Developmental Malformations
X-linked hydrocephalus (L1 syndrome)
Dec. 12, 2024
Worddefinition
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas.
Craniosynostosis
- Updated 05.25.2019
- Released 10.01.1998
- Expires For CME 05.25.2022
Craniosynostosis
Introduction
Overview
Craniosynostosis, the premature closure of cranial sutures, has been known to exist for centuries, but modern surgical management has only emerged and evolved over the past 100 years. Genetic findings have shed light in the pathophysiology of this disorder. In this article, the authors discuss the early descriptions of craniosynostosis, its molecular basis, and the evolution of its surgical treatment.
Key points
|
• Craniosynostosis is a condition characterized by the premature fusion of 1 or more of the cranial sutures. | |
|
• Its prevalence is 3 to 6 cases per 10,000 live births. | |
|
• It can be seen in normal individuals or as part of a multisystem syndrome. | |
|
• Genetic factors associated with it include mutations in EFNB1, EFNA4, MSX2, FGFR1-3, SHOC2, and TWIST1 genes. | |
|
• Surgical release of the affected suture is an effective way of correcting skull deformity and preventing mental retardation. Endoscopic techniques have been employed. |
Historical note and terminology
Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion or abnormal development of 1 or more cranial sutures. Although the disorder was known in antiquity (there is speculation that the Athenian leader, Pericles, had sagittal synostosis) (26), Sommering observed in 1791 that skull growth occurs along cranial sutures and that growth failure at a suture results in skull deformity (107). In 1851 Virchow described various types of craniosynostosis and observed that normal growth occurs perpendicular to cranial sutures and that compensatory growth in craniosynostosis occurs parallel to the closed suture (119). Craniosynostosis occurring as part of dysgenetic syndromes was first reported by Apert, who described oxycephaly with syndactyly in 1906, and Crouzon who described craniofacial dysostosis in 1912. A large number of named syndromes followed; attribution of primacy for reporting remains a subject of dispute (20). Surgical treatment for craniosynostosis was pioneered in the 1890s by Lannelongue and Lane, both of whom performed strip craniectomy to remove a synostosed suture. Initially, little distinction was made between congenital, primary craniosynostosis and microcephaly (31). Surgery for affected infants and children resulted in high mortality and poor results. The popularity of surgical repair plummeted after a scathing critique by Jacobi in 1894 (54), but revived in the 1930s with more careful case selection and the more extensive procedures of Bauer (04) and King (62).
Nomenclature in craniosynostosis is complicated by a number of classifications. Causation divides the group into primary and secondary craniosynostosis. Primary synostosis is intrinsic to a disease process that closes a suture before or soon after birth, forcing the skull to grow in abnormal directions. Secondary craniosynostosis occurs when arrest of brain growth or metabolic diseases fail to keep an otherwise normal suture(s) patent. Causes of secondary craniosynostosis include microcephaly, shunted hydrocephalus, amniotic band syndrome, positional flattening or modeling of the calvarium and rickets. There are forms of craniosynostosis that are part of an inherited syndrome and associated with a host of congenital anomalies. A few of the more than 100 recognized syndromic synostoses (18) are listed in Table 1. These syndromes usually involve multiple sutures, especially the coronal. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, an isolated birth defect, is usually sporadic. Anatomical classification systems are based on the sites of affected sutures and resultant head shapes.
Table 1. Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Examples
|
Name |
Associated findings |
Inheritance |
|
Crouzon disease |
Midface hypoplasia, exorbitism, hypertelorism |
Autosomal dominant |
|
Apert syndrome |
Same as Crouzon disease, plus syndactyly of all 4 limbs |
Autosomal dominant |
|
Pfeiffer syndrome |
Same as Crouzon disease, plus beaked nose, broad thumbs and great toes, may be syndactyly |
Autosomal dominant |
|
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome |
Facial asymmetry, strabismus, low hairline, variable syndactyly, normal thumbs and great toes |
Autosomal dominant |
|
Carpenter syndrome |
Mental deficiency, short stature, obesity, variable syndactyly, heart and limb defects |
Autosomal recessive |
|
Cloverleaf skull |
Can be associated with above syndromes, thanatophoric dysplasia |
Autosomal dominant |
|
Baller-Gerold syndrome |
Radial, carpal, and digital aplasia |
Autosomal recessive |
|
Antley-Bixler syndrome |
Same as Crouzon disease, plus choanal atresia and stenosis, multiple limb anomalies |
Autosomal recessive |
Clinical manifestations
Presentation and course
Characteristic changes in head shape reflect involvement of specific cranial sutures. Normal skull development initiates around day 23 to 26 of gestation. Craniosynostosis can be associated with over 130 different syndromes; however, most commonly present as a single abnormality (09). Over time, a bewildering number of names have been proposed to describe the anatomical consequences of this involvement.
Table 2 describes the common names and the responsible suture(s); the accompanying figures illustrate head shape (somewhat exaggerated).
Table 2. Craniosynostosis: Anatomical Classification
|
Involved suture |
Anatomical names (cephal = "head") |
|
Sagittal |
scaphocephaly (boat-shaped), dolichocephaly (long) |
|
Coronal (bilateral) |
brachycephaly (short) |
|
Coronal (unilateral) |
plagiocephaly (diagonal) |
|
Metopic |
trigonocephaly (triangle-shaped) |
|
Lambdoidal (bilateral) |
posterior or occipital brachycephaly |
|
Lambdoidal (unilateral) |
posterior or occipital plagiocephaly |
|
Multiple sutures* |
pansynostosis (all), oxycephaly (conical), acrocephaly (pointed), turricephaly or turmschadel (tower), cloverleaf skull or kleeblattschadel |
|
* = many anatomical variants | |
Because craniofacial bones grow as an integrated unit, most synostoses cause significant change in basicranial and midfacial bones. Metopic and coronal stenoses result in small anterior fossae; coronal stenosis produces shallow orbits; lambdoidal and bilateral coronal stenosis produce forward displacement of the petrous bone. Stenosis of the coronal suture as it continues as the sphenofrontal suture and the sphenoethmoidal suture affect the size of the nasopharynx and apposition of the epiglottis to the soft palate. Isolated sagittal synostosis, the most common, is rarely associated with deformity of the skull base or facial bones.
As the extent of craniosynostosis increases, the number of associated problems also increases. Prominent among these are ophthalmologic disorders, airway obstruction, and feeding difficulties. Refractive error is common in children with craniosynostosis because of alteration in shape of the globe and position of the eyes. In children with syndromic craniosynostosis amblyopia caused by strabismus, ametropia, or ptosis is also seen (47). Decreased central visual acuity and optic atrophy is less common, but may also occur (79).
Psychomotor retardation is uncommon in single suture synostosis (108; 60), although minor delays are frequently found with careful testing (102; 103). Sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is associated with a high prevalence (> 50%) of deficits in executive function, and research has depicted altered neocortical structural and functional connectivity in these patients (05). However, children with multiple suture closure exhibit developmental delays, particularly those with syndromic craniosynostosis (97). Although many syndromes involve congenital cerebral anomalies, there is evidence of progressive neurologic deterioration in some (27; 36; 58). The most likely explanation of such progressive impairment is cranial growth restriction and resultant increased intracranial pressure. Small crania and elevated intracranial pressure complicate 26% to 54% of multiple suture synostosis but also involve the occasional case of isolated suture closure (92). However, even children with unisutural synostosis may have asymptomatic intracranial hypertension (17). Hydrocephalus is also discovered in 12% or more of syndromic craniosynostosis (35; 40) but is uncommon in isolated suture synostosis (17). Syndromic craniosynostosis and cloverleaf skull may be further complicated by hindbrain herniation ("acquired Chiari malformation"), which may require separate decompressive surgery (16). Whether the herniation is purely the result of intracranial crowding or whether suboccipital bony deformities contribute has not been determined.
Prognosis and complications
Outcome should concentrate on 2 areas, the child's appearance and his or her neurologic development. The craniofacial deformity tends to increase with time and may stigmatize the affected child. Decompressive surgery is effective in limiting deformity (37), especially if done early in life.
Rapid brain growth and the flexible cranium allow the head to assume a more nearly-normal shape. There is wide variation of cosmetic outcomes among the different types of synostoses; this appears to be more a matter of the underlying deformities than surgical technique (28).
A more serious problem in children with multiple suture craniosynostosis is that of neurodevelopmental impairment, especially in those with syndromic forms. Once considered an integral part of various syndromes, impaired cognitive development is often the result of associated cerebral anomalies (97). However, there is evidence for progressive deterioration, both clinically (92) and on electrophysiological monitoring, in many of these children (27). In a national sample of 82 children with syndromic craniosynostosis, Maliepaard and colleagues found that the children had full scale IQs similar to the normative population but were at increased risk for development of intellectual disability, internalizing, and social and attention problems (69). Additionally, children with Apert syndrome had lower full scale IQs and children with Muenke syndrome had more social, attention, and inattention problems. There are often symptoms and signs of intracranial hypertension, which may lead to blindness. This suggests that increased intracranial pressure secondary to restricted brain growth and hydrocephalus (or other factors) may be a contributing factor. Indeed, early and aggressive cranial decompression has allowed relatively normal neurodevelopmental progress, even in some children with syndromes thought to be uniformly associated with mental retardation (95). However, restenosis, hydrocephalus, and even hindbrain herniation may occur despite surgical decompression (116). Treatment of hydrocephalus poses a difficult management issue because it can secondarily contribute to premature suture closure and growth arrest (113). Even children with successful surgery for single suture synostosis can develop craniosynostosis of multiple sutures and increased intracranial pressure; postoperative patients must be carefully followed (52). Early surgery does not assure normal cognitive development; children with early repair of sagittal or metopic synostosis do not score as well as controls at school age (120; 102; 103). However, early surgery improves developmental level (06). Additionally, early surgical reconstruction helps limit progressive deformity of the cranial base. Infants retain malleability in the skull leading to easier shaping (09). Early diagnosis and treatment are essential factors in preventing serious complications and improving long-term outcome (36; 58).
Clinical vignette
The full-term product of a normal pregnancy, labor, and delivery was noted to have a long, narrow head. There was no family history of craniocerebral deformities, and the child was neuroradiologically normal on examination. Skull radiographs and CT scans confirmed isolated synostosis of the sagittal suture. The deformity progressed, and at 6 weeks of age the child was admitted for surgery.
An extensive decompression of the skull was performed, with excision of the stenotic suture and enlargement of adjacent sutures down to the skull base.
Improvement in cranial appearance was rapid and has been maintained despite rapid regrowth of craniectomized bone.
Subsequent appearance and neurologic development are normal.
Biological basis
Etiology and pathogenesis
Primary synostoses may be divided into nonsyndromic and syndromic types. Most cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis are isolated and sporadic; however, a small percentage reflect autosomal dominant inheritance. Studies of nonsyndromic, midline synostoses among twins suggest both genetic and environmental components (64). Exome sequencing of 291 parent-offspring trios with midline nonsyndromic synostoses revealed 15 probands with heterozygous damaging de novo mutations in 12 negative regulators of Wnt, BMP, and Ras/ERK signaling. The findings in this study implicate new genetic involvement in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and demonstrate a relation in the pathophysiology of nonsyndromic and rare syndromic forms of craniosynostosis (117). Syndromic craniosynostosis, on the other hand, is usually inherited, again with occasional sporadic cases. The syndromes exhibit considerable genetic heterogeneity (82). Inheritance of several syndromes is listed in Table 1. Several chromosomal anomalies, apart from those associated with specific genetic mutations, are also associated with craniosynostosis. Genetic factors include mutations in EFNB1, EFNA4, MSX2, FGFR 1-3, SHOC2, and TWIST1 genes. Proteins encoded by these genes control the intramembranous ossification of the skull (77; 66). Primary craniosynostosis may also be a teratogenic effect of valproic acid, retinoic acid, cancer chemotherapy, or phenytoin (19; 39).
Secondary craniosynostosis results from premature closure of sutures; it occurs occasionally in children with microcephaly and rarely in children who have been shunted for hydrocephalus. Metabolic disorders such as hypophosphatemic rickets and hyperthyroidism may cause craniosynostosis. It is also an occasional finding in the mucopolysaccharidoses and mucolipidoses. Rarely, secondary craniosynostosis may result from marrow hyperplasia and osseous overgrowth in hematologic disorders, such as sickle cell anemia or the thalassemias (18). Amniotic band syndromes are associated with craniosynostosis, along with facial and cranial clefts, limb amputations, and other birth anomalies. Workers at the Centers for Disease Control have reported an association between fertility treatment and craniosynostosis (91).
Our present understanding of cranial morphogenesis is best approached historically. In the 19th century it was universally believed that the skull grew by apposition of new bone at the margins of cranial sutures. Sommering proposed that premature suture closure prevented normal skull growth perpendicular to the involved suture (107). Virchow added to this theory the idea of compensatory growth parallel to the closed suture (119). Some aspects of this hypothesis have been enlarged to explain the evolution of abnormal head shape in craniosynostosis. Normal closure of sutures varies between individuals; however, the metopic suture usually closes within the first 2 years of life. The sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid sutures close by 40 years of age, whereas the squamosal, occipitomastoid, and sphenotemporal sutures may remain partly open at age 70 years (24). However, the basic premise that skull growth occurs only at cranial sutures cannot be correct.
Furthermore, the calvarium consists of membranous bone, sandwiched between the outer dural layer (endocranium) and the pericranium. Calvarial growth occurs by a repetitive cycle of suture widening and ossification of enlarging membranous bones (32).
Moss presented an explanation of normal and abnormal skull growth that relied on biomechanical forces originating from the skull base (76). He proposed that dural bands, originating at the skull base, created growth vectors for the calvarium. Cranial sutures formed along these vectors kept patent by biomechanical forces. Interference with these vectors, usually the result of synchondrosis at the skull base, caused the affected suture to close prematurely. Transfer of force to adjacent growth sites completes the deformity.
However, investigations have cast doubt on the Moss hypothesis. Experimental closure of vault sutures can cause craniostenosis and facial deformities typical of the clinical syndromes (89). This reversal of the direction of influence undermines the idea of the skull base as the origin of changes. Local dura, rather than transmitted forces, seems to be most important in determining sutural patency (12) and the timing of suture closure (67). There is accumulating evidence that biomechanical forces do not play a major role in sutural growth and closure; these processes instead respond to complex cell signaling mechanisms (84; 01). It has long been presumed that restricted head growth is responsible for the associated intracranial hypertension and mental retardation. However, computer analysis of intracranial volumes over time suggests that skull constriction effects of synostosis dissipate over the first few months of life (100; 70; 78; 99). Furthermore, impaired venous drainage may play a larger and more durable role than previously suspected (115; 94; 43). Increased intracranial pressure is thought to result from restricted venous outflow, secondary to the obstruction of the skull base venous structures from alterations in the cranial vault (10; 113). A similar role has been implicated for upper airway obstruction and hydrocephalus (43; 114). The latter is an especially common finding in children with syndrome craniosynostosis, and it poses a significant management issue. CSF diversion, although beneficial for the treatment of hydrocephalus, may contribute to further fusion of the sutures and growth arrest for the cranial vault (43; 113).
Advances in molecular genetics have identified the importance of fibroblast growth factor receptors in the biology of syndromic craniosynostosis (122). Fibroblast growth factor receptors are tyrosine kinases that transduce signals from extracellular fibroblast growth factors into the cell. Mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 result in a spectrum of craniofacial abnormalities, including the syndromes of Crouzon, Pfeiffer, Apert, and Jackson-Weiss (109; 81; 13; 38). These mutations are associated with an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin production, which causes localized proliferation of osteoblastic cells and increased bone formation at the suture site (25). The fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene is located on chromosome 10q, whereas fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3, both of which have also been associated with autosomal dominant craniosynostosis, are located on chromosomes 8p and 4p, respectively. In children with Apert syndrome, 2 adjacent amino acid substitutions account for the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 abnormality. In other syndromes, mutations may be characterized by amino acid substitutions, deletions, insertions, or splice-site mutations. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutation has been implicated in some nonsyndromic cases (93). In addition to these genes for growth factor receptors, craniosynostosis may be associated with mutation of homeobox genes and genes involved in apoptosis (48), a process shown to be important in suture formation and maintenance (11). Identical mutations may produce different phenotypes, suggesting other, as yet undiscovered, genes are also involved (63).
Additionally, mutations in these genes and several others have been implicated in non-syndromic single suture craniosynostosis. In particular, TWIST1 has been associated with the development of single suture craniosynostosis (66). It is a transcriptional regulator of mesenchymal cell fate during skeletal development, inducing differentiation toward both the chondrogenic and the osteogenic lineages. In Drosophila, twist homozygous mutations disrupt embryo gastrulation and result in failure of mesodermal-derived organ development leading to complete eversion of the head. Genome wide screening for copy number variations and intense genomic resequencing allowed the identification of other previously unknown gene variants that can be associated with different single suture craniosynostosis types (73; 23).
Epidemiology
The incidence of craniosynostosis is estimated to be 1 in 2000 children (65), although the incidence of any of more than 100 syndromic craniosynostoses varies widely. It is estimated that Crouzon syndrome occurs once in 25,000 births, whereas Apert syndrome occurs once in 100,000 births. A craniosynostosis registry maintained for 3 years in Colorado revealed a birth prevalence of 14.1 per 10,000 live births (02).
The sagittal suture is the most commonly involved suture, constituting more than half of all craniosynostosis. Sagittal synostosis is rarely syndromic, and is more frequent in males by a ratio of 3:1 (53). Unilateral or bilateral involvement of the coronal suture is the next most common; however, the male:female ratio is 1:2 (65). Bilateral coronal synostosis is more frequently familial than unilateral synostosis, and it is often associated with involvement of other sutures. Metopic synostosis occurs in less than 10% of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. However, most series represent patients with clinically significant craniosynostosis. Lesser degrees of metopic stenosis may exhibit a palpable ridge and slight hypotelorism; this is probably the commonest craniosynostosis (104). Examination of portraits and the exhumed skull of the composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart confirms he had metopic synostosis (90). Progression of isolated, single suture synostosis to that of multiple sutures is uncommon.
Prevention
There appears to be an increased risk of craniosynostosis in the offspring of mothers who smoke or live at high altitude (03) and who take certain medications during pregnancy (19). Fetal ultrasound studies have identified syndromic (61; 106) and isolated (111) sutural synostosis early in pregnancy. Apert syndrome has been confirmed by molecular diagnosis of amniotic fluid (33). There is laboratory evidence that opening involved sutures in utero can minimize craniocerebral changes (112).
Differential diagnosis
In the neonate, craniosynostosis must be differentiated from modeling of the calvarium, which may be caused by abnormal intrauterine positioning or vaginal delivery. Premature infants may have dolichocephaly without sagittal synostosis (50). Many cultures practice infant head wrapping and molding, another source of confusion (34). Asymmetric skull growth may be found in children with chronic subdural hematomas, slowly growing brain tumors, and cerebral hemiatrophy (32).
Multiple secondary suture synostosis may occur in disorders with decreased brain volume or microcephaly. These include fetal alcohol syndrome, prenatal infection, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, Chiari malformation, shunted hydrocephalus, and a variety of underlying genetic or metabolic disorders. Appropriate diagnosis of microcephaly may avert unnecessary surgery for secondary craniosynostosis.
The most difficult distinction is in the infant with occipital plagiocephaly. This condition, attributed to unilateral lambdoidal synostosis, was uncommon before the 1990s. A large increase was attributed by Kane and colleagues to the increase in the supine positioning of infants for sleeping (59). In 1992 the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended the “back to sleep” position to prevent sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Intrauterine cranial restriction may also play a role (68), and these children usually exhibit some cranial flattening at birth (83). Certainly, there appear clinically to be 2 syndromes: (1) the rare, true lambdoidal synostosis and (2) the much more common lambdoid positional molding (15). Positional plagiocephaly occurs in the absence of suture synostosis and is due to external forces that deform the shape of the skull (ie, when the child is supine) (105). In this condition there is flattening of 1 side of the occiput, with anterior displacement of the ipsilateral ear. Repositioning of the child to the nonaffected side is effective for mild cases. In more severe deformities, helmet therapy is employed with good results for children up to 18 months of age (22).
Diagnostic workup
Because craniosynostosis often starts in utero, the condition should be diagnosable at or shortly after birth. Careful examination of head shape and facial appearance is essential to identify both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostoses, as is limb and general examination for the former. Examination of parents and review of their childhood photographs is important. Anthropometric measurements of the affected child's skull are typically abnormal. In addition to measuring the occipitofrontal circumference, it is helpful to measure the cephalic index, which is the ratio of biparietal diameter to anteroposterior diameter x 100. The normal cephalic index ranges from 78 to 84; scaphocephaly is associated with a decreased value and brachycephaly with an increased value.
A diagnosis of craniosynostosis is usually made by clinical examination; findings include a head shape consistent with the palpably-closed suture(s), often characteristic orbital, maxillary, and limb changes. A palpable ridge may replace the stenosed suture.
Radiologic evaluation offers confirmation and provides supplemental information that may be useful for management. Classic findings on routine x-ray include sclerosis or indistinctness along the suture and ridging of bone at the suture. Skull radiographs, however, may show synostosis along a few millimeters of suture, despite clinical evidence of inadequate skull growth along the length of the suture. CT scanning has been considered the best modality for diagnosing craniosynostosis, although problems with volume averaging occasionally interfere with demonstration of small areas of synostosis.
Thin-section, 3-dimensional CT enhances specificity of diagnosis and provides additional information about associated abnormalities of the basicranial and facial bones (07; 72; 77). Neuroimaging also permits evaluation of the brain, which may be abnormal in children with syndromic synostoses. Like bicoronal synostosis, metopic synostosis is associated with other abnormalities, such as cleft palate and holoprosencephaly. MRI offers additional information about neuronal migration abnormalities, hindbrain herniation and brainstem compression, delayed myelination, and oropharyngeal obstruction (45). Rozovsky and associates showed that cranial ultrasound is useful as a first-line imaging examination for diagnosis of craniosynostosis as it provided substantial accuracy for detection with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity (96). Additionally, the use of cranial ultrasound removes the harmful effects of ionizing radiation which can be particularly deleterious in young infants (96). Also, it can be diagnosed intrauterine by a variety of neuroimaging techniques that can improve outcome in these children (46). Neuroimaging may not be essential unless there is some question regarding the diagnosis or where help is needed in surgical planning (14).
Secondary radiologic signs of craniosynostosis are caused by the deforming pressure of growing brain after suture closure. Elevated intracranial pressure in children with multiple suture stenosis may lead to increased convolutional markings, erosion of the floor of the sella turcica, and flattening of the anterior and posterior clinoids.
Cervical spine radiographs should be considered to identify craniovertebral abnormalities or instability that may lead to spinal cord injury during prone positioning for surgery.
Neuropsychological testing should be obtained to provide a useful baseline and serial monitor of developmental progress in children with craniosynostosis. With younger children, in whom such testing is difficult and not always reliable, serial evoked responses can be used to monitor neurologic development (27).
Management
Treatment approaches depend on the type of craniosynostosis and the age of the child. Knowledge of the child's developmental potential and parental expectations may also guide selection of management options. There is no clear-cut evidence that positional or deformational occipital plagiocephaly requires surgical correction or orthotic devices. There is also less enthusiasm for operation in milder forms of metopic synostosis, as untreated cases may not progress.
Surgery for craniosynostosis is guided largely by the sutures involved and the patient’s age and appearance.
Simple linear craniectomy rarely produces satisfactory results; more complex procedures are typically required for removal of abnormal sutures and reconstruction of the skull. Blood loss and transfusion needs can be minimized by technical adaptations (110). Some surgeons recommend a staged craniectomy, whereas others recommend a morcellation procedure or "expanding cranioplasty," allowing immediate, partial reshaping of the calvarium (75; 51). This procedure involves separating the calvarium into several segments of bone that can be repositioned, thereby allowing future growth and remodeling. Hashim and colleagues compared neuropsychological outcomes following treatment with whole-vault cranioplasty or endoscopic strip craniectomy for patients with sagittal craniosynostosis and reported that patients undergoing early whole-vault cranioplasty attained higher intelligence quotient and achievement scores relative to those undergoing strip craniectomy (42).
Timing of surgical intervention is important, as it affects the capability of the craniofacial bones to achieve a more nearly normal pattern of growth (86; 88; 101). Because the rate of brain growth decreases in older children, those with craniosynostosis may require more extensive surgery to achieve results similar to those achieved in younger children with limited surgery. Sagittal synostosis is best treated as early as 6 weeks of age. Surgery by 3 to 6 months of age permits restoration of near-normal skull contour. Surgery for children under 1 year of age requires loose fixation of bone segments to allow for brain growth, whereas those over 3 years of age require rigid fixation (87). Because metallic hardware often erodes through thin scalps, absorbable cranial fixation devices have been developed (29). Although early surgery is optimal for most calvarial abnormalities associated with craniosynostosis, surgical treatment of associated facial abnormalities should be delayed. Premature treatment of midface hypoplasia impairs growth potential and ultimately causes greater facial deformity. Changes of the cranial base that accompany synostosis of individual cranial sutures develop slowly. Based on their studies of orbital development, Bentley and colleagues recommend that frontoorbital advancement surgery be delayed until late in the first year of life (08). Distraction methods have high success rates in older children (80). Illustrations of surgical technique and results include skin incision, sagittal synostosis, and synostoses.
-
Sagittal synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (1)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. These anterior soft tissue and skull views show that the protrusion of the forehead and the bitemporal narrowing are corrected. (Contributed by Dr. Cynthia Swen...
-
Sagittal synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (3)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. These vertex views shows barrel-staving in the occipital area after removal of 1 to 2 centimeters of bone to decrease cephalic length and stair-step osteotomy a...
-
Left unicoronal synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (1)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. These anterior soft tissue and skull views show reshaping of the orbits, both at the supraorbital rim and posterior orbital roof. (Contributed by Dr. Cynthia Sw...
-
Left unicoronal synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (2)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. The vertex views show correction of the temporal bulging with barrel-staving and infracturing, and the lateral views show advancement of the orbital rim and bar...
-
Bicoronal synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (2)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. The vertex views demonstrate deterioration of V-shaped supraorbital bar and forehead, as well as parietal advancement osteotomies. The lateral views show improv...
-
Metopic synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (2)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. The vertex views demonstrate parietal bone work and forehead reshaping (note derotation of V-shaped supraorbital bar and forehead). The lateral views show advan...
-
Lambdoid synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (1)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. The vertex views demonstrate correction of parietal and occipital asymmetries. The base views show extensive barrel-staving throughout the parietal and occipita...
-
Lambdoid synostosis: pre- and postoperative 3-D CT reconstructions (2)Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) 3-D CT reconstructions. The posterior views demonstrate reexpansion of the flattened parietooccipital region; the lambdoid sutures are open in this child (deformational plagiocephaly)....
A minimally invasive surgical approach has surfaced with the introduction and widespread use of endoscopic suturectomy (74). This is based on the principle that if timely intervention occurs, the rapidly growing brain will cause expansion of the skull into the normal shape. The procedure involves the insertion of the endoscope through small scalp incisions and the subsequent removal of a strip of bone including the fused suture (74). No internal fixation is used. It is generally recommended for younger children and involves the use of a postoperative cranial molding helmet. Surgeons have been able to demonstrate minimal blood loss, short operative times, early hospital discharge, and excellent functional and cosmetic results for these procedures (55; 49). The efficacy of this technique has been established in the treatment of isolated sagittal synostosis (55). Several groups have expanded the use of the endoscope for other forms of single suture synostosis (56; 57; 41). Additionally, cost analysis has shown that endoscope-assisted craniectomy plus helmet therapy is a less costly surgical option for patients with sagittal craniosynostosis than open cranial vault repair (121).
Children with extensive craniosynostosis require a multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, geneticists, psychologists, orthodontists, and pediatricians, in addition to neurosurgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, and plastic surgeons. Comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation is essential. Corrected visual acuity is the best measure of central afferent function. Examination of the fundi and visual fields permit assessment of possible increased intracranial pressure. Examination should include cycloplegic refraction and investigation of individual and conjugate eye movements. Because of shallow orbits in many children with craniosynostosis (30), the risk of exposure keratopathy should also be determined. Associated hydrocephalus rarely responds to synostosis surgery and must be shunted (21).
Genetic counseling is important, particularly in view of mosaicism and variability of penetrance and expression in dominantly inherited syndromic craniosynostoses. Problems with hearing, feeding, and failure to thrive require the oversight of a pediatrician. Developmental problems may require consultation with a neuropsychologist. Family counseling is especially important (98).
Special considerations
Pregnancy
There is a higher incidence of perinatal complications associated with prenatal craniosynostosis (46).
Anesthesia
Increased intracranial pressure, airway impairment, and associated anomalies present special anesthetic risks in these children, requiring careful planning (118; 71). Perioperative airway management is required in a large proportion of children with craniofacial anomalies (85; 71).
Media
References
- 01
- Alden TD, Lin KY, Jane JA. Mechanisms of premature closure of cranial sutures. Childs Nerv Syst 1999;15:670-5. PMID 10603008
- 02
- Alderman BW, Fernbach SK, Greene C, Mangione EJ, Ferguson SW. Diagnostic practice and the estimated prevalence of craniosynostosis in Colorado. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:159-64. PMID 9041871
- 03
- Alderman BW, Zamudio S, Baron AE, et al. Increased risk of craniosynostosis with higher antenatal maternal altitude. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24:420-6. PMID 7635605
- 04
- Bauer KH. Die zirculare Kraniotomie als Entlastungtrepanation bei drohender Turmschadelerblindung und bei nichtlocalisierbaren Hirngeschwulsten. Deutsch Ztschr fur Chir 1932;237:402-21.
- 05
- Beckett JS, Brooks ED, Lacadie C, et al. Altered brain connectivity in sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;13(6):690-8. PMID 24745341
- 06
- Bellew M, Chumas P, Mueller R, Liddington M, Russell J. Pre- and postoperative developmental attainment in sagittal synostosis. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:346-50. PMID 15781920
- 07
- Benson ML, Oliverio PJ, Yue NC, Zinreich SJ. Primary craniosynostosis: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:697-703. PMID 8623653
- 08
- Bentley RP, Sgouros S, Natarajan K, Dover MS, Hockley AD. Changes in orbital volume during childhood in cases of craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 2002;96:747-54. PMID 11990817
- 09
- Blake SM, Bradshaw WT. Craniosynostosis. Nurs Crit Care 2015;10(1):27-33. Available at: http://journals.lww.com/.
- 10
- Booth CD, Figueroa RE, Lehn A, Yu JC. Analysis of the jugular foramen in pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22(1):285-8. PMID 21239920
- 11
- Bourez RL, Mathijssen IM, Vaandrager JM, Vermeij-Keers C. Apoptotic cell death during normal embryogenesis of the coronal suture: early detection of apoptosis in mice using annexin V. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:441-5. PMID 9477828
- 12
- Bradley JP, Levine JP, Blewett C, et al. Studies in cranial suture biology: in vitro cranial suture fusion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:150-6. PMID 8695623
- 13
- Britto JA, Moore RL, Evans RD, Hayward RD, Jones BM. Negative autoregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 expression characterizing cranial development in cases of Apert (P253R mutation) and Pfeiffer (C278F mutation) syndromes and suggesting a basis for differences in their cranial phenotypes. J Neurosurg 2001;95:660-73. PMID 11596961
- 14
- Cerovac S, Neil-Dwyer JG, Rich P, Jones BM, Hayward RD. Are routine preoperative CT scans necessary in the management of single suture craniosynostosis. Br J Neurosurg 2002;16:348-54. PMID 12389887
- 15
- Chadduck WM, Kast J, Donahue DJ. The enigma of lambdoid positional molding. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:304-11. PMID 9485158
- 16
- Cinalli G, Chumas P, Arnaud E, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D. Occipital remodeling and suboccipital decompression in severe craniosynostosis associated with tonsillar herniation. Neurosurgery 1998a;42:66-71. PMID 9442505
- 17
- Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Kollar EM, et al. Hydrocephalus and craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1998b;88:209-14. PMID 9452225
- 18
- Cohen MM. Craniosynostosis: diagnosis, evaluation, and management. New York: Raven, 1986.
- 19
- Cohen MM. Etiopathogenesis of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991;2(3):507-13. PMID 1821298
- 20
- Cohen MM. Apert syndrome, not Apert's syndrome: Apert neither had nor owned the syndrome that bears his name. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:532-3. PMID 9252628
- 21
- Collmann H, Sorensen N, Krauss J. Hydrocephalus in craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:902-12. PMID 15864600
- 22
- Couture DE, Crantford JC, Somasundaram A, Sanger C, Argenta AE, David LR. Efficacy of passive helmet therapy for deformational plagiocephaly: report of 1050 cases. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35(4):E4. PMID 24079783
- 23
- Cunningham ML, Horst JA, Rieder MJ, et al. IGF1R variants associated with isolated single suture craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A(1):91-7. PMID 21204214
- 24
- Delashaw JB, Persing JA, Jane JA. Cranial deformation in craniosynostosis: a new explanation. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1991;2:611-20.
- 25
- DePollack C, Renier D, Hott M, Marie PJ. Increased bone formation and osteoblastic cell phenotype in premature cranial suture ossification (craniosynostosis). J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:401-7.
- 26
- Di Rocco C. Craniosynostosis in old Greece: political power and physical deformity. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:859. PMID 16078077
- 27
- Donati R, Landi A, Rovati LC, et al. Neurophysiological evaluation with multimodality evoked potentials in craniostenosis and craniofacial stenosis. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:286-9. PMID 9482053
- 28
- Dufresne C, Richtsmeier JT. Interaction of craniofacial dysmorphology, growth, and prediction of surgical outcome. J Craniofac Surg 1995;6:270-81. PMID 9020701
- 29
- Eppley BL, Sadove AM, Havlik RJ. Resorbable plate fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:1-7. PMID 9207653
- 30
- Ezaldein HH, Metzler P, Persing JA, Steinbacher DM. Three-dimensional orbital dysmorphology in metopic synostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67(7):900-5. PMID 24820454
- 31
- Feinsod M, Davis NL. Unlocking the brain: attempts to improve mental function of microcephalic retarded children by "craniotomy." Neurosurgery 2003;53(3):723-30; discussion 730. PMID 12943588
- 32
- Fernbach SK, Feinstein KA. Radiologic evaluation of the child with craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1991;2:569-85.
- 33
- Filkins K, Russo JF, Boehmer S, et al. Prenatal ultrasonographic and molecular diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1997;17:1081-4. PMID 9399359
- 34
- FitzSimmons E, Prost JH, Peniston S. Infant head molding: a cultural practice. Arch Fam Med 1998;7:88-90. PMID 9443706
- 35
- Fok H, Jones BM, Gault DG, Andar U, Hayward R. Relationship between intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in craniosynostosis. Br J Plast Surg 1992;45:394-7. PMID 1638296
- 36
- Fontana SC, Belinger S, Daniels D, Tuttle M, Camarata PJ, Andrews BT. Longitudinal assessment of developmental outcomes in infants undergoing late craniosynostosis repair. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29(1):25-8. PMID 29040147
- 37
- Friede H, Lauritzen C, Figueroa AA. Roentgencephalometric follow-up after early osteotomies in patients with scaphocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 1996;7:96-101. PMID 8949834
- 38
- Fujisawa H, Hasegawa M, Kida S, Yamashita J. A novel fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 mutation in Crouzon syndrome associated with Chiari type I malformation and syringomyelia. J Neurosurg 2002;97:396-400. PMID 12186468
- 39
- Gardner JS, Guyard-Boileau B, Alderman BW, Fernbach SK, Greene C, Mangione EJ. Maternal exposure to prescription and non-prescription pharmaceuticals or drugs of abuse and risk of craniosynostosis. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:64-7. PMID 9563695
- 40
- Gault DT, Renier D, Marchac D, Jones BM. Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1992;90:377-81.
- 41
- Gociman B, Agko M, Blagg R, Garlick J, Kestle JR, Siddiqi F. Endoscopic-assisted correction of metopic synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24(3):763-8. PMID 23714875
- 42
- Hashim PW, Patel A, Yang JF, et al. The effects of whole-vault cranioplasty versus strip craniectomy on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134(3):491-501. PMID 24804639
- 43
- Hayward R. Venous hypertension and craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:880-8. PMID 15834728
- 44
- Hayward R, Gonsalez S. How low can you go. Intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and respiratory obstruction in children with complex craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 2005;102(1 Suppl):16-22. PMID 16206729
- 45
- Hayward R, Harkness W, Kendall B, Jones B. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of craniosynostosis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1992;26:293-9. PMID 1470877
- 46
- Helfer TM, Peixoto AB, Tonni G, Araujo Júnior E. Craniosynostosis: prenatal diagnosis by 2D/3D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Med Ultrason 2016;18(3):378-85. PMID 27622416
- 47
- Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Minguini N, Katowitz JA. Visual loss in patients with craniofacial synostosis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991;28:344-8. PMID 1757862
- 48
- Heutink P, Vermeij-Keers C, Oostra BA. The genetic background of craniosynostosis syndromes. Eur J Hum Genet 1995;3:312-23. PMID 8556306
- 49
- Honeycutt JH. Endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2014;28(3):144-9. PMID 25210508
- 50
- Huang MH, Mouradian WE, Cohen SR, Gruss JS. The differential diagnosis of abnormal head shapes: separating craniosynostosis from positional deformities and normal variants. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:204-11. PMID 9603553
- 51
- Hudgins RJ, Burstein FD, Boydston WR. Total calvarial reconstruction for sagittal synostosis in older infants and children. J Neurosurg 1993;78:199-204. PMID 8421203
- 52
- Hudgins RJ, Cohen SR, Burstein FD, Boydston WR. Multiple suture synostosis and increased intracranial pressure following repair of single suture, nonsyndromal craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:167-72. PMID 9527314
- 53
- Hunter AG, Rudd NL. Craniosynostosis. I. Sagittal synostosis: its genetics and associated clinical findings in 214 patients who lacked involvement of the coronal suture(s). Teratology 1976;14:185-94. PMID 982314
- 54
- Jacobi A. Non nocere. Med Rec 1894;45:609-18.
- 55
- Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2012a;28(9):1333-9. PMID 22872245
- 56
- Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic technique for coronal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2012b;28(9):1429-32. PMID 22872259
- 57
- Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Early treatment of coronal synostosis with endoscopy-assisted craniectomy and postoperative cranial orthosis therapy: 16-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013;12(3):207-19. PMID 23808724
- 58
- Kajdic N, Spazzapan P, Velnar T. Craniosynostosis - recognition, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2018;18(2):110-6. PMID 28623672
- 59
- Kane AA, Mitchell LE, Craven KP, Marsh JL. Observations on a recent increase in plagiocephaly without synostosis. Pediatrics 1996;97:877-85. PMID 8657530
- 60
- Kapp-Simon KA. Mental development and learning disorders in children with single suture craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:197-203. PMID 9603552
- 61
- Kaufmann K, Baldinger S, Pratt L. Ultrasound detection of Apert syndrome: a case report and literature review. Am J Perinatol 1997;14:427-30. PMID 9263565
- 62
- King JE. Oxycephaly: a new operation and its results. Arch Neurol Psych 1938;40:1205-19.
- 63
- Lajeunie E, Catala M, Renier D. Craniosynostosis: from a clinical description to an understanding of bone formation of the skull. Childs Nerv Syst 1999;15:676-80. PMID 10603009
- 64
- Lajeunie E, Crimmins DW, Arnaud E, Renier D. Genetic considerations in nonsyndromic midline craniosynostoses: a study of twins and their families. J Neurosurg 2005;103(4 Suppl):353-6. PMID 16270687
- 65
- Lajeunie E, LeMerrer M, Bonaiti-Pellie C, et al. Genetic study of nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet 1995;55:500-4. PMID 7762595
- 66
- Lattanzi W, Bukvic N, Barba M, et al. Genetic basis of single-suture synostoses: genes, chromosomes and clinical implications. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28(9):1301-10. PMID 22872241
- 67
- Levine JP, Bradley JP, Roth DA, McCarthy JG, Longaker MT. Studies in cranial suture biology: regional dura mater determines overlying suture biology. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:1441-7. PMID 9583471
- 68
- Littlefield TR, Kelly KM, Pomatto JK, Beals SP. Multiple-Birth Infants at Higher Risk for Development of Deformational Plagiocephaly: II. Is One Twin at Greater Risk. Pediatrics 2002;109:19-25. PMID 11773537
- 69
- Maliepaard M, Mathijssen IM, Oosterlaan J, Okkerse JM. Intellectual, behavioral, and emotional functioning in children with syndromic craniosynostosis. Pediatrics 2014;133(6)e1608-15. PMID 24864183
- 70
- Mardini S, See LC, Lo LJ, Salgado CJ, Chen YR. Intracranial space, brain, and cerebrospinal fluid volume measurements obtained with the aid of three-dimensional computerized tomography in patients with and without Crouzon syndrome. J Neurosurg 2005;103(3 Suppl):238-46. PMID 16238077
- 71
- McCarthy JG, Warren SM, Bernstein J, et al. Parameters of care for craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012;49 Suppl:1S-24S. PMID 21848431
- 72
- Medina LS. Three-dimensional CT maximum intensity projections of the calvaria: a new approach for diagnosis of craniosynostosis and fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1951-4. PMID 11110553
- 73
- Mefford HC, Shafer N, Antonacci F, et al. Copy number variation analysis in single-suture craniosynostosis: multiple rare variants including RUNX2 duplication in two cousins with metopic craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A(9):2203-10. PMID 20683987
- 74
- Mehta VA, Bettegowda C, Jallo GI, Ahn ES. The evolution of surgical management for craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 2010;29(6):E5. PMID 21121719
- 75
- Mori K, Sakamoto T, Nakai K. Expanding cranioplasty for craniosynostosis and allied disorders. Childs Nerv Syst 1992;8:399-405. PMID 1458498
- 76
- Moss ML. The pathogenesis of premature cranial synostosis in man. Acta Anat 1959;37:351-70. PMID 14424622
- 77
- Nagaraja S, Anslow P, Winter B. Craniosynostosis. Clin Radiol 2013;68(3):284-92. PMID 22939693
- 78
- Netherway DJ, Abbgott AH, Anderson PJ, David DJ. Intracranial volume of patients with nonsyndromal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 2005;103(2 Suppl):137-41. PMID 16370279
- 79
- Newman SA. Ophthalmic features of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1991;2:587-609.
- 80
- Nonaka Y, Oi S, Miyawaki T, Shinoda A, Kurihara K. Indication for and surgical outcomes of the distraction method in various types of craniosynostosis. Advantages, disadvantages, and current concepts for surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20(10):702-9. PMID 15168051
- 81
- Oldridge M, Lunt PW, Zackai EH, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation for nucleotide substitutions in the IgII-IgIII linker of FGFR2. Hum Molec Genet 1997;6:137-43. PMID 9002682
- 82
- Paznekas WA, Cunningham ML, Howard TD, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, due to TWIST and FGFR mutations. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:1370-80. PMID 9585583
- 83
- Peitsch WK, Keefer CH, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. Incidence of cranial asymmetry in healthy newborns. Pediatrics 2002;110:E72. PMID 12456939
- 84
- Pensler JM, Ivescu AS, Radosevich JA. Scaphocephaly: premature closure of the sagittal suture: a localized disorder of cellular metabolism. Ann Plast Surg 1998;40:48-52. PMID 9464696
- 85
- Perkins JA, Sie KC, Milczuk H, Richardson MA. Airway management in children with craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:135-40. PMID 9138508
- 86
- Persing JA, Babler WJ, Winn HR, Jane J, Rodeheaver G. Age as a critical factor in the success of surgical correction of craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1981 54:601-6.
- 87
- Persing JA, Jane JA. Treatment of syndromic and nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis in infancy and childhood. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1991;2:655-63.
- 88
- Persing JA, Jane JA, Edgerton MT. Surgical treatment in craniosynostosis. In: Persing JA, Edgerton MT, Jane JA, editors. Scientific foundations and surgical treatment of craniosynostosis. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989:117-238.
- 89
- Persing JA, Morgan EP, Cronin AJ, Wolcott WP. Skull base expansion: craniofacial effects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1028-33. PMID 2034723
- 90
- Puech B, Puech PF, Tichy G, Dhellemmes P, Cianfarani F. Craniofacial dysmorphism in Mozart's skull. J Forensic Sci 1989;34:487-90. PMID 2651556
- 91
- Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Shaw GM, Romitti PA. Fertility treatments and craniosynostosis: California, Georgia, and Iowa, 1993-1997. Pediatrics 2003;111(5 Part 2):1163-6. PMID 12728131
- 92
- Renier D. Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis: pre- and postoperative recordings: correlation with functional results. In: Persing JA, Edgerton MT, Jane JA, editors. Scientific foundations and surgical treatment of craniosynostosis. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989:263.
- 93
- Renier D, El-Ghouzzi V, Bonaventure J, Le Merrer M, Lajeunie E. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutation in nonsyndromic coronal synostosis: clinical spectrum, prevalence, and surgical outcome. J Neurosurg 2000;92:631-6. PMID 10761652
- 94
- Rich PM, Cox TC, Hayward RD. The jugular foramen in complex and syndromic craniosynostosis and its relationship to raised intracranial pressure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24(1):45-51. PMID 12533326
- 95
- Robin NH, Scott JA, Arnold JE, et al. Favorable prognosis for children with Pfeiffer syndrome types 2 and 3: implications for classification. Am J Med Genet 1998;75:240-4. PMID 9475589
- 96
- Rozovsky K, Udjus K, Wilson N, Barrowman NJ, Simanovsky N, Miller E. Cranial ultrasound as a first-line imaging examination for craniosynostosis. Pediatrics 2016;137(2):e20152230. PMID 26772661
- 97
- Sarimski K. Cognitive functioning of young children with Apert's syndrome. Genet Couns 1997;8:317-22. PMID 9457501
- 98
- Sarimski K. Children with Apert syndrome: behavioural problems and family stress. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:44-9. PMID 9459216
- 99
- Sgouros S. Skull vault growth in craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:861-70. PMID 15791470
- 100
- Sgouros S, Hockley AD, Goldin JH, Wake MJ, Natarajan K. Intracranial volume change in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1999;91:617-25. PMID 10507384
- 101
- Shillito J. A plea for early operation for craniosynostosis. Surg Neurol 1992;37:182-99. PMID 1536022
- 102
- Shimoji T, Shimabukuro S, Sugama S, Ochiai Y. Mild trigonocephaly with clinical symptoms: analysis of surgical results in 65 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2002;18:215-24. PMID 12042920
- 103
- Shipster C, Hearst D, Somerville A, Stackhouse J, Hayward R, Wade A. Speech, language, and cognitive development in children with isolated sagittal synostosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45(1):34-43. PMID 12549753
- 104
- Shuper A, Merlob P, Grunebaum M, Reisner SH. The incidence of isolated craniosynostosis in the newborn infant. Am J Dis Child 1985;139:85-6. PMID 3969991
- 105
- Shweikeh F, Nuño M, Danielpour M, Krieger MD, Drazin D. Positional plagiocephaly: an analysis of the literature on the effectiveness of current guidelines. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35(4):E1. PMID 24079780
- 106
- Skidmore DL, Pai AP, Toi A, Steele L, Chitayat D. Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of two cases. Prenat Diagn 2003;23(12):1009-13. PMID 14663839
- 107
- Sommering ST. Vom Baue des Menschliche. 2nd ed. Leipzig, Voss, 1839.
- 108
- Speltz ML, Endriga MC, Mouradian WE. Presurgical and postsurgical mental and psychomotor development of infants with sagittal synostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:374-9. PMID 9345602
- 109
- Steinberger D, Reinhartz T, Unsold R, Muller U. FGFR2 mutation in clinically nonclassifiable autosomal dominant craniosynostosis with pronounced phenotypic variation. Am J Med Genet 1996;66:81-6. PMID 8957519
- 110
- Steinbok P, Heran N, Hicdonmez T, Cochrane DD, Price A.. Minimizing blood transfusions in the surgical correction of coronal and metopic craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20(7):445-52. PMID 15168053
- 111
- Stelnicki EJ, Mooney MP, Losken HW, et al. Ultrasonic prenatal diagnosis of coronal suture synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:252-8. PMID 9482048
- 112
- Stelnicki EJ, Vanderwall K, Harrison MR, Longaker MT, Kaban LB, Hoffman WY. The in utero correction of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:287-96. PMID 9462759
- 113
- Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M, Massimi L, Gasparini G, Pelo S, Di Rocco C. Complex craniosynostoses: a review of the prominent clinical features and the related management strategies. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28(9):1511-23. PMID 22872268
- 114
- Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M, Massimi L, Santini P, Di Rocco C. Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with single suture and complex craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:913-21. PMID 15871027
- 115
- Taylor WJ, Hayward RD, Lasjaunias P, et al. Enigma of raised intracranial pressure in patients with complex craniosynostosis: the role of abnormal intracranial venous drainage. J Neurosurg 2001;94:377-85. PMID 11235939
- 116
- Thompson DN, Jones BM, Harkness W, Gonsalez S, Hayward RD. Consequences of cranial vault expansion surgery for craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:296-303. PMID 9485157
- 117
- Timberlake AT, Furey CG, Choi J, et al. De novo mutations in inhibitors of Wnt, BMP, and Ras/ERK signaling pathways in non-syndromic midline craniosynostosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(35):E7341-7. PMID 28808027
- 118
- Vaughan C. Anesthetic management of children with craniofacial anomalies. CRNA 1997;8:123-34. PMID 9437947
- 119
- Virchow R. Uber den cretinismus, namentlich in Franken: und uber pathologische Schadelformen. Verh Phys Med Gesane Wurzburg 1851;2:230-71.
- 120
- Virtanen R, Korhonen T, Fagerholm J, Viljanto J. Neurocognitive sequelae of scaphocephaly. Pediatrics 1999;103:791-5. PMID 10103304
- 121
- Vogel TW, Woo AS, Kane AA, Patel KB, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD. A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;13(3):324-31. PMID 24410127
- 122
- Wilkie AO, Wall SA. Craniosynostosis: novel insights into pathogenesis and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol 1996;9:146-52. PMID 8782984
Contributors
All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.
Authors
-
Brittany Gerstein
Brittany Gerstein of Tulane University has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile -
Stephen L Nelson Jr MD PhD
Dr. Nelson of Tulane University School of Medicine received honorariums from BioMarin and LivaNova for speaking engagements.
See Profile
Editor
-
Michael V Johnston MD†
Dr. Johnston of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile
Former Authors
- David A Griesemer MD (original author), Sherman C Stein MD, Kimon Bekelis MD, and Robert J Singer MD
Patient Profile
- Age range of presentation
-
- 0-01 month
- 01-23 months
- 02-05 years
- Sex preponderance
-
- Female = male
- Population groups selectively affected
-
- none selectively affected
- Occupation groups selectively affected
-
- none selectively affected
ICD & OMIM codes
- ICD-9
-
- Craniosynostosis: 756.0
- ICD-10
-
- Craniosynostosis: Q75.0
- Developmental delay: R62.50
- Microcephaly: Q02
- OMIM
-
- Craniosynostosis: #615314
This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.
-
Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
-
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
-
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
-
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.
Questions or Comment?
MedLink®, LLC
3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122
Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400
US Number: +1-619-640-4660
Support: service@medlink.com
Editor: editor@medlink.com
ISSN: 2831-9125
Also in This Category
-
-
Developmental Malformations
Cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome
Nov. 22, 2024
-
Developmental Malformations
Schizencephaly
Oct. 13, 2024
-
Developmental Malformations
Fetal anticonvulsant syndrome
Oct. 08, 2024
-
Developmental Malformations
Rhombencephalosynapsis
Oct. 06, 2024
-
Developmental Malformations
Malformations of the brain
Sep. 28, 2024
-
Developmental Malformations
Von Hippel-Lindau disease
Sep. 28, 2024
-
Developmental Malformations
Vein of Galen malformations
Sep. 22, 2024