Severe closed head injury …

Richard S Polin MD

General Neurology

Updated 08.16.2024
Released 06.18.1999
Expires For CME 08.16.2027

Severe closed head injury

Author: Richard S Polin MD

See Contributor Disclosures

Editor: Randolph W Evans MD

Severe closed head injury

In This Article

Quick Link

Introduction

Overview

Surgical and medical management of closed head injury continues to evolve. Although no one has yet identified the "magic bullet" to prevent secondary injury after head trauma, several promising novel strategies are being employed. In this update, the author discusses recent trials using ketamine for severe traumatic brain injury.

Key points

	• Wartime experience has continuously influenced and improved civilian management of severe traumatic brain injury.
	• Predictors of outcome include the Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Scores and aspects of the neurologic exam of the comatose patient, such as the pupillary exam.
	• Contemporary brain injury management has shifted from intense hyperventilation and mannitol administration to maintaining tissue oxygenation and employing hypertonic saline.

Historical note and terminology

Evidence from the antiquities suggests that there were cases of neurosurgical intervention for brain injuries by the Chinese, the Incas, and the Greeks, among others (56). MacEwen described the diagnosis and evacuation of a subdural hematoma (55). Much trauma experience has been obtained from war. In specific, Cushing's attention to antisepsis and early debridement produced improved mortality figures in World War I (28). Experience during World War II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam War taught neurosurgeons that rapid surgery could produce excellent survival statistics. The two most important developments in the evolution of head trauma care have been the introduction of the CT scan by Houndsfield and colleagues in the 1970s and the introduction of the Glasgow Coma Scale by Teasdale and Jennett during the same period (104). The ability to rapidly diagnose and accurately describe injuries has been extremely beneficial to trauma patients.

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

The clinical examination of a patient with severe brain injury is similar to the evaluation of a comatose patient. Following evaluation and stabilization of airway, breathing, and circulation, attention is focused on the neurologic examination. The Glasgow Coma Scale score is a quick and reliable test of neurologic function. The Glasgow Coma Scale scores eye-opening, motor response, and verbal output to obtain a score between 3 and 15. Intubated patients are assigned a verbal score of 3. In addition to the Glasgow Coma Scale, several tests must be performed on each patient. These tests include:

	• Observation for signs of basilar skull fracture, Battle sign (blood over the mastoid process), and raccoon eyes as well as palpation and observation for open, depressed skull fracture.
	• Pupillary examination. Pupils should be examined for the presence of afferent pupillary defect indicating trauma to the optic nerve or third nerve palsy with an interruption in parasympathetic efferents leading to a dilated pupil.
	• Corneal reflex. The corneal reflex tests the trigeminal nerve (sensory limb) and facial nerve (motor limb).
	• Cold calorics. In the patient with head injury, the neck will also be immobilized. Doll's eye maneuvers, therefore, are contraindicated. In comatose patients, infusion of cold saline into the ear will cause a chronic deviation of the eye to the opposite side with a corrective beat towards the midline if the pontine gaze centers are intact. Absent cold calorics indicate damage below the mid pons.
	• Gag reflex. Gag reflex tests the ninth and tenth cranial nerves.
	• Extremities. Although the Glasgow Coma Scale score tallies the best of four limb responses, each extremity must be assessed. Focal hemiparesis may be either contralateral or ipsilateral to an intracranial mass lesion. Exploratory burr holes should be performed as necessary on the side of the pupillary abnormality. Isolated lower extremity weakness could indicate a spinal cord injury. When quadriplegia is present, a cervical spine injury must be suspected.
	• Rectal tone. Rectal tone will be diminished in cases of spinal cord injury.

Prognosis and complications

The following section is adapted from 68 (68).

Prognosis. Despite the advances made in understanding the pathophysiology, neuroimaging, and intensive care management of severe head injury, morbidity and mortality remain high. Jennett and colleagues reported in 1979 that approximately half of patients with severe head injuries died (57). By 1991, the results of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank demonstrated a 35% improvement in the mortality rate of patients with severe head injuries, with over 40% of patients having a good recovery (71). Spain and colleagues described 133 patients treated between 1994 and 1996 with severe traumatic brain injury. Overall mortality was 18% (102). In an international trial of an excitatory amino acid inhibitor, 427 patients were enrolled. Of those patients, 409 were included in the final, 6-month data analysis. Overall, 23% of patients died by the 6-month follow-up. Fifty-seven percent of patients had favorable outcomes (75).

Aggressive treatment of the comatose patient remains, with few exceptions, the standard. Tien and colleagues examined patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and compared patients with at least one reactive pupil to those with bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils. They found 100% mortality in the group with bilateral fixed pupils but a 58% survival rate in patients with at least one reactive pupil (106).

Chamoun and associates examined a cohort of 189 patients presenting with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 (20). The overall mortality rate was 49%, with 80% mortality in patients with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils. However, only 13% of the population had a favorable outcome at 6 months. Younger age, lower intracranial pressure, and reactive pupils served as statistically and significantly favorable prognostic factors.

Mauritz and colleagues specifically looked at prognosis in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 on presentation, with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils (72). Eight of 92 (8.7%) individuals in a large trauma cohort who met these criteria had a favorable 12-month outcome. The same group also reported that age over 65, although a poor prognostic factor, does not inevitably lead to an unfavorable outcome (15).

Wang and associates added another prognosis variable in traumatic brain injury. In addition to traditional prognostic factors, such as age, GCS score, use of anticoagulants, and presence of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, they found that the fibrosis-4 score, a marker for baseline hepatic function, was an independent predictor of mortality in a multivariate model (112). Kunapaisal and colleagues examined admission platelet count as a marker of coagulopathy and a potential prognostic factor after severe traumatic brain injury (65). A retrospective study of over 44,000 patients found that patients older than 50 years of age have lower admission platelet counts, which was independently associated with greater mortality after traumatic brain injury.

The MRC CRASH Trial accrued a validated cohort of 8509 patients and attempted to develop a model for outcome prediction in this cohort. Factors influencing outcome included age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, pupil reactivity, and the presence of a major extracranial injury in a basic model; an additional CT model included significant factors such as petechial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, midline shift, nonevacuated hematoma, and obliteration of cisterns. The study was designed to differentiate between injuries in low- and high-income populations (76). Steyerberg and colleagues used criteria obtained from 11 trials but used the same cohort to validate differences in 6-month outcomes based on age, Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, papillary reactivity, hypoxia, hypotension, low hemoglobin, high glucose, and CT findings, including traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (103).

Complications. Complications include all sequelae of prolonged coma and recumbency and systemic trauma, including systemic infection, deep venous thrombosis, electrolyte abnormalities, fat embolism syndrome, stress ulceration, and anemia. Meningitis is common in patients with skull base fractures leading to dural tears. All patients must be monitored for signs of rhinorrhea and otorrhea. Postoperative patients, especially those whose original wound was dirty, should also be monitored for signs of infection. Hydrocephalus may develop in patients with subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage.

Clinical vignette

A 14-year-old male was struck by a car while riding a bicycle. He had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of E4M6V3=13 at the scene but then suffered a seizure and was brought to the hospital. In our emergency room, he was found to have equal round and reactive pupils and was Glasgow Coma Scale E3M6V3=12. CT scan showed evidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, a small parafalcine subdural hemorrhage, and brainstem swelling.

Severe closed head injury (CT) (1)

CT scan shows evidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, a small parafalcine subdural hemorrhage, and brainstem swelling. (Contributed by Dr. Richard Polin.)

Approximately 18 hours after the injury, he suffered a respiratory arrest and was resuscitated and intubated. His Glasgow Coma Scale was E1M4VT=5T. CT was unchanged, and an intracranial pressure monitor was placed. Initial pressure was 20 Torricelli units. The patient was treated with intermittent doses of mannitol, 25 g propofol every 4 hours, and a paralytic agent. The pressure remained less than 25, with cerebral perfusion pressure greater than 70 for 48 hours. On the morning of postinjury day 3, intracranial pressure was noted to be elevated to the low thirties. CT scan showed worsened brain swelling as well as a left frontal contusion. The pupils were unequal, with the left pupil dilated but sluggishly reactive.

Severe closed head injury (CT) (2)

CT scan shows brain swelling and left frontal contusion after severe head injury. (Contributed by Dr. Richard Polin.)

The patient was taken emergently to the operating room, where a bifrontal craniectomy with bilateral subtemporal decompressions was performed. An expansive duraplasty and suture ligation of the sagittal sinus and division of the anterior falx were also performed. Postoperative CT scan showed the extent of decompression. The patient was noted after surgery to be briskly localizing with all extremities, and the pupils became equal and reactive. The patient was extubated on postoperative day 6 and Glasgow Coma Scale 15 on postoperative day 8. The patient required cognitive rehabilitation but had no neurologic deficits other than memory changes.

Decompression after surgery for severe closed head injury (CT)

An expansive duraplasty was performed, as well as suture ligation of the sagittal sinus and division of the anterior falx. (Contributed by Dr. Richard Polin.)

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Severe head injuries are preventable in most cases. Ethanol intoxication is involved in almost half of all severe traumatic brain injuries in the United States. Illegal drug intoxication is also involved in a significant number of traumatic brain injuries.

The following is adapted from Graham (43):

Pathophysiology. The pathophysiology of severe head injury involves well-defined radiographic patterns of injury.

Epidural hematoma. Epidural hematoma is most often caused by injury to the middle meningeal artery after it exits the foramen spinosum and runs beneath the temporal bone and the sphenoid wing. The blood clot forms between the dura and the skull and pushes in towards the brain.

Subdural hematoma. Subdural hematoma usually occurs due to tearing of bridging veins between the dura and the brain. Small arteries on the brain’s surface may be causative factors as well. Blood layers along the surface of the brain, compressing the ipsilateral hemisphere.

Intracerebral hematoma. Hematoma formation occurs with direct trauma to intracranial vessels. These changes often occur at the frontal and temporal poles. Delayed hemorrhage may result from coagulopathy.

Contusion. A hemorrhagic transformation is characterized by venous injury, localized cerebral edema, and possible increased intracranial pressure.

Diffuse axonal injury. A distinct pattern of white matter damage is characterized radiographically by punctate lesions throughout the white matter. The corpus callosum is typically involved. Often, there is associated intraventricular hemorrhage. Brainstem involvement may lead to especially poor prognosis despite relatively normal intracranial pressure measurements. Damage in the brainstem typically involves areas of the dorsolateral quadrant of the rostral brainstem. The pathologic findings include axonal bulbs that appear as axonal swellings on axons running in one direction.

Graham and associates used diffusion tensor imaging to examine the brains of 55 patients who had suffered diffuse axonal injury versus 19 controls (44). They found a strong correlation between diffuse axonal injury and axonal injury and subsequent neurodegeneration. High rates of atrophy were seen specifically in central white matter tracts like the corpus callosum.

Direct vascular injury. Vascular injury after closed head injury usually involves one of three mechanisms: (1) traumatic pseudoaneurysm, (2) carotid-cavernous fistula, or (3) traumatic dissection. Although the former two diagnoses are usually delayed, the latter diagnosis should be considered in any unexplained neurologic deficit after a closed head injury. Angiography is the test of choice for carotid or vertebral artery dissection.

Cerebral blood flow and head injury. After a closed head injury, regional and global cerebral blood flow changes may affect the neurologic outcome. Cerebral blood flow is proportional to the cerebral perfusion pressure times the fourth power of the diameter of the vessel. The two most common methods for assessing cerebral blood flow after trauma are the 133Xenon radiographic technique and jugular venous saturation.

Muizelaar reported a series of 92 patients who underwent early 133Xenon monitoring after traumatic brain injury. Areas of focal ischemia (cerebral blood flow less than 18 mL/100 g per minute) were seen in 41% of patients with subdural hematoma and 50% of individuals with diffuse swelling, compared to no ischemia in patients with epidural hematoma or normal CT scans. Regional ischemia predicted poorer late outcomes. Cerebral blood flow was lowest within 4 to 6 hours of injury (average 22.5 ± 5.2 mL/100 g per minute), gradually reaching a baseline by 12 to 18 hours after injury. Muizelaar reasons that using hyperventilation to reduce intracranial pressure will also reduce cerebral blood flow by almost 60%, thereby worsening both regional and global cerebral ischemia (77).

Jugular venous saturation may also provide an estimate of cerebral blood flow. A fiberoptic catheter is introduced in a retrograde fashion into the jugular bulb. A low jugular venous saturation correlates with a high oxygen extraction and ischemia. Woodman and Robertson examined episodes of jugular venous desaturation (jugular venous saturation less than 50%, more than 10 minutes) in patients after traumatic brain injury (116). Severe disability, vegetative outcome, or death occurred in 91% of individuals with multiple episodes of ischemia versus 55% of individuals with no episodes of desaturation.

Biochemical alterations in traumatic brain injury. A complete discussion of biochemical abnormalities in traumatic brain injury is beyond the scope of this text. Neuronal injury from trauma is similar in most respects to injury from other forms of ischemia. Consequently, the same pharmacological interventions used to combat ischemic disease have been tested in preclinical and clinical trials of traumatic brain injury. In traumatic injury, a degree of primary damage from the injury is refractory to any means of neuroprotection. However, a penumbra of tissue may be responsive to neuroprotective agents (73).

Several groups have attempted to quantify the injury severity or the potential for secondary injury using either microdialysis catheters placed directly into the brain or measuring either serum or spinal fluid markers of tissue injury. Rhodes and colleagues demonstrated higher levels of serum cytokines interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients with more severe brain injury (84). However, changes in cytokine concentration were not predictive of clinical deterioration. Marklund and colleagues demonstrated via cranial microdialysis catheters elevation of tau and beta-amyloid after head injury, with different patterns signifying focal versus a diffuse axonal pattern of injury (69). Semple and colleagues examined the role of chemokine CC ligand-2 (CCL2), a monocyte chemoattractant, in both the CSF of patients with brain injury and a mouse knockout model (94). Their study found the presence of CCL2 in patients after traumatic head injury. They found that the knockout mice showed identical injuries to the wild type in the first week but significantly reduced delayed tissue damage over 2 to 4 weeks, indicating a possible role of CCL2 in posttraumatic secondary tissue damage.

Epidemiology

Trauma causes approximately 150,000 deaths per year in the United States. About half of these injuries are the result of brain injuries. Young male adults are preferentially affected. The most common cause of severe traumatic brain injury is motor vehicle accidents. Assaults, falls, penetrating injuries, and self-inflicted injuries comprise the majority of other injuries (63). Holmes and colleagues have presented an extensive analysis of head injury epidemiology. This group accrued 13,728 patients in a prospective multi-institutional study and examined every trauma patient receiving a CT scan in the emergency department of 21 trauma centers. Logistical regression demonstrated an increased risk of head injury with male sex (65%, relative risk 1.27), age over 65 years (relative risk 1.59), and age under 10 years (relative risk 1.44). Overall, 8.7% of the cohort was determined to have significant radiographic abnormalities on CT scan (50).

Sorani and colleagues examined the role of race and ethnicity in an urban trauma population and concluded that weak trends for increased mortality in African American and Asian patients were present (101). Shandro and colleagues examined ethanol usage in regard to outcome in a large trauma cohort and found no influence of admission ethanol levels on both long- and short-term mortality (95).

Investigators have examined specific preinjury pharmacological treatments as outcome predictors in traumatic brain injury. Smith and Weeks looked at what would seem to be a clear-cut adverse predictor of poor outcome, namely using anticoagulants at the time of head injury (100). The use of warfarin or similar anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents would be assumed to result in poorer outcomes, especially in older individuals. Still, the data are not conclusive, with some data showing up to a five or six times higher likelihood of morbidity and mortality. Other authors suggest such effects are related to the degree of anticoagulation not simply the use, or that, alternatively, the negative effect centered on patient age and use of anticoagulants was not an independent predictor of poor outcome but instead was dependent on age.

Antihypertensive agents have also been evaluated in terms of protective or detrimental effects. Mohseni and associates examined a cohort of 662 patients suffering acute traumatic brain injury, of whom 25% were taking beta blockers before their event (74). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the absence of beta blockers was an independent predictor of poor outcomes with a two-fold increased risk of mortality. Conversely, Catapano and colleagues looked at a similar number of patients with severe traumatic brain injury not taking beta blockers who were on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and found in logistic regression analysis a three-fold increased risk of mortality (19).

Diagnostic workup

Diagnostic workup of traumatic brain injury includes angiography, laboratory tests for coagulopathy, ethanol levels, and other drug intoxication, and routine blood chemistry. Coagulation studies are particularly important in patients who may require surgical intervention.

Radiographic workup specifically addressing the central nervous system includes plain x-rays (AP, lateral, and open mouth odontoid) of the cervical spine to reveal injury to the cervicothoracic junction; CT scan of the brain to include bone, brain, and blood windows; and after the primary workup, plain films of the thoracic and lumbar spine. In patients with traumatic brain injury and minimal evidence of damage on CT scan, MRI scans may help to reveal focal injuries to the brainstem and supratentorial white matter, suggesting diffuse axonal injury. Angiography is necessary when vessel dissection, traumatic aneurysm formation, or carotid-cavernous fistula is suspected. Many centers routinely perform follow-up CT scans in patients within 24 hours of injury or admission. Velmahos and associates examined this practice and determined that in a 1-year sample of 179 consecutive trauma patients who underwent routine repeat head CT after brain injury, 37 (21%) demonstrated radiographic worsening, in which seven (4%) required intervention. Each of those seven patients also demonstrated clinical deterioration, leading to the conclusion that repeat CT scanning is only needed in the face of clinical deterioration (109).

The physiological monitoring of patients suffering from severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale less than 8) has traditionally consisted of intracranial pressure, oxygen saturation, and hemodynamic monitoring. Neurologic surgeons and other physicians tending to patients with head injuries employ these values to guide therapy and determine prognosis. Somatosensory evoked potentials have become a tool to assist in prognosticating outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury.

Somatosensory evoked potentials are inexpensive and less susceptible to sedation than electroencephalography (38). Absent bilateral cortical responses on initial examination reliably predict death, and normal responses predict good clinical outcomes in prospective trials. Improvement in serial somatosensory evoked potentials may precede improvements in the clinical exam, with emphasis on the amplitude and cortical conduction time of the evoked potentials (25). Median somatosensory evoked potential values have also been shown to predict the degree of diffuse axonal injury sustained by patients with brain injury (62).

It should be emphasized that somatosensory evoked potentials should be accompanied by monitoring of intracranial pressure, oxygen saturation, and hemodynamic permanents, as outlined in the Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care guidelines (07).

In the acute phase setting, biomarkers may help predict the presence or severity of traumatic brain injury. Bazarian and associates completed a prospective trial of biomarkers in patients with traumatic brain injury in a multicenter trial at 22 centers (ALERT-TBI) (08; 09). Immediate plasma concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) were used in individuals with nonpenetrating mild to moderate closed head injury, with levels correlating to the presence of abnormality on CT scan. The negative predictive value for individuals with negative testing was quite high, with only three of 1959 patients exhibiting a positive CAT scan with negative test values. Similarly, positive values correlated well with the presence of pathology on CT, although the primary value was determining which patients did not require imaging.

Another trial looked at different biomarkers and found that GFAP had better predictive value than UCH-L1 and calcium-binding protein beta at 12 to 32 hours post-injury (67). Chihi and colleagues specifically looked at the role of brain natriuretic peptide and found an association between elevated levels and postoperative seizures in patients with acute subdural hematoma (21). The use of biomarkers at presentation may eventually predict the need for additional imaging or intervention as well as prognosis.

Management

Management strategies will be discussed in the format of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons guide for managing severe head injury.

Resuscitation of blood pressure and oxygenation. All traumatic brain injury victims should be managed according to advanced trauma life support protocols. Airway, breathing, and circulation should be addressed in the initial evaluation. Systemic hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) and hypoxemia (PaO2 less than 60 mm Hg) adversely affect the outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury. In an analysis of patients entered in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank, a single episode of hypotension was found to more than double the mortality rate (60% vs. 27%). Patients with hypoxia and hypotension had a 75% mortality rate, and 94% had unfavorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale of death, vegetative state, and severe disability) (70). Avoidance of either condition is recommended for managing traumatic brain injury.

Neither the effects of erythropoietin nor maintaining a high transfusion threshold on patients with closed head injury resulted in improved neurologic outcomes (87). Robertson and colleagues found no beneficial influence of raising the hematocrit, either chemically or via transfusion.

Intracranial pressure monitoring. Intracranial pressure monitoring can be performed through the subarachnoid, the ventricular, or, rarely, the epidural space. Monitoring intracranial pressure allows the clinician to monitor and treat elevations in brain pressure associated with traumatic brain injury. Intracranial pressure monitoring is recommended for all severe traumatic brain injury victims with an abnormal CT scan. Patients with a normal CT scan but no evidence of drug or alcohol intoxication also may be considered likely candidates. Results from the Traumatic Coma Data Bank indicate that the proportion of time a patient spends with intracranial pressure elevation over 20 mm Hg is highly predictive of outcome (70). Ventricular pressure monitoring is the gold standard; however, fiberoptic subarachnoid or intraparenchymal catheters may be used if the ventricles are small. Newer technologies will allow multiparameter recording. A publication by Valadka and colleagues described using brain tissue PO2 monitors in head injury (107). Sustained brain PO2 values less than 15 torr or any value less than 6 torr were associated with increased mortality. Similar CO2, pH, and temperature probes are available, although the clinical utility is not yet proven.

Continuous or intermittent drainage has been employed when ventricular monitors are used. Nwachuku and colleagues performed a randomized trial and found more effective intracranial pressure control with continuous drainage (80).

Over the past decades, intracranial pressure monitoring has become a standard in most neurosurgical centers in the developed world. Chesnut and colleagues challenged this approach in an ambitious trial in Bolivia and Ecuador (23). Patients were randomly assigned after severe traumatic brain injury to be managed according to monitoring or solely based on imaging and clinical examination. Surprisingly, the treatment group did not affect ICU days, adverse events, and survival. Whether this finding extrapolates to modern American trauma centers remains to be seen.

Threshold for intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Intracranial pressure above 20 mm Hg has been considered elevated in traumatic brain injury studies. This value has never been substantiated in rigid clinical trials. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons guidelines focus on cerebral perfusion pressure as an option (cerebral perfusion pressure or mean arterial pressure-intracranial pressure). A critical value of cerebral perfusion pressure of 70 mm Hg has been suggested. Again, this value has not been substantiated by a clinical trial. In an analysis of data collected from the Selfotel trial, Juul and colleagues analyzed the effect of threshold values of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on worsening in patients after severe head injury (60). They found that elevation of intracranial pressure of 20 mm Hg or more was far more predictive than cerebral perfusion pressure of unfavorable outcomes.

Hyperventilation. In the past, chronic prolonged hyperventilation was used to enact a reduction in intracranial pressure. Lowering the PaCO2 causes reduced cerebral blood flow. However, subsequent research has suggested that prolonged hyperventilation may be detrimental. Severe traumatic brain injury is associated with a decreased cerebral blood flow independent of hyperventilation. Further reductions in cerebral blood flow may compromise areas of relative ischemia in damaged brain. Muizelaar randomized patients to hypocapnia and normocapnia after severe traumatic brain injury (77). Patients with a low CO2 had poorer outcomes at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Diringer and colleagues studied cerebral blood flow after closed head injury in patients treated with moderate hyperventilation and found no impairment in global cerebral blood flow, although regional blood values were not reported (31).

Mannitol or diuretic treatment. Mannitol can provide control of elevated intracranial pressure. Mannitol is thought to work not only as an osmotic diuretic but also as a plasma expander, reducing blood viscosity and increasing cerebral blood flow. Mannitol is normally bolused in a 1 g/kg dose followed by chronic administration of either a drip or intermittent boluses. All patients receiving mannitol should have a Foley catheter and have their serum osmolarity monitored to avoid hypernatremia and dehydration. Furosemide or other thiazide diuretics or urea are other potential osmotic agents.

Mannitol administration was subjected to a Cochrane Database review in 2005. Mannitol administration in patients with severe closed head injury was superior to placebo or barbiturate but potentially inferior to hypertonic saline (111). Mannitol administration effectively lowered intracranial pressure in 14 instances of intracranial pressure elevation, with maximal effects at 40 minutes and effects continuing up to 100 minutes after administration with a mean reduction from 25 to 17 mm Hg (91).

Hypertonic saline. Hypertonic saline has been employed as an alternative to mannitol or diuretics, providing similar control of elevated intracranial pressure without renal toxicity. Ware and colleagues used a 23.4% hypertonic saline solution in adult patients and compared results to mannitol administration (113). They found that both agents reduced intracranial pressure effectively; however, the hypertonic saline provided longer-lasting results.

Mannitol versus hypertonic saline. Trials have been designed to compare the use of mannitol versus hypertonic saline in severe traumatic brain injury. Rickard and colleagues concluded that although both treatments effectively reduced intracranial pressure, there was a trend favoring hypertonic saline (85). Boone and associates reviewed the literature and found no consistent advantage of either regimen (13). Bulger and colleagues performed a randomized prospective trial of prehospital hypertonic saline administration by emergency medical services personnel. There were no clinical benefits at 6 months of either hypertonic saline or hypertonic saline with dextran as opposed to normal saline (16). Conversely, Li and associates found a significant benefit of hypertonic saline as opposed to mannitol in reducing intracranial pressure (66). Finally, Burgess and colleagues found that hypertonic saline resulted in better intracranial pressure reduction than saline; however, the mortality and outcomes were unaffected (17).

Barbiturates. Barbiturate therapy has been found experimentally to reduce intracranial pressure. Eisenberg and colleagues conducted a prospective, double-blind study using a loading dose of 10 mg/kg of pentobarbital over 30 minutes, followed by 5 mg/kg per hour for three doses and 1 mg/kg per hour subsequently (36). In this study, patients who "responded" to barbiturates had a lower mortality, although no effect on outcome was substantiated. Schwartz and colleagues compared pentobarbital to mannitol and found no change in outcome in patients with mass lesions and worse outcomes with pentobarbital in individuals with diffuse injury (93).

Glucocorticoids. The use of glucocorticoids is not currently indicated in managing head injury. Large prospective studies by Braakman, Cooper, Giannotta, Deaden, and colleagues have failed to show an advantage of steroids over a placebo (27; 14; 41; 30). Subsequent trials of nonglucocorticoid steroids have failed to show a definitive effect.

A 1996 survey of UK neuroscience intensive-care units showed that corticosteroids were used in 14% of units to treat traumatic brain injury (54), and a similar study in the United States demonstrated steroid administration to be a component of traumatic brain injury therapy in nearly two thirds of U.S. trauma centers (39). Results of a systematic review conducted in 1997 suggested that steroid therapy for patients with closed head injuries decreased the absolute risk for death by 1% to 2% compared with no steroid treatment (02). However, an evidence-based review of the available literature, conducted by the Cochrane Group in 2000, failed to demonstrate any conclusive benefit of corticosteroid administration in patients with traumatic brain injury (03).

A large multicenter, randomized clinical trial has been completed to address the question of steroid therapy in closed head injury. A total of 10,008 patients were enrolled at 239 hospitals in 49 countries. Inclusion criteria required a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or less and initiation of treatment within 8 hours of injury. Patients were randomized to receive either methylprednisolone or placebo for 48 hours. Primary outcomes were mortality within 2 weeks and death and disability at 6 months. At 2 weeks, 21.1% of patients treated with corticosteroids and 17.9% of those treated with placebo had died (relative risk, 1.18; P=0.0001). At 6 months, 25.7% of the corticosteroid group had died versus 22.3% of the placebo group (relative risk 1.15, p=0.0001). Subset analysis showed that the mortality difference was not affected by injury severity score, time from injury to initiation of steroids, or degree of extracranial trauma (86; 35).

Based on the class I data now available from the trial and supported by Cochrane Group analysis, it does not appear that the routine administration of corticosteroids has a role in the management of traumatic brain injury. This conclusion should not be generalized to spinal cord injury management at this time (04).

Amantadine therapy. Giacino and associates investigated the effectiveness of amantadine in improving the pace of recovery following traumatic brain injury. Patients were randomized to treatment versus placebo between 4 and 16 weeks after severe traumatic brain injury. Amantadine was postulated to work as a dopamine or N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. The amantadine treatment group showed an accelerated rate of neurologic recovery, although after treatment, the placebo group caught up in terms of functional recovery (40).

Progesterone therapy. Numerous preclinical and phase 1 and 2 trials have demonstrated the neuroprotective effects of progesterone, suggesting a potential beneficial effect in human closed-head injury (Wei and Xiao 2013). Skolnick and colleagues conducted a multicenter clinical trial using dosing with progesterone in patients with severe closed head injury (98). Unfortunately, they found no progesterone benefit in severe traumatic brain injury in this randomized, prospective trial.

Seizure prophylaxis. Annegers and colleagues found that 17% of severe traumatic brain injury victims had new unprovoked seizures (06).

The risk of seizures was increased in individuals with brain contusion, subdural hematoma, skull fracture, loss of consciousness, or amnesia of greater than 1 day and age greater than 65 years. Temkin and colleagues demonstrated that seizure prophylaxis with phenytoin was not protective of late seizures after severe traumatic brain injury (105). Phenytoin only is recommended in these patients, starting with a loading dose of 1 g of phenytoin or its more rapid-acting metabolite, fosphenytoin.

More recent trials have called into doubt the need and the safety of seizure prophylaxis after severe head injury. Bhullar and colleagues showed detrimental effects on recovery without influencing seizure frequency, and they advised further randomized studies (11). When seizure prophylaxis is utilized, a shift from phenytoin to levetiracetam has been advocated (64).

Hypothermia. Although a multicenter National Institutes of Health-funded trial failed to show a statistically significant benefit of induced hypothermia after traumatic brain injury, enthusiasm for this approach persists. Jiang and colleagues demonstrated improved mortality rates and outcomes in patients treated with mild (33°C to 35°C) hypothermia for between 3 and 14 days (58). Conversely, no benefit of hypothermia was found in a trial of patients presenting with low intracranial pressure scores (97). A study examining the effect of both hypothermia and progesterone has been reported to show the beneficial effects of hypothermia in an early analysis of 64 of a planned accrual of 250 patients (92). Hypothermia is typically induced with cooling blankets, although more direct methods exist. The patient is typically chemically paralyzed and dosed with chlorpromazine to prevent shivering. Rewarming is performed passively. Hypothermia is used in combination with other therapies for lowering intracranial pressure. New intracranial pressure monitors allow real-time monitoring of brain temperature.

Nonetheless, enthusiasm has been tempered by negative clinical trials, including an examination of hypothermia in pediatric patients that showed no benefit for hypothermia of 32.5 degrees initiated within 8 hours and continuing for 24 hours (53).

Erythropoietin as a neuroprotective agent. Based on preclinical studies showing a possible benefit of erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury through better oxygen-carrying capacity, Nichol and colleagues designed a randomized prospective trial comparing subcutaneous erythropoietin versus placebo within 24 hours of injury (78). There were safety concerns regarding thrombotic events in the trial design. The trial accrued 606 patients in 29 centers and, unfortunately, did not show a statistically significant benefit of erythropoietin in terms of improving neurologic outcome. On the other hand, there was no increase in thrombotic complications seen in the patients who received erythropoietin (79). A post hoc analysis of the trial looked at individuals with more severe injury severity scores indicating significant extracranial injury and found a statistically significant benefit in these patients who received a rather poor score compared to controls in terms of 6-month mortality (99).

Hyperbaric oxygen in traumatic brain injury. Because of the known adverse effect of hypoxemia on brain function, hyperbaric oxygen treatment has been postulated as a potential agent to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury both in the acute setting and also to potentially alleviate postconcussive symptoms. Rockswald and colleagues reported a phase 2 trial of 42 patients randomized within 24 hours of injury to receive three consecutive treatments of 3 hours of hyperbaric oxygen (88). This trial showed improvements in both secondary markers, such as brain tissue partial pressure of oxygen and improved lactate/pyruvate ratio and also a 26% reduction in mortality compared to controls and a 36% improvement in favorable outcome. A Cochrane review of the subject identified a total of 571 individuals accrued in seven studies. Although two studies demonstrated improvements in the GCS scale over the treatment course, these results could not be extrapolated, and a larger randomized study was suggested to examine potential benefits (10). A systematic review suggested that the safety profile of hyperbaric oxygen after traumatic brain injury has been established, with strong proof of concept evidence for treatment pending a larger trial (29).

Ketamine in severe traumatic brain injury. Ketamine is a commonly used anesthetic agent known to inhibit cortical depolarization primarily as an NMDA antagonist. Beneficial effects have been recognized in neuroanesthesia prompting clinical trials looking for a neuroprotective effect. Godoy and colleagues presented a review and noted that ketamine did not increase intracranial pressure and postulated a role in severe traumatic brain injury (42). Carlson and associates examined 10 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage (18). They did continuous electrocorticography and showed inhibition of spreading depolarization, which has been shown to be an indicator of increased tissue damage and poor clinical outcomes. The patients with head injury had all undergone hemicraniectomy and had an electrode placed at the time of surgery. Andreason and colleagues performed a meta-analysis and found five relatively small clinical trials, none of which provided statistically significant evidence of the benefit of ketamine (05). However, large randomized clinical trials were felt to be indicated.

Rapid correction of coagulopathy in traumatic brain injury. Coagulopathy in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage can result from concomitant warfarin use, massive volume replacement in multisystem trauma, hepatic disease, or release of tissue thromboplastin in head injury alone. The dire consequences of anticoagulation in the traumatic brain injury population are supported by 50% to 60% mortality for these patients suffering an intracranial hemorrhage (45; 61).

Complicating the care of these patients is the fact that they often harbor an intracranial mass lesion requiring emergent surgical evacuation. Traditional treatment of coagulopathy has been with fresh frozen plasma. Fresh frozen plasma for the correction of coagulopathy is often time-consuming, which can significantly delay movement of the patient to the operating room for definitive therapy. In the late 1980s, a recombinant form of activated factor VII (rFVIIa) (NovoSeven; Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark) was developed to treat bleeding in patients with hemophilia. rFVIIa cleaves factor X to Xa, leading to the generation of thrombin (49). It has subsequently been used for hemostasis in cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (115; 47; 46). In the neurosurgical population, rFVIIa has been studied in the aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage population, in pediatric spinal fusions, and in patients with traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Veshchev and colleagues reported on a single patient with warfarin-induced coagulopathy and an acute subdural hematoma treated with rFVIIa for rapid correction of an INR of 6.39 (110). This patient then underwent emergent hematoma evacuation. Repeated INR measurement after a single dose of rFVIIa was 1.25 and remained normal (110).

Park and colleagues have also reported on the use of rFVIIa in intracerebral hemorrhage (81). They examined nine patients who received rFVIIa for emergent neurosurgical intervention in the face of coagulopathy. Five of the patients had suffered an intracerebral hemorrhage. All patients’ coagulation profiles normalized following administration of rFVIIa, as quickly as 20 minutes in most cases (81).

Dosing regimens for rFVIIa range from 35 to 90 mcg/kg per dose given IV Push (96). Complications are rare but include acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism (82; 89). A single 1200 mcg vial of rFVIIa costs approximately USD 00.00 (81).

Investigations have centered on antifibrinolytic agents, most specifically tranexamic acid. Tranexamic acid has been used for many years intraoperatively to address excessive bleeding. Examinations of tranexamic acid to prevent aneurysm rebleeding have shown some efficacy offset by medical complications. Yutthakasemsunt and associates performed a randomized trial of tranexamic acid versus placebo in 238 individuals with Glasgow Coma Scale randomized within 8 hours from injury giving just a single 2 gm dose (118). They found a slightly reduced risk of hemorrhage progression, but statistical significance was not met. No increased risk was seen.

In another small, randomized trial, Jokar and colleagues randomized 80 patients to receive a placebo or two doses of tranexamic acid in patients presenting with CT evidence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (59). The patients receiving tranexamic acid showed a statistically diminished rate of hematoma expansion. This was a small study, however, and included both intracerebral and extra-axial hemorrhages.

Finally, and most importantly, the CRASH-3 trial was published in 2019 as a randomized placebo-controlled trial in 175 sites in 29 countries (22). This trial was a follow-up to CRASH-2, which was performed in victims of general trauma. This trial included patients with a Glasgow Coma Score of 12 or lower with any intracranial bleeding on CT. Recruitment was initially within 8 hours of injury, with that window narrowed to 3 hours midway through the trial based on interim analysis. An initial bolus of 1 gm was provided, followed by an infusion of another gram over 8 hours. Over 12,000 patients were randomized. The trial showed a reduction in injury-related deaths in patients with moderate closed head injury treated within 3 hours. There was no increase in vascular occlusive events or seizures. Patients with severe head injury did not show the same benefit.

More recent trials have focused on fibrinogen administration after traumatic brain injury. Sabouri and colleagues reported a randomized controlled trial of 137 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 9 (90). Patients with low fibrinogen (lower than 200 mg/dl) were randomized, with 71 patients included in the final analysis. This group found that the patients receiving fibrinogen infusion had improvements in short-term Glasgow Coma Scale scores and improved measures of hematoma expansion as well as Glascow Outcome Scale-extended scores. Fujiwara and associates examined two protocols for predicting and treating hypofibrinogenemia but found no significant differences in terms of 30-day mortality (37). They found that coagulation abnormalities on arrival were severe risk factors for developing hypofibrinogenemia and showed that fibrinogen levels were maintained with transfusion.

Diabetes insipidus in closed head injury. Following traumatic brain injury, abnormalities of water balance are among the most commonly recognized metabolic disorders. Damage to the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus, their axons within the pituitary stalk, or the neurohypophysis results in polyuria, an inability to concentrate the urine, and elevated serum osmolality. This constellation of findings, in the presence of low levels of circulating vasopressin, is known as central diabetes insipidus.

In 1986, Edwards and Clark noted diabetes insipidus to occur in 23 of 53 (43%) patients reported with posttraumatic pituitary dysfunction (34). In their review, Yuan and Wade concluded that traumatic diabetes insipidus should be considered relatively rare, arising only after severe brain trauma (117). However, additional work has shown diabetes insipidus to occur acutely in about one quarter of patients following head injury and is unrelated to the severity of the head injury, as assessed by Glasgow Coma Score (01). Diabetes insipidus has also been reported to occur in 13% of patients in the late head injury period (12).

The drug of choice for the treatment of central diabetes insipidus is desmopressin, which is a synthetic analogue of arginine vasopressin. Desmopressin may be administered orally, intranasally, or parenterally. There are wide individual variations in the dosage required to control diuresis. Daily requirements for oral preparations vary from 100 to 1200 µg in three divided doses, for intranasal around 2 to 40 µg, and for parenteral 0.1 to 1 µg. A low dose should be used initially, which can then be increased as needed. Dilutional hyponatremia is the primary side effect if desmopressin is administered in excess over a prolonged period.

Surgical management of diffuse brain injury. Decompressive procedures to address diffuse as opposed to focal mass lesions have remained controversial and are given as no more than an option in managing these conditions. Although some reports have offered a case-control evaluation of decompressive craniectomy showing a benefit in select populations (83), prospective studies have not yet validated this finding. In a population-based study of 147 patients undergoing either unilateral or bilateral decompressive craniectomy over a 4-year period, Honeybul and colleagues found that functional outcome was significantly improved compared to a head injury prediction model for either procedure (51). Chibbaro and associates detailed a prospective multicenter trial of 147 consecutive patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (24). They found that 67% had a favorable outcome based on a Glasgow Outcome Score of 4 or 5. Ecker and associates reported 33 patients treated with decompressive craniectomy during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and documented Glasgow Outcome Score of 4 or 5 in 60% of patients and 23% mortality (33).

Cooper and colleagues performed a randomized prospective trial comparing bifrontotemporalparietal decompressive craniectomy to standard medical care in 155 patients (26). In this trial, surgery improved intracranial pressure, but outcomes were actually worse than in the control patients at 6 months. However, delays in randomization and choice of a less aggressive surgical approach may affect the applicability of the results. Conversely, Ho and associates analyzed 168 patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy and documented that unless the predicted unfavorable outcome risk was greater than 80%, decompressive craniectomy was not only effective but also resulted in significant cost savings (48).

Outcomes

Overall, prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury is highly dependent on initial presentation. Individual diagnoses also color recovery. Humble and associates examined 311 victims of severe traumatic brain injury (52). Within this cohort, 47% had clinical diffuse axonal injury, and 56% had radiographic evidence of diffuse axonal imaging on MRI. Clinical but not radiographic evidence of diffuse axonal injury was related to poorer short-term recovery scores and functional independence measurements at hospital discharge. However, neither clinical nor radiographic diffuse axonal injury correlated to survival, long-term Glasgow outcome scale scores, or long-term quality of life scales. Conversely, van Eijck and colleagues performed a systematic review of the same topic and found that the risk of unfavorable outcomes in traumatic brain injury with diffuse axonal injury was three times higher than in patients without it (108). The overall favorable outcome rate with diffuse axonal injury was 62%. Lesions in the corpus callosum were associated with more unfavorable outcomes.

Special considerations

Anesthesia

In general, anesthetic management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury should avoid hypotension and hypoxemia and optimize intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure.

Premedication should, if possible, be reserved until after a formal neurologic examination because the neurologic examination will be blunted by sedatives and eliminated by paralytics. Benzodiazepines (midazolam 0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg) and narcotics (fentanyl 100 to 200 µg) provide an excellent combination for sedation in patients with head injury. Propofol given as a continuous drip may provide a rapidly reversible alternative that can lower intracranial pressure. Monitoring must include a precordial Doppler probe if venous sinus injury is suspected. Aspiration pneumonia is common in these patients and should be addressed if suspected clinically or radiographically. Anesthetic induction is often initiated with lidocaine (1 to 1.5 mg/kg) to blunt physiological changes during intubation. Thiopental and etomidate both reduce intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow and are neuroprotective. Paralysis with succinylcholine may increase intracranial pressure. Rocuronium or vecuronium are alternatives.

Anesthetic maintenance should be directed towards lowering the cerebral metabolic rate and intracranial pressure without causing systemic hypotension. A combination of narcotics, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates can achieve this balance. Nitrous oxide is generally to be avoided because of the risk of tension pneumocephalus. Volatile anesthetics may cause cerebral vasodilation and increase intracranial pressure. When possible, blood loss should be carefully monitored and replaced with packed red blood cells or colloid (32).

Media

References

01: Agha A, Rogers B, Mylotte D, et al. Neuroendocrine dysfunction in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2004;60(5):584-91. PMID 15104561
02: Alderson P, Roberts I. Corticosteroids in acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized trials. BMJ 1997;314:1855-9. PMID 9224126
03: Alderson P, Roberts I. Corticosteroids for acute traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000196. PMID 10796701
04: Alderson P, Roberts I. Corticosteroids for acute traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(1):CD000196. PMID 15674869
05: Andreason TH, Madsen FA, Barbateskovic M, Lindschou J, Gluud C, Moller K. Ketamine for critically ill patients with severe acute brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. Neurocrit Care 2024. [Epub ahead of print] PMID 39085508
06: Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Coan SP, Rocca WA. A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries. N Engl J Med 1998;338(1):20-4. PMID 9414327
07: Anonymous. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. J Neurotrauma 1996;13(11):641-734. PMID 8941879
08: Bazarian JJ, Biberthaler P, Welch RD, et al. Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 2018;17(9):782-9. PMID 30054151
09: Bazarian JJ, Welch RD, Caudle K, et al. Accuracy of a rapid glial fibrillary acidic protein/ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 test for the prediction of intracranial injuries on head computed tomography after mild traumatic brain injury. Acad Emerg Med 2021;28(11):1308-17. PMID 34358399
10: Bennett MH, Trytko B, Jonker B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD004609. PMID 23235612
11: Bhullar IS, Johnson D, Paul JP, Kerwin AJ, Tepas JJ 3rd, Frykberg ER. More harm than good: antiseizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury does not decrease seizure rates but may inhibit functional recovery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76(1):54-60. PMID 24368357
12: Bohnen N, Twijnstra A, Jolles J. Water metabolism and postconcussional symptoms 5 weeks after mild head injury. Eur Neurol 1993;33:77-9. PMID 8440294
13: Boone MD, Oren-Grinberg A, Robinson TM, Chen CC, Kasper EM. Mannitol or hypertonic saline in the setting of traumatic brain injury; what have we learned? Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:177. PMID 26673517
14: Braakman R, Schouten HJ, Blaauw-van Dishoeck M, Minderhoud JM. Megadose steroids in severe head injury. Results of a prospective double-blind clinical trial. J Neurosurg 1983;58(3):326-30. PMID 6338164
15: Brazinova A, Mauritz W, Leitgeb J, et al. Outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury who have Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3 or 4 and are over 65 years old. J Neurotrauma 2010;27(9):1549-55. PMID 20597653
16: Bulger EM, May S, Brasel KJ, et al. Out-of-hospital resuscitation following severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:1455-64. PMID 20924011
17: Burgess S, Abu-Laban RB, Slavik RS, Vu EN, Zed PJ. A systemic review of randomized controlled trials comparing hypertonic sodium solutions and mannitol for traumatic brain injury: implications for emergency department management. Ann Pharmacother 2016;50(4):291-300. PMID 26825644
18: Carlson AP, Abbas M, Alunday RL, Qeadan F, Shuttleworth CW. Spreading depolarization in acute brain injury inhibited by ketamine: a prospective, randomized, multiple crossover trial. J Neurosurg 2018;130(5):1513-9. PMID 29799344
19: Catapano JS, Chapman AJ, Dull M, et al. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with increased mortality among patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2019;31(3):507-13. PMID 31187434
20: Chamoun RB, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP. Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation. J Neurosurg 2009;111(4):683-7. PMID 19326973
21: Chihi M, Oppong MD, Quesada CM, et al. Role of brain natriuretic peptide in the prediction of the early postoperative seizures following surgery for traumatic acute subdural hematoma: a prospective study. Neurol Ther 2021;10(2):847-63. PMID 34342872
22: CRASH-3 trial collaborators. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019;394(10210):1713-23. PMID 31623894
23: Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. New Engl J Med 2012;367(26):2471-81. PMID 23234472
24: Chibbaro S, Di Rocco F, Mirone G, et al. Decompressive craniectomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients. World Neurosurg 2011;75(3-4):558-62. PMID 21600512
25: Claassen J, Hansen HC. Early recovery after closed traumatic head injury: somatosensory evoked potentials and clinical findings. Crit Care Med 2001;29(3):494-502. PMID 11373410
26: Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1493-502. PMID 21434843
27: Cooper PR, Moody S, Clark WK, et al. Dexamethasone and severe head injury. A prospective double-blind study. J Neurosurg 1979;51(3):307-16. PMID 381599
28: Cushing H. A study of a series of wounds involving the brain and its structures. Br J Surg 1918;5:558.
29: Daly S, Thorpe M, Rockswold S, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of acute severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2018;35(4):623-29. PMID 29132229
30: Dearden NM, Gibson JS, McDowall DG, Gibson RM, Cameron MM. Effect of high-dose dexamethasone on outcome from severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1986;64(1):81-8. PMID 3510286
31: Diringer MN, Yundt K, Videen TO, et al. No reduction in cerebral metabolism as a result of early moderate hyperventilation following severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2000;92:7-13. PMID 10616076
32: Durieux M. Anesthesia for head trauma. In: Stone D, Sperry RJ, Johnson JO, Speakermann BF, Yemen TA, editors. The neuroanesthesia handbook. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996:385-414.
33: Ecker RD, Mulligan LP, Dirks M, et al. Outcomes of 33 patients from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan undergoing bilateral or bicompartmental craniectomy. J Neurosurg 2011;115:144-9. PMID 21438659
34: Edwards OM, Clark JD. Post-traumatic hypopituitarism. Medicine 1986;65:281-90. PMID 3018425
35: Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, et al. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months. Lancet 2005;365(9475):1957-9. PMID 15936423
36: Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, Marshall LF, Walker MD. High-dose barbiturate control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1988;69(1):15-23. PMID 3288723
37: Fujiwara G, Murakami M, Ishii W, et al. Effectiveness of administration of fibrinogen concentrate as prevention of hypofibrinogenemia in patients with traumatic brain injury with a higher risk for severe hyperfibrinolysis: single center before-and-after study. Neurocrit Care 2023;38(3):640-9. PMID 36324002
38: Ganes T, Lundar T. EEG and evoked potentials in comatose patients with severe brain damage. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69(1):6-13. PMID 2448122
39: Ghajar J, Hariri R, Narayan R, Lacono L, Firlik K, Patterson R. Survey of critical care management of comatose head injured patients in the United States. Crit Care Med 1995;23:560-7. PMID 7874910
40: Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2012;366:819-26. PMID 22375973
41: Giannotta SL, Weiss MH, Apuzzo ML, Martin E. High dose glucocorticoids in the management of severe head injury. Neurosurgery 1984;15(4):497-501. PMID 6333649
42: Godoy DA, Badenes R, Pelosi P, Robba C. Ketamine in acute phase of severe traumatic brain injury “an old drug for new uses?” Crit Care 2021;25(1):19. PMID 33407737
43: Graham DI. Neuropathology of head injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996:43-59.
44: Graham NS, Jolly A, Zimmerman K, et al. Diffuse axonal injury predicts neurodegeneration after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Brain 2020;143(12):3685-98. PMID 33099608
45: Hart RG, Boop SB, Anderson DC. Oral anticoagulants and intracranial hemorrhage. Facts and hypotheses. Stroke 1995;26(8):1471-7. PMID 7631356
46: Hendriks HG, Meijer K, de Wolf JT, et al. Reduced transfusion requirements by recombinant factor VIIa in orthotopic liver transplantation: a pilot study. Transplantation 2001b;71(3):402-5. PMID 11233901
47: Hendriks HG, van der Maaten JM, de Wolf J, Waterbolk TW, Slooff MJ, van der Meer J. An effective treatment of severe intractable bleeding after valve repair by one single dose of activated recombinant factor VII. Anesth Analg 2001a;93(2):287-9. PMID 11473845
48: Ho KM, Honeybul S, Lind CRP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2011;71:1637-44. PMID 22182872
49: Hoffman M, Monroe DM 3rd, Roberts HR. Activated factor VII activates factors IX and X on the surface of activated platelets: thoughts on the mechanism of action of high-dose activated factor VII. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1998;9 Suppl 1:S61-5. PMID 9819030
50: Holmes JF, Hendey GW, Oman JA, et al. Epidemiology of blunt head injury victims undergoing ED cranial computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med 2006;24(2):167-73. PMID 16490645
51: Honeybul S, Ho KM, Lind CR, Gillett GR. Observed versus predicted outcome for decompressive craniectomy: a population-based study. J Neurotrauma 2010;27(7):1225-32. PMID 20412014
52: Humble SS, Wilson LD, Wang L, et al. Prognosis of diffuse axonal injury with traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018;85(1):155-9. PMID 29462087
53: Hutchison JS, Ward RE, Lacroix J, et al. Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. New Eng J Med 2008;358:2447-56. PMID 18525042
54: Jeevaratnum DR, Menon DK. Survey of intensive care of severely head injured patients in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1996;312(7036):944-7. PMID 8616307
55: Jennett B. Sir William MacEwen 1848-1924. Pioneer Scottish neurosurgeon. Surg Neurol 1976;6(2):57-60. PMID 781884
56: Jennett B. Historical perspective on head injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996:3-13.
57: Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T. Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 1979;4(4):283-9. PMID 450225
58: Jiang JY, Yu MK, Zhu C. Effect of long-term mild hypothermia therapy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: 1-year follow-up review of 87 cases. J Neurosurg 2000;93(4):546-9. PMID 11014530
59: Jokar A, Ahmadi K, Salehi T, Sharif-Alhoseini M, Rahimi-Movaghar V. The effect of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Chin J Traumatol 2017;20(1):49-51. PMID 28209450
60: Juul N, Morris GF, Marshall LF. Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury. The Executive Committee of the International Selfotel trial. J Neurosurg 2000;92:1-6. PMID 10616075
61: Karni A, Holtzman R, Bass T, et al. Traumatic head injury in the anticoagulated elderly patient: a lethal combination. Am Surg 2001;67(11):1098-100. PMID 11730229
62: Konasiewicz SJ, Moulton RJ. Electrophysiologic assessment of intracerebral contusions in closed head injury. J Trauma 1994;37(3):370-4. PMID 8083895
63: Kraus J, McArthur DL, Silverman TA, Jayaraman M. Epidemiology of brain injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996:13-30.
64: Kruer RM, Harris LH, Goodwin H, et al. Changing trends in the use of seizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury: a shift from phenytoin to levetiracetam. J Crit Care 2013;28(5):883.e9-13. PMID 23566730
65: Kunapaisal T, Phuong J, Liu Z, et al. Age, admission platelet count, and mortality in severe isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study. Transfusion 2023;63(8):1472-80. PMID 37515367
66: Li M, Chen T, Chen SD, Cai J, Hu YH. Comparison of equimolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(17):e736. PMID 25929908
67: Mahan MY, Thorpe M, Ahmadi A, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) outperforms S100 calcium-binding protein β (S100β) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as predictor for positive computed tomography of the head in trauma subjects. World Neurosurg 2019;128:e434-44. PMID 31051301
68: Marion D. Outcome from severe head injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996:767-77.
69: Marklund N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Ronne-Engström E, Enblad P, Hillered L. Monitoring of brain interstitial total tau and beta amyloid proteins by microdialysis in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2009;110(6):1227-37. PMID 19216653
70: Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD, et al. Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 1991;75(Suppl):S59-66.
71: Marshall LF, Gautille T, Klauber MR, et al. The outcome of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1991;75(Suppl):S28-36.
72: Mauritz W, Leitgeb J, Wilbacher I, et al. Outcome of brain trauma patients who have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils in the field. Eur J Emer Med 2009;16(3):153-8. PMID 19282759
73: Miller J, Piper IR, Jones PA. Pathophysiology of head injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996:61-9.
74: Mohseni S, Talving P, Wallin G, Ljungqvist O, Riddez L. Preinjury β-blockade is protective in isolated severe traumatic brain injury. J trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76(3):804-8. PMID 24553552
75: Morris GF, Juul N, Marshall SB, Benedict B, Marshall LF. Neurologic deterioration as a potential alternative endpoint in human clinical trials of experimental pharmacological agents for treatment of severe traumatic brain injuries. Executive Committee of the International Selfotel Trial. Neurosurgery 1998;43(6):1369-72. PMID 9848851
76: MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008;336:425-29. PMID 18270239
77: Muizelaar J. CBF and management of the head injured patient. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996:553-61.
78: Nichol A, French C, Little L, et al. Erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015a;16:39. PMID 25884605
79: Nichol A, French C, Little L, et al. Erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury (EPO-TBI): a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2015b;386(10012):2499-506. PMID 26452709
80: Nwachuku EL, Puccio AM, Fetzick A, et al. Intermittent versus continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage management in adult severe traumatic brain injury: assessment of intracranial pressure burden. Neurocrit Care 2014;20(1):49-53. PMID 23943318
81: Park P, Fewel ME, Thompson B, Hoff JT. Recombinant activated factor VII for the rapid correction of coagulopathy in nonhemophilic neurosurgical patients. Neurosurgery 2003;53(1):34-8; discussion 38-9. PMID 12823871
82: Peerlinck K, Vermylen J. Acute myocardial infarction following administration of recombinant activated factor VII (Novo Seven) in a patient with haemophilia A and inhibitor. Thromb Haemost 1999;82(6):1775-6. PMID 10613674
83: Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 1997;41(1):84-92. PMID 9218299
84: Rhodes J, Sharkey J, Andrews P. Serum IL-8 and MCP-1 concentration do not identify patients with enlarging contusions after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2009;66(6):1591-7. PMID 19509619
85: Rickard AC, Smith JE, Newell P, Bailey A, Kehoe A, Mann C. Salt or sugar for your injured brain? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mannitol versus hypertonic sodium solutions to manage raised intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Emery Med J 2014;31(8):679-83. PMID 23811861
86: Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, et al. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1321-8. PMID 15474134
87: Robertson CS, Hannay HJ, Yanal JM, et al. Effect of erythropoietin and transfusion threshold on neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;312(1):36-47. PMID 25058216
88: Rockswald SB, Rockswold GL, Zaun DA, Liu J. A prospective, randomized phase II clinical trial to evaluate the effect of combined hyperbaric and normobaric hyperoxia on cerebral metabolism, intracranial pressure, oxygen toxicity, and clinical outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2013;118(6):1317-28. PMID 23510092
89: Rosenfeld SB, Watkinson KK, Thompson BH, Macfarlane DE, Lentz SR. Pulmonary embolism after sequential use of recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrate in a factor VIII inhibitor patient. Thromb Haemost 2002;87(5):925-6. PMID 12038803
90: Sabouri M, Vahidian M, Sourani A, Mahdavi SB, Tehrani DS, Shafiei E. Efficacy and safety of fibrinogen administration in acute post-traumatic hypofibrinogenemia in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Neurosci 2022;101:204-11. PMID 35642832
91: Sakowitz OW, Stover JF, Sarrafzadeh AS, et al. Effects of mannitol bolus administration on intracranial pressure, cerebral extracellular metabolites, and tissue oxygenation in severely head-injured patients. J Trauma 2007;62(2):292-8. PMID 17297315
92: Samson N, Sinha S, Tandon V, et al. A randomized placebo controlled trial of progesterone with or without hypothermia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury-analysis of preliminary data. Neurosurgery 2013;60 Suppl 1:175.
93: Schwartz ML, Tator CH, Rowed DW, Reid SR, Meguro K, Andrews DF. The University of Toronto head injury treatment study: a prospective, randomized comparison of pentobarbital and mannitol. Can J Neurol Sci 1984;11(4):434-40. PMID 6440704
94: Semple BD, Bye N, Rancan M, Ziebell JM, Morganti-Kossmann MC. Role of CCL2 (MCP-1) in traumatic brain injury (TBI): evidence from severe TBI patients and CCL2-/- mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30(4):769-82. PMID 20029451
95: Shandro JR, Rivara FP, Wang J, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, MacKenzie EJ. Alcohol and risk of mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2009;66(6):1584-90. PMID 19509618
96: Shapiro AD, Gilchrist GS, Hoots WK, Cooper HA, Gastineau DA. Prospective, randomised trial of two doses of rFVIIa (NovoSeven) in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Thromb Haemost 1998;80(5):773-8. PMID 9843170
97: Shikozaki T, Hayakata T, Taneda M, et al. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of mild hypothermia for severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure. Mild Hypothermia Study Group in Japan. J Neurosurg 2001;94(1):50-4. PMID 11147897
98: Skolnick BE, Maas AI, Narayan RK, et al. A clinical trial of progesterone for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2014;371(26):2467-76. PMID 25493978
99: Skrifvars MB, Bailey M, French C, et al. Erythropoietin in patients with traumatic brain injury and extracranial injury-a post hoc analysis of the EPO-TBI trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017;83(3):449-56. PMID 28590358
100: Smith K, Weeks S. The impact of pre-injury anticoagulation therapy in the older adult patient experiencing a traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. JBI Libe Syst Rev 2012:10(58):4610-21. PMID 27820526
101: Sorani MD, Lee M, Kim H, Meeker M, Manley GT. Race/ethnicity and outcome after traumatic brain injury at a single, diverse center. J Trauma 2009;67(1):75-80. PMID 19590312
102: Spain D, McIlvoy LH, Fix SE, et al. Effect of a clinical pathway for severe traumatic brain injury on resource utilization. J Trauma 1998;45:101-5. PMID 9680020
103: Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based upon admission characteristics. PloS Med 2008;5(8):e165; discussion e165. PMID 18684008
104: Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2(7872):81-4. PMID 4136544
105: Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, Keihm J, Chabal S, Winn HR. A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. N Engl J Med 1990;323(8):497-502. PMID 2115976
106: Tien HC, Cunha JR, Wu SN, et al. Do trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils have any chance of survival. J Trauma 2006;60(2):274-8. PMID 16508482
107: Valadka AB, Gopinath SP, Contant CF, Uzura M, Robertson CS. Relationship of brain tissue PO2 to outcome after severe head injury. Crit Care Med 1998;26(9):1576-81. PMID 9751596
108: van Eijck MM, Schoonman GG, van der Naalt J, et al. Diffuse axonal injury after traumatic brain injury is a prognostic factor for functional outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Inj 2018;32(4):395-402. PMID 29381396
109: Velmahos GC, Gervasini A, Petrovick L, et al. Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary. J Trauma 2006;60(3):494-501. PMID 16531845
110: Veshchev I, Elran H, Salame K. Recombinant coagulation factor VIIa for rapid preoperative correction of warfarin-related coagulopathy in patients with acute subdural hematoma. Med Sci Monit 2002;8(12):CS98-100. PMID 12503044
111: Wakai A, Roberts I, Schierhout G. Mannitol for acute traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD 001049. PMID 16235278
112: Wang R, Cai L, Liu Y, Zhang J, He M, Xu J. Liver fibrosis score is associated with the mortality of traumatic brain injury patients. Neurosurg Rev 2023;46(1):201. PMID 37581745
113: Ware ML, Nemani VM, Meeker M, et al. Effects of 23.4% sodium chloride solution in reducing intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Neurosurgery 2005;57(4):727-36. PMID 16239885
114: Wei J, Xiao GM The neuroprotective effects of progesterone on traumatic brain injury: current status and future prospects. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2013;34(12):1485-90. PMID 24241345
115: White B, McHale J, Ravi N, et al. Successful use of recombinant FVIIa (Novoseven) in the management of intractable post-surgical intra-abdominal haemorrhage. Br J Haematol 1999;107(3):677-8. PMID 10583276
116: Woodman T, Robertson CS. Jugular venous oxygen saturation monitoring. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996:519-37.
117: Yuan XQ, Wade CE. Neuroendocrine abnormalities in patients with traumatic brain injury. Front Neuroendocrinol 1991;12:209-30. PMID 11538874
118: Yutthakasemsunt S, Kittiwatangul W, Piyavechirat P, Thinkamrop B, Phuenpathom N, Lumbiganon P. Tranexamic acid for patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. BMC Emerg Med 2013;13(20):13-20. PMID 24267513

Contributors

All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.

Author

Richard S Polin MD

Dr. Polin of Polin Neurosurgery has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile

Editor

Randolph W Evans MD

Dr. Evans of Baylor College of Medicine received honorariums from Abbvie, Amgen, Biohaven, Impel, Lilly, and Teva for speaking engagements.
See Profile

Former Authors

Peter C Shin MD
Anil Nanda MD FACS
Joshua M Ammerman MD

Patient Profile

Age range of presentation: 0 month to 65+ years
Sex preponderance: male>female, >1:1
Heredity: none
Population groups selectively affected: none selectively affected
Occupation groups selectively affected: none selectively affected

ICD & OMIM codes

ICD-10: Concussion: S06.0

Diffuse brain injury: S06.2

Traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: S06.6

Other intracranial injuries: S06.8
ICD-11: Other specified concussion: NA07.0Y

Concussion, unspecified: NA07.0Z

Diffuse brain injury: NA07.3

Traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: NA07.7

Other specified intracranial injury: NA07.Y

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125

Severe closed head injury

Associated Disorders

Cerebral edema
Chronic subdural hematoma
Diffuse axonal injury
Headache attributed to head trauma
Neurovascular injuries
- Posttraumatic epilepsy
- Posttraumatic movement disorders
- Posttraumatic sleep disturbance
- Sexual dysfunction in patients with neurologic disorders
- Traumatic brain injury

Differential Diagnosis

the feigning of brain trauma
ethanol intoxication

Also Relevant

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy
Minor closed head injury
Pediatric concussion
Posttraumatic sleep disturbance
Sports activities: neurologic complications
- Traumatic cranial neuropathy
- Traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage
- Traumatic intracranial aneurysms

Severe closed head injury …

Severe closed head injury

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Prognosis and complications

Clinical vignette

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Epidemiology

Prevention

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic workup

Management

Outcomes

Special considerations

Anesthesia

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Editor

Former Authors

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Brain death/death by neurologic criteria

Hepatic encephalopathy

Bowel dysfunction in neurologic disorders

Coma due to primary brainstem and diencephalic lesions

Transient visual loss

Neuroimaging in acute stroke

Sports activities: neurologic complications

Neurotechnology: brain-computer and brain-machine interfaces

Severe closed head injury

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Prognosis and complications

Clinical vignette

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Epidemiology

Prevention

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic workup

Management

Outcomes

Special considerations

Anesthesia

Media

References

Contributors

Author

Editor

Former Authors

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview. Start a Free Account to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Brain death/death by neurologic criteria

Hepatic encephalopathy

Bowel dysfunction in neurologic disorders

Coma due to primary brainstem and diencephalic lesions

Transient visual loss

Neuroimaging in acute stroke

Sports activities: neurologic complications

Neurotechnology: brain-computer and brain-machine interfaces

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.