellie W. A treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery, to which is added, a set of anatomical plates, exhibiting the various cases that occur in practice, accurately engraved, with explanations. London: Alexand...

Although Smellie is frequently credited with describing obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, his description was quite limited. He described, in rather vague terms, transient bilateral arm weakness in a neonate following a complicated delivery that occurred in 1746 (161). The initial presentation was breech, but this was converted to a face presentation that resulted in the arrest of labor. Smellie was able to deliver the child with forceps. As Smellie later recounted, "The long compression had rendered the arms paralytic for several days, though this misfortune was soon remedied by friction and embrocations [a liquid used for rubbing on the body to relieve pain from sprains and strains]" (161).

Wilhelm Heinrich Erb. German neurologist and neurophysiologist Wilhelm Heinrich Erb (1840–1921) first compared neonatal brachial plexus palsy with that found in adults and concluded that it involved the upper roots (184; 147).

Wilhelm Heinrich Erb (1840–1921)

German neurologist and neurophysiologist Wilhelm Heinrich Erb (1840–1921). Erb first compared neonatal brachial plexus palsy with that found in adults and concluded that it involved the upper roots. (Courtesy of the U.S. National ...

Guillaume-Benjamin-Amand Duchenne (de Boulogne). The term “Duchenne-Erb palsy” was coined because French neurologist Guillaume-Benjamin-Amand Duchenne (de Boulogne) (1806–1875) received credit for describing the brachial plexus palsy following delivery of affected newborns (46; 22; 142; 86; 64; 129; 143; 147).

Guillaume-Benjamin-Amand Duchenne (de Boulogne) (1806–1875)

French neurologist Guillaume-Benjamin-Amand Duchenne (de Boulogne) (1806–1875). Duchenne described the brachial plexus palsy following delivery of affected newborns. (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.)

In 1862, Duchenne published a pioneering collection of photographic images of patients with various neuromuscular diseases, including one with an Erb (upper plexus) palsy (47). Duchenne also recognized an association with clavicular fractures, subacromial dislocations, and ipsilateral brachial plexus injuries.

Boy with right Erb palsy, photographed by French neurologist Guillaume-Benjamin Duchenne de Boulogne (before 1862)

As described by Duchenne: Posterior and external dislocation of the shoulder (subacromial dislocation), dating from birth, in a 6-year-old boy, characterized: (1) by a relief located below the posterior angle of the acromion, f...

In 1872, Duchenne further described the child that he had photographed in 1857. A 6-year-old boy was presented to Duchenne for treatment of congenital right arm weakness (46).

In March 1857, a young boy named Théophile Bigot, aged 6, was presented to me to be treated for a congenital paralysis of the upper right limb. The movements of the latter were, in fact, so hampered since his birth that he could not use them. All muscles responded normally to electrical excitation. His right shoulder was deformed; the attitude of the arm on this side was abnormal (see the figure drawn from the photograph I took of it). One noticed on the posterior face of the stump of the shoulder, a little below the posterior angle of the acromion, a rounded relief that indicated, in this point, the presence of the head of the humerus, which, moreover, one recognized perfectly by touch. Anteriorly, the shoulder stump presented a slight subacromial depression, but without apparent relief of the coracoid process, and the head of the humerus was no longer found in its normal position. This head of the humerus appeared to be straddling the posterior edge of the glenoid cavity. It was certainly not in the infraspinatus fossa; it was difficult to explain it, but what was indisputable was that it had remained thus incomplete for 6 years. The elbow, carried a little forward, was set aside from the body and could not be brought closer to it; attempts to obtain it caused pain. The humerus was kept in rotation inwards [internally rotated], and one could not mechanically impart to it the slightest movement in the opposite direction without making the child cry out. The forearm was a little flexed on the arm, without it being possible to extend it completely. The voluntary movements of the arm were weak and limited like those of the forearm.

(46), translation by Dr. Douglas J Lanska

Six-year-old boy with congenital right arm weakness and obstetric subspinous dislocation

(Source: Duchenne [de Boulogne] GB. Paralysies obstétricales infantiles des membres supérieurs avec ou sans fractures, luxations ou autres complications. In: De l'électrisation localisée et de son application à la physiologie, ...

Duchenne noted that three other children were referred at around the same time with the same deformity of the shoulder and with the same disturbances in the movements of the arm on the shoulder. He recognized the characteristic signs of scapulohumeral dislocation in all these children. The cause of this dislocation appeared to be identical in all these cases and, in particular, to be the result of extreme force being applied during delivery:

The parents of the children said in fact that their birth had been laborious—that, to extract them, [the midwife or physician] had to exercise long and violent pulls, using a finger or a hook passed under one of the armpits, and that the limb exposed to these pulls had been deprived of movements after their birth. It was precisely on this side that the dislocation existed, the production of which is very well explained by the violence exerted on the armpit.

(46), translation by Dr. Douglas J Lanska

With more extensive obstetric brachial plexus palsies, Duchenne also noted the effects of the weakness on the posture of the arm and hand, the development of contractures, and the changes in strength over time. One child was born in "dire circumstances" with a shoulder presentation—a malpresentation in which the fetus is in a transverse lie (ie, its vertebral column is perpendicular to that of the mother) so that the leading part (the part that first enters the birth canal) is an arm, a shoulder, or the trunk. In addition, the umbilical cord was wrapped around his neck, and the delivery was "long and arduous." He sustained perinatal asphyxia and was "hardly brought back to life." As further evidence of birth trauma, he had a fractured ulna near the elbow joint. After his birth, he did not move his upper right arm. Initially, Duchenne noted no clear difference in the appearance of the right arm and hand, but in a few months, the hand gradually became deformed and less developed than the opposite arm. Duchenne concluded that, "Atrophic paralysis and deformation of the hand are the result of the lesion of some nerves involved in the fracture of the bones of the forearm during the maneuver of childbirth" (46), translation by Dr. Douglas J Lanska.

Obstetric paralysis before treatment

Duchenne applied faradic currents to the arm, and, over time, the child's hand function and appearance improved, though the child still had limited function of the arm and hand.

Obstetric paralysis after treatment

I saw .... the shape of the hand return to its normal state by the return of their tonic force. [This figure] was drawn from the photograph I made of the hand of the sick little one after his treatment. If we compare it to [the hand] photographed and then drawn during the treatment, we notice that the claw no longer exists ... that the last two phalanges have extended and that the first have flexed a little. This reestablishment of the normal shape of the hand was due to the development of the interossei. The eminences had also developed as well as the atrophied muscles of the forearm. ... [T]he movements of the upper limb had gained in strength and extent, but they had not recovered their independence. ... I was hopeful that with the help of certain gymnastic exercises prescribed by me, [he would continue to improve]. Two years later, this young boy came to show me that this hope had come true; he used that hand almost as well as the other.

(46), translation by Dr. Douglas J Lanska

Duchenne presented one further illustration of the "deformation of the hand,” following a childhood obstetric subacromial dislocation.

Obstetric paralysis with scapulohumeral dislocation

The disorders caused, in these children, in the movements and in the attitude of the limb, by the subacromial dislocation [of the acromioclavicular joint], may well suggest the existence of a congenital cerebral palsy of the upper limb; in either case, the elevation of the arm is difficult and limited. Furthermore, the hand is pronated, and the arm internally rotated... [I]n all these children, there existed, moreover, a veritable paralysis that had been occasioned by the lesion of the brachial plexus and which was more or less complete and more or less serious. Thus, in one of them ... some muscles were atrophied or responded weakly to electrical excitation (the biceps and the anterior brachialis) or had lost their electrical contractility (flexors of the fingers and interossei).

(46), translation by Dr. Douglas J Lanska

Augusta Klumpke. In addition, brachial plexus injury to the lower roots (C8-T1) was first described by American-born French neurologist Augusta Klumpke (1859-1927) in 1885 (95; 132; 20; 21; 64; 153; 188; 51).

Augusta Klumpke (1859–1927)

American-born French neurologist Augusta Klumpke (1859–1927) (right) and her husband Jules Dejerine (1849–1917). (Courtesy of Wellcome Images and Wikimedia Commons. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)

Erb palsy in Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany. In 1859 Wilhelm was born in Berlin to Victoria (or "Vicky"; 1840-1901), Princess Royal, the eldest daughter of Britain's Queen Victoria (1819-1901), and Prince Frederick William of Prussia (the future Frederick III; 1831-1888)--a marriage intended to unite the royal families of Britain and Germany. A traumatic breech birth resulted in an Erb palsy, which left Wilhelm as an adult with a withered left arm about 6 inches (15 centimeters) shorter than his right. In a letter to her mother, Queen Victoria, Vicky wrote, "The idea of his remaining a cripple haunts me." She felt a cure had to be found, and subjected Wilhelm to various bizarre procedures that served only to traumatize the boy. Beginning at 6 months of age and continuing for years, a hare was slaughtered in his presence twice a week to provide "animal baths"; the still-warm flesh of the dead hare was then tied around boy's left arm, with the hope that the vitality of the wild animal would somehow be transferred into the boy's dysfunctional arm. As the boy became more mobile, they tied his good arm behind his back thinking that this would force him to use and strengthen his weak arm, but this was of course a plan destined to fail and one that only heaped frustration and agony on the growing boy. In another letter to her mother, Queen Victoria, Vicky wrote: "It [He] gets so fretful and cross and violent and passionate that it makes me quite nervous sometimes." For most of his childhood, Wilhelm's withered arm was also subjected to electrotherapy treatments that were not only painful but that succeeded only in provoking a nervous reaction in the young boy. It was only at age 12 that the many, varied, and painful attempts to cure his disability were finally abandoned. Even then, Wilhelm's deformity was considered an embarrassment that had to be kept hidden from public view, but the deformity was, of course, still present, to his mother's shame. Vicky viewed the delivery of a less than physically perfect heir to the Prussian throne as a personal failure and, moreover, one that raised concerns about the ability of her son to thrive in the militant court atmosphere that was his destiny. In still another letter to her mother, Vicky confessed that the deformity "spoils all the pleasure and pride I should have in him." Although her rejection of her son stemmed in part from her failure to bring forth a strong male heir, no doubt compounded by the responsibility she felt (or blame she perceived) as the English mother of a German heir, it was nevertheless a quite terrible reaction by a mother toward her own son and one that Wilhelm reacted to in anger and resentment.

In most of the extant photographs and paintings, the royal photographers and painters concocted a remarkable diversity of subterfuges to obscure the left hand or to otherwise conceal its deformity (although some paintings and sculptures adopted an altogether different approach: just portray the arm and hand as if they were normal!). Photographs and paintings show Wilhelm holding a pair of white gloves in his left hand to make the arm seem longer, hiding his left hand under crossed arms, hiding his left arm behind his back, covering his left hand with his right on the hilt of a sword, putting his left hand in a pocket, holding his left hand with his right, holding a cane to give the illusion of a useful limb posed at a dignified angle, or hiding his hand and arm under a cape. There are also some officially sanctioned paintings and sculptures that portray his left arm and hand as if they were normal.

Prince Wilhelm holding a pair of white gloves in his left hand to make the arm seem longer

Prince Wilhelm c1871 as a 12-year-old boy in Berlin. Note the small size of his left hand, a result of his Erb palsy from obstetric trauma. The white glove is a prop, intended to suggest, by extension, a longer left arm. Despit...
Prince Wilhelm hiding his left hand under crossed arms

Prince Wilhelm c1875 as a 16-year-old boy in Berlin. Note how his left hand is hidden by crossing his arms and positioning the left hand so that it is behind a table. (Photograph by German painter and photographer Carl Wilhelm ...
Prince Wilhelm hiding his left arm behind his back

Prince Wilhelm in 1877 as an 18-year-old student in Kassel. In 1859, Wilhelm suffered an Erb palsy during a difficult breech birth. The deformity affected him throughout his life. As was typical of him, he tried (albeit unsucce...
Kaiser Wilhelm II covering his left hand with his right on the hilt of a sword

Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1905. Wilhelm in dress military regalia, wearing an elaborate "eagle spike" Pickelhaube helmet. He is resting his diminutive and deformed left hand on a sword hilt and then covering it with his normal right...
Kaiser Wilhelm II putting his left hand in a pocket

Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany in exile at the Dutch manor of Doorn in September 1933, in civilian clothes and with a cigarette. Wilhelm had been forced to abdicate in 1918 at the end of WWI. (Photograph by German photographer Os...

The disability from obstetric brachial plexus palsy clearly affected Wilhelm’s emotional development, and seemingly caused him to over-compensate through aggressiveness and competitiveness. Instead of his life providing a bridge to strengthen the ties of Britain and German, he ultimately initiated actions that split them apart.

Surgical case series from Leon Pierce Clark and colleagues (1905–1907). In 1905, neurologist and psychiatrist Leon Pierce Clark (1870–1933), neurosurgeon Alfred S Taylor (1869–1942), and pathologist Thomas P Prout described the results of 20 dissections and many experiments on infantile cadavers as well as a series of operations on seven clinical cases, which indicated that tension (overstretching) of the nerve roots of the brachial plexus was the basis of obstetric brachial plexus palsies. In this surgical case series from the beginning of the 20th century, two of seven cases (29%) died in the perisurgical period (34). This series gives a useful perspective on the range of presentations, the operative findings, and the degree of recovery achieved at that time.

Case 1. A 25-month-old girl with complete paralysis of her left arm. She was a first child and with vertex presentation. Labor was prolonged and difficult. Instruments were used, and strong traction was exerted on the head. Complete paralysis of the left arm was noted a few days after birth. No spontaneous improvement resulted during the first 2 months after birth. After 4 months, slight flexion of the fingers and wrist was possible. Contractures contributed to the deformity. The child died 19 hours after surgery in 1903.

Entire brachial lesion of the left arm

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)

Case 2. A 10-year-old girl with typical "laceration" (stretch) brachial birth palsy. Typical birth palsy of a milder grade was present. She was the fourth child and with vertex presentation and marked asphyxiation after labor lasting 7 hours. "Forceps were used and great force employed in delivery." Palsy of the right arm was at once noticed. Improvement began at the end of 4 months and continued for 1 year. Slight contractures occurred in all the paralyzed muscles, producing a characteristic deformity. At operation in 1903, the fifth and sixth nerve roots were found to be damaged. A 1 cm portion was excised, and the proximal and distal ends were sutured. Marked return of muscle power began 3 months after surgery and continued for 2 years.

Typical laceration brachial birth palsy

Ordinary position in which the patient held the right arm before operation. (Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Max possible supination of the hand before operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Max elevation of arm possible before operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Patient's ability to place her hand on the top of her head 18 months after operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Patient's markedly improved ability to elevate her arm 18 months after operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Supination of the right hand 18 months after operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)

Case 3. An 8-year-old boy with typical "laceration" (stretch) brachial birth palsy. Obstetric birth palsy of the right arm (Erb palsy) was present. He was the third child and with vertex presentation. Labor lasted 14 hours, and instrumentation was finally used. After prolonged and forceful traction, he was born asphyxiated and with total paralysis of the right arm. During the first year, there was some slight return of power, but there was no subsequent improvement. The right arm and shoulder girdle were distinctly underdeveloped compared to the left side and in x-ray images. The shoulder was a flail joint. The elbow could not be extended more than 150 degrees. The wrist was markedly flexed and adducted (toward the ulna). The extremity was cooler than the normal one, and the hand was purple-colored. The bones on the damaged side were between 12% and 20% shorter than the corresponding bones on the opposite side. There was a pronounced posteroinferior dislocation of the shoulder. The coracoid and acromion processes were longer, more pointed, and bent more downward and forward than normal. At operation in 1903, the upper trunk of the brachial plexus was found to have been torn apart, and the torn ends were displaced and adherent to other structures with connective tissue. The damaged tissue was excised, and the ends sutured. The boy made steady but very slow progress postoperatively, and after 9 months, he was able to move his arm slightly.

Typical laceration brachial birth palsy

Ordinary position in which the patient held the right arm before operation. (Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Max supination the right hand before operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Extent muscle power in biceps and deltoid before operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Reduction in deformity of the right arm 9 months after operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Extent of muscle power in biceps and deltoid 9 months after operation

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Return of muscle power 10 months after operation

(Sources: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707. Taylor AS, Prout TP. Results from the surgical treatment of brachial birth palsy: with a note on the pathology. JAMA 1907;...

Taylor and Prout presented further information on the surgical treatment of brachial birth palsy in 1907 (169). Further return of function was evident in the arm of this patient 2 years and 7 months following the first operation.

Power to put the hand to the face after two operations

Two years and 7 months after first operation and 6.5 months after the second operation, showing power to put the hand to the face, involving some external rotation of the humerus and some supination of the forearm. (Source: Tay...
Slight power of abduction after two operations

Two years and 7 months after first operation and 6.5 months after the second operation, showing slight power of abduction. Deltoid activity. (Source: Taylor AS, Prout TP. Results from the surgical treatment of brachial birth pa...

Case 4. An 8-month-old boy with typical "laceration" (stretch) brachial birth palsy of the right arm. “Typical birth palsy” was present. He was the third child and with vertex presentation. Labor was 72 hours long and was conducted by a midwife, who, when the head was born, pulled forcibly on it to deliver the shoulders, which were caught (shoulder dystocia). Two days later, paralysis of the right arm was noticed. No improvement occurred prior to operation. At operation, only the fifth and sixth cervical roots were affected near where they join to form the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. The child died 3 days after surgery.

Typical laceration brachial birth palsy of the right arm

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)

Case 5. A 4.5-year-old boy with a mild degree of "laceration" (stretch) brachial birth palsy of the right arm. He was the second child and with vertex presentation. “Very difficult labor. Instruments used after 19 hours and 'great pulling' was employed." The right arm was paralyzed at birth. Movements began to return at the end of 3 months, but by the age of 6 months, the improvements had stopped. Paralysis, deformity, contractures, and atrophy were typical of a medium-grade birth palsy. At operation in 1904, a portion of the damaged fifth and sixth roots and the proximal portion of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus were resected and the free ends sutured. No movement was evident in C5- and C6-innervated muscles for 3 months. Slow improvement occurred thereafter, but the child was poorly cooperative with instructions, so little hope of significant further progress was expected.

Mild degree of laceration brachial birth palsy of the right arm

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)

Case 6. An 11-year-old girl with a mild degree of "laceration" (stretch) brachial birth palsy of the left arm. She was the first child and with vertex presentation. "Delivered by a midwife, who pulled on the head." Partial paralysis of the left arm was noticed within the first 2 days. After several months, improvement began and continued for about 2 years, appearing first in the hand muscles and then extending upward. At operation in 1904, a lesion was found in the fifth nerve root and the outer part of the junction of the fifth and sixth nerve roots (upper trunk of the brachial plexus). The damaged portion was excised and the free ends sutured. The lesion resulted from a traction injury, with rupture of the perineural sheath and hemorrhage into its substance and into the meshes of the epineurium.

Mild degree of laceration brachial birth palsy of the left arm

(Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.)
Rupture of the perineural sheath and hemorrrhage into its substance and into the meshes of the epineurium (schematic)

Schematic representation of a rupture of the perineural sheath and hemorrrhage into its substance and into the meshes of the epineurium, resulting in the formation of a hematoma. Legend: (a) epineurium, (b) perineurium, (c) ner...
Gross lesion position at surgery

Schematic representation of the position of the gross lesion evident at surgery. The irregular darked area at the top represents areas of damage to the perineural sheath. (Source: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brach...

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

	• Injury to the brachial plexus can be classified by the anatomic localization of the nerves affected, such as the upper, lower, or total plexus.
	• Erb (or Erb-Duchenne) palsy, being the most common form of brachial plexus palsy in neonates, is caused by disruption of the upper brachial plexus nerves at cervical nerve roots 5 and 6, and possibly 7 (C5-C7).
	• Clinical findings for C5-C6 palsy include shoulder muscle paralysis with an asymmetric Moro reflex, an internally rotated upper arm, an extended elbow due to flexor paralysis, a pronated forearm, and a flexed wrist.
	• If C7 is also involved, the baby may have a “waiter's tip” posture with adduction and inward rotation at the shoulder, extension and pronation at the elbow, and flexion of the fingers.
	• Klumpke palsy is a less common form of brachial plexus palsy in neonates and is caused by involvement of the brachial plexus at cervical roots 7 and 8 and thoracic root 1 (C7-C8, T1).
	• Classic clinical signs of Klumpke palsy include a supinated forearm with a flexed wrist and fingers, a “claw hand,” and an absent grasp reflex.
	• In lower brachial plexus palsy, the involvement of the sympathetic nerves from the first thoracic root, which gives rise to the superior cervical sympathetic ganglion, can result in ipsilateral Horner syndrome manifested by ipsilateral constricted pupil, upper lid ptosis, and facial anhidrosis.
	• Total brachial plexus palsy is often erroneously called "Klumpke" palsy as the patient presents with a lesion of C7-T1, but total brachial plexus palsy is always associated with an upper spinal nerve lesion of varying severity.
	• The phrenic nerve, arising from C3, C4, and C5 can be involved in brachial plexus palsy with resultant ipsilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, causing a decrease in thoracic space, tidal volume, and vital capacity.

Injury to the brachial plexus can be classified by the anatomic localization of the nerves affected, such as the upper, lower, or total plexus. Erb (or Erb-Duchenne) palsy, being the most common form of brachial plexus palsy in neonates, is caused by disruption of the upper brachial plexus nerves at cervical nerve roots 5 and 6, and possibly 7 (C5–C7) (112). Clinical findings for C5-C6 palsy include shoulder muscle paralysis with an asymmetric Moro reflex, an internally rotated upper arm, an extended elbow due to flexor paralysis, a pronated forearm, and a flexed wrist (66; 83; 183). If C7 is also involved, the baby may have a “waiter's tip” posture with adduction and inward rotation at the shoulder, extension and pronation at the elbow, and flexion of the fingers (66; 183). In children with an upper plexus lesion, in addition to the motor deficits, the sensibility of the thumb and index finger is diminished, which has a significant negative impact on hand function (24; 25).

Brachial plexus, anatomical arrangement

(Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.)
Erb palsy, “waiter’s tip” posture

Notice the posture of the affected hand in the “waiter’s tip” posture. (Source: Graham EE. Diseases of Children. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1916. Public domain.)
Erb palsy

These patients have an internally rotated upper arm, extended elbow, a pronated forearm, and a flexed wrist. (Contributed by Dr. Ian Heger.)
Erbs paralysis in a child 26 months of age with atrophy of the deltoid, subluxation of the arm, and marked bony prominences

(Source: Koplik H. The diseases of infancy and childhood. New York and Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1910. Public domain.)

Klumpke palsy is a less common form of brachial plexus palsy in neonates and is caused by involvement of the brachial plexus at cervical roots 7 and 8 and thoracic root 1 (C7-C8, T1) (112). Classic clinical signs include a supinated forearm with a flexed wrist and fingers, a “claw hand.” These patients have absence of the grasp reflex on examination (83). In lower brachial plexus palsy, the involvement of the sympathetic nerves from the first thoracic root, which gives rise to the superior cervical sympathetic ganglion, can result in ipsilateral Horner syndrome manifested by ipsilateral constricted pupil, upper lid ptosis, and facial anhidrosis. However, total brachial plexus palsy is often called "Klumpke" palsy as the patient presents with a lesion of C7-T1, but total brachial plexus palsy is always associated with an upper spinal nerve lesion of varying severity (128). Obstetrical-induced Klumpke palsy with only a paralyzed hand is extremely rare (09).

Klumpke palsy

Clinical signs include a supinated forearm with a flexed wrist and fingers. (Contributed by Dr. Ian Heger.)

The phrenic nerve, arising from C3, C4, and C5 can be involved in brachial plexus palsy with resultant ipsilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, causing a decrease in thoracic space, tidal volume, and vital capacity. The neonate can develop tachypnea, cyanosis, and inefficient ventilation (07; 36). If brachial plexus palsy is associated with injury to cervical spinal cord, the patient may be unable to breathe, resulting in subsequent ventilator dependence or death (36; 155).

Among newborns born vaginally by breech or cephalic presentation, those born breech are more likely to develop Erb palsy, whereas those in the cephalic group are more likely to have total brachial plexus palsy (10). Breech infants have a higher frequency of bilateral obstetrical brachial plexus palsies and concurrent phrenic nerve palsy (10). Concurrent phrenic nerve palsy in neonates with brachial plexus palsy is a strong negative prognostic indicator for spontaneous motor recovery of the brachial plexus, particularly after vertex delivery (189). In contrast, concurrent Horner syndrome in neonates with brachial plexus palsy has no prognostic value in predicting poor spontaneous motor recovery in patients with total-type brachial plexus palsy (190).

For nondiabetic mothers who deliver vaginally, neonatal BW 4400 g or greater was associated with a significant increase in the adverse neonatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia or brachial plexus injury, whereas neonatal BW 4800 g or greater was associated with a significant increase in the adverse maternal outcomes of postpartum hemorrhage or third- or fourth-degree perineal tears (11).

Prognosis and complications

Prognosis. The prognosis and natural history of neonatal brachial plexus palsy depends on the extent of the initial injury. The pure forms of Erb-Duchenne palsy (ie, C5-C6) and pan-plexus palsy have a higher incidence of nerve avulsions than the extensive form of Erb palsy (ie, C5-C7) (175). Rapid and useful motor recovery is typical with Erb-Duchenne palsy and the upper root levels (C5 and C6) of pan-plexus palsy, in contrast to the poor prognosis of motor recovery with lesions of the lower root levels (C8 and T1) of pan-plexus palsy (168). Recovery of sensory function is much more frequent and occurs to a greater degree than recovery of motor function (168).

The prognosis and natural history depend, at least in some cases, on various circumstances of delivery (10). For example, spontaneous recovery of shoulder abduction and elbow flexion in newborns with Erb palsy is significantly worse among those with vaginal deliveries who were born breech compared with those born with cephalic presentations (61; 10). Obstetric brachial plexus palsy after a breech delivery is more typically the result of avulsion of the upper roots, an injury that cannot be treated satisfactorily by microsurgical grafting and carries a considerably worse prognosis for shoulder function (175; 61).

Determination of whether the injury is preganglionic or postganglionic through imaging and clinical exam can help predict the extent of motor recovery (72). Usually, preganglionic avulsion injuries are less likely to spontaneously recover motor function without surgical intervention. Injury to the phrenic, long thoracic, dorsal scapular, scapular, sympathetic chain, or the thoracodorsal nerve portends a poor recovery (72).

The Mallet Classification is a widely used tool that categorizes motor function of the shoulder to degrees of brachial plexus injury. The Mallet score looks at movement of the hand to mouth, neck, and spine and global abduction and external rotation. The lowest score given for no function is 1, and the score for normal function is 5. Summation of all these movement scores gives the overall Mallet score (133). In approximately 20% of cases, the Mallet score cannot be applied because of a discrepancy between the deficiency of shoulder abduction and shoulder external rotation (08). On this basis, Al-Qattand and El-Sayed concluded that “documenting the deficits in shoulder abduction and external rotation are best done separately and this can be accomplished by using other grading systems” (08). Narakas and colleagues also developed a classification of brachial plexus injury for infants aged 3 weeks and older for predicting the prognosis of spontaneous recovery depending on the severity of the brachial plexus injury, which is a strong predictor of outcome (128; 154; 57; 72). In the Narakas classification, poor recovery was less than half the normal range for elbow flexion and shoulder abduction (128). Narakas and colleagues found that Group I with Erb palsy (C5-6 injuries) had the best prognosis and occurred most commonly. Group II with C5-7 injuries had a poorer prognosis than Group I. Group III had involvement of C5-T1 and presented with a flail extremity, and Group IV with Horner syndrome in addition to C5-T1 involvement occurred in 4% of cases and had the worst prognosis.

Mallet classification

This assessment tool scores motor function of the shoulder by observing movement of hand to mouth, neck, and spine and global abduction and external rotation. (Contributed by Dr. Ian Heger.)

When elbow flexion is considered in isolation, elbow flexion recovers spontaneously except in rare cases, although recovery occurs later in more severe injuries (77). On this basis, the authors considered it doubtful that nerve reconstruction could improve elbow flexion more than the likely spontaneous recovery in infants with obstetric brachial plexus injuries (77), although such procedures are increasingly being recommended (120; 124).

In a systematic review of brachial plexus palsy that included studies reported from 1966 to 2001, Pondaag and colleagues concluded that recovery occurs in approximately 70% to 80% of patients, with the remaining patients having residual deficits (138). Most patients with brachial plexus palsy diagnosed at birth recover from the neurologic deficit (06; 138). However, those who did not recover during the 3- to 6-month period require surgical intervention.

In a population-based study of 38,749 births during 1999 to 2001, Lagerkvist and colleagues reported that the incidence of brachial plexus palsy was 2.9 per 1000 live births (100). By 18 months, most infants had recovered with only 18% showing persistent brachial plexus palsy. At 3 months of age, the predictive value of regained elbow flexion, shoulder external rotation, and forearm supination for complete recovery was 100%, 99%, and 96%, respectively. Noetzel followed 80 patients with brachial plexus palsy who did not recover by 2 weeks of age and noted complete recovery was seen in 66% of patients by 6 months of age. Nine percent of patients demonstrated 3/5 strength in the triceps and biceps by 6 months and had residual weakness of 4/5 strength in triceps and biceps. Fourteen percent of subjects continued to have severe weakness in all muscle groups and were not antigravity by 6 months (122). Foad and colleagues performed an evidence-based review summarizing the data regarding prognosis using the Narakas classification and found that approximately 64% of group I and II have spontaneous recovery of biceps function at 3 months of age; this is consistent with conclusions from other studies that saw spontaneous recovery rates of approximately 66% (122; 80; 138; 57).

The decision to proceed with surgery for brachial plexus palsy is usually made by 6 months of life and is based on the clinical course as well as imaging findings suggestive of a poor prognosis for recovery. Depending on the severity of the injury and whether the distal basal lamina tubes remain intact, total recovery may occur in weeks or months (107). The distance between the proximal and distal stumps that the nerve axon must sprout determines the length of time for recovery. Spontaneous recovery is usually seen within the first 3 to 4 months after injury (107). By the age of 2 to 3 months, poor hand function is an absolute indication for surgical intervention (136; 107). Pondaag and colleagues also recommend surgery for patients who do not recover external rotation of the shoulder and elbow flexion or forearm supination by the age of 4 months (135). Clarke and Curtis recommended surgical exploration by 9 months if the patient is unable to place a cookie in the mouth with no more than 45 degrees of neck flexion, hence, a failed cookie test (128).

The specific surgical intervention depends on intraoperative electromyographic evaluations and visual observations of the brachial plexus. Surgical options for the patient are exploration and at times neurophysiologic testing in cases of neuroma-in-continuity with expectant management, neurolysis wherein the nerves are freed from inflammatory adhesions, neuroma excision and end-to-end anastomosis of the same nerve, and nerve grafting with local nerve by end-to-end anastomosis or remote nerves using sural nerve transplant or intrabrachial plexus transplant donor nerves (23; 65; 98).

Complications. Consequences of untreated neonatal brachial plexus injury may affect the glenohumeral joint of the shoulder and other joints of the arm as well as hand and finger function. The late sequelae include glenoid deformity or posterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint (91), glenohumeral flexion contracture, and lost active shoulder extension (84). Neonatal brachial plexus injuries also result in structural changes in the affected limb bones, a finding found also in animal models, but these changes may be diminished if the microsurgical reinnervation is accomplished early enough (68). The most common deformities are limb length discrepancy, the development of contractures at the shoulder, elbow, and forearm as well as ulnar deviation of the wrist, and paralysis of the fingers (148; 70; 04). Zancolli and colleagues found that in 148 patients, the most common deformity was internal rotation contracture of the shoulder (72%) followed by supination contracture of the forearm (69%) and flexion contracture of the elbow (62%) (191). The amount of intraoperative correction is significantly associated with higher self-confidence and normal activities of daily living (73).

Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy sequelae with supination deformity of the forearm (1)

The photo exhibits a 25-year-old woman with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy sequelae and supination deformity of the forearm. (Source: Hamdi NB, Doubi M, Abalkhail TB, Mortada H. Clinical and psychosocial outcomes following c...
Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy sequelae and supination deformity of the forearm (2)

The photo exhibits an 8-year-old boy with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy sequelae and supination deformity of the forearm. (Source: Hamdi NB, Doubi M, Abalkhail TB, Mortada H. Clinical and psychosocial outcomes following cor...

Approximately two thirds of the children (69%) develop a glenohumeral abduction contracture; it is more common in those with upper neonatal brachial plexus injury (04).

Muscle denervation and degeneration are also complications of neonatal brachial plexus palsy. The most affected muscle is the subscapularis muscle, and its structural abnormality correlated with the degree of glenoid version (82). Abnormal rotator cuff muscles also correlated with posterior subluxation of the humeral head and the shape of the glenoid. The supraspinatus muscle differences correlated with the degree of superior subluxation of the humerus (82).

Neonatal brachial plexus has a negative influence on upper limb function and quality of life, and it has lifelong implications and impacts on a patient’s choices regarding education and profession as well as on work performance (177; 113).

Clinical vignette

Case 1 (unilateral Erb-Duchenne paralysis). A 4490 g male neonate was delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery with no apparent complication. However, immediately after birth it was noticed that the baby did not spontaneously move his right arm. Initially his arm was flaccid, but over time it became clear that his distal function was good and proximally he was weak.

He presented to the clinic at 2 years of age for evaluation and possible treatment. He had worked with physical therapy, and the flexion in his arm had improved, but he still had considerable trouble elevating and externally rotating his arm. MRI showed right-sided pseudomeningoceles at the C5-C6 and C6-C7 lateral recesses that extended into the neural foramina with preservation of the right C6 and C7 nerve roots within the pseudomeningoceles. Spinal cord signal intensity and appearance remained normal.

Case 2 (bilateral Klumpke paralysis). JM presented to Boston Children’s Hospital at 7 months of age with the residua of bilateral Klumpke obstetric palsy (174). He was born on May 30, 1902, following a difficult labor. When the physician, JM Wells, arrived after 12 hours of labor, there was a face presentation with the chin posterior. Chloroform was given to complete relaxation, but the head could not be flexed. Application of forceps was tried, “but as there was absolutely no ‘give’ this was quickly discarded.” Several attempts were made at a version, and on the third attempt “the occiput engaged, and the labor proceeded normally, the right shoulder presenting at the pubes.” In the process, the attending physician noted that, “during one of the rests from the anesthetic, while I held my hand in the vagina with fingers against the chin using more or less pressure I heard and felt a decided click or snap. At first I thought the child’s neck was broken…” After delivery, the child was initially “narcotized by the chloroform but after slight artificial respiration came around all right.” When the child recovered from the anesthetic, the physician and the mother noticed that both arms hung limp from the shoulders without movement, whereas the head, neck, and legs moved normally. The child’s neck was examined, and no evidence of a fracture was identified.

Bilateral Klumpke obstetric palsy

(Source: Thomas JJ. Two cases of bilateral birth paralysis of the lower-arm type. Boston Med Surg J 1905;153(16):431-6. Public domain.)
Face presentation, mento-posterior

(Source: Smellie W. A set of anatomical tables, with explanations, and an abridgement of the practice of midwifery, with a view to illustrate a treatise on that subject, and collection of cases. Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas, 1793....
Chin-posterior presentation

(Source: Williams JW. Obstetrics: A text-book for the use of students and practitioners. 3rd edition. New York and London: D Appleton and Co., 1912. Public domain.)
Chin-posterior face presentation, forceps applied

(Source: Smellie W. A set of anatomical tables, with explanations, and an abridgement of the practice of midwifery, with a view to illustrate a treatise on that subject, and collection of cases. Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas, 1793....
Conversion of face presentation to vertex presentation

Direction of forces in the conversion of a face presentation to a vertex presentation. Large forces are operating on the head and neck to accomplish this conversion, placing fragile structures, such as the brachial plexus, at risk...

He first moved his arms at the shoulders at 4 weeks. When he was examined on December 7, 1902 (approximately 6 months of age), his arms were abducted and internally rotated, the forearms flexed and pronated, the wrists somewhat extended, the fingers extended at the metacarpophalangeal joint and flexed distally, and the thumbs abducted to the plane of the hand. Passive extension at the elbow was “resisted with considerable force,” but the hands were flaccid. Voluntary motion of the upper extremities was limited to “elevation of the arms, and flexion of the forearms” (ie, the C5-6 myotomes). Movements of the head, neck, and legs were normal. Horner syndrome was not mentioned. The triceps reflex was absent bilaterally, but the knee jerks were normal. Pinprick sensation was present and judged normal in the upper extremities.

On February 4, 1903 (approximately 8 months of age), forearm flexion was “fair” (C5-6), the supinator muscles could be felt to contract (C6-7), the wrists could be slightly extended (C6-7), but deviated to the ulnar side, and slight movement had returned to the fingers of the left hand (except the middle finger) (probably C7-8 and not T1) and also the thumb and index finger of the right hand (probably C7-8 and not T1). Marked atrophy was noted in the forearm flexors (C7-8) and the intrinsic hand muscles (T1). The deltoids (C5), biceps (C5-6), and supinator (C6-7) muscles responded normally to electrical stimulation, whereas the triceps (C7-8) and all the muscles of the forearms (C7-8) and hands (T1) gave no response.

He learned to walk at about 1 year of age and had normal cognitive development. On the last reported examination in May 1905 (2 years of age), his gait was normal, but the paralysis of his arms had remained nearly the same, except that the grasp was somewhat stronger, especially on the left, though this was attributed to “recovery of the long flexor muscles, as the paralysis and wasting in the small muscles of the hand [was] still marked, and pronation of the forearms, flexion of the hands, and extension of the forearms [had] not improved, in spite of fairly regular treatment with massage and electricity.”

Biological basis

	• The brachial plexus is formed by the C5-T1 nerve roots and consists of roots, trunks, divisions, cords, and branches.
	• The five cervico-thoracic nerve roots merge to form an upper, middle, and lower trunk, and each trunk divides into anterior and posterior divisions, using the axillary artery as the anatomical landmark.
	• The six divisions then form three cords: the posterior cord that contains posterior divisions of C5-T1, the lateral cord that contains the anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks of C5-7, and the medial cord, which contains the anterior division of the lower trunk.
	• The most important branches of the brachial plexus are the musculocutaneous nerve that is formed from the lateral cord, the median nerve combined from the lateral and medial cord, the ulnar nerve from the medial cord, and the radial and axillary nerves from the posterior cord.
	• The upper brachial plexus, C5 and C6, innervates the deltoid, spinati, biceps, brachioradialis, biceps supinator, and flexor muscles of the forearm, whereas the lower brachial plexus innervates the intrinsic muscles of the hand.
	• When examining a patient with a suspected brachial palsy, attention should be given to the position of the head, neck, and arm, noting concurrent nonmuscular torticollis, as well as fractures of the clavicle, humeri, and ribs.
	• Obstetric brachial plexus palsy can result from excessive lateral traction and forceful deviation of the fetal head from the axial plane of the fetal body, particularly in association with shoulder dystocia, which increases the necessary applied peak tractional force to the nerve roots exiting the spine and also increases the time to deliver the fetal shoulders.
	• The Seddon (1942) 4-category classification of the neuropathology of brachial plexus palsy involves these classes: Neurapraxia (Class I), Axonotmesis (Class II), Neurotmesis (Class III), and Root avulsion. Although complete recovery frequently occurs in brachial plexus palsy secondary to neurapraxia and axonotmesis, permanent loss of function occurs after root avulsion and neurotmesis if no surgical intervention is undertaken. Sunderland (1951) expanded this classification somewhat.
	• Following nerve injury, the distal end undergoes a process called Wallerian degeneration where the myelin and damaged axon are broken down by the Schwann cells and macrophages and disappear. If the severity of the injury is too great, the neuron will undergo apoptosis or cell death; however, if the cell body remains intact, chromatolysis may reverse, and the axon may regenerate with the formation of a growth cone.

Anatomic localization

The brachial plexus is formed by the C5-T1 nerve roots and consists of roots, trunks, divisions, cords, and branches. The five cervico-thoracic nerve roots merge to form an upper, middle, and lower trunk, and each trunk divides into anterior and posterior divisions, using the axillary artery as the anatomical landmark. The six divisions then form three cords: the posterior cord that contains posterior divisions of C5-T1, the lateral cord that contains the anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks of C5-7, and the medial cord, which contains the anterior division of the lower trunk. The most important branches are the musculocutaneous nerve that is formed from the lateral cord, the median nerve combined from the lateral and medial cord, the ulnar nerve from the medial cord, and the radial and axillary nerves from the posterior cord. The upper brachial plexus, C5 and C6, innervates the deltoid, spinati, biceps, brachioradialis, biceps supinator, and flexor muscles of the forearm (83; 183). The lower brachial plexus innervates the intrinsic muscles of the hand (76).

When examining a patient with a suspected brachial palsy, attention should be given to the position of the head, neck, and arm. Concurrent nonmuscular torticollis may develop in association with brachial plexus injury, with the head turned away from the affected arm (94; 16; 79). If present, palpate the sternocleidomastoid to feel for a contractured muscle or a pseudotumor (128). Brachial plexus palsy and associated torticollis do not affect the clinical progression of the disease, nor does it have bearing on the severity of the palsy (79). In fact, 63% of patients recovered with conservative management of their torticollis (79).

Next, the neck and arms should be evaluated for fractures of the clavicle, humeri, and ribs because a so-called "pseudoparalysis" can be mistaken for a true brachial plexus injury. Pseudoparalysis occurs when the brachial plexus is indirectly compressed by bone fragment, local swelling, or involuntary arm splinting (128). Evaluation of shoulder function is also important because posterior dislocation of the shoulder has been associated with brachial plexus palsy (55; 166). Evaluation of the shoulder includes passive and active range of motion and holding the arm in 90 degrees of abduction and adduction as well as internal and external rotation of the joint (91). Also, one can palpate the pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, and teres muscle to evaluate the contractile force (91).

Moreover, total brachial plexus palsy may also result in atony and flexed posture of the fingers (128). The presence of finger movement in the setting of brachial plexus injury may later result in the development of posterior subluxation or dislocation of the humerus head due to imbalance of the muscles during development of the infant’s shoulder (119). With total brachial plexus palsy the presence of a Horner syndrome generally conveys a worse prognosis for functional recovery (128; 53).

Asymmetry of the Moro reflex and tonic neck reflex also indicates brachial plexus injury (133). The Moro reflex disappears around 6 months in healthy infants; it is elicited by sudden extension of the neck that causes shoulder abduction and elbow and digit extension as well as finger spreading. The asymmetric tonic neck reflex is elicited by turning the head to one side, which causes extension of the upper and lower extremities on the side to which the head is turned and contralateral upper and lower extremity flexion. Also, one should test for sensation to light touch and pain with nail bed pressure and observing for aversive movements in the affected hand (133).

Pathophysiology

Brachial plexus palsy occurs as a result of stretch, tear, avulsion, or compression of the nerves. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy can result from excessive lateral traction and forceful deviation of the fetal head from the axial plane of the fetal body, particularly in association with shoulder dystocia, which increases the necessary applied peak tractional force to the nerve roots exiting the spine and also increases the time to deliver the fetal shoulders (56; 74; 76; 45). Direct compression of the fetal shoulder on the symphysis pubis may also cause an injury to the brachial plexus (45).

C5-T1 roots, schematic representation

Schematic representation of the left C5-T1 roots with the cervical spine straight (top) and with the head tilted markedly toward the right shoulder (bottom). This either stretches the nerve roots (dashed lines) or causes them to b...
C5–T1 roots, avulsion

Avulsion of the left C5–T1 roots with head tilted markedly toward the right shoulder. (Source: Fieux G. De la pathologie des paralysies obstétricales chez le nouveau-né. Paralysies obstétricales. Annales de Gynécolologie et d’Obst...
Shoulder impinging on symphysis pubis

The anterior (right) shoulder of the infant is impinging on the symphysis pubis. (Source: Edgar JC. The practice of obstetrics: designed for the use of students and practitioners of medicine. Philadelphia: P Blakiston’s Son & ...
Shoulder dystocia causing obstructed labor

Downward pressure on the head is used to pull the baby’s anterior (right) shoulder along under the mother’s symphysis pubis. If the shoulders are too wide, the infant cannot pass below the symphysis pubis or requires significant m...
Brachial plexus injury

Lateral traction forces applied to the head during delivery may put excessive strain on the nerves of the brachial plexus, which may lead to brachial plexus injury or avulsion (as depicted). (Contributed by Dr. Ian Heger.)

The neuropathology of brachial plexus palsy was originally described by Seddon (149), who classified nerve injury as:

Neurapraxia (Class I). Damage to the nerve sheath where there is a block of nerve conduction. The axon and nerve elements are left intact. The potential for regeneration is present. Neurapraxia is the most common form of brachial plexus injury.

Axonotmesis (Class II). Disruption of the axon of the nerve where the endoneurium is disrupted. However, the neural sheath (perineurium and epineurium) is left intact. The potential for regeneration is present.

Neurotmesis (Class III). Complete disruption of the postganglionic nerve (endoneurium, perineurium, and epineurium are transected) (149).

Root avulsion. Complete disruption of the ganglia from the spinal cord at both the anterior and posterior roots.

Although complete recovery frequently occurs in brachial plexus palsy secondary to neurapraxia and axonotmesis, permanent loss of function occurs after root avulsion and neurotmesis if no surgical intervention is undertaken.

Sunderland’s first and second degrees of peripheral nerve injury agree with Seddon’s Class I and II, respectively. However, in 1951 Sunderland expanded on Seddon’s classification of nerve injury in regard to whether transection of the nerve involves the epineurium and perineurium in the setting of damaged endoneurium (167). In Sunderland’s fourth degree injury, perineurium is damaged, and in the fifth-degree injury the nerve is completely transected with epineurium being damaged as well (167). Spontaneous recovery is not possible without surgical intervention with these two injuries (130).

Cell biology of neuronal sprout growth. When a peripheral nerve is injured or transected, the part of the axon that is still attached to the cell body is called the proximal stump, and the other segment is called the distal stump. Nerve injury prompts the recruitment of Schwann cells and glial cells to the area to remove debris. The distal end undergoes a process called Wallerian degeneration where the myelin and damaged axon are broken down by the Schwann cells and macrophages and disappear. Only the endoneurium remains. The cell body undergoes chromatolysis where the nucleus moves to the periphery, and the Nissl bodies or the endoplasmic reticulum is dispersed. The proximal end swells and undergoes some degeneration as well in a retrograde fashion. If the severity of the injury is too great, the neuron will undergo apoptosis or cell death. However, if the cell body remains intact, chromatolysis may reverse, and the axon may regenerate with the formation of a growth cone. Schwann cells that proliferate around the endoneurial tube or basal lamina tube in the distal stump form bands of Büngner, which help guide the sprouting axon for regeneration. Human axon growth rates can reach 2 mm/day in small nerves and 5 mm/day in large nerves (121).

Epidemiology

	• Obstetric brachial plexus palsy has an estimated incidence of 0.2 to 5 per 1000 live births.
	• Spontaneous recovery rate is 60%, and some children suffer permanent impairment.
	• Erb palsy, which involves the upper trunk (C5-C6), occurs in about 60% of brachial palsy injuries. An additional 20% to 30% of injuries are the more extensive form of Erb palsy involving C7, and 10% to 20% have total or pan-plexus injuries involving C5-T1. Klumpke palsy is rare.
	• Suggested risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus injuries include shoulder dystocia, macrosomia (birth weight > 4 kg), maternal diabetes mellitus, small maternal stature, maternal obesity, excessive maternal weight gain in pregnancy, high maternal parity, prolonged pregnancy (postmaturity) or prematurity, prolonged second stage of labor, induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, secondary arrest of dilatation, persistent fetal malposition, instrument-assisted deliveries, downward traction of the fetal head, and vaginal breech extraction.
	• Most cases of neonatal brachial plexus injuries have no known risk factors, and a significant proportion are now thought to occur in utero.
	• Shoulder dystocia is defined as any birth that requires obstetric maneuvers to deliver the fetal shoulders, and it is the highest known risk factor for brachial plexus injury.

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy has an estimated incidence of 0.2 to 5 per 1000 live births, and some studies report that the incidence in the United States is decreasing (165; 138; 14; 58; 45; 59; 180; 90; 125). It was previously believed that 80% to 95% of all injuries are mild and most neonates recover in the first 2 months; however, evidence shows that the spontaneous recovery rate is 60% and some children suffer permanent impairment (80; 138). Erb palsy, which involves the upper trunk (C5-C6), occurs in about 60% of brachial palsy injuries, making it the most common type of brachial plexus injury. An additional 20% to 30% of injuries are the more extensive form of Erb palsy involving C7, and 10% to 20% have total or pan-plexus injuries involving C5-T1. Klumpke palsy, which is an isolated lower root injury involving C8-T1, is a rare entity with conflicting data on its incidence (66).

Erb-Duchenne C5-C6 palsy, occasionally bilateral and complicated by phrenic nerve injury, is the most frequent form of obstetric brachial plexus palsy after a breech birth (175). The more extensive form of Erb-Duchenne palsy (ie, C5-C7, rather than C5-C6) and pan-plexus palsy (ie, C5-T1) are particularly frequent after vaginal delivery with complicated cephalic presentations (175).

Risk factors. Suggested risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus injuries include shoulder dystocia, macrosomia (birth weight > 4 kg), maternal diabetes mellitus, small maternal stature (ie, producing cephalopelvic disproportion), maternal obesity, excessive maternal weight gain in pregnancy, high maternal parity (ie, 6 or more), prolonged pregnancy (postmaturity) or prematurity, prolonged second stage of labor, induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, secondary arrest of dilatation, persistent fetal malposition, instrument-assisted deliveries (ie, vacuum extraction and forceps delivery), downward traction of the fetal head, vaginal breech extraction, and lower socioeconomic status (26; 27; 165; 112; 74; 78; 88; 114; 154; 14; 45; 57; 172; 126; 180; 90; 187; 12; 52; 75; 140). The strongest risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy are shoulder dystocia, macrosomia (especially infant birthweight of 4400 gm or more), and vaginal breech delivery (114; 01; 54; 126; 02; 59; 11; 176; 52). Risk of obstetric brachial plexus palsy increases progressively with increasing fetal size, with a 2.5-fold increased risk for 4001 to 4500 g neonates and a 21.0-fold increased risk for neonates greater than 4500 g, compared with the risk for infants of normal size (ie, 2501-4000 g) (112; 114).

Risk factors for a permanent injury with obstetric brachial plexus palsy include high maternal body mass index, shoulder dystocia, fractured humerus, and fetal asphyxia (14; 52). Fracture of the clavicle in vaginal deliveries is significantly more frequent with transient brachial plexus injuries, possibly reflecting a protective effect (14). Because intrapartum peak forces applied by the clinician are significantly lower in routine deliveries than difficult deliveries, infants born following routine deliveries are more likely to develop Erb palsy and ultimately good recovery, whereas those born following difficult deliveries are more likely to develop total palsy and have poor functional recovery (54). Increasing gestational age and birthweight have a stronger effect on the risk for birth injury among cephalic vaginal deliveries than among vaginal breech deliveries (93).

Among 566 births with shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury was observed in 88 (16%), and permanent sequelae were detected in 12 (2%) (52). Maneuvers other than McRobert's (advanced maneuvers) were used more often, and clavicle fracture was seen more often in the group with plexus injury. Brachial plexus injury was observed 4.7 times more often in infants who were delivered with advanced maneuvers and 3.6 times more often in infants with clavicle fractures at birth.

In breech presentations, obstetrical brachial plexus palsy mainly results from “faulty performance of the manoeuvres that are needed to deliver the shoulders,” and there is a high frequency of root avulsions in breech deliveries of low birthweight infants (168; 27).

Shoulder dystocia. Shoulder dystocia, reported in 0.2% to 3.3% of all births, occurs due to the discrepancy between fetal shoulder size and the maternal pelvic inlet (62). The reported incidence of obstetric brachial plexus palsy after shoulder dystocia varies widely from 4% to 40% (45). Shoulder dystocia is anticipated to cause anterior shoulder involvement, which would produce a higher frequency of right obstetric brachial plexus palsies because the left occipito-anterior presentation is most common; nevertheless, posterior shoulder involvement is frequently seen (87).

Vertex presentation, occiput anterior

Illustration by British obstetrician William Smellie (1754). (Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Edited by Douglas Lanska. Public domain.)
Vertex presentations, classification

The vertex presentations are classified according to the position of the fetal occiput relative to the maternal pelvis. Top row (left to right): right occipito-anterior (ROA), straight occipito-anterior, left occipito-anterior (LO...

Shoulder dystocia is defined by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) as any birth that requires obstetric maneuvers to deliver the fetal shoulders, and it is the highest known risk factor for brachial plexus injury (164; 58). Shoulder dystocia is often encountered unexpectedly--either when downward traction of the fetal head fails to deliver the shoulders, if there is extensive fetal vertex molding in prolonged labor, or if the fetus shows the “turtle sign” (19). Turtle sign refers to the retraction of the presenting chin into the maternal perineum due to bilateral shoulder dystocia. The most reliable predictor for shoulder dystocia is a previous episode of shoulder dystocia (43). Although shoulder dystocia is more common in macrosomic babies (ie, birthweight more than 4000 gm), fetal macrosomia is not a reliable predictor of shoulder dystocia (127).

Ultrasound examination is an unreliable mechanism in detecting fetal weight, with only 62% to 66% accuracy in detecting weight within 10% of the actual fetal weight (30).

ACOG recommends delivery via Cesarean section for babies weighing more than 5000 gm but does not have any current delivery recommendations for prevention of shoulder dystocia (39). For every 14 fetuses with an expected birth weight of more than 5000 gm delivered by cesarean section, one case of brachial plexus birth palsy can be prevented (40).

There are several maneuvers that can be implemented during vaginal delivery to relieve shoulder dystocia and, thus, prevent brachial plexus injury. The McRoberts maneuver refers to the positioning of flexed maternal thighs towards the maternal chest to slide the maternal pubic bone over the fetal anterior shoulder (89). This maneuver, coupled with suprapubic pressure, resolved 25% of cases of shoulder dystocia in one study (103). If the McRoberts maneuver fails to relieve the shoulder dystocia, rotational forces like the Woods’ corkscrew maneuver and Rubin maneuver can be applied. The Woods corkscrew maneuver applies force on the anterior surface of the posterior shoulder whereas the Rubin maneuver applies force on the posterior shoulder. The Rubin maneuver had a success rate of 66% and a birth injury rate of 14%. The Woods corkscrew maneuver had a success rate of 72% and birth injury rate of 9.5%. It is important to note that these maneuvers are usually performed after, or with, the McRoberts maneuver complicating the reporting of success and birth injury rates (81). The Zavanelli maneuver, or cephalic replacement, pushes the fetal head back into the mother so that the obstetrician can attempt a C-section and is rarely performed in the United States; consequently, there are very few reliable data in the literature to assess its rate of success or birth injury (103).

In a retrospective review of 46 children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy and shoulder dystocia, the incidence of brachial plexus palsy persistence was significantly higher at 2 years of age when more than three maneuvers were used or when the duration of the impacted shoulder lasted more than 120 seconds (44).

A strategy of prompt identification of shoulder dystocia accompanied by cessation of axial fetal head traction can decrease the risk of brachial plexus strain, injury, or tear, whereas performance of exact obstetrical maneuvers allowed delivery of fetal shoulders without permanent obstetrics brachial palsy or cerebral morbidity (71).

Closer attention to optimal management of shoulder dystocia has improved birth outcomes: in Sweden, obstetric brachial plexus palsy in vaginally delivered infants in a cephalic presentation at birth decreased during the period 1997–2019 despite an increase in important risk factors, including shoulder dystocia (115).

Mode of delivery. Brachial plexus palsy is the most common type of injury in vaginal breech delivery (93).

Although cesarean section is widely perceived as protective against obstetric brachial plexus injury, a systematic review identified 299 infants who sustained brachial plexus injury after cesarean section, half (53%) of whom had risk factors for likely challenging handling/manipulation of the fetus prior to delivery, in the presence of considerable maternal or fetal concerns or in the presence of poor access due to obesity or adhesions (85).

Cases with no known risk factors. Most cases of neonatal brachial plexus injuries have no known risk factors, and a significant proportion are now thought to occur in utero (96; 48; 87; 74; 63; 88; 14; 45; 57; 126). In a case in which the brachial plexus injury involved the posterior shoulder following a spontaneous delivery without forceps or manual rotation, with delivery effected using only the McRoberts maneuver, the authors hypothesized that maternal expulsive forces combined with lodging of the posterior shoulder on the sacral promontory caused the injury (74). Neonatal brachial plexus palsy can occur after cesarean section, sometimes in association with uterine pathology (eg, bicornuate uterus or uterine fibroids) (48; 63; 05; 126).

Transvaginal ultrasound showing a cross-section of a bicornuate uterus

Transvaginal ultrasound showing a cross-section of a bicornuate uterus, with two cavities or "horns" visible at the left and right, respectively. In the "horn" to the right, a gestational sac is visible, with a diameter of 5.7 ...
Types of structural uterine malformations

Original figure by Eternamente Aprendiz on July 19, 2011. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en. Figure edited and modified by Dr. Douglas J L...
Pathological specimen of a bicornuate uterus

This uterus was removed in the course of excising an ovarian mucinous cystadenoma. The photo shows the uterus and adnexa (less the initially excised left ovarian tumor) from the posterior aspect. The pale-yellow, right ovary is...

In addition, electrophysiological studies have demonstrated evidence of denervation on the day of birth, which is not attributable to a birth-related injury (96). Possible mechanisms of intrauterine brachial plexus injury include the endogenous propulsive forces of labor, intrauterine maladaptation or failure of the shoulders to rotate, impaction of the posterior shoulder behind the sacral promontory, and uterine anomalies (eg, fibroids, an intrauterine septum, or a bicornuate uterus) (48; 74; 45). Indeed, fetal macrosomia is a risk factor for obstetric brachial plexus palsy regardless of whether the delivery is vaginal or by cesarean section (112).

Temporal trends. The epidemiology of obstetric brachial plexus palsy in the United States may be changing over time due to population-level changes in obstetric care, particularly a significant increase in the rate of cesarean delivery (38); indeed, the rate of obstetric brachial plexus palsy declined from 1.7 to 0.9 cases per 1000 live births in the interval from 1997 to 2012, in parallel with increasing rates of cesarean delivery. Cesarean section is associated with a decreased risk of obstetric brachial plexus palsy but does not eliminate the risk completely (48; 63; 114; 154). In particular, for singleton pregnancies with breech presentation or fetal macrosomia, the frequency of neonatal brachial plexus palsy can be reduced with planned cesarean delivery (112; 78). However, this is controversial because a policy of elective cesarean section for fetal macrosomia would require 148 to 258 cesarean sections to prevent a single persistent injury, and avoidance of operative vaginal delivery would require 50 to 99 cesarean sections per injury prevented (97). Indeed, a decision-analysis study to estimate the potential effectiveness and monetary costs of a policy of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound concluded that for the 97% of pregnant women who are not diabetic, a policy of elective cesarean delivery for ultrasonographically diagnosed fetal macrosomia is “medically and economically unsound” (144). The best approach in pregnancies complicated by diabetes and fetal macrosomia is less clear (144).

Diagnostic workup

	• Neonatal brachial plexus palsies are typically diagnosed during physical examination.
	• There are three main diagnostic modalities in working up brachial plexus palsies: plain radiographs, MRI, and CT myelography. Because most cases resolve spontaneously, these tests are usually performed after 3 months of age.
	• EMG and nerve conduction studies are not routinely performed in the assessment of brachial palsy injuries because these tests provide limited predictive value for the presence of specific root damage. However, nerve conduction studies are used to monitor operative progress by establishing a baseline.

Neonatal brachial plexus palsies are typically diagnosed during physical examination. A thorough neurologic examination involves assessing for the presence of the Moro reflex and the asymmetric tonic neck reflex. The diagnosis of brachial plexus palsy is supported by the absence of reflexes that induce elbow flexion, wrist extension, and digit extension. Additionally, the presence of Horner syndrome may indicate lower root injury and generally conveys a worse prognosis for functional recovery (53). The presence of crepitus, gross deformities, or lower extremity involvement may suggest alternative diagnoses like humeral or clavicular fractures and cerebral hypoxia.

There are three main diagnostic modalities in working up brachial plexus palsies: plain radiographs, MRI, and CT myelography. Because most cases resolve spontaneously, these tests are usually performed after 3 months of age. Plain radiographs of the cervical spine, shoulder, clavicle, elbow, and hand help rule out fractures, dislocations, subluxation, septic arthritis, dysplasia, and other abnormal anatomy (41; 03). CT myelography offers the best visualization of rootlets at each level of the spinal cord and is, therefore, optimal for its use for detecting pseudomeningoceles that are associated with nerve root avulsions (178). MRIs have the advantage of being noninvasive, don’t involve exposure to radiation, and can allow for visualization of the spinal cord and brachial plexus, but this modality is less sensitive than CT myelography in detecting nerve root avulsions (13; 186). A preliminary study suggests that 3-D proton-density MRI can evaluate spinal nerve roots in infants with suspected brachial plexopathy, without the need for radiation, contrast agents, or sedation; if confirmed, this may allow for earlier determination of the severity of injury based on serial clinical assessments (18). A systematic review concluded that MRI is the most sensitive and specific diagnostic modality for identifying preganglionic nerve injuries (eg, pseudomeningoceles and rootlet avulsion, the latter of which has the poorest prognosis in this patient population and often dictates the need for surgical intervention) (67).

Of note, EMG and nerve conduction studies are not routinely performed in the assessment of brachial palsy injuries because these tests provide limited predictive value for the presence of specific root damage. However, nerve conduction studies are used to monitor operative progress by establishing a baseline (151). A meta-analysis, however, noted the overall poor quality of available studies but, nevertheless, suggested that the most methodologically sound studies of the prognostic value of early electrodiagnosis in neonatal brachial plexus palsy support the use of electrodiagnosis, at standardized timeframes, as a key prognostic modality for complementing clinical judgment and neuroimaging (179); this conclusion was challenged, however, and at present the general utility of electrodiagnosis for neonatal brachial plexus palsies is unclear (141; 181).

Management

	• Neonatal brachial plexus injuries generally require multidisciplinary management.
	• Early surgical referral may improve outcomes in patients unlikely to recover sufficiently with conservative management. Outcomes are better than the natural history of the condition in appropriately selected patients with surgical management.
	• The main goal of the surgery in infants with Erb palsy is to restore shoulder and biceps muscle function.
	• Although there are no randomized trials comparing surgical reconstruction versus conservative treatment in infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, some authorities have proposed that nerve reconstruction is indicated “when the result of nerve surgery is assumedly better than the expected natural recovery, [and] spontaneous recovery is absent or severely delayed” (137).

Neonatal brachial plexus injuries generally require multidisciplinary management (163; 49; 117). Many children with conservatively managed neonatal brachial plexus palsy have good long-term shoulder and elbow outcomes (117).

Surgery. Early surgical referral may improve outcomes in patients unlikely to recover sufficiently with conservative management (163). Outcomes are better than the natural history of the condition in appropriately selected patients with surgical management (163). In a study of 425 conservatively and 99 operatively managed children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy, operative patients had similar recovery of active range of motion when compared with nonoperative patients for shoulder external rotation, elbow extension, forearm supination, Narakas grade 1 to 2 injury, shoulder abduction, and forward flexion, even though operatively managed patients had more severe presenting injuries on average (116). New treatment paradigms and prediction algorithms may facilitate appropriate surgical case selection (163; 185; 190).

The main goal of the surgery in infants with Erb palsy is to restore shoulder and biceps muscle function. In palsy involving C7 nerve roots, reinnervation of the triceps is important. In global palsy, the primary focus is on hand reinnervation and grasp function, followed by elbow flexion, shoulder function, and finally, elbow, wrist, and finger extension (106; 108; 171). Even primary C5-8 brachial plexus reconstruction can provide restoration of elbow flexion and provide most affected patients a sensitive and functional hand, although secondary surgery to improve shoulder and wrist function is often necessary (105). For patients with complete neonatal brachial plexus palsy, sufficient recovery of hand function to perform bimanual activity tasks is possible and should be a priority in surgical treatment (156).

Primary nerve repair or nerve transfer procedures using microsurgery have now replaced muscle and tendon transfer as primary treatment modality, starting as early as 3 months of age but no later than 6 months of age. Distal nerve transfers have a significant advantage over primary intraplexal repair in early recovery of elbow flexion and shoulder abduction, but the outcomes become similar after 9 months (173). Secondary procedures 12 to 18 months after the primary treatment include tendon transfer and contracture release (37). Patients with chronic lesions who cannot undergo or have not responded to reconstruction undergo secondary reconstruction. These procedures consist of arthrodesis, muscle releases, neurovascular tissue/muscle or tendon transfers, or tenodesis.

For a patient with Erb palsy, a supraclavicular exposure is sufficient to expose the C5-C6 roots. An incision is made through the skin and platysma behind the sternocleidomastoid’s posterior border to the clavicle. Then dissection through the omohyoid is performed to expose the clavicle with division of the subclavius muscle and the periosteum of the clavicle (130). One then identifies the pectoral nerve branching off the anterior division of the upper trunk to preserve it. The upper trunk and spinal nerves that lie between the anterior and middle scalene muscles are exposed by reflecting aside the fat pad in the posterior triangle of the neck (133; 15). Care must be taken to identify the phrenic nerve (anteriorly located on the anterior scalene muscle) and the spinal accessory nerve, which may be aided with direct electrical stimulation (133; 130). Commonly, the trunks are surrounded by fibrotic tissue due to the initial injury (133). Exploration may disclose avulsed ganglia, neuroma in continuity, a ruptured brachial plexus, or a pseudomeningocele.

Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, avulsed ganglia

Avulsed ganglia noted on supraclavicular exploration in a child with an obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. (Source: Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44(3):380-9. Creative Commons Attri...
Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, neuroma in continuity

Example of a neuroma in continuity in a child with an obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. (Source: Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44(3):380-9. Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommerci...
Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, ruptured brachial plexus

Example of ruptured brachial plexus in a child with an obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. (Source: Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44(3):380-9. Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommerc...
Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, pseudomeningocele

Pseudomeningocele in the neck of a child with an obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. (Source: Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44(3):380-9. Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Sh...
Surgical exposure of the brachial plexus revealing a neuroma in continuity.

(Contributed by Dr. Ian Heger.)

Although there are no randomized trials comparing surgical reconstruction versus conservative treatment in infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, some authorities have proposed that nerve reconstruction is indicated “when the result of nerve surgery is assumedly better than the expected natural recovery, [and] spontaneous recovery is absent or severely delayed” (137). Nerve grafts are harvested from sensory nerves such as the sural nerve, the medial brachial nerves, and antebrachial cutaneous nerves (133). Other sources include parts of the plexus where regeneration probably won’t succeed, like the medial cord, ulnar nerve, the C7 spinal nerve, and the spinal accessory nerve; however, the presence of a pseudomeningocele precludes the use of the nerve for grafting (133; 123).

Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, intraplexus repair

Exposed plexus with intraplexus repair using nerve grafts in a child with an obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. (Source: Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44(3):380-9. Creative Commons ...
Nerve grafting after resection of neuroma in continuity

The sural nerve is a common source for the donor nerve. (Contributed by Dr. Ian Heger.)

Neurotization utilizes nerve transfers to connect an uninjured neighbor nerve to the distal portion of an injured nerve, which is useful in avulsion injuries. Best candidate donor nerves are spinal accessory, intercostal, medial pectoral, thoracodorsal, long thoracic, and subscapular nerves; however, in infants, the efficacy is unknown for the use of the long thoracic, pectoral, thoracodorsal, and subscapularis nerves (107).

Examination of each root sample on the distal stump by a neuropathologist intraoperatively for major trunks or connections with doubtful quality may be helpful in guiding the surgeon in evaluating the quality of the proximal and distal stumps for grafting. The characteristics used to judge the quality of the root are the fascicular pattern (meaning the number and arrangement of the fascicles) and the presence of fibrosis in the peri- or epineurium, the presence of Büngner bands, and the level of remyelination and number of ganglion cells (15). A retrospective review of the outcomes of 96 patients who underwent either primary (less than 3 months of age) or secondary surgical intervention for neonatal brachial plexus palsy found that there were significant improvements in shoulder function. Reconstruction of both axillary and suprascapular nerves yielded improved outcomes of shoulder abduction and external rotation, whereas the rerouting of latissimus dorsi or teres major tendons and lengthening of the extra-articular tendons significantly improved global shoulder function (170).

Neurolysis. Neurolysis involves the release of the nerves from adhesions and inflammation. Some studies suggest that neurolysis is an inferior technique compared to resection of the neuroma and nerve grafting methods (98; 104). However, other studies suggest that neurolysis may be beneficial in cases that only involve the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus rather than the total plexus (35; 32; 50; 69). Chuang and colleagues advocate neurolysis should be done to determine the extent of scarring and the severity of the nerve lesion. Less severe lesions would require only neurolysis as treatment where significant scarring warrants resection of the neuroma and nerve grafting (33). Laurent and Lee proposed that neurolysis should not be used when intraoperative electrophysiological recordings show greater than 50% drop in the amplitude of the muscle action potential; rather, neuroma resection is indicated (102).

Resection of neuroma in continuity. Another surgical treatment is total resection of the neuroma in continuity with nerve graft interposition rather than neurolysis. One concern is that resection of a neuroma in continuity would diminish motor function as a result of a loss of nerve fibers that cross the neuroma; however, aggressive resection has not been found to result in significant motor loss (28). As stated earlier, some surgeons rely on electrodiagnostic recordings to guide their approach to the repair whereas others’ standard of care uses the resection of the neuroma with nerve grafting alone (66). Once resection of the neuroma has taken place, nerve grafts are used to bridge proximal and distal nerve stumps to guide growing axons using usually autologous sural nerve grafts (107).

Cable grafting. Cable grafting utilizes sutures or glue to join nerve strands in order to produce a graft with the same diameter as the recipient nerve. This technique has not been extensively used in obstetric brachial plexus palsy (145).

Nerve transfer. Nerve transfer procedures involve coapting a nerve from outside (extraplexal) or inside (intraplexal) of the brachial plexus to a denervated brachial plexus nerve (123). This procedure is becoming more commonly used and is advantageous because only one interface is used as compared to the nerve graft where one has to connect two stumps (72). ‘‘Terminal nerve transfers’’ refers to the complete transection of the terminal portion of a donor nerve whereas “end to side nerve transfers” utilizes fascicles of the donor nerve and preserves the terminal portion of the donor nerve (123). Common donor nerves include the spinal accessory, medial pectoral nerves, intercostal nerves, contralateral C7, hypoglossal, and ulnar nerve fascicles (123; 72; 107). Recipient nerves may include the terminal branches of the axillary, radial, median, and musculocutaneous nerve as well as the suprascapular nerve (123). In the past, nerve transfers were used to improve rotator cuff and bicep function, but now studies are looking at elbow flexion and hand function (72). Transfer of an ulnar fascicle to the biceps branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin transfer) provides greater early recovery of forearm supination compared with nerve grafting, with equivalent elbow flexion recovery (29).

Muscle transfer. Free muscle transportation is useful to restore elbow flexion and motor function of the fingers and wrist to attempt to restore prehension or grasping (42; 182). Previously, donor muscles used for reconstruction were the latissimus dorsi, gracilis and rectus femoris muscles. However, the best donor muscle is the gracilis muscle because the others are not as successful for improvement of finger function (42; 152). Neurotization of the free muscle transfer includes the use the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve and the third to sixth intercostal nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve or the median nerve (42; 33). Also, some studies have demonstrated successful use of the contralateral C7 nerve root to restore extensor digitorum communis function (31; 182).

Botulinum toxin: Botulinum toxin type A may be used off-label as an adjuvant to physical therapy and surgery in moderate to severe obstetric brachial plexus palsy (60); ultrasound-guided injection may increase effectiveness and reduce adverse effects (60).

Media

References

01: Abazi N, Murtezani A, Ibraimi Z, Këpuska AB, Berisha A. Epidemiology of brachial plexus palsy in newborns. Paediatrics Today 2014;10(2):129-34.
02: Aberg K, Norman M, Pettersson K, Ekéus C. Vacuum extraction in fetal macrosomia and risk of neonatal complications: a population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95(10):1089-96. PMID 27472147
03: Abzug JM, Kozin SH. Current concepts: neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Orthopedics 2010;33(6):430-5. PMID 20806753
04: Alabau-Rodriguez S, Romero-Larrauri P, Soldado F. Glenohumeral abduction contractures after residual neonatal brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2022;47(3):243-7. PMID 34521296
05: Alfonso DT. Causes of neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2011;69(1):11-6. PMID 21332434
06: Al-Qattan MM. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy associated with breech delivery. Ann Plast Surg 2003;51(3):257-65. PMID 12966236
07: Al-Qattan MM, Clarke HM, Curtis CG. The prognostic value of concurrent phrenic nerve palsy in newborn children with Erb's palsy. J Hand Surg Br 1998;23(2):225. PMID 9607664
08: Al-Qattan MM, El-Sayed AA. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: the mallet grading system for shoulder function--revisited. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:398121. PMID 24527447
09: al-Qattan MM, el-Sayed AA, al-Kharfy TM, al-Jurayyan NA. Obstetrical brachial plexus injury in newborn babies delivered by caesarean section. J Hand Surg Br 1996;21(2):263-5. PMID 8732415
10: Al-Qattan MM, El-Sayed AA, Al-Zahrani AY, et al. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a comparison of affected infants delivered vaginally by breech or cephalic presentation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2010;35(5):366-9. PMID 20031999
11: Ashwal E, Berezowsky A, Orbach-Zinger S, et al. Birthweight thresholds for increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity following vaginal delivery: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;298(6):1123-9. PMID 30291484
12: Avram CM, Garg B, Skeith AE, Caughey AB. Maternal body-mass-index and neonatal brachial plexus palsy in a California cohort. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35(25):6953-60. PMID 34096464
13: Azouz EM, Oudjhane K. Disorders of the upper extremity in children. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6(3):677-95. PMID 9654591
14: Backe B, Magnussen EB, Johansen OJ, Sellaeg G, Russwurm H. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a birth injury not explained by the known risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87(10):1027-32. PMID 18798052
15: Bahm J, Ocampo-Pavez C, Noaman H. Microsurgical technique in obstetric brachial plexus repair: a personal experience in 200 cases over 10 years. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2007;2:1. PMID 17214900
16: Ballock RT, Song KM. The prevalence of nonmuscular causes of torticollis in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16(4):500-4. PMID 8784706
17: Bar J, Dvir A, Hod M, Orvieto R, Merlob P, Neri A. Brachial plexus injury and obstetrical risk factors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;73(1):21-5. PMID 11336717
18: Bauer AS, Shen PY, Nidecker AE, Lee PS, James MA. Neonatal magnetic resonance imaging without sedation correlates with injury severity in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Hand Surg Am 2017;42(5):335-43. PMID 28328741
19: Bennett BB. Shoulder dystocia: an obstetric emergency. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999;26(3):445-58, viii. PMID 10472064
20: Bogousslavsky I. The Klumpke family--memories by Doctor Dèjerine, born Augusta Klumpke. Eur Neurol 2005;53(3):113-20. PMID 15860915
21: Bogousslavsky I. The Swiss connection of Augusta Dèjerine- Klumpke. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 2011;162:37-41.
22: Brody IA, Wilkins RH. Erb's palsy. Arch Neurol 1969;21(4):442-4. PMID 4898021
23: Brucker J, Laurent JP, Lee R, et al. Brachial plexus birth injury. J Neurosci Nurs 1991;23(6):374-80. PMID 1839546
24: Buitenhuis SM, Pondaag W, Wolterbeek R, Malessy MJ. Sensibility of the hand in children with conservatively or surgically treated upper neonatal brachial plexus lesion. Pediatr Neurol 2018;86:57-62. PMID 30077550
25: Buitenhuis SM, Pondaag W, Wolterbeek R, Malessy MJA. Tactile perception of the hand in children with an upper neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023;104(6):872-7. PMID 36535418
26: Camus M, Lefebvre G, Veron P, Darbois Y. Obstetrical injuries of the newborn infant. Retrospective study apropos of 20,409 births [Article in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1985;14(8):1033-43. PMID 3833902
27: Camus M, Vauthier D, Lefebvre G, Veron P, Darbois Y. Retrospective study of 33 cases of obstetric paralysis of the brachial plexus [Article in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1988;17(2):220-8. PMID 3385158
28: Capek L, Clarke HM, Curtis CG. Neuroma-in-continuity resection: early outcome in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(5):1555-64. PMID 9774011
29: Chang KW, Wilson TJ, Popadich M, Brown SH, Chung KC, Yang LJ. Oberlin transfer compared with nerve grafting for improving early supination in neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018;21(2):178-84. PMID 29219789
30: Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Scardo JA, Berghella V. A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18(4):211-20. PMID 16318969
31: Chen L, Gu YD, Hu SN, Xu JG, Xu L, Fu Y. Contralateral C7 transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsions in children - a report of 12 cases. J Hand Surg Am 2007;32(1):96-103. PMID 17218182
32: Chin KF, Di Mascio L, Holmes K, Misra VP, Sinisi MM. The value of preoperative and intraoperative electromyography in the management of obstetric brachial plexus injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010;6(6):595-9. PMID 21121738
33: Chuang DC, Mardini S, Ma HS. Surgical strategy for infant obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: experiences at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116(1):132-42; discussion 143-4. PMID 15988259
34: Clark LP, Taylor AS, Prout TP. A study in brachial birth palsy. Am J Med Sci 1905;130:670-707.
35: Clarke HM, Al-Qattan MM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM. Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: results following neurolysis of conducting neuromas-in-continuity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97(5):974-82; discussion 983-4. PMID 8619001
36: de Vries TS, Koens BL, Vos A. Surgical treatment of diaphragmatic eventration caused by phrenic nerve injury in the newborn. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33(4):602-5. PMID 9574760
37: DeDeugd CM, Shin AY, Shaughnessy WJ. Derotational pronation-producing osteotomy of the radius and biceps tendon rerouting for supination contractures in neonatal brachial plexus palsy patients. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2018;22(1):10-4. PMID 29369125
38: DeFrancesco CJ, Shah DK, Rogers BH, Shah AS. The epidemiology of brachial plexus birth palsy in the United States: declining incidence and evolving risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop 2019;39(2):e134-40. PMID 29016426
39: Dodd JM, Catcheside B, Scheil W. Can shoulder dystocia be reliably predicted. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;52(3):248-52. PMID 22428758
40: Dodd M, Lindqvist PG. Antenatal awareness and obstetric outcomes in large fetuses: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021;256:314-9. PMID 33264690
41: Dodds SD, Wolfe SW. Perinatal brachial plexus palsy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2000;12(1):40-7. PMID 10676773
42: Doi K. Palliative surgery: free muscle transfers. In: Gilbert A, editor. Brachial Plexus Injuries. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd, 2001:137-50.
43: Donnelly V, Foran A, Murphy J, McParland P, Keane D, O'Herlihy C. Neonatal brachial plexus palsy: an unpredictable injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(5):1209-12. PMID 12439505
44: Doty MS, Chauhan SP, Chang KW, et al. Persistence and extent of neonatal brachial plexus palsy: association with number of maneuvers and duration of shoulder dystocia. AJP Rep 2020;10(1):e42-8. PMID 32140291
45: Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S. Are all brachial plexus injuries caused by shoulder dystocia? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009;64(9):615-23. PMID 19691859
46: Duchenne (de Boulogne) GB. Paralysies obstétricales infantiles des membres supérieurs avec ou sans fractures, luxations ou autres complications. In: De l'électrisation localisée et de son application à la physiologie, à la pathologie et à la thérapeutique par courants induits et par courants galvaniques interrompus et continus. Paris: J B Baillière, 1872:353-67.
47: Duchenne GB. Album de photographies pathologiques complémentaire du livre intitulé de l'électrisation localisée. Paris: JB Baillière et fils, 1862.
48: Dunn DW, Engle WA. Brachial plexus palsy: intrauterine onset. Pediatr Neurol 1985;1(6):367-9. PMID 3880422
49: Eldridge B, Alexander N, McCombe D. Recommendations for management of neonatal brachial plexus palsy: Based on clinical review. J Hand Ther 2020;33(3):281-7.e1. PMID 32151504
50: El-Gammal TA, El-Sayed A, Kotb MM, et al. Total obstetric brachial plexus palsy: results and strategy of microsurgical reconstruction. Microsurgery 2010;30(3):169-78. PMID 20049908
51: Ellis H. Augusta Klumpke (1859-1927). J Neurol 2010;257:1765-6.
52: Elmas B, Ercan N, Ersak DT, et al. Risk factors for brachial plexus injury and permanent sequelae due to shoulder dystocia. Niger J Clin Pract 2022;25(12):2016-23. PMID 36537460
53: El-Sayed AA. The prognostic value of concurrent Horner syndrome in extended Erb obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Child Neurol 2014a;29(10):1356-9. PMID 24453157
54: El-Sayed AA. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy following routine versus difficult deliveries. J Child Neurol 2014b;29(7):920-3. PMID 23864589
55: Eng GD. Brachial plexus palsy in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1971;48(1):18-28. PMID 5314897
56: Fieux G. De la pathologie des paralysies obstétricales chez le nouveau-né. Paralysies obstétricales. Annales de Gynécolologie et d’Obstétrique 1897;47:52-64.
57: Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Foad MB, Lippert WC. Prognosis following neonatal brachial plexus palsy: an evidence-based review. J Child Orthop 2009;3(6):459-63. PMID 19885693
58: Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Ying J. The epidemiology of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(6):1258-64. PMID 18519319
59: Freeman MD, Goodyear SM, Leith WM. A multistate population-based analysis of linked maternal and neonatal discharge records to identify risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus injury. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136(3):331-6. PMID 28099684
60: Garcia Ron A, Gallardo R, Huete Hernani B. Utility of ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin type A for muscle imbalance in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy: description of the procedure and action protocol. Neurologia 2019;34(4):215-23. PMID 28347577
61: Geutjens G, Gilbert A, Helsen K. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy associated with breech delivery. A different pattern of injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78(2):303-6. PMID 8666647
62: Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195(3):657-72. PMID 16949396
63: Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Ouzounian JG, Miller DA, Paul RH. Brachial plexus palsy associated with cesarean section: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(5):1162-4. PMID 9396913
64: Gilbert A, Pivato G. Obstetrical palsy the French contribution. Sem Plastic Surg 2005;19:5-16.
65: Gilbert A, Pivato G, Kheiralla T. Long-term results of primary repair of brachial plexus lesions in children. Microsurgery 2006;26(4):334-42. PMID 16634084
66: Gilbert A, Whitaker I. Obstetrical brachial plexus lesions. J Hand Surg Br 1991;16(5):489-91. PMID 1791356
67: Girard AO, Suresh V, Lopez CD, et al. Radiographic imaging modalities for perinatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Childs Nerv Syst 2022;38(7):1241-58. PMID 35536348
68: Gkiatas I, Kostas-Agnantis I, Batistatou A, et al. Neonatal brachial plexus injuries and their impact on growing bone. An experimental study. Injury 2020;S0020-1383(20):30192-3. PMID 32122625
69: Gosk J, Rutowski R, Urban M, Wiącek R, Mazurek P, Wnukiewicz W. Neurolysis of the conducting neuroma-in-continuity in perinatal brachial plexus palsy - evaluation of the results of surgical treatment. Folia Neuropathol 2011;49(3):197-203. PMID 22101953
70: Gosk J, Wnukiewicz W, Urban M. The effect of perinatal brachial plexus lesion on upper limb development. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:116. PMID 24694070
71: Habek D, Prka M, Luetić AT, Marton I, Medić F, Miletić AI. Obstetrics injuries during shoulder dystocia in a tertiary perinatal center. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022;278:33-7. PMID 36113284
72: Hale HB, Bae DS, Waters PM. Current concepts in the management of brachial plexus birth palsy. J Hand Surg Am 2010;35(2):322-31. PMID 20141905
73: Hamdi NB, Doubi M, Abalkhail TB, Mortada H. Clinical and psychosocial outcomes following correction of supination deformity in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy patients: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022;23(1):808. PMID 36002839
74: Hankins GD, Clark SL. Brachial plexus palsy involving the posterior shoulder at spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am J Perinatol 1995;12(1):44-5. PMID 7710576
75: Hardie CM, Bourke G, Salt E, et al. Demographics and deprivation in obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a retrospective cohort study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024;49(5):570-5. PMID 37694876
76: Harpold TL, McComb JG, Levy ML. (1998). Neonatal neurosurgical trauma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1998;9(1):141-54. PMID 9405771
77: Hems TEJ, Savaridas T, Sherlock DA. The natural history of recovery of elbow flexion after obstetric brachial plexus injury managed without nerve repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017;42(7):706-9. PMID 28627963
78: Herbst A, Thorngren-Jerneck K. Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80(8):731-7. PMID 11531616
79: Hervey-Jumper SL, Justice D, Vanaman MM, Nelson VS, Yang LJ. Torticollis associated with neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Pediatr Neurol 2011;45(5):305-10. PMID 22000310
80: Hoeksma AF, ter Steeg AM, Nelissen RG, van Ouwerkerk WJ, Lankhorst GJ, de Jong BA. Neurological recovery in obstetric brachial plexus injuries: an historical cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46(2):76-83. PMID 14974631
81: Hoffman MK, Bailit JL, Branch DW, et al. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(6):1272-8. PMID 21555962
82: Hogendoorn S, van Overvest KL, Watt I, Duijsens AH, Nelissen RG. Structural changes in muscle and glenohumeral joint deformity in neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(4):935-42. PMID 20360518
83: Hughes CA, Harley EH, Milmoe G, Bala R, Martorella A. Birth trauma in the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125(2):193-9. PMID 10037286
84: Jambrina-Abasolo U, Hutanu D, Gonzalez-Morgado D, Blasco-Casado F, Rojas-Neira J, Soldado F. Shoulder extension impairment with residual neonatal brachial plexus injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023;32(10):2082-8. PMID 37178959
85: Jaufuraully S, Narasimhan AL, Stott D, Attilakos G, Siassakos D. A systematic review of brachial plexus injuries after caesarean birth: challenging delivery? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023;23(1):361. PMID 37198580
86: Jay V. On a historical note: Duchenne of Boulogne. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1998;1(3):254-5. PMID 10463286
87: Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ, Kreinick CJ. Brachial plexus palsy: an old problem revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166(6 Pt 1):1673-6. PMID 1309174
88: Jevitt CM. Shoulder dystocia: etiology, common risk factors, and management. J Midwifery Womens Health 2005;50(6):485-97. PMID 16260363
89: Jevitt CM, Morse S, O'Donnell YS. Shoulder dystocia: nursing prevention and posttrauma care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2008;22(1):14-20. PMID 18287897
90: Johnson GJ, Denning S, Clark SL, Davidson C. Pathophysiologic origins of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 2020;136(4):725-30. PMID 32925630
91: Julka A, Vander Have KL. Shoulder sequelae of neonatal brachial plexus injuries: orthopedic assessment and management. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2011;4(2):131-40. PMID 21955971
92: Katzenstein M. A child with Erb Palsy depicted in art. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1996;35(7):381. PMID 8829013
93: Kekki M, Koukkula T, Salonen A, et al. Birth injury in breech delivery: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Finland. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023;308(4):1139-50. PMID 36074174
94: Kennedy R. Suture of the brachial plexus in birth paralysis of the upper extremity. Br Med J 1903;1(2197):298-301. PMID 20760684
95: Klumpke A. Klumpke's paralysis. 1885. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;(368):3-4. PMID 10613147
96: Koenigsberger MR. Brachial plexus palsy at birth: intrauterine or due to delivery trauma? Ann Neurol 1980;8:228.
97: Kolderup LB, Laros RK, Musci TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(1):37-41. PMID 9240580
98: Konig RW, Antoniadis G, Börm W, Richter HP, Kretschmer T. Role of intraoperative neurophysiology in primary surgery for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP). Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22(7):710-4. PMID 16453110
99: Koplik H. The diseases of infancy and childhood. New York and Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1910.
100: Lagerkvist AL, Johansson U, Johansson A, Bager B, Uvebrant P. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a prospective, population-based study of incidence, recovery, and residual impairment at 18 months of age. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52(6):529-34. PMID 20041937
101: Lanska MJ, Roessmann U, Wiznitzer M. Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cord birth injury. Pediatrics 1990;85(5):760-4. PMID 2330237
102: Laurent JP, Lee RT. Birth-related upper brachial plexus injuries in infants: operative and nonoperative approaches. J Child Neurol 1994;9(2):111-7; discussion 118. PMID 8006360
103: Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SS, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Lao TT. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG 2011;118(8):985-90. PMID 21481159
104: Lin JC, Schwentker-Colizza A, Curtis CG, Clarke HM. Final results of grafting versus neurolysis in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123(3):939-48. PMID 19319058
105: Lombard A, Bachy M, Fitoussi F. C5-8 neonatal brachial plexus palsy: operative findings, reconstructive strategy and outcome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020;45(8):798-804. PMID 32000570
106: Malessy MJ, Pondaag W. Obstetric brachial plexus injuries. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2009;20(1):1-14, v. PMID 19064174
107: Malessy MJ, Pondaag W. Nerve surgery for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2011;4(2):141-8. PMID 21955972
108: Malessy MJ, Pondaag W, van Dijk JG. Electromyography, nerve action potential, and compound motor action potentials in obstetric brachial plexus lesions: validation in the absence of a "gold standard”. Neurosurgery 2009;65(4 Suppl):A153-9. PMID 19927061
109: McAbee GN, Ciervo C. Medical and legal issues related to brachial plexus injuries in neonates. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2006;106(4):209-12. PMID 16627776
110: McBride MT, Hennrikus WL, Mologne TS. Newborn clavicle fractures. Orthopedics 1998;21(3):317-9; discussion 319-20. PMID 9547816
111: McClintock AH, editor. Smellie’s treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery. Vol 2. London New Sydenham Society, 1877:365.
112: McFarland LV, Raskin M, Daling JR, Benedetti TJ. Erb/Duchenne's palsy: a consequence of fetal macrosomia and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68(6):784-8. PMID 3785790
113: Medeiros DL, Agostinho NB, Mochizuki L, Oliveira AS. Quality of life and upper limb function of children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Rev Paul Pediatr 2020;38:e2018304. PMID 32159646
114: Mollberg M, Hagberg H, Bager B, Lilja H, Ladfors L. High birthweight and shoulder dystocia: the strongest risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy in a Swedish population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84(7):654-9. PMID 15954875
115: Mollberg M, Ladfors LV, Strömbeck C, Elden H, Ladfors L. Increased incidence of shoulder dystocia but a declining incidence of obstetric brachial plexus palsy in vaginally delivered infants. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023;102(1):76-81. PMID 36345990
116: Muhlestein WE, Chang KW, Justice D, et al. Recovery of shoulder, elbow, and forearm movement after nerve reconstruction for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Neurosurgery 2024b;94(1):193-201. PMID 37850933
117: Muhlestein WE, Smith BW, Chang KW, et al. Early referral to multidisciplinary specialty centers to optimize outcomes in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2024a;66(1):117-24. PMID 37246332
118: Muthukumar N, Santhanakrishnan AG, Sivakumar K. Arachnoid cyst masquerading as obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;10(1):62-3. PMID 22681321
119: Nath RK, Benyahia M, Somasundaram C. Finger movement at birth in brachial plexus birth palsy. World J Orthop 2013;4(1):24-8. PMID 23362472
120: Nath RK, Boutros SG, Somasundaram C. Restoration of elbow flexion in patients with complete traumatic and obstetric brachial plexus injury after functional free gracilis muscle transfer: our experience and management. Eplasty 2017;17:e34. PMID 29213347
121: Navarro X, Vivó M, Valero-Cabré A. Neural plasticity after peripheral nerve injury and regeneration. Prog Neurobiol 2007;82(4):163-201. PMID 17643733
122: Noetzel MJ, Park TS, Robinson S, Kaufman B. Prospective study of recovery following neonatal brachial plexus injury. J Child Neurol 2001;16(7):488-92. PMID 11453444
123: Oberlin C, Durand S, Belheyar Z, Shafi M, David E, Asfazadourian H. Nerve transfers in brachial plexus palsies. Chir Main 2009;28(1):1-9. PMID 19162520
124: O'Grady KM, Power HA, Olson JL, et al. Comparing the efficacy of triple nerve transfers with nerve graft reconstruction in upper trunk obstetric brachial plexus injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140(4):747-56. PMID 28609352
125: Osorio M, Lewis S, Tse RW. Promoting recovery following birth brachial plexus palsy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2023;70(3):517-29. PMID 37121640
126: Ouzounian JG. Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Semin Perinatol 2014;38(4):219-21. PMID 24863028
127: Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Battista LR, Lee RH. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: analysis of incidence and risk factors. Am J Perinatol 2012;29(7):515-8. PMID 22495895
128: Ozkan T, Atakan A. Physical examination. In: Gilbert A. Brachial Plexus Injuries. London, Martin Dunitz, 2001.
129: Parent A. Duchenne de Boulogne: a pioneer in neurology and medical photography. Can J Neurol Sci 2005;32(3):369-77. PMID 16225184
130: Park T, Powers A. Birth Brachial Plexus Injury. In: Winn HR, editor. Youman's Neurological Surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2011:2192-8.
131: Peleg D, Hasnin J, Shalev E. Fractured clavicle and Erb's palsy unrelated to birth trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(5):1038-40. PMID 9396889
132: Peltier L. The classic: Klumpke’s paralysis: 1859-1927. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;368:3-4.
133: Piatt JH Jr. Birth injuries of the brachial plexus. Pediatr Clin North Am 2004;51(2):421-40. PMID 15062677
134: Pollack RN, Buchman AS, Yaffe H, Divon MY. Obstetrical brachial palsy: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43(2):236-46. PMID 10863623
135: Pondaag W, de Boer R, van Wijlen-Hempel MS, Hofstede-Buitenhuis SM, Malessy MJ. External rotation as a result of suprascapular nerve neurotization in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3):530-7; discussion 530-7. PMID 16145533
136: Pondaag W, Malessy MJ. Recovery of hand function following nerve grafting and transfer in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg 2006;105(1 Suppl):33-40. PMID 16871868
137: Pondaag W, Malessy MJ. The evidence for nerve repair in obstetric brachial plexus palsy revisited. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:434619. PMID 24551845
138: Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, Thomeer RT. Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46(2):138-44. PMID 14974639
139: Ramachandran M, Aronson JK. The diagnosis of art: Albrecht Dürer and the Christ Child’s drooped shoulder. J R Soc Med 2008;101(2):87-8. PMID 22135841
140: Regnault N, Lebreton E, Tang L, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 695,912 deliveries in France in 2018. Diabetologia 2024;67(3):516-27. PMID 38182910
141: Rehm A, Thahir A. Letter regarding "Early electrodiagnosis in the management of neonatal brachial plexus palsy: A systematic review". Muscle Nerve 2020;62(4):E70-1. PMID 32567689
142: Reincke H, Nelson KR. Duchenne de Boulogne: electrodiagnosis of polyomyelitis. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:56-62. PMID 2183045
143: Rondot P. G B A Douchenne de Bolougne (1806-1875). J Neurol 2005;252(7):866-7. PMID 15999235
144: Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276(18):1480-6. PMID 8903259
145: Samardzic MM, Rasulic LG, Grujicic DM. Results of cable graft technique in repair of large nerve trunk lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(11):1177-82. PMID 9870065
146: Saravolac V. Images from antiquity: Erb's palsy-pathologic entity or artist's impression? Ann Plast Surg 2010;65(3):275-6. PMID 20733358
147: Schmitt C, Mehlman CT, Meiss AL. Hyphenated history: Erb-Duchenne brachial plexus palsy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2008;37(7):356-8. PMID 18795182
148: Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. Pathogenesis and management of deformities of the elbow, wrist, and hand in late neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2011;4(2):119-30. PMID 21955970
149: Seddon HJ. A Classification of Nerve Injuries. Br Med J 1942;2(4260):237-9. PMID 20784403
150: Shelton DC. The Emperor's new clothes. J R Soc Med 2010;103(2):46-50. PMID 20118333
151: Shenaq SM, Berzin E, Lee R, Laurent JP, Nath R, Nelson MR. Brachial plexus birth injuries and current management. Clin Plast Surg 1998;25(4):527-36. PMID 9917972
152: Shenaq SM, Kim JY, Armenta AH, Nath RK, Cheng E, Jedrysiak A. The Surgical Treatment of Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113(4):54E-67E. PMID 15083009
153: Shoja MM, Tubbs RS. Augusta Dèjerine-Klumpke: the first female neuroanatomist. Clin Anat 2007;20(6):585-7. PMID 17330887
154: Sibiński M, Synder M. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy--risk factors and predictors. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007;9(6):569-76. PMID 18227748
155: Simon L, Perreaux F, Devictor D, Millotte B, Husson B, Waguet J. Clinical and radiological diagnosis of spinal cord birth injury. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;81(3):F235-6. PMID 10733283
156: Siqueira MG, Heise CO, Martins RS, Zaccariotto M, Pessa M, Sterman-Neto H. Hand function outcomes following surgical treatment of complete neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Childs Nerv Syst 2024;40(5):1455-9. PMID 38183435
157: Siqueira MG, Heise CO, Martins RS. Surgical treatment of birth-related brachial plexus injuries: a historical review. Childs Nerv Syst 2020;36(9):1859-68. PMID 32468240
158: Smellie W. A sett of anatomical tables, with explanations, and an abridgment, of the practice of midwifery. London: [s.n.], 1754a.
159: Smellie W. A treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery, to which is added, a set of anatomical plates, exhibiting the various cases that occur in practice, accurately engraved, with explanations. London: Alexander Cleugh and M Watson, 1790.
160: Smellie W. Traité de la theorie et pratique des accouchemens / Trad. de l'Anglois de M. Smellie, D.M. / par M. de Preville, M. / Auquel on a joint le secret de Rooenhuisen, / dans l'art d'accoucher, trad. du Holl. Paris: chez Delaguette, 1754b.
161: Smellie W. A collection of cases and observations in midwifery. Volume 2 [of A treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery]. Third edition. London: D Wilson, 1764:506-9.
162: Smellie W. A set of anatomical tables, with explanations, and an abridgement of the practice of midwifery, with a view to illustrate a treatise on that subject, and collection of cases. Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas, 1793.
163: Smith BW, Daunter AK, Yang LJ, Wilson TJ. An update on the management of neonatal brachial plexus palsy-replacing old paradigms: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2018;172(6):585-91. PMID 29710183
164: Sokol RJ, Blackwell SC; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin: Shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;80(1):87-92. PMID 12578001
165: Soni AL, Mir NA, Kishan J, Faquih AM, Elzouki AY. Brachial plexus injuries in babies born in hospital: an appraisal of risk factors in a developing country. Ann Trop Paediatr 1985;5(2):69-71. PMID 2409908
166: Stojcevic-Polovina M. Risk factors in infants with paresis of the brachial plexus. Acta Med Iugosl 1986;40(1):3-14. PMID 3962725
167: Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain 1951;74(4):491-516. PMID 14895767
168: Tada K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H. Birth palsy: natural recovery course and combined root avulsion. J Pediatr Orthop 1984;4(3):279-84. PMID 6736230
169: Taylor AS, Prout TP. Results from the surgical treatment of brachial birth palsy: with a note on the pathology. JAMA 1907;48(2):96-104.
170: Terzis JK, Kokkalis ZT. Primary and secondary shoulder reconstruction in obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Injury 2008;39 Suppl 3:S5-14. PMID 18684457
171: Terzis JK, Kokkalis ZT. Elbow flexion after primary reconstruction in obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009;34(4):449-58. PMID 19587070
172: Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44(3):380-9. PMID 22279269
173: Thatte MR, Nayak NS. Prospective study comparing outcomes of primary intraplexal repair versus distal nerve transfers in Narakas grade I birth brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024;49(5):591-5. PMID 37747709
174: Thomas JJ. Two cases of bilateral birth paralysis of the lower-arm type. Boston Med Surg J 1905;153(16):431-6.
175: Ubachs JM, Slooff AC, Peeters LL. Obstetric antecedents of surgically treated obstetric brachial plexus injuries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102(10):813-7. PMID 7547739
176: Vakhshori V, Bouz GJ, Alluri RK, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A, Lightdale N. Risk factors associated with neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States. J Pediatr Orthop B 2020;29(4):392-8. PMID 31856038
177: van der Holst M, Groot J, Steenbeek D, Pondaag W, Nelissen RG, Vliet Vlieland TP. Participation restrictions among adolescents and adults with neonatal brachial plexus palsy: the patient perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2018;40(26):3147-55. PMID 28944700
178: Vanderhave KL, Bovid K, Alpert H, et al. Utility of electrodiagnostic testing and computed tomography myelography in the preoperative evaluation of neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;9(3):283-9. PMID 22380957
179: van der Looven R, Le Roy L, Tanghe E, et al. Early electrodiagnosis in the management of neonatal brachial plexus palsy: A systematic review. Muscle Nerve 2020a;61(5):557-66. PMID 31743456
180: van der Looven R, Le Roy L, Tanghe E, et al. Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2020b;62(6):673-83. PMID 31670385
181: van der Looven R, Pitt M. Response to the "letter to editor": critical appraisal of systematic review. Muscle Nerve 2020;62(4):E72-3. PMID 32572968
182: Vekris MD, Lykissas MG, Beris AE, Manoudis G, Vekris AD, Soucacos PN. Management of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy with early plexus microreconstruction and late muscle transfers. Microsurgery 2008;28(4):252-61. PMID 18381657
183: Volpe J. Perinatal Trauma. Neurology of the Newborn. Philadelphia: WB Sanders Company, 2001.
184: Watt AJ, Niederbichler AD, Yang LJ, Chung KC. Wilhelm Heinrich Erb, M.D. (1840 to 1921): a historical perspective on Erb’s palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119(7):2161-6. PMID 17519716
185: Wilson TJ, Chang KW, Yang LJ. Prediction algorithm for surgical intervention in neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Neurosurgery 2018;82(3):335-42. PMID 28419287
186: Wittenberg KH, Adkins MC. MR imaging of nontraumatic brachial plexopathies: frequency and spectrum of findings. Radiographics 2000;20(4):1023-32. PMID 10903692
187: Yenigul AE, Yenigül NN, Başer E, Özelçi R. A retrospective analysis of risk factors for clavicle fractures in newborns with shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury: a single-center experience. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2020;54(6):609-13. PMID 33423993
188: Yildirim FB, Sarikcioglu L. Augusta Dèjerine-Klumpke (1859-1927) and her eponym. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79(1):102. PMID 18079304
189: Yoshida K, Kawabata H. The prognostic value of concurrent phrenic nerve palsy in newborn babies with neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40(6):1166-9. PMID 25804363
190: Yoshida K, Kawabata H. The prognostic value of concurrent Horner syndrome in surgical decision making at 3 months in total-type neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018;43(6):609-12. PMID 29747529
191: Zancolli EA, Zancolli ER Jr. Palliative surgical procedures in sequelae of obstetric palsy. Hand Clin 1988;4(4):643-69. PMID 2469689

Contributors

All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.

Author

Douglas J Lanska MD MS MSPH

Dr. Lanska of the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and the Medical College of Wisconsin has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile

Former Authors

Dilip M Purohit MD
John B Cahill MD
June Yowtak MD PhD
Asiya Khan Shakir MD
Ian Heger MD

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125

Brachial plexus palsy in neonates

Differential Diagnosis

cerebral injury
cervical spine injury
trauma
dislocation of the upper extremity
hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy
- arachnoid cyst

Also Relevant

Brachial neuritis
Brachial plexus injuries
Hereditary neuropathy with predisposition to pressure palsy
Horner syndrome
Peripheral nerve injuries
- Suprascapular neuropathy

Brachial plexus palsy in neonates …

Brachial plexus palsy in neonates

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Prognosis and complications

Clinical vignette

Biological basis

Anatomic localization

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic workup

Management

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Former Authors

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

NF2-related schwannomatosis

Breath-holding spells

Acute cerebellar ataxia in children

Headache in children: overview and treatment approaches

Alternating hemiplegia of childhood

Pyridoxine/P5P-dependent developmental epileptic encephalopathy

Zika virus: neurologic complications

Cerebral edema in childhood

Brachial plexus palsy in neonates

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Prognosis and complications

Clinical vignette

Biological basis

Anatomic localization

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic workup

Management

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Former Authors

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview. Start a Free Account to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

NF2-related schwannomatosis

Breath-holding spells

Acute cerebellar ataxia in children

Headache in children: overview and treatment approaches

Alternating hemiplegia of childhood

Pyridoxine/P5P-dependent developmental epileptic encephalopathy

Zika virus: neurologic complications

Cerebral edema in childhood

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.