Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management …

Tanjala Gipson MD

General Child Neurology

Updated 07.14.2023
Released 11.03.2008
Expires For CME 07.14.2026

Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management

Author: Tanjala Gipson MD

See Contributor Disclosures

Editor: Ann Tilton MD

Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management

In This Article

Quick Link

Introduction

Overview

Developmental delay in children, a common and concerning presentation in pediatric primary and specialty care, is diagnosed when a child fails to achieve developmental milestones as expected. Identifying, evaluating, and treating children with learning or developmental impairments is of great concern in the clinical, educational, and public health settings. This article reviews the core principles of development in children. Appropriate use of screening methods to identify developmental problems in children is discussed. The specialty medical evaluation and management of children with identified developmental disorders will be reviewed, including current recommendations for investigations and treatment.

Key points

	• Developmental delay is only an appropriate diagnosis until the age of 7 years; the diagnosis must be further specified thereafter.
	• Developmental delay is a common pediatric presentation that can be influenced by all health domains (biological, psychological, and socioeconomic).
	• The range of underlying diagnoses is broad, and assessment of developmental delay requires a comprehensive and longitudinal approach to history and physical examination.
	• Investigations should be targeted based on individual presentations and co-occurring conditions, with genetic testing being the first line for unexplained cases of global developmental delay.
	• A child with a developmental disability should have an identified medical home as a child with special health care needs with targeted, multidisciplinary interventions.

Historical note and terminology

The study of child development has a long-standing history, with different approaches to cognitive development emerging over time and from different disciplines. The study of development aims to describe how and why people change over their lifetime, how this manifests in individual differences, and what can be done to maximize the growth of function, both in normal development and development that may be impaired by disease or injury.

Freud and his followers proposed and promoted a psychodynamic perspective of child development. They put forward the theory that early experiences shaped the adult personality, influencing the three components of the personality: the id, the ego, and the superego. They suggested there were discontinuous stages of development and required resolution of the previous phase before moving to the next phase. These phases comprised the oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital phases. Healthy development through these stages culminates in the ability to invest in and derive pleasure from love and work. Fixation on a lower stage may occur if fundamental needs are not met at any particular stage. Although there are many criticisms of this approach to development, and it has limited clinical translation, its emphasis on early experience and emotional relationships added an early contribution to the understanding of early emotional development that was continued through Erik Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Erikson conceived of personality development as a series of eight conflicts (trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, identity vs. confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, ego integrity vs. despair) that extend sequentially throughout life (33).

Another foundational development theory emerged from Jean Piaget’s constructivist approach that proposed four broad stages of cognitive development that arise from the individual actively constructing knowledge based on their own experiences. The stages (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational) each build on the previous, increasing the sophistication and abstraction of thought across multiple cognitive domains (07). Although Piaget’s theories added an understanding of the overview of child learning and found success in some educational models of experiential learning, they oversimplified the consistency and complexity of learning, underestimated the competence of infants and children, and did not account for the contribution of social relationships to learning and development.

Albert Bandura described how children could learn through the environment with social learning theory. Bandura expanded on the concepts of classical and operant condition (where a behavior is learned due to an association between a stimulus and the response) by describing mediating processes that can occur between stimuli and the response (accounting for individual differences) and how behavior can be learned through observation (54).

Modern approaches to the evaluation of development in children trace back to the work of Arnold Gesell, pediatrician and psychologist at the Yale University School of Medicine, and his collaborator, Catherine Amatruda. Dr. Gesell focused on early child development, leading to popular writings such as The First Five Years of Life (23). He and Amatruda also created a new science of developmental evaluation with the 1941 publication of Developmental Diagnosis - Normal and Abnormal Child Development - Clinical Methods and Pediatric Applications (24). They described the developmental examination of the infant and linked problems in development to medical problems, including prematurity, thyroid disorders, seizures, cerebral palsy, visual disorders, and hearing impairments, and later emphasized the link between the fetus and postnatal child development in The Embryology of Behavior (25).

In creating the science of developmental diagnosis, Gesell and Amatruda compared typical developmental patterns with those seen in the child being evaluated. Typical development is based on documented sequences of skill emergence and the age norms for when these skills are observed. Gesell established the first set of norms by recording the skill acquisition of children seen in his clinic, establishing that an orderly, timed, and sequential development process occurred predictably. This allowed for the identification of both normal and abnormal patterns. They also introduced the concept of developmental quotient (DQ), a comparison of a child’s chronological age and developmental age, expressed as a ratio. By combining public health methods of population screening for disease with the methods introduced by Gesell, William Frankenburg aimed for widespread identification of developmental disorders (21).

Paul Dworkin further described the process of embedding developmental monitoring into the surveillance process as recommended by both major British and American pediatric organizations (19). In the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement on developmental surveillance and screening, surveillance is used to describe the continuous, informal tracking of a child’s development (04). In 2020, the trends observed in pediatricians’ developmental screening practices from 2002 to 2016 were reported, noting a nearly tripled effort toward screening (36). Screening implies using a standardized test at discrete age intervals on all children. As introduced by Gesell, developmental evaluation describes the more complex process used for establishing a developmental diagnosis.

Description

General principles. Fundamental to understanding the science of child development is the notion that it is a dynamic, fluid process resulting from a predictable and orderly nervous system evolution beginning in the fetal period and proceeding through the lifespan. Normal development is the result of both the orderly development of neuroanatomy, which is dependent on the appropriate organization and signaling at the right time with an absence of disruption or dysfunction, as well as an appropriate environment that provides sufficient input (including nutrition, learning opportunities, and social-emotional connections) for ongoing growth.

Development is subdivided into several streams centered on functional skills that can be measured and compared over time (gross and fine motor, speech and language, and social and personal skills, as well as activities of daily living) (73). Developmental delay can affect any of these streams. At older ages (generally starting at school age), when testing is more reliable and predictive, cognition can be further subdivided into areas of intellectual functioning, such as memory, verbal comprehension, visuospatial reasoning, expressive language, fluid reasoning, executive functioning, and adaptive functioning. Elucidating the pattern of deficits is important for diagnosis, guiding investigations, and remediation through intervention and accommodations.

Motor development. Gross motor development involves full-body movements of the trunk and legs, culminating in independent walking, running, and climbing. Fine motor skills primarily involve the shoulder, arms, and hands, allowing refined skills such as grasping, writing, and throwing. These skills increasingly merge with visual skills into drawing and construction, allowing the testing of visual-motor-based problem solving, a core function of intellectual development. Normal motor development progresses from cephalad to caudad, with refinement of upper body movements progressing before those of the lower body. Delays in motor development range from high prevalence minor neuromotor abnormalities and coordination disorders to more severe and lower prevalence disorders such as cerebral palsy, spinal cord abnormalities, muscular dystrophies, and myopathies. Motor delays may also be a marker for other neurodevelopmental disabilities, chronic illnesses, or visual impairment. Infant hypotonia and delays in reaching motor milestones are common and can be the first sign in children with genetic disorders and associated intellectual disabilities, but they can also be seen in children with otherwise normal cognitive development (51).

Speech and language development. Language refers to a system of learned abstract symbols and rule-governed structures used to send and receive messages. Language is typically subdivided into receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language. Receptive language is the efficient understanding of these symbols and rules. Language delay is often the most recognizable reflection of intelligence in development for parents and professionals in young children. Expressive language involves the expression of symbols and rules. Pragmatic language refers to the ability to use language appropriately within a social, situational, and communicative context. In the development of pragmatics, a child acquires the ability to use language in a social context. Importantly, language development begins even before children use their first word. Protophones are vocalizations, not including cries and laughs, that start on the first day of life and continue through the first year of life. Precanonical protophones include vowel-like sounds (vocants), growls, and squeals during the first half-year of life. Canonical syllables occur in the second half of the first year and are composed of consonant-vowel combinations, such as “na” and “da” (52).

Social and personal skills. Social development requires language and problem-solving skills but is more heavily dependent on appropriate verbal and nonverbal communication and is often associated with pragmatic communication deficits. Other areas of social skills include the ability to understand, build, and maintain appropriate interpersonal relationships. In children, this includes appropriate play skills and the ability to modulate behavior appropriately for the social context. As they progress in personal emotional recognition, regulation and modulation of emotions become more important. Delays in social skills are seen in children with intellectual disorders, communication disorders, and autism spectrum disorders.

Activities of daily living. Activities of daily living, including personal hygiene, cooking, cleaning, and handling money, are a subset of adaptive functioning that also includes communication, social, and relationship skills. The development of adaptive skills occurs in parallel to the other development streams. They depend on motor, language, and intellectual skill development and are subject to environmental and cultural influences. Delays in achieving milestones in activities of daily living such as feeding, toileting, and dressing do not directly infer diagnoses but provide further evidence for suspected diagnoses. A delay in adaptive functioning is necessary to diagnose intellectual disability in DSM-5.

Definitions. In developmental disorders, the timing, order, or sequence of acquiring specific readily recognizable skills, commonly referred to as milestones, is disturbed. The assessment of abnormal development employs the principles of delay, deviance, dissociation, and regression (01). Abnormal development can be seen in the pattern of slowed development, where progress continues with steady progress that is behind what is expected for age. Milestones or proficiency of skills are reached at a significantly later age than average (usually defined as two or more standard deviations behind population norms). This pattern is generally implied when development is referred to as “delayed.”

Other abnormal development patterns include plateau, where skills no longer progress, or regression, where previously acquired skills are lost. It can be difficult to distinguish between delay and plateau or regression when observed at a single time point. However, it is important to identify developmental plateaus or regression, even when they may coexist with a preexisting delay because these patterns suggest different etiologies (for example, neurodegenerative, neoplastic, metabolic, or autoimmune) that require specific investigations and interventions. Dissociation describes differing rates of development across the five streams of function. For example, a child with intellectual disability may have a delay in speaking skills but walk independently at a typical age. Deviance occurs when a child acquires milestones out of the usual sequence within a single stream of development. For example, a child who crawls before sitting unsupported demonstrates deviant gross motor skills; in language development, deviance is demonstrated in the use of idiosyncratic language in autism spectrum disorders.

The DSM-5 divides intellectual disorders into intellectual disability, global developmental delay, and unspecified intellectual disability. Global developmental delay is reserved for children younger than 5 years of age who show significant delays (scores two or more standard deviations below the mean) in two or more of the following developmental domains: fine/gross motor skills, speech/language, social or personal skills, and activities of daily living. Typically, children with global developmental delay show delays across most or all domains of functioning. Intellectual disability is defined as deficits in intellectual functions (reasoning, problem-solving, planning, abstract thinking, judgment, academic learning) on both clinical assessment and standardized testing and deficits in adaptive functioning that result in failure to meet developmental and sociocultural standards for independence and social responsibility. These deficits must have onset in the developmental period. Intellectual disability is classified as mild, moderate, severe, or profound based on the severity of deficits in adaptive functioning and can be further described based on associated medical conditions, genetic conditions, or environmental factors. Unspecified intellectual disability refers to individuals over the age of 5 years who have a history and clinical presentation consistent with cognitive impairment but are not suitable for standardized intellectual testing and, therefore, cannot meet the criteria for intellectual disability (63).

A specific learning disorder refers to difficulties in learning in a specific area, where academic skills are behind (2 or more grades) what is expected for age in the context of otherwise normal intellect, ie, achievements in a particular skill (eg, reading) are deficient and out of keeping with IQ (would be diagnostic of a specific learning disorder in reading).

Epidemiology. In 2016, 52.9 million children (or 8.4%) younger than 5 years of age had developmental disabilities worldwide, with approximately 95% living in low- and middle-income countries. Sensory deficits (hearing and vision loss) accounted for 40.7 million children with disabilities, followed by intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder, accounting for 12.5 and 4.6 million, respectively; however, intellectual disability accounted for the most years lived with disability (28).

The differential diagnosis for developmental delay includes:

	• Isolated developmental delay
	• Neurologic disease or injury
	• Inborn errors of metabolism and other progressive medical concerns
	• Teratogenic or toxic exposure
	• Chromosomal disorders
	• Genetic syndromes
	• Other neurodevelopmental disorders (eg, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder)
	• Specific learning disabilities
	• Other mental health disorders
	• Medical diagnoses
	• Sensory impairment
	• Socioeconomic deprivation

Clinical applications

Identification: developmental surveillance and screening. Identifying and evaluating a child with a suspected developmental disorder typically begins with concern regarding a delay in the child’s acquisition of developmental skills. Such concern may arise directly from the parent. In fact, parental concern has been demonstrated to predict lower standard scores and to accurately identify major delays (17; 38; 15). Another source is through surveillance and screening by the primary care health provider during ongoing well-child care. Current recommendations for the early identification of developmental disorders by the American Academy of Pediatrics include:

	(1) Performance of developmental surveillance at every preventive visit
	(2) Administration of a standardized developmental screening test to all children at the 9-, 18-, and 24- or 30-month preventive care visits
	(3) Administration of a standardized developmental screening test when concerns arise through surveillance (04).

When developmental surveillance and screening suggest the possibility of a developmental disorder, further medical and developmental evaluation should be performed to establish the extent of concern and to initiate evaluation for an underlying etiology.

Developmental surveillance. Developmental surveillance is a flexible, longitudinal, continuous, and cumulative process performed over time (04). The clinician inquires about developmental concerns, identifies key historical risk factors, and obtains a developmental history of milestone achievement from the parent. Informal observations of a child’s development are made during the physical examination. As much as the clinical environment allows, developmental surveillance should include direct observation of developmental skills attainment over time. The child health care provider should suspect a developmental problem when a child shows consistent delay in one or more development streams or when deviancy or regression are observed. When such concerns arise, the child should be referred for formal developmental evaluation.

Developmental screening. Developmental screening is a more formal procedure performed on all children discretely during preventive health care. It employs standardized screening tests to identify children needing further evaluation for a developmental disorder and can be for generalized development or specific disorders. Screening does not result in a diagnosis but can alert medical professionals to the need for further evaluation. A child may be assigned a risk category rather than continuous standard scores. Those in the suspect category typically require more frequent surveillance or screening, whereas those at highest risk require more detailed developmental and medical testing. No specific screening tool is recommended. The appropriate tools should be chosen for reliability and sensitivity in the population being considered and for feasibility and sustainability in the clinical context (04).

Developmental evaluation. Developmental assessment is a more complex process aimed at identifying specific developmental disorders. It consists of developmental testing in each development stream, with interpretation of any abnormal patterns (eg, delay, deviancy, dissociation, and regression). This may require involvement of multidisciplinary expertise for appropriate testing in each of the developmental streams. Delays in language and nonverbal abilities on both history and evaluation, accompanied by a history of delays in adaptive skills, suggest a diagnosis of intellectual disability. Delays in language development with normal nonverbal skills (dissociation) imply a communication disorder diagnosis.

Developmental disorders present to professionals at varying points in time, depending on the affected stream of development and the severity of the delay. Children with severe motor disabilities typically present with an absence of rolling or sitting in infancy. When mild, the toddler may have a delay in onset of independent walking or deviant toe-walking. The child with a communication disorder, including autism, or an intellectual disorder may present to the physician as early as 18 months with absence of early vocabulary development, interest in others, use or response to name or pointing, imitation, or following of simple verbal requests. Others with communication or intellectual disabilities may present between ages 2 to 3 years when vocabulary fails to grow, short sentences are not formed, or verbal requests cannot be followed. Isolated learning disorders are not apparent until children fail to acquire academic achievement at school age.

Evaluation of the child with developmental delay. The medical consultative evaluation is typically performed by child neurologists who are also neurodevelopmental disabilities specialists, developmental and behavioral pediatricians, child neurologists, pediatricians with experience in neurodevelopmental disabilities, or others with expertise in medical genetics or physical medicine and rehabilitation. The aims are identifying developmental diagnoses, recognizing an underlying etiology, offering prognostic information, and initiating appropriate therapy and ongoing medical treatment of related problems. With improved identification of monogenic intellectual disabilities and understanding of the cellular pathways involved (eg, everolimus for tuberous sclerosis), there are several emerging treatments that may hold promise for targeting the underlying disorders, increasing resolve to find etiologies for developmental disorders (73).

Patient history. The consultative medical evaluation of the child with delayed development begins with a comprehensive review of the developmental history. Using the core principles of delay, dissociation, deviance, and regression through identification of the ages of milestone acquisition, coupled with measurement of developmental quotient, the developmental history provides clues to the developmental diagnosis. Additional behavioral history can reveal abnormal patterns of social or play behaviors, with reports of hyperactivity, impulsivity, noncompliance, aggression, destruction, stereotypy, solitary play, or self-injury.

A comprehensive medical history provides valuable information on etiology and management guidance. The cause of cognitive or developmental delay can be identified in approximately one third of children based on history and physical exam alone (72). History should include prenatal history for exposure to teratogens, intrauterine infections, or other risks (eg, gestational diabetes or pregnancy-related hypertension). History of documentation of complications during labor or delivery should be sought as well as neonatal complications such as prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, seizures, retinopathy, or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (49). Information on medical illnesses or surgical procedures can identify developmental risk factors such as serious infections, head trauma, seizure disorders, congenital anomalies, and chronic medical, metabolic, or endocrine disorders. A full review of systems could provide information relevant to etiology and co-occurring conditions that need to be addressed. This includes descriptions of diet, sleep, mental health concerns, and recurrent or chronic pain. A child’s family history can reveal relatives with related genetic, developmental, learning, or intellectual disorders. Social history is useful for understanding related family risk and protective factors and offers insight into the current level of support. Various patterns of developmental abnormalities can be observed in cases of neglect, abuse, or deprivation (09). Identifying current family stressors, such as problems in health, employment, marriage, physical abuse, or substance abuse, is important to assist the family in receipt of community services and support and, therefore, to minimize such problems and their effect on the child and family.

Physical examination. Performance of a comprehensive physical examination can further assist in identifying related medical conditions. The examination should include growth measurement and general physical and neurologic examinations. Comparison of weight, height, and head circumference to age norms can assist in identifying conditions and syndromes associated with failure to thrive, short stature, overgrowth, obesity, microcephaly, and macrocephaly. The general physical exam can identify congenital anomalies or markers of an underlying genetic disorder, such as neurocutaneous lesions, midline defects, cardiac anomalies, or genitourinary findings. Dysmorphic features of the head, face, ears, or hairline suggesting genetic disorders may be seen. In infants and young children, the neurologic examination should include classic elements evaluating cranial nerve function, tone, strength, and reflexes but should also assess reactivity and level of consciousness, motor function as well as the pathological, primitive, and postural reflexes that emerge or diminish through the course of normal development (13; 30). In the older ambulatory child, evaluation of gait quality, functional movement, and fine motor movement provides additional information. In the school-age child, soft or subtle signs, such as mild axial hypotonia, synkinesia, or dyskinesia, as observed while doing repetitive hand movements or walking with a stressed gait, may accompany disorders of communication, learning, and ADHD (70; 16; 45; 53).

Developmental evaluation. Developmental evaluation is a critical part of the comprehensive evaluation and must be tailored to the age and presentation of the child, as well as the current treatment, education, or social needs. Evaluations by related professionals in the fields of psychology, early childhood education, speech-language pathology, audiology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and social work may offer information useful to making a diagnosis as well as provide information regarding a child’s therapeutic and educational needs and related child and family support. Various instruments are commercially available, ranging from comprehensive measures of several domains to measures of specific domains, such as articulation. The clinician must choose tests based on the child’s age, the area of development, the psychometric properties of the test, and the time required for administration. The Capute Scales (02), the Battelle Developmental Inventory (50), and the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (46) are valid multi-domain evaluations in the infant, toddler, and preschooler. In school-aged children with academic concerns, achievement tests, such as the Wide-Range Achievement Test (74), can clarify reading, arithmetic, and spelling abilities. Formal psychological measures of intelligence should be performed by psychologists when a child is suspected of having an intellectual or learning disability. Behavior typically is assessed through parent or teacher questionnaire completion and can be broad-based, looking at a wide range of behaviors, or diagnosis-targeted such as autism- or ADHD-specific questionnaires. Behavior observation in different contexts may also be undertaken, particularly if there are differing reports across environments.

Investigations. Formal assessment for sensory impairments should be performed to exclude sensory impairments as a cause for developmental abnormalities and look for markers of associated conditions in possible syndromic conditions that include developmental delays. Sensory impairments are typically identifiable during the first year of life. The vision-impaired child will fail to fix and follow objects by 3 months of age. The hearing-impaired child who is not identified during newborn hearing screening can be recognized with a lack of response to sound or turning to voice during the first 6 months or through the absence of saying “mama” or “dada” but can be missed when hearing impairment is not complete or is progressive.

Laboratory investigation. Metabolic disorders should also be investigated if there is a history of periodic change, loss of skills, or precipitation of symptoms by illness. Newborn screening detects many inborn errors of metabolism, but because these conditions are potentially treatable, and we do not know the false-negative rate of newborn screening in many cases, it is also important to consider them during evaluation (71; 43). If children have been born in jurisdictions where newborn screening is not routine, comprehensive laboratory tests for inborn errors of metabolism should be considered early in evaluation. Serum lead and thyroid function tests should be considered in the appropriate context (44) and ferritin is commonly recommended in cases of dietary restriction in association with developmental delays (43).

Genetic investigations. Identifying a specific diagnosis may inform treatment decisions, allow for specific anticipatory guidance, and provide recurrence-risk information for family planning. For this reason, evaluation for developmental delay and autism spectrum disorders includes genetic work-up. If a specific genetic syndrome is suspected based on the rest of the examination, the appropriate test should be sent. However, in cases where the clinical history, family history, physical exam, and developmental exam do not suggest a specific disorder, chromosomal microarray is considered first-line evaluation (42; 20; 62; 44). In a query of the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays Consortium database, at least 7% of the cases had a diagnosis leading to specific clinical management implications (60), but some reports indicated a diagnostic yield up to 20% (39). Analysis of FMR1 for fragile X is currently recommended in guidelines for all boys and girls in whom the cause of their developmental delay is unknown as first-line testing with microarray. However, the prevalence of all other X-linked disorders exceeds fragile X (44), and some guidelines recommend testing only in select cases (29). MECP2 for Rett syndrome should be considered in girls in the right clinical setting. Second-tier genetic testing for single gene disorders or gene panels can be added based on the clinical picture, such as X-linked intellectual disability panels in boys. Whole exome or whole genome sequencing are emerging technologies that are becoming much more widely available. Some tertiary centers have reported diagnostic hit rates of 40% to 68% for children with developmental disabilities and other features suggestive of a genetic cause, dysmorphisms, other organ system abnormalities, abnormal neuroimaging, etc. (62; 66; 68). Whole exome or whole genome sequencing holds promise for the evaluation of developmental disabilities, but because of the complexity of interpreting and reporting these tests, it should only be done by experienced clinicians after extensive genetic counseling with the families. Recently, whole exome sequencing has been recommended as a first-tier clinical test (67).

Neuroimaging. MRI of the brain as a tool to investigate global developmental delay is controversial. MRI remains a resource-intensive investigation, and although there is little risk involved in MRI, there is a small risk associated with general anesthetic required in young children. There is a wide range of reported rates of abnormalities (0% to 98%), but it is often recommended to investigate for underlying etiology if developmental delay is severe, affecting multiple domains, or if there are any other neurologic signs or symptoms (eg, epilepsy) (29; 47). Neuroimaging should be considered when examination reveals significant motor findings or focal neurologic abnormalities or when microcephaly, macrocephaly, or changing head circumference growth velocity is seen. In children with idiopathic cerebral palsy, the American Academy of Neurology and Child Neurology Society recommend neuroimaging, preferably with MRI (06). CT is not recommended for the evaluation of developmental delay.

Other. Further investigations should be tailored to specific indications that may arise during a comprehensive medical history and physical exam. An EEG is recommended only if there is suspicion of seizure or patterns suggestive of specific epilepsy syndromes (64).

Treatments and interventions.

Management of the child with developmental delay. After completing a comprehensive medical and developmental evaluation of the child with developmental problems, establishing developmental diagnoses, and identifying associated medical conditions, the physician can initiate a plan for active treatment and comprehensive management. Beginning with early identification of these problems, an affected child can receive educational and intervention services aimed at improving the child’s development through local early intervention and special education programs. These should not be delayed by ongoing investigations into the possible etiology of the delay if that is required. Internationally, the rights of children with disabilities are recognized in Article 23 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was ratified by 198 countries (every member state of the United Nations except the United States) and entered into force in September 1990 (14). It asserts that children with disabilities should “enjoy a full and decent life” and receive “education, training, health care services, rehabilitation services, preparation for employment and recreation opportunities.” The rights of children with disabilities to life, education, and community participation were further emphasized in the 2008 United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Within the United States, access to early education and intervention services aimed at improving the child’s development through local intervention and special education programs was established through federal law under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (32).

Beginning as early as birth and continuing through age 3 years, any child with a known disability, significant delay, or condition with a high risk for disability (eg, Down syndrome) is entitled to early intervention services that provide developmental therapies intended to improve performance in one of the developmental spheres. These can include traditional therapies, such as physical therapy, occupation therapy, and speech-language therapy, as well as broader services, such as special instruction, counseling, and family training. Many programs provide parent training or home-based therapy to allow for generalization of skills learned (12; 61). For children 3 years and older and continuing into the school-age years, children with disabilities should have access to individualized, free, and appropriate education along with related therapy services (05; 37).

Specific medical treatments targeted towards a child’s related medical conditions are also important. Children with cerebral palsy should be considered for medical treatment of tone abnormalities with oral agents, intramuscular botulinum toxin, or intrathecal baclofen in addition to receiving physical therapy (48; 11; 08; 65). Children with early-onset epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex may have better developmental outcomes with early intervention using medications that target the disease neurobiology (27; 34). Careful screening for other co-occurring and potentially interfering conditions, particularly those that could interfere with optimal development, should be undertaken continuously. For example, dental issues are common in children with disabilities, can result in pain and interfere with behavior and sleep, and may require specialized care (35). Up to 80% of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities are reported to have sleep disorders (03; 10).

Children with communication or intellectual disabilities who demonstrate comorbid behavior disorders may benefit from psychopharmacologic treatments, such as stimulants for ADHD (69). A meta-analysis of the treatment of children with ADHD indicated high-quality evidence that psychostimulants (formulations of methylphenidate or amphetamine) have a moderate-to-large effect on oppositional behavior, cognitive problems, and aggression symptoms. Other ADHD medications (alpha-2 agonists or atomoxetine) have a small to moderate effect on these symptoms (56). Risperidone and aripiprazole have evidence in treating aggression in children with autism spectrum disorder (59; 22) but require regular clinical and laboratory monitoring to ensure safety (55). Based on a systematic review, there is moderate-quality evidence that risperidone has a moderate-to-large effect on conduct problems and aggression in youth with below-average IQ, with and without ADHD, and high-quality evidence that risperidone has a moderate effect on disruptive and aggressive behavior in youth with average IQ and oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder, with and without ADHD (57).

Finally, children with a developmental disability should have a medical home as a child with special health care needs (41; 05; 31). This allows the primary care provider a chronic condition management program to monitor regular health for chronological age and to provide anticipatory guidance for developmental age. In cases where complex care management is required, some centers have implemented specific care coordination services that can assist with planning of multiple services and supports, which have been shown to improve care access, needs met, and family empowerment (40). Specialized, condition-related office visits, written care plans, explicit co-management with medical specialists, appropriate patient education, and an effective monitoring and tracking system should be implemented. Ongoing surveillance for other behavioral, mental health, and developmental concerns should also be undertaken on an ongoing basis. It has been shown that individuals with developmental concerns have a high incidence of these co-occurring mental health conditions and that they can go unrecognized due to diagnostic overshadowing (58).

Psychosocial education and support should incorporate the caregivers and families of children with developmental disorders. Both the primary care physician and the specialist can refer the family to community-based support services, such as respite care, parent-to-parent programs, and advocacy organizations. Parent organizations and condition-specific organizations can provide further family support, assistance, and information, including information on specific community services (26). Some children will qualify for additional benefits, and physicians or multidisciplinary support (such as social workers) in the child’s medical home should be informed about these additional services and their qualifications. As children become young adults and transition to adult services, there can be an increased burden on families and caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities. Transition resources should be employed where available to ensure ongoing support of individuals’ needs (18).

References

01: Accardo PJ, Accardo JA, Capute AJ. A neurodevelopmental perspective on the continuum of developmental disabilities. In: Accardo PJ, editor. Capute and Accardo’s Neurodevelopmental Disabilities in Infancy and Childhood: Vol. I. Neurodevelopmental Diagnosis and Treatment. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing; 2008:3-25.
02: Accardo PJ, Capute AJ. The Capute Scales: Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing, 2005.
03: Accardo JA, Malow BA. Sleep, epilepsy, and autism. Epilepsy Behav 2015:47:202-6. PMID 25496798
04: American Academy of Pediatrics. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics; Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Pediatrics 2006;118:405-20.
05: American Academy of Pediatrics. Role of the medical home in family-centered early intervention services. Council on Children with Disabilities. Pediatrics 2007;120:1153-8. PMID 17974754
06: Ashwal S, Russman BS, Blasco PA, et al. Practice parameter: diagnostic assessment of the child with cerebral palsy. Report of the American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee and the Child Neurology Society Practice Committee. Neurology 2004;62:851-63. PMID 15037681
07: Beilin H, Fireman G. The foundation of Piaget’s theories: mental and physical action. Adv Child Dev Behav 1999;27:221-46. PMID 10884847
08: Bjornson K, Hays R, Graubert C, et al. Botulinum toxin for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a comprehensive evaluation. Pediatrics 2007;120:49-58. PMID 17606561
09: Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet 2017;389(10064):77-90. PMID 27717614
10: Blackmer AB, Feinstein JA. Management of sleep disorders in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a review. Pharmacotherapy 2016;36(1):84-98. PMID 26799351
11: Buckon CE, Thomas SS, Piatt JH Jr, Aiona MD, Sussman MD. Selective dorsal rhizotomy versus orthopedic surgery: a multidimensional assessment of outcome efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:457-65. PMID 15031833
12: Buschmann A, Jooss B, Rupp A, Feldhusen F, Pietz, J, Philippi H. Parent-based language intervention for 2-year-old children with specific expressive language delay: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 2009;94(2):110-6. PMID 18703544
13: Capute AJ, Palmer FB, Shapiro BK, Wachtel RC, Ross A, Accardo PJ. Primitive reflex profile: a quantitation of primitive reflexes in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1984;26:375-83. PMID 6734954
14: Convention on the Rights of the Child. UN General Assembly. November 20, 1989. United Nations, Treaty Series Volume 1577:3. 1989.
15: Deakin-Bell N, Walker K, Badawi N. The accuracy of parental concern expressed in the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to predict developmental delay. J Paediatr Child Health 2013;49:E133-6. PMID 23336747
16: Denckla MB. Revised neurological examination for subtle signs. Psychopharmacol Bull 1985;21:773-800. PMID 4089106
17: Dixon G, Badawi N, French D, Kurinczuk JJ. Can parents accurately screen children at risk of developmental delay. J Paediatr Child Health 2009;45:268-73. PMID 9493118
18: Dressler PB, Nguyen TK, Moody EJ, Friedman SL, Pickler L. Use of transition resources by primary care providers for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil 2018;56(1):56-68. PMID 29389256
19: Dworkin PH. British and American recommendations for developmental monitoring: the role of surveillance. Pediatrics 1989;84:1000-10. PMID 2479904
20: Flore LA, Milunsky JM. Updates in the genetic evaluation of the child with global developmental delay or intellectual disability. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2012;173-80. PMID 23245550
21: Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr 1967;71:181-91. PMID 6029467
22: Fung LK, Majahan R, Nozzolillo A, et al. Pharmacologic treatment of severe irritability and problem behaviors in autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2016;137 Suppl 2:S124-35. PMID 26908468
23: Gesell A. The First Five Years of Life; A Guide to the Study of the Preschool Child. From the Yale Clinic of Child Development. New York: Harper and Row, 1940.
24: Gesell A, Amatruda CS. Developmental diagnosis; normal and abnormal child development, clinical methods and practical applications. New York, London: P. B. Hoeber, 1941.
25: Gesell A, Amatruda CS. The embryology of behavior: the beginnings of the human mind. New York: Harper & brothers, 1945.
26: Gilson CB, Bethune LK, Carter EW, McMillan ED. Informing and equipping parents of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil 2017;55(5):347-60. PMID 28972871
27: Gipson TT, Gerner G, Srivastava S, et al. Early neurodevelopmental screening in tuberous sclerosis complex: a potential window of opportunity. Pediatr Neurol 2014;51(3):398-402. PMID 25160545
28: Global Research on Developmental Disabilities Collaborators. Developmental disabilities among children younger than 5 years in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6(10):e110-21. PMID 30172774
29: Hart AR, Sharma R, Atherton M, et al. Aetiological investigation in early developmental impairment: are they worth it? Arch Dis Child 2017;102(11):1004-13. PMID 28735260
30: Heineman KR, Hadders-Algra M. Evaluation of neuromotor function in infancy-A systematic review of available methods. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2008;29:315-23. PMID 18698195
31: Homer CJ, Klatka K, Romm D, et al. A review of the evidence for the medical home for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 2008;122:e922-37. PMID 18829788
32: IDEA. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. http://www.copaa.org. 2004.
33: Knight ZG. A proposed model of psychodynamic psychotherapy linked to Erik Erikson’s eight stages of psychosocial development. Clin Psychol Psychother 2017;24(5):1047-58. PMID 28124459
34: Kotulska K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Curatolo P, et al. Prevention of epilepsy in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex in the EPISTOP trial. Ann Neurol 2021;89(2):304-14. PMID 33180985
35: Kumar S, Pai D, Saran R. Oral health characteristics and dental rehabilitation of children with global developmental delay. Case Rep Dent 2017;2017:5486327. PMID 28250997
36: Lipkin PH, Macias MM, Baer Chen B, et al. Trends in pediatricians' developmental screening: 2002-2016. Pediatrics 2020;145(4):e20190851. PMID 32123018
37: Lipkin PH, Schertz M. Early intervention. In: Accardo PJ, editor. Capute and Accardo’s Neurodevelopmental Disabilities in Infancy and Childhood: Vol. I. Neurodevelopmental Diagnosis and Treatment. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing, 2008:519–52.
38: Martin AJ, Darlow BA, Salt A, et al. Identification of infants with major cognitive delay using parental report. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012,54:254-9. PMID 22188172
39: Martin CL, Ledbetter DH. Chromosomal microarray testing for children with unexplained neurodevelopmental disorders. JAMA 2017;317(24):2545-6. PMID 28654998
40: McAllister JW, McNally KR, Rodgers R, Mpofu PB, Monahan PO, Lock TM. Effects of a care coordination intervention with children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and their families. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2018;39(6):471-80. PMID 29672338
41: McPherson M, Arango P, Fox H, et al. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 1998;102:137-40. PMID 9714637
42: Michelson DJ, Shevell MI, Sherr EH, Moeschler JB, Gropman AL, Ashwal S. Evidence reports: genetic and metabolic testing on children with global developmental delay. Neurology 2011;77:1629-35. PMID 21956720
43: Mithyantha R, Kneen R, McCann E, Gladstone M. Current evidence-based recommendation of investigating children with global developmental delay. Arch Dis Child 2017;102(11):1071-6. PMID 29054862
44: Moeschler JB, Shevell M, Committee on Genetics. Comprehensive evaluation of the child with intellectual disability or global developmental delays. Pediatrics 2014;134(3):e903-18. PMID 25157020
45: Mostofsky SH, Newschaffer CJ, Denckla MB. Overflow movements predict impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD. Percept Mot Skills 2003;97:1315-31. PMID 15002876
46: Mullen EM. Mullen Scales of Early Learning: AGS edition. Circle Pines, MN: Pearson Assessments, 1995.
47: Murias K, Moir A, Myers KA, Liu I, Wei XC. Systematic review of MRI findings in children with developmental delay or cognitive impairment. Brain Dev 2017;39(8):644-55. PMID 28457518
48: Murphy NA, Irwin MC, Hoff C. Intrathecal baclofen therapy in children with cerebral palsy: efficacy and complications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1721-5. PMID 12474176
49: Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CR. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet 2012;379:445-52. PMID 22244654
50: Newborg J. Battelle Developmental Inventory. 2nd ed. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing; 2005.
51: Noritz GH, Murphy NA, Neuromotor Screening Expert Panel. Motor delays: early identification and evaluation. Pediatrics 2013;131(6):e2016-27.** PMID 28860134
52: Oller DK, Eilers RE, Neal AR, Schwartz HK. Precursors to speech in infancy: the prediction of speech and language disorders. J Commun Disord 1999;32(4):223-45. PMID 10466095
53: Peters LH, Maathuis KG, Kouw E, Hamming M, Hadders-Algra M. Test-retest, inter-assessor and intra-assessor reliability of the modified Touwen examination. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2008;12:328-33. PMID 17951085
54: Price V, Archbold J. Development and application of social learning theory. Br J Nurs 1995;4(21):1263-8. PMID 8574105
55: Pringsheim T, Panagiotopoulos C, Davidson J, Ho J, CAMESA guideline group. Evidence-based recommendations for monitoring safety of second generation antipsychotics in children and youth. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;20(3):218-33. PMID 21804853
56: Pringsheim T, Hirsch L, Gardner D, Gorman DA. The pharmacological management of oppositional behaviour, conduct problem, and aggression in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: as systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 1: psychostimulants, alpha-2 agonists, and atomoxetine. Can J Psych 2015a;60(2):42-51. PMID 25886655
57: Pringsheim T, Hirsch L, Gardner D, Gorman DA. The pharmacological management of oppositional behaviour, conduct problem, and aggression in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: as systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 2: antipsychotics and traditional mood stabilizers. Can J Psych 2015b;60(2):52-61. PMID 25886656
58: Reiss S, Szyszko J. Diagnostic overshadowing and professional experience with mentally retarded persons. Am J Ment Defic 1983;87(4):396-402. PMID 6829617
59: Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology Autism Network. Risperidone treatment of autistic disorder: longer-term benefits and blinded discontinuation after 6 months. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:1361-9. PMID 15994720
60: Riggs ER, Wain KE, Riethmaier D, et al. Chromosomal microarray impacts clinical management. Clin Genet 2014;85(2):147-53. PMID 23347240
61: Rickards AL, Walstab JE, Wright-Rossi RA, Simpson J, Reddihough DS. One-year follow-up of the outcome of a randomized controlled trial of a home-based intervention programme for children with autism and developmental delay and their families. Child Care Health Dev 2009;35(5):593-602. PMID 19508318
62: Schaefer GB, Mendelsohn NJ, Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Clinical genetics evaluation in identifying the etiology of autism spectrum disorders: 2013 guideline revisions. Genet Med 2013;15(5):399-407. PMID 23519317
63: Schalock RL, Luckasson RA, Shogren KA, et al. The renaming of mental retardation: understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;45(2):116-24. PMID 17428134
64: Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2003;60(3):367-80. PMID 12578916
65: Simpson DM, Gracies JM, Graham HK, et al. Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of spasticity (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2008;70:1691-8. PMID 18458229
66: Srivastava S, Cohen JS, Vernon H, et al. Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice. Ann Neurol 2014;76(4):473-83. PMID 25131622
67: Srivastava S, Love-Nichols JA, Dies KA, et al. Meta-analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet Med 2019;21(11):2413-21. PMID 31182824
68: Tarailo-Graovac M, Shyr C, Ross CJ, et al. Exome sequencing and the management of neurometabolic disorders. N Engl J Med 2016;374(23):2246-55. PMID 27276562
69: Tarrant N, Roy M, Deb S, Odedra S, Retzer A, Roy A. The effectiveness of methylphenidate in the management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil 2018;83:217-32. PMID 30266025
70: Touwen BC. Examination of the child with minor neurological dysfunction. London: MacKeith Press, 1979.
71: van Karnebeek CD, Houben RF, Lafek M, Giannasi W, Stockler S. The treatable intellectual disability APP www.treatable-id.org: a digital tool to enhance diagnosis & care for rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012;7:47. PMID 22824307
72: van Karnebeek CD, Scheper FY, Abeling NG, et al. Etiology of mental retardation in children referred to a tertiary care center: a prospective study. Am J Ment Retard 2005;110(4):253-67. PMID 15941363
73: van Karnebeek CDM. Evaluation of the child with developmental impairments. Continuum 2018;24(1 Child Neurology):228-47.** PMID 29432245
74: Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test. 4th ed. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2006.

Contributors

All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.

Author

Tanjala Gipson MD

Dr. Gipson of University of Tennessee Health Science Center has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile

Editor

Ann Tilton MD

Dr. Tilton has received honorariums from Allergan and Ipsen as an educator, advisor, and consultant.
See Profile

Former Authors

Kara Murias MD PhD FRCPC
Michael V Johnston MD†
Paul H Lipkin MD (original author), Mary O Leppert MD (original author), Siddarth Srivastava MD, Jacqueline Weissman MD MPH, and Vera Joanna Burton MD PhD

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125

Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management

Also Relevant

Academic underachievement
Acalculia
Angelman syndrome
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Autism spectrum disorder
- Cerebral palsy
- Child maltreatment
- Developmental language disorder
- Disorders of articulation
- Down syndrome
- Fragile X syndrome
- GLUT1DS-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathy
- Intellectual disability
- Tourette syndrome

Clinical Categories

Web References

Guidelines

Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management …

Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Description

Clinical applications

References

Contributors

Author

Editor

Former Authors

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Acute cerebellar ataxia in children

Wilson disease

Zika virus: neurologic complications

Anti-LGI1 encephalitis

Cerebral edema in childhood

Fatal familial insomnia

CNS germinoma

Vein of Galen malformations

Developmental delay in children: evaluation and management

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Description

Clinical applications

References

Contributors

Author

Editor

Former Authors

This is an article preview. Start a Free Account to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Acute cerebellar ataxia in children

Wilson disease

Zika virus: neurologic complications

Anti-LGI1 encephalitis

Cerebral edema in childhood

Fatal familial insomnia

CNS germinoma

Vein of Galen malformations

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.