Presbycusis

Douglas J Lanska MD MS MSPH

Neuro-Ophthalmology & Neuro-Otology

Updated 05.14.2024
Released 04.21.2013
Expires For CME 05.14.2027

Presbycusis

Author: Douglas J Lanska MD MS MSPH

See Contributor Disclosures

Presbycusis

In This Article

Quick Link

Introduction

Overview

In this article, the author explains the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic workup, and management of presbycusis.

Key points

	• Presbycusis (literally “elder hearing”) is the gradual loss of hearing that occurs in most people as they grow older.
	• Presbycusis is a complex disease with multifactorial etiology that results from accumulated damage to the inner ear with aging.
	• Presbycusis results primarily from accumulated damage to the inner ear, particularly a loss of sensory hair cells in the cochlea (ie, sensory presbycusis).
	• Patients with presbycusis develop an insidiously progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, which becomes functionally problematic in late life.
	• The main presenting symptoms are hearing loss, subjective tinnitus, or both.
	• Presbycusis is the most prevalent sensory impairment in the elderly and the third most prevalent chronic condition in older Americans, after hypertension and arthritis.
	• Risk factors for presbycusis can be grouped into four major categories: (1) aging; (2) environmental (eg, noise exposure); (3) genetic predisposition; and (4) health comorbidities (eg, cigarette smoking and atherosclerosis).
	• Remediation of hearing loss is an important contributor to quality of life among elderly persons with presbycusis.
	• Useful management approaches include education about communication effectiveness, hearing aids, assistive listening devices, and cochlear implants for severe hearing loss.

Historical note and terminology

Presbycusis (literally “elder hearing”) is the gradual loss of hearing that occurs in most people as they grow older (60). The term “presbycusis” is generally used to incorporate all processes that contribute to hearing loss over time, including both extrinsic insults (eg, noise, ototoxic agents, disease) and physiologic degeneration (60).

Between 1924, when the Johns Hopkins Otologic Research Laboratory was founded and 1938, otolaryngologist Samuel J. Crowe (1883-1955) and anatomist Stacy R. Guild (1890-1966) amassed a collection of about 1800 temporal bones that incorporated hearing thresholds (measured by the recently invented audiometer), new pathologic techniques (ie, for temporal bone decalcification, sectioning, and staining), and a method for the graphic reconstruction of the cochlea (02). Using this resource, Crowe and Guild made the first detailed otopathologic description of presbycusis. In 1931 and 1934, they observed the loss of spiral ganglion neurons and outer hair cells in the basal turn of the cochlea in individuals with high-frequency hearing loss, and they demonstrated that stria vascularis degeneration and middle ear pathology were not the most common causes for high-frequency hearing loss.

Presbycusis results primarily from accumulated damage to the inner ear, particularly a loss of sensory hair cells in the cochlea (ie, sensory presbycusis) (60; 89). In some individuals there may be contributions from other sources, including central (ie, brainstem), neural (ie, ganglion cell loss), strial or “metabolic” (ie, strial atrophy), and possibly cochlear conductive or mechanical (eg, stiffness of the basilar membrane) sources (107; 40; 06). The term “metabolic” presbycusis for presbycusis associated with strial atrophy is so-named because the stria vascularis is the metabolic pump that generates the endocochlear potential (40).

Presbycusis has also been categorized into a variety of different types (or "phenotypes") on the basis of the pattern of sensorineural hearing loss on the audiogram (90; 91). Most cases have patterns that are intermediate to the extremes of either flat or sloping loss (01). In addition, the audiometric profiles do not naturally separate into discrete classes, indicating that the previously reported "subtypes" are actually the result of categorical segregation of a continuous and heterogeneous distribution (01). Furthermore, quantitative studies of human temporal bones with flat or sloping audiometric configurations suggest that audiometric classification alone is insufficient to predict underlying otopathology (74; 75). Nevertheless, many studies utilize such subtypes, and clinically it is important to recognize the common patterns because the patterns are associated with different etiologies. In general, the high-frequency steeply sloping, high-frequency gently sloping, and flat patterns are similar in frequency and collectively represent more than 90% of cases (24; 03): other patterns are rare, including low-frequency ascending, mid-frequency U-shape, and mid-frequency reverse U-shape patterns. The flat subtype is more common in women, whereas the high-frequency steeply sloping subtype is more common in men (26; 24).

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

	• Patients with presbycusis develop an insidiously progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, which becomes functionally problematic in late life. The main presenting symptoms are hearing loss (about 50%), subjective tinnitus (about 25%), or both (about 25%).
	• Presbycusis is generally considered to be fairly symmetric, but the “oldest old” (ie, older than 95 years of age) commonly demonstrate asymmetric hearing thresholds and word recognition scores that are not indicative of retrocochlear pathology.
	• Patients affected by presbycusis find the speech of others to sound mumbled or muffled and have particular difficulty perceiving or discriminating high-pitched consonants (eg, ch, f, k, s, t, or th) compared to lower-pitched vowel sounds.
	• Central auditory dysfunction is an important component of presbycusis that may contribute to clinical communication difficulties to varying degrees.
	• Patients with presbycusis experience all three of the core dimensions of stigma, which include cognitive attribution, emotional reactions, and behavioral reactions: cognitive attributions include beliefs that they appear old, stupid, and crippled; emotional reactions include feelings of shame and self-pity as well as feeling that they are being ridiculed; and behavioral reactions include concealment and distancing.

Patients with presbycusis develop an insidiously progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, which becomes functionally problematic in late life. The main presenting symptoms are hearing loss (about 50%), subjective tinnitus (about 25%), or both (about 25%) (77). Presbycusis is generally considered to be fairly symmetric, but the “oldest old” (ie, > 95 years) commonly demonstrate asymmetric hearing thresholds and word recognitions scores that are not indicative of retrocochlear pathology (62).

Patients affected by presbycusis find the speech of others to sound mumbled or muffled, and have particular difficulty perceiving or discriminating high-pitched consonants (eg, ch, f, k, s, t, or th) compared to lower-pitched vowel sounds (17). They have more difficulty hearing the higher-pitched voices of women and children than men’s voices, and they typically have difficulty understanding conversations when there is background noise. Some sounds may be distorted or perceived as overly loud: when talking at a regular pitch and volume, the patient may have difficulty discriminating speech sounds, whereas compensatory efforts by the speaker to talk in a lower register and more loudly can produce an irritated response from the patient (“You don’t have to yell!”). Presbycusis is often associated with subjective tinnitus, which has been called "presbytinnitus" in this circumstance. However, there is no significant association between the hearing loss of patients with presbycusis and the pitch and loudness of the associated subjective tinnitus (92).

Although there is insufficient evidence to confirm the existence of "central" presbycusis as an isolated entity (53), central auditory dysfunction (ie, involving the auditory pathways in the brain) is nevertheless an important component of presbycusis that may contribute to clinical communication difficulties to varying degrees. Measures of central auditory function may decline more quickly with age than measures of peripheral auditory function (38). Central presbycusis is characterized by marked difficulty hearing in noise, a problem that is not ameliorated—and indeed may be exacerbated—by amplification (36). Individuals with central presbycusis also have difficulty with various behavioral measures: speech in competition, temporally distorted speech, and binaural speech perception (especially dichotic listening) (53).

Patients with presbycusis have impaired ability to recognize facial emotional reactions (09). Facial emotional recognition impairment in presbycusis is associated with atrophy of neural structures engaged in the perceptual and conceptual level of face emotion processing: the right insula, right hippocampus, bilateral cingulate cortex, and multiple areas of the temporal cortex (09).

Presbycusis is stigmatizing (23; 102). Patients with presbycusis experience all three of the core dimensions of stigma, which include cognitive attribution, emotional reactions, and behavioral reactions: (1) cognitive attributions include beliefs that they appear old, stupid, and crippled; (2) emotional reactions include feelings of shame and self-pity as well as feeling that they are being ridiculed; and (3) behavioral reactions include concealment and distancing (23). Hearing devices have a significant positive influence on stigmatic experiences in some patients with presbycusis (23) but in others the hearing devices themselves add to the perceived stigma (102). Indeed, stigma is a prominent barrier to use of hearing aids for some patients, even though modern devices offer in-the-canal models, miniature sizes, and camouflage with hair or skin color (102).

Presbycusis contributes to communication difficulties, isolation, and cognitive decline in elderly adults (94).

Prognosis and complications

Hearing loss can negatively impact the quality of life of affected individuals (20; 102). By impairing communication, hearing loss contributes to loneliness, isolation, dependence, and frustration (39; 20; 21; 102). Furthermore, the increasing cognitive demand of verbal communication and the diminished sense of social connectedness resulting from hearing loss can contribute to feelings of vulnerability and poor health, particularly in the elderly (21). Hearing loss certainly complicates assessment of cognitive function (39), and, in elderly individuals with cognitive impairment or dementia, the added communication difficulty resulting from hearing loss can exacerbate the cognitive dysfunction and also contribute to paranoia.

Biological basis

	• Presbycusis is a complex disease with multifactorial etiology that results from accumulated damage to the inner ear (and to a lesser degree the central auditory pathways) with aging.
	• The underlying pathophysiology of presbycusis involves an interplay between environmental and genetic factors.
	• The primary pathology involves the hair cells, stria vascularis, and afferent spiral ganglion neurons.
	• The neural abnormalities in presbycusis subjects with cochlear amplifier dysfunction extend beyond the core auditory network and are associated with cognitive decline in multiple domains.
	• In addition to changes in the cochlea, presbycusis involves biological aging in the central auditory system.
	• Genetic factors (both chromosomal genetic factors and mutations of mitochondrial DNA) predispose affected individuals to develop hearing loss with advancing age.

Etiology and pathogenesis

Presbycusis is a complex disease with multifactorial etiology that results from accumulated damage to the inner ear (and to a lesser degree the central auditory pathways) with aging. The primary pathology involves the hair cells, stria vascularis, and afferent spiral ganglion neurons (31). The underlying pathophysiology of presbycusis involves an interplay between environmental and genetic factors (ie, a gene-environment interaction) (98).

Presbycusis leads to lower activation of the auditory cortices, compared to the elderly with normal hearing (35). Age-related hearing loss has a negative effect on advanced auditory processing capabilities and accelerates the decline in speech comprehension, especially in speech competition situations (52); as a result, older adults with age-related hearing loss exhibit decompensation of network connections involving multisensory integration (52).

The neural abnormalities in presbycusis subjects with cochlear amplifier dysfunction extend beyond the core auditory network and are associated with cognitive decline in multiple domains (10). One study of patients with presbycusis and cochlear amplifier dysfunction found greater brain atrophy in the cingulate cortex and in the parahippocampus in these patients compared with controls (10), whereas another study noted decreased directed functional connections of the hippocampus in patients with presbycusis (16). In a cross-sectional analysis of 98 participants in a cohort study of hearing and brain biomarkers of Alzheimer disease, early audiometric age-related hearing loss was associated with higher β-amyloid burden measured in vivo with PET scans (42).

Based on the results of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, presbycusis patients develop topological reorganization of the whole-brain functional network, and presbycusis patients with cognitive decline show more obvious changes in these topological properties than those without cognitive decline (45).

A study of the topological reorganization and classification performance of low-order functional connectivity (LOFC) and high-order functional connectivity (HOFC) networks in patients with presbycusis used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (Rs-fMRI) data from 60 patients with presbycusis and 50 matched healthy control subjects (109).

Classification performance of LOFC and HOFC networks in patients with presbycusis

Classification performance of low-order functional connectivity and high-order functional connectivity networks in patients with presbycusis. (Source: Xu Y, Li X, Yan Q, et al. Topological disruption of low- and high-order func...

"Rich-club nodes" were defined as the top 10 (12%) brain regions with the highest average nodal degree of all regions in the group. The edges of the functional network were classified into three types of connections: (1) local connections (linking two peripheral nodes); (2) "rich-club" connections (linking two rich-club nodes); and (3) feeder connections (linking one rich-club node to one peripheral node). Aberrant modular architectures of low-order functional connectivity and high-order functional connectivity networks were identified.

Aberrant modular architectures of LOFC and HOFC networks

Significantly altered inter-modular functional connectivity between groups was observed in LOFC (A) and HOFC (C) networks. Significant changes were observed in intramodular functional connectivity in LOFC (B) and HOFC networks ...

Feeder connections, local connections, and "rich-club" connections were uniformly lower in presbycusis subjects than healthy controls, but this reached statistical significance only for "rich-club" connections in high-order functional connectivity networks.

Comparison of the three types of connections in functional connectivity networks

The mean strength of the three connections between patients with presbycusis and healthy controls were compared using a two-sample t-test. (A) In LOFC networks, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the mean st...

The use of high-order functional connectivity profiles boosted presbycusis classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to using low-order functional connectivity profiles. Striking differences between groups in topological metrics were discovered in the constructed networks (LOFC and HOFC). Network-based statistics analysis identified a subnetwork involving 26 nodes and 23 signally altered internodal connections in patients with presbycusis compared to healthy control subjects in high-order functional connectivity networks.

Highly connected nodes of presbycusis in HOFC networks

Significantly altered functional connections featured highly connected nodes of presbycusis in HOFC networks. Spheres represent regions (nodes) and lines indicate connections (edges). Abbreviations: ANG, angular gyrus; CAL, cal...

A study of functional connectivity with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging found that abnormal effective connectivity within the Papez circuit may be involved in the cognitive impairment observed after hearing loss in presbycusis patients (108).

Environmental noise exposure and solvent exposure are significant contributors to sensory presbycusis (24), although some reports question the magnitude of the contribution from noise exposure (19). Low-frequency hearing loss is considered typical of strial or “metabolic” presbycusis, and this type of presbycusis is associated with comorbid cardiovascular disease, especially in women (37).

Various medical comorbidities can contribute to age-associated changes in hearing. For example, with diabetes, hyperglycemia and oxidative stress may contribute to cochlear microangiopathy and auditory neuropathy (50).

In addition to changes in the cochlea, presbycusis involves biological aging in the central auditory system (34; 43; 51; 53; 60; 89; 71). Anatomical reductions in neurons of the cochlear nucleus and their output pathways in the elderly can potentially occur due to either primary aging changes in the brain, or to secondary age-dependent plasticity of the cochlear nucleus in response to the age-related loss of inputs from the cochlea (34). Neurophysiological and biochemical studies suggest declines in glycine-mediated inhibition, reflected in increased firing rates in cochlear nucleus neurons, of aging individuals (34). Animal studies indicate that the loss of auditory sensitivity from inner hair cell synaptopathy can be centrally compensated until advanced age (71). In older adults, the GABA level in the right auditory cortex (MEGA-PRESS magnetic resonance spectroscopy) is associated with age and speech-in-noise performance (25).

Age-related declined in auditory function are accompanied by similar age-related declines in vestibular function (04).

Oxidative stress causes profound alterations of various biological structures, including cellular membranes, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. Dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with better hearing in the elderly population (56), whereas chronic inflammation is associated with a worsening of presbycusis (103). The cumulative effect of oxidative stress may induce damage to macromolecules such as mitochondrial DNA with the resulting accumulation of mutations and an associated decline of mitochondrial function, and secondary induction of apoptosis of the cochlear cells (110). Reduced glutathione (GSH) is one of the most important scavengers of reactive oxygen species, and its ratio with oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is a marker of oxidative stress; high glutathione peroxidase activity with a low GSH:GSSG ratio is a risk factor for presbycusis, suggesting that oxidative stress contributes to presbycusis (49).

Genetic factors predispose affected individuals to develop hearing loss with advancing age (32; 84; 07; 13; 03; 27; 67; 48; 11; 57; 82). One proposed mechanism for presbycusis is a significant increase in oxidative stress in the cochlea, and indeed polymorphisms of several antioxidant enzymes that have been linked to presbycusis, including polymorphisms of the enzymes glutathione S-transferase (GST), N-acetyltransferase (NAT), and cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) (07; 03; 67). Common alleles of GRM7, the gene encoding metabotropic glutamate receptor type 7, also contribute to an individual's risk of developing presbycusis, possibly through a mechanism of altered susceptibility to glutamate excitotoxicity in hair cells and in spiral ganglion cells of the inner ear where the gene is expressed (32). Using microarray analysis to identify presbycusis-associated genes, a variety of genes involved in immunity and apoptosis are associated with human presbycusis (27). In particular, BAK-mediated apoptosis may be a core mechanism in the progression of age-related hearing loss (30).

Gene polymorphisms in folate metabolism may play an important role in the etiology of presbycusis (66). Various gene polymorphisms of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and thymidylate synthase (TYMS) are significantly associated with the onset of presbycusis in a South Indian population (66).

Multiple genes that are known to be expressed in the adult human cochlea are differentially hypermethylated in blood cells among elderly women with presbycusis (12). The significance of this finding is not yet clear. P2RX2, KCNQ5, ERBB3, and SOCS3 are associated with the progression of presbycusis (12).

In addition to chromosomal genetic factors, mutations of mitochondrial DNA are involved in the development of presbycusis (69; 110; 29; 48). In particular, presbycusis is associated with the 4977 bp common deletion (69), which is also known to be increased in aging tissues and is preferentially found in chronologically and photoaged skin. As mentioned above, these mitochondrial mutations may result from the cumulative effect of oxidative stress (110).

Individuals with downward-sloping audiometric patterns of presbycusis exhibit degeneration of the stria vascularis, spiral ganglion cells, inner hair cells, and outer hair cells (75). Sensory (hair cell) presbycusis in particular is characterized by a precipitous high tone loss, ie, the high-frequency steeply sloping pattern (15). Loss of peripheral neurites in the anterior basal cochlear segment is associated with a gradual down-sloping audiogram, ie, the high-frequency gently sloping pattern (15). In contrast, individuals with flat audiometric patterns of presbycusis typically have outer hair cell loss alone or in combination with inner hair cell or ganglion cell loss, but infrequently have stria vascularis atrophy (74).

The presence of subjective tinnitus in patients with presbycusis is associated with more severe degeneration of outer hair cells and stria vascularis (99).

Epidemiology

	• Presbycusis is the most prevalent sensory impairment in the elderly and the third most prevalent chronic condition in older Americans, after hypertension and arthritis.
	• Presbycusis affects about one third of people aged 65 years and older, and up to one half of people aged 75 years and older, although some estimates place the proportion of elderly patients affected much higher.
	• Risk factors for presbycusis include repeated exposure to loud noises, smoking, certain medications, several comorbid conditions, and a family history of presbycusis.
	• Hearing loss is associated with a higher incidence of dementia in older adults.

Presbycusis is the most prevalent sensory impairment in the elderly (13; 20) and the third most prevalent chronic condition in older Americans, after hypertension and arthritis (63). Presbycusis affects about one third of people aged 65 years and older, and up to one half of people aged 75 years and older, although some estimates place the proportion of elderly patients affected much higher (95; 81; 87). However, the prevalence of presbycusis varies with the pure-tone averaged frequencies and the classification system used (87).

Hearing loss progressively worsens with age. In a cross-sectional analysis using the 2005 to 2006, 2009 to 2010, and 2011 to 2012 cycles of the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), hearing loss steadily worsened across the adult lifespan to at least age 100 years (93). When cases are limited to those with at least moderately severe hearing loss in the better ear (ie, pure tone average at the speech frequencies of 0.5, 1, and 2 KHz of > 55 dB), the prevalence increases with age, but at more modest levels: in a study among older Chinese people in Taiwan, the prevalence was 1.6% from 65 to 69 years, 3.2% for 70 to 74 years, 7.5% for 75 to 79 years, and 14.9% for those aged 80 and over (14). The rate of hearing loss increases during the tenth decade of life compared with the ninth decade (105).

Presbycusis preferentially affects the high-frequency range of hearing (58). Virtually all centenarians have some degree of presbycusis, and more than 90% suffer from moderate to severe (41 to 80 dB) hearing loss below 2 kHz, and profound (> 81 dB) hearing loss at 4 and 8 kHz (68; 62).

Risk factors for presbycusis include repeated exposure to loud noises (including occupational noise exposure), smoking, certain medications (eg, cancer chemotherapy, particularly with cisplatin; some antibiotics, particularly aminoglycosides; loop diuretics; and aspirin and other anti-inflammatory agents), several comorbid conditions (eg, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, and renal failure), and a family history of presbycusis (50; 88; 05). Premature hair graying may be a risk factor for age-associated hearing impairment at extended high frequencies (79). The various risk factors for presbycusis can be grouped into four major categories: (1) aging; (2) environmental (eg, noise exposure); (3) genetic predisposition; and (4) health comorbidities (eg, cigarette smoking and atherosclerosis) (110).

Dietary antioxidants may help reduce the risk of developing presbycusis because higher intake of seeds and nuts, fruits, seaweed, and vitamin A were positively associated with better hearing in a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 5201 older adults (aged 50 years and older) in the fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2010 to 2012 (18).

Hearing loss is associated with a higher incidence of cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults (41; 96; 100; 55; 73). In a 10-year national population-based study, the incidence of dementia was 1.3-fold higher among patients with age-related hearing loss, suggesting that age-related hearing loss may be one of the early characteristics of dementia (96). In another study, observed hearing loss was associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of developing dementia in a multiethnic cohort (41).

Smoking and diabetes have a strong synergistic effect on presbycusis (05).

In the Rotterdam Study, a longitudinal cohort study of individuals aged greater than or equal to 45 years from a suburb of Rotterdam, the Netherlands, hearing loss among 3590 nondemented community-dwelling participants was associated with lower cognitive function at baseline and accelerated cognitive decline on a memory test (22). However, the association between hearing loss and accelerated cognitive decline was nonsignificant after adjustment for nonlinear age effects. The authors concluded that more evidence is needed to determine if hearing loss is a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline.

Differential diagnosis

Confusing conditions

Other common causes of sensorineural hearing loss include noise-induced hearing loss, vascular occlusive disease, trauma, Meniere syndrome, viral infections, meningitis, toxins, and genetic syndromes. Less common causes include acoustic neuroma. Distinguishing these various conditions requires attention to past medical and environmental exposure history (eg, noise or toxin exposure, trauma, etc.), onset and course of hearing loss, whether the hearing loss is unilateral or bilateral, the distribution of hearing loss as a function of sound frequency, associated manifestations (eg, subjective tinnitus, vertigo), and family history.

Hearing loss from presbycusis is insidious in onset and gradually progressive. Noise-induced hearing loss has an insidious onset and is either gradually progressive (with continued noise exposure) or static. In contrast, hearing loss associated with vascular occlusive disease, trauma, and viral infections has an acute onset and remains static or may improve. Hearing loss associated with ototoxins or meningitis has a subacute onset and is later static once the cause is removed. Hearing loss associated with Meniere syndrome is fluctuating.

Noise-induced hearing loss is typically bilateral, but may be more severe in one ear, particularly in those using firearms and in professional musicians who play stringed instruments. In contrast, hearing loss associated with many of the other conditions is typically unilateral (eg, vascular occlusive disease, trauma, Meniere syndrome, viral neurolabyrinthitis, acoustic neuroma). Vascular hearing loss may rarely be bilateral with severe vertebrobasilar occlusive disease. Meniere syndrome is generally unilateral at onset, but may progress to bilateral involvement and, in any case, typically is at a much younger age.

The configuration of hearing loss on the audiogram can be helpful in suggesting or supporting an etiology. Conductive hearing loss indicates another disorder or a mixed condition.

Conductive hearing loss audiogram

Audiogram showing conductive hearing loss. With conductive hearing loss, hearing is impaired for air-conducted sounds but not for bone-conducted sounds, producing an air-bone gap on the audiogram. (Courtesy of James Lanska.)

A bilaterally symmetric, flat, or downward sloping pattern of sensorineural hearing loss suggests presbycusis, whereas a notched pattern of sensorineural hearing loss with a notch at 4000 or 6000 Hz is suggestive of noise-induced hearing loss (08; 78; 76; 44; 70) and a low-frequency trough pattern suggests Meniere syndrome.

Sensorineural hearing loss (flat pattern)

Audiogram showing flat sensorineural hearing loss. (Contributed by James Lanska.)
Sensorineural hearing loss (high-frequency sloping pattern)

Audiogram showing sloping, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. (Contributed by James Lanska.)
Sensorineural hearing loss audiogram (notched pattern)

Audiogram showing a “4 kHz notch” (or colloquially, a “4K notch”) pattern of sensorineural hearing loss, commonly seen in noise-induced hearing loss (Moukos et al 2014). Both ears are shown. (Courtesy of James Lanska.)
Sensorineural hearing loss audiogram (low-frequency trough pattern)

Audiogram showing a low-frequency trough pattern of sensorineural hearing loss, commonly seen in Meniere disease. The left ear is shown. (Courtesy of James Lanska.)

Management

	• Remediation of hearing loss is an important contributor to quality of life among elderly persons with presbycusis.
	• Useful management approaches include education about communication effectiveness, hearing aids, assistive listening devices, and cochlear implants for severe hearing loss.
	• Healthcare professionals and family members can improve communication with affected patients by facing the person (so that the impaired person can easily see face and lip movements), speaking in a lower register with short simple sentences, and eliminating extraneous background sounds when possible.
	• Lip reading is an important compensatory strategy for affected individuals and has been shown to improve comprehension.
	• Hearing aids are the principal form of rehabilitation for presbycusis and can specifically improve communication, reduce hearing handicap, and improve the quality of life for affected individuals.
	• Patients with presbycusis and dementia typically require the cooperation of their caregivers to maintain the hygiene of their ear canals, to maintain and adjust the hearing aids, and to facilitate insertion.
	• Assistive devices (eg, built-in telephone amplifier, low-frequency doorbells, amplified ringers, close-captioned television decoders, flashing alarm clocks, flashing smoke detectors, and alarm bed vibrators) and training in “speech-reading” (ie, using visual cues to help determine what is being said) are helpful for many patients with presbycusis.
	• For selected patients with profound hearing loss that is not improved by a simple hearing aid, a cochlear implant device may provide functional hearing.

Remediation of hearing loss is an important contributor to quality of life among elderly persons with presbycusis. Useful management approaches include education about communication effectiveness, hearing aids, assistive listening devices, and cochlear implants for severe hearing loss (39).

Healthcare professionals and family members can improve communication with affected patients by facing the person (so that the impaired person can easily see face and lip movements), speaking in a lower register with short simple sentences, and eliminating extraneous background sounds when possible. Lip reading is an important compensatory strategy for affected individuals and has been shown to improve comprehension (86; 85). Individuals with presbycusis or hearing impairment experience significantly improved spoken-word intelligibility when spoken-word recognition is coupled with speechreading, leading to the suggestion that speechreading may serve as a "third ear" (85).

Hearing aids are the principal form of rehabilitation for presbycusis and can specifically improve communication, reduce hearing handicap, and improve the quality of life for affected individuals (106; 40; 64; 72; 83). Hearing aids are effective for treating mild to moderate hearing loss when the device is appropriately selected and fit for the patient, and the patient is motivated and able to use the device (95). Unfortunately, many older adults have difficulty accepting the need for amplification, and many others become dissatisfied with the performance of hearing aids in a variety of sonic environments (80). Consequently, hearing aids remain underused in the elderly, especially among the “oldest old” (105). Newer digital hearing aids may improve performance, but they are expensive and are not covered by Medicare (80).

Hearing aids are of most benefit for those with sensory presbycusis. Neural and central types of presbycusis are rare and may not exist in strict isolation but are significant because amplification typically does not benefit patients with significant neural or central contributions to their hearing loss (36).

Dementia is another barrier to use of hearing aids. Patients with presbycusis and dementia typically require the cooperation of their caregivers to maintain the hygiene of their ear canals, to maintain and adjust the hearing aids, and to facilitate insertion (54). Nevertheless, it is important for such patients to optimize their hearing to improve their communication with others, maintain and maximize their functional performance, lessen the frequency of problematic neuropsychiatric features (eg, agitation, depression, and paranoia), limit their dependence on others, and lessen their need for institutional care.

Assistive devices (eg, built-in telephone amplifier, low-frequency doorbells, amplified ringers, close-captioned television decoders, flashing alarm clocks, flashing smoke detectors, and alarm bed vibrators) and training in “speech-reading” (ie, using visual cues to help determine what is being said) are helpful for many patients with presbycusis (106; 40). Instruction in sign language should be considered for those with severe hearing loss associated with presbycusis.

For selected patients with profound hearing loss that is not improved by a simple hearing aid, a cochlear implant device may provide functional hearing (39; 95; 21); there is no absolute age threshold beyond when this procedure cannot be done for appropriate patients. Cochlear implantation may improve audiologic performance and quality of life in elderly patients, even into their eighties (59; 39; 28; 95; 61). Among patients treated with cochlear implants for hearing loss, patients with presbycusis perform as well as younger patients on speech discrimination tests in quiet environments, but perform significantly worse in noisy surroundings, possibly due to contributions from central presbycusis (61). Pain and transient vertigo are the most common complications reported in elderly patients following cochlear implantation (28).

A variety of pharmacological agents have been explored for their potential to slow the development of hearing loss, or treat the associated subjective tinnitus, in people with presbycusis (46; 97; 33; 47). To date, none of these agents have an established role in the management of presbycusis, and none have been approved for treatment of presbycusis by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, preliminary data suggest that a water-soluble coenzyme Q10 formulation may be helpful in improving hearing in patients with presbycusis (46). Preliminary data also suggest that pramipexole may improve subjective tinnitus associated with presbycusis, although it does not change hearing thresholds (97).

Media

References

01: Allen PD, Eddins DA. Presbycusis phenotypes form a heterogeneous continuum when ordered by degree and configuration of hearing loss. Hear Res 2010;264(1-2):10-20. PMID 20144701
02: Andresen NS, Winslow MK, Gregg L, et al. Insights into presbycusis from the first temporal bone laboratory within the United States. Otol Neurotol 2022;43(3):400-8. PMID 35061640
03: Angeli SI, Bared A, Ouyang X, Du LL, Yan D, Zhong Liu X. Audioprofiles and antioxidant enzyme genotypes in presbycusis. Laryngoscope 2012;122(11):2539-42. PMID 22965834
04: Azevedo C, Vilarinho S, Sousa Menezes A, Milhazes Mar F, Dias L. Vestibular and cochlear dysfunction in aging: Two sides of the same coin? World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;8(4):308-14. PMID 36474668
05: Bae SH, Kwak SH, Choi JY, Jung J. Synergistic effect of smoking on age-related hearing loss in patients with diabetes. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):18893. PMID 33144636
06: Bao J, Ohlemiller KK. Age-related loss of spiral ganglion neurons. Hear Res 2010;264(1-2):93-7. PMID 19854255
07: Bared A, Ouyang X, Angeli S, et al. Antioxidant enzymes, presbycusis, and ethnic variability. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;143(2):263-8. PMID 20647132
08: Bauer P, Korpert K, Neuberger M, Raber A, Schwetz F. Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47,388 noise-exposed workers. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;90(6):3086-98. PMID 1787247
09: Belkhiria C, Vergara RC, Martinez M, Delano PH, Delgado C. Neural links between facial emotion recognition and cognitive impairment in presbycusis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021;36(8):1171-8. PMID 33503682
10: Belkhiria C, Vergara RC, San Martín S, et al. Cingulate cortex atrophy is associated with hearing loss in presbycusis with cochlear amplifier dysfunction. Front Aging Neurosci 2019;11:97. Erratum in: Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:131. PMID 31080411
11: Boucher S, Tai FWJ, Delmaghani S, Lelli A, et al. Ultrarare heterozygous pathogenic variants of genes causing dominant forms of early-onset deafness underlie severe presbycusis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020;117(49):31278-89. PMID 33229591
12: Bouzid A, Smeti I, Dhouib L, et al. Down-expression of P2RX2, KCNQ5, ERBB3 and SOCS3 through DNA hypermethylation in elderly women with presbycusis. Biomarkers 2018;23(4):347-56. PMID 29325454
13: Bovo R, Ciorba A, Martini A. Environmental and genetic factors in age-related hearing impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res 2011;23(1):3-10. PMID 21499014
14: Chang HP, Chou P. Presbycusis among older Chinese people in Taipei, Taiwan: a community-based study. Int J Audiol 2007;46(12):738-45. PMID 18049963
15: Chen MA, Webster P, Yang E, Linthicum FH Jr. Presbycusic neuritic degeneration within the osseous spiral lamina. Otol Neurotol 2006;27(3):316-22. PMID 16639268
16: Chen YC, Yong W, Xing C, et al. Directed functional connectivity of the hippocampus in patients with presbycusis. Brain Imaging Behav 2019;14(3):917-26. PMID 31270776
17: Cheslock M, De Jesus O. Presbycusis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2022. PMID 32644646
18: Choi JE, Ahn J, Moon IJ. Associations between age-related hearing loss and dietary assessment using data from Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrients 2021;13(4):1230. PMID 33917838
19: Ciorba A, Benatti A, Bianchini C, et al. High frequency hearing loss in the elderly: effect of age and noise exposure in an Italian group. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125(8):776-80. PMID 21729437
20: Ciorba A, Bianchini C, Pelucchi S, Pastore A. The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults. Clin Interv Aging 2012;7:159-63. PMID 22791988
21: Clark JH, Yeagle J, Arbaje AI, Lin FR, Niparko JK, Francis HW. Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60(10):1936-45. PMID 22974240
22: Croll PH, Vinke EJ, Armstrong NM, et al. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in the general population: a prospective cohort study. J Neurol 2021;268(3):860-71. PMID 32910252
23: David D, Zoizner G, Werner P. Self-stigma and age-related hearing loss: a qualitative study of stigma formation and dimensions. Am J Audiol 2018;27(1):126-36. PMID 29379957
24: Demeester K, van Wieringen A, Hendrickx JJ, et al. Audiometric shape and presbycusis. Int J Audiol 2009;48(4):222-32. PMID 19363723
25: Dobri SGJ, Ross B. Total GABA level in human auditory cortex is associated with speech-in-noise understanding in older age. Neuroimage 2021;225:117474. PMID 33099004
26: do Carmo LC, Médicis da Silveira JA, Marone SA, D'Ottaviano FG, Zagati LL, Dias von Söhsten Lins EM. Audiological study of an elderly Brazilian population. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2008;74(3):342-9. PMID 18661006
27: Dong Y, Li M, Liu P, Song H, Zhao Y, Shi J. Genes involved in immunity and apoptosis are associated with human presbycusis based on microarray analysis. Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134(6):601-8. PMID 24552194
28: Eshraghi AA, Rodriguez M, Balkany TJ, et al. Cochlear implant surgery in patients more than seventy-nine years old. Laryngoscope 2009;119(6):1180-3. PMID 19301411
29: Falah M, Farhadi M, Kamrava SK, et al. Association of genetic variations in the mitochondrial DNA control region with presbycusis. Clin Interv Aging 2017;12:459-65. PMID 28424544
30: Falah M, Najafi M, Houshmand M, Farhadi M. Expression levels of the BAK1 and BCL2 genes highlight the role of apoptosis in age-related hearing impairment. Clin Interv Aging 2016;11:1003-8. PMID 27555755
31: Fischer N, Johnson Chacko L, Glueckert R, Schrott-Fischer A. Age-dependent changes in the cochlea. Gerontology 2020;66(1):33-9. PMID 31117093
32: Friedman RA, Van Laer L, Huentelman MJ, et al. GRM7 variants confer susceptibility to age-related hearing impairment. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18(4):785-96. PMID 19047183
33: Frisina RD, Ding B, Zhu X, Walton JP. Age-related hearing loss: prevention of threshold declines, cell loss and apoptosis in spiral ganglion neurons. Aging (Albany NY) 2016;8(9):2081-99. PMID 27667674
34: Frisina RD, Walton JP. Age-related structural and functional changes in the cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 2006;216-217:216-23. PMID 16597491
35: Fuksa J, Profant O, Tintěra J, Svobodová V, Tóthová D, Škoch A, Syka J. Functional changes in the auditory cortex and associated regions caused by different acoustic stimuli in patients with presbycusis and tinnitus. Front Neurosci 2022;16:921873. PMID 36340777
36: Gates GA. Central presbycusis: an emerging view. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147(1):1-2. PMID 22535914
37: Gates GA, Cobb JL, D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The relation of hearing in the elderly to the presence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119(2):156-61. PMID 8427676
38: Gates GA, Feeney MP, Mills D. Cross-sectional age-changes of hearing in the elderly. Ear Hear 2008;29(6):865-74. PMID 18998241
39: Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet 2005;366(9491):1111-20. PMID 16182900
40: Gates GA, Rees TS. Hear ye. Hear ye! Successful auditory aging. West J Med 1997;167(4):247-52. PMID 9348755
41: Golub JS, Luchsinger JA, Manly JJ, Stern Y, Mayeux R, Schupf N. Observed hearing loss and incident dementia in a multiethnic cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65(8):1691-7. PMID 28323321
42: Golub JS, Sharma RK, Rippon BQ, Brickman AM, Luchsinger JA. The association between early age-related hearing loss and brain β-amyloid. Laryngoscope 2021;131(3):633-8. PMID 32644260
43: Gourevitch B, Edeline JM. Age-related changes in the guinea pig auditory cortex: relationship with brainstem changes and comparison with tone-induced hearing loss. Eur J Neurosci 2011;34(12):1953-65. PMID 22092590
44: Griest SE, Bishop PM. Tinnitus as an early indicator of permanent hearing loss. A 15 year longitudinal study of noise exposed workers. AAOHN J 1998;46(7):325-9. PMID 9748912
45: Guan B, Xu Y, Chen YC, Xing C, et al. Reorganized Brain Functional Network Topology in Presbycusis. Front Aging Neurosci 2022;14:905487. PMID 35693344
46: Guastini L, Mora R, Dellepiane M, Santomauro V, Giorgio M, Salami A. Water-soluble coenzyme Q10 formulation in presbycusis: long-term effects. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131(5):512-7. PMID 21162656
47: Halonen J, Hinton AS, Frisina RD, Ding B, Zhu X, Walton JP. Long-term treatment with aldosterone slows the progression of age-related hearing loss. Hear Res 2016;336:63-71. PMID 27157488
48: Han B, Zhou T, Tu Y, et al. Correlation between mitochondrial DNA 4977 bp deletion and presbycusis: A system review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(27):e16302. PMID 31277167
49: Hasansulama W, Madiadipoera TS, Sunarjati, Garna H. Glutathione peroxide and glutathione to disulfide glutathione ratio in presbycusis: a case-control study. Med Arch 2022;76(3):209-14. PMID 36200118
50: Helzner EP, Contrera KJ. Type 2 diabetes and hearing impairment. Curr Diab Rep 2016;16(1):3. PMID 26699766
51: Hinojosa R, Nelson EG. Cochlear nucleus neuron analysis in individuals with presbycusis. Laryngoscope 2011;121(12):2641-8. PMID 22109765
52: Huang HM, Chen GS, Liu ZY, et al. Age-related hearing loss accelerates the decline in fast speech comprehension and the decompensation of cortical network connections. Neural Regen Res 2023;18(9):1968-75. PMID 36926721
53: Humes LE, Dubno JR, Gordon-Salant S, et al. Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2012;23(8):635-66. PMID 22967738
54: Hutchison B, Covan EK, Bogus JC. Presbycusis, part 1: can you hear the music of life. Care Manag J 2012;13(3):148-72. PMID 23072178
55: Jafari Z, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH. Age-related hearing loss and tinnitus, dementia risk, and auditory amplification outcomes. Ageing Res Rev 2019;56:100963. PMID 31557539
56: Kang JW, Choi HS, Kim K, Choi JY. Dietary vitamin intake correlates with hearing thresholds in the older population: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;99(6):1407-13. PMID 24646817
57: Karimian M, Behjati M, Barati E, Ehteram T, Karimian A. CYP1A1 and GSTs common gene variations and presbycusis risk: a genetic association analysis and a bioinformatics approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020;27(34):42600-10. PMID 32712936
58: Kim S, Park JM, Han JS, et al. Age-related hearing loss in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One 2020;15(12):e0243001. PMID 33259558
59: Kunimoto M, Yamanaka N, Kimura T, et al. The benefit of cochlear implantation in the Japanese elderly. Auris Nasus Larynx 1999;26(2):131-7. PMID 10214890
60: Lanska DJ. Disorders of the special senses in the elderly. In: Nair A, Sabbagh M, editors. Geriatric neurology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2014:396-459.
61: Lenarz M, Sönmez H, Joseph G, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients. Laryngoscope 2012;122(6):1361-5. PMID 22539093
62: Leskowitz MJ, Caruana FF, Siedlecki B, Qian ZJ, Spitzer JB, Lalwani AK. Asymmetric hearing loss is common and benign in patients aged 95 years and older. Laryngoscope 2016;126(7):1630-2. PMID 27040356
63: Li-Korotky HS. Age-related hearing loss: quality of care for quality of life. Gerontologist 2012;52(2):265-71. PMID 22383543
64: Lotfi Y, Mehrkian S, Moossavi A, Faghih-Zadeh S. Quality of life improvement in hearing-impaired elderly people after wearing a hearing aid. Arch Iran Med 2009;12(4):365-70. PMID 19566353
65: Maeda Y, Takao S, Sugaya A, et al. Relationship between pure-tone audiogram findings and speech perception among older Japanese persons. Acta Otolaryngol 2018;138(2):140-4. PMID 28933573
66: Manche SK, Jangala M, Dudekula D, Koralla M, Akka J. Polymorphisms in folate metabolism genes are associated with susceptibility to presbycusis. Life Sci 2018;196:77-83. PMID 29369772
67: Manche SK, Jangala M, Putta P, Koralla RM, Akka J. Association of oxidative stress gene polymorphisms with presbycusis. Gene 2016;593(2):277-83. PMID 27562082
68: Mao Z, Zhao L, Pu L, Wang M, Zhang Q, He DZ. How well can centenarians hear. PLoS One 2013;8(6):e65565. PMID 23755251
69: Markaryan A, Nelson EG, Hinojosa R. Quantification of the mitochondrial DNA common deletion in presbycusis. Laryngoscope 2009;119(6):1184-9. PMID 19358252
70: McBride DI, Williams S. Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss. Occup Environ Med 2001;58(1):46-51. PMID 11119634
71: Mohrle D, Ni K, Varakina K, et al. Loss of auditory sensitivity from inner hair cell synaptopathy can be centrally compensated in the young but not old brain. Neurobiol Aging 2016;44:173-84. PMID 27318145
72: Mondelli MF, Souza PJ. Quality of life in elderly adults before and after hearing aid fitting. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012;78(3):49-56. PMID 22714847
73: Morita Y, Sasaki T, Takahashi K, et al. Age-related hearing loss is strongly associated with cognitive decline regardless of the APOE4 polymorphism. Otol Neurotol 2019;40(10):1263-7. PMID 31664002
74: Nelson EG, Hinojosa R. Presbycusis: a human temporal bone study of individuals with flat audiometric patterns of hearing loss using a new method to quantify stria vascularis volume. Laryngoscope 2003;113(10):1672-86. PMID 14520091
75: Nelson EG, Hinojosa R. Presbycusis: a human temporal bone study of individuals with downward sloping audiometric patterns of hearing loss and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2006;116(9 Pt 3 Suppl 112):1-12. PMID 16946668
76: Neuberger M, Korpert K, Raber A, Schwetz F, Bauer P. Hearing loss from industrial noise, head injury and ear disease. A multivariate analysis on audiometric examinations of 110,647 workers. Audiology 1992;31(1):45-57. PMID 1554332
77: Ogunleye AO, Labaran AO. Presbycusis in Nigerians at the University College Hospital, Ibadan. Afr J Med Sci 2005;34(3):293-6. PMID 16749364
78: Osguthorpe JD, Klein AJ. Occupational hearing conservation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991;24(2):403-14. PMID 1857619
79: Ozbay I, Kahraman C, Kucur C, Namdar ND, Oghan F. Is there a relationship between premature hair greying and hearing impairment? J Laryngol Otol 2015;129(11):1097-100. PMID 26412241
80: Pacala JT, Yueh B. Hearing deficits in the older patient: "I didn't notice anything". JAMA 2012;307(11):1185-94. PMID 22436959
81: Parham K, McKinnon BJ, Eibling D, Gates GA. Challenges and opportunities in presbycusis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144(4):491-5. PMID 21493222
82: Peng L, Li N, Huang Z, Qiu C, Yin S. Prognostic gene expression signature for age-related hearing loss. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:814851. PMID 35463035
83: Picard GK, Bentvelzen AC, Savage G, Barnier A, Strutt PA. Hear me out: a meta-analysis of third-party disability due to presbycusis. Ear Hear 2024;45(2):297-305. PMID 37635275
84: Raynor LA, Pankow JS, Miller MB, et al. Familial aggregation of age-related hearing loss in an epidemiological study of older adults. Am J Audiol 2009;18(2):114-8. PMID 19474454
85: Reis LR, Escada P. Effect of speechreading in presbycusis: do we have a third ear? Otolaryngol Pol 2017;71(6):38-44. PMID 29327687
86: Reis LR, Escada P. Presbycusis: do we have a third ear? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82(6):710-4. PMID 27080751
87: Rodríguez-Valiente A, Álvarez-Montero Ó, Górriz-Gil C, García-Berrocal JR. Prevalence of presbycusis in an otologically normal population. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2020;71(3):175-80. PMID 31506162
88: Rolim LP, Samelli AG, Moreira RR, et al. Effects of diabetes mellitus and systemic arterial hypertension on elderly patients' hearing. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018;84(6):754-63. PMID 29030131
89: Roth TN. Aging of the auditory system. Handb Clin Neurol 2015;129:357-73. PMID 25726279
90: Schuknecht HF. Further observations on the pathology of presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol 1964;80:369-82. PMID 14198699
91: Schuknecht HF, Gacek MR. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102(1 Pt 2):1-16. PMID 8420477
92: Seimetz BM, Teixeira AR, Rosito LP, Flores LS, Pappen CH, Dall'igna C. Pitch and loudness tinnitus in individuals with presbycusis. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;20(4):321-6. PMID 27746834
93: Sharma RK, Lalwani AK, Golub JS. Modeling hearing loss progression and asymmetry in the older old: a national population-based study. Laryngoscope 2021;131(4):879-84. PMID 33161587
94: Slade K, Plack CJ, Nuttall HE. The effects of age-related hearing loss on the brain and cognitive function. Trends Neurosci 2020;43(10):810-21. PMID 32826080
95: Sprinzl GM, Riechelmann H. Current trends in treating hearing loss in elderly people: a review of the technology and treatment options - a mini-review. Gerontology 2010;56(3):351-8. PMID 20090297
96: Su P, Hsu CC, Lin HC, et al. Age-related hearing loss and dementia: a 10-year national population-based study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274(5):2327-34. PMID 28229293
97: Sziklai I, Szilvássy J, Szilvássy Z. Tinnitus control by dopamine agonist pramipexole in presbycusis patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Laryngoscope 2011;121(4):888-93. PMID 21433025
98: Tawfik KO, Klepper K, Saliba J, Friedman RA. Advances in understanding of presbycusis. J Neurosci Res 2020;98(9):1685-97. PMID 30950547
99: Terao K, Cureoglu S, Schachern PA, et al. Cochlear changes in presbycusis with tinnitus. Am J Otolaryngol 2011;32(3):215-20. PMID 20434804
100: Thomson RS, Auduong P, Miller AT, Gurgel RK. Hearing loss as a risk factor for dementia: a systematic review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2017;2(2):69-79. PMID 28894825
101: Torres-Russotto D, Landau WM, Harding GW, Bohne BA, Sun K, Sinatra PM. Calibrated finger rub auditory screening test (CALFRAST). Neurology 2009;72(18):1595-600. PMID 19414727
102: Vaisbuch Y, Santa Maria PL. Age-related hearing loss: innovations in hearing augmentation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018;51(4):705-23. PMID 29735277
103: Verschuur C, Agyemang-Prempeh A, Newman TA. Inflammation is associated with a worsening of presbycusis: evidence from the MRC national study of hearing. Int J Audiol 2014;53(7):469-75. PMID 24679110
104: Walker JJ, Cleveland LM, Davis JL, Seales JS. Audiometry screening and interpretation. Am Fam Physician 2013;87(1):41-7. PMID 23317024
105: Wattamwar K, Qian ZJ, Otter J, et al. Increases in the rate of age-related hearing loss in the older old. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;143(1):41-5. PMID 27632707
106: Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PMID 1939883
107: Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83(3):859-95. PMID 3281988
108: Xing C, Chang W, Liu Y, et al. Alteration in resting-state effective connectivity within the Papez circuit in Presbycusis. Eur J Neurosci 2023;58(4):3026-36. PMID 37337805
109: Xu Y, Li X, Yan Q, et al. Topological disruption of low- and high-order functional networks in presbycusis. Brain Commun 2024;6(2):fcae119. PMID 38638149
110: Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Kondo K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res 2013;303:30-8. PMID 23422312

Patient Profile

Age range of presentation: 45 to 65+ years
Sex preponderance: Male=female
Heredity: Heredity may be a factor
Population groups selectively affected: None selectively affected
Occupation groups selectively affected: None selectively affected

ICD & OMIM codes

ICD-10: Presbycusis, unspecified ear: H91.10
ICD-11: Presbycusis: AB54
For hereditary diseases: Age-related hearing impairment 1 (Presbycusis1): %612448

Age-related hearing impairment 2 (Presbycusis2): %612976

Autosomal dominant deafness 25: #605583

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125

Presbycusis

Differential Diagnosis

acoustic neuroma
genetic syndromes
Meniere syndrome
meningitis
noise-induced hearing loss
- toxins
- trauma
- vascular occlusive disease
- viral infections

Also Relevant

Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss
Central deafness
Neurologic disorders of aging
Noise-induced hearing loss
Sensorineural hearing loss
- Subjective tinnitus

	• Simple office-based screening and evaluation procedures can identify potential hearing disorders.
	• Screening can be performed periodically by asking the patient or family if there are perceived hearing problems or by using clinical office tests, such as whispered voice, finger rub, and related techniques.
	• Complaints of hearing loss or subjective tinnitus, or positive results from office screening and evaluation procedures, should prompt audiologic referral to confirm the diagnosis with audiometric testing.
	• The pure-tone threshold on the pure-tone audiogram is a good predictor of speech perception by speech audiometry among older persons.

Presbycusis

Presbycusis

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Prognosis and complications

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Epidemiology

Prevention

Differential diagnosis

Confusing conditions

Diagnostic workup

Management

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Toxic and nutritional deficiency optic neuropathies

Nystagmus

Third nerve palsy

Von Hippel-Lindau disease

Giant cell arteritis

Ischemic optic neuropathy

Transient visual loss

Vestibular schwannoma

Presbycusis

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Prognosis and complications

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Epidemiology

Prevention

Differential diagnosis

Confusing conditions

Diagnostic workup

Management

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview. Start a Free Account to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Toxic and nutritional deficiency optic neuropathies

Nystagmus

Third nerve palsy

Von Hippel-Lindau disease

Giant cell arteritis

Ischemic optic neuropathy

Transient visual loss

Vestibular schwannoma

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.