Split cord malformation

Developmental Malformations

Updated 01.19.2021
Released 12.12.1994
Expires For CME 01.19.2024

Split cord malformation

Authors: Justine Ker BA, Stephen L Nelson Jr MD PhD

See Contributor Disclosures

Editor: Michael V Johnston MD†

Split cord malformation

In This Article

Quick Link

Introduction

Overview

Split cord malformations, although rare, can cause progressive neurologic impairment if not properly identified and surgically treated. These malformations can be associated with tethered cord, congenital scoliosis, and other spinal dysraphisms. In this article, the authors describe the various signs and symptoms that are associated with these malformations, the imaging modalities best used for diagnosis, and the surgical treatment options and prognosis. They also provide updated information about the etiology, evaluation, and treatment of this interesting group of disorders.

Key points

	• Split cord malformations are associated with spinal dysraphisms, congenital scoliosis, and tethered cord.
	• Split cord malformations usually present in childhood but can present in adulthood, especially in patients with the above conditions who have new-onset neurologic symptoms.
	• Split cord malformations can be missed by routine imaging, especially if that imaging was done in the past with older technology; thus, a prior normal scan does not rule-out this condition.
	• Early identification and surgical correction can arrest or improve neurologic symptoms.

Historical note and terminology

Diastematomyelia was first described in 1837 by Ollivier. The term is used to describe a developmental malformation of the spinal cord that is characterized by a splitting of the cord into at least 2 independent segments. The term is from the Greek "diastema" (cleft) and "myelos" (marrow or medulla). Usually, the cord is split by some type of mesenchymal derivative such as bone or cartilage. This term is meant to differentiate the malformation from diplomyelia, which signifies a twinning of the spinal cord.

The major distinction made by most authors between these 2 entities had to do with the presumed embryologic pathogenesis (33). Diastematomyelia was believed to be a disruptive embryological process where the developing neural tube and related structures are split by abnormal tissue forces. Diplomyelia was believed to be the result of some type of local twinning phenomenon. The clinical impression of diastematomyelia was always that there is a high probability of clinical deterioration in individuals with this condition (58; 25). Several clinical series were published that emphasized the therapeutic role that neurosurgical intervention could play (14; 15). Pang and colleagues published 2 papers that cast doubt on the distinction between these 2 conditions by presenting a unified theory of pathogenesis and management. They proposed grouping together these 2 conditions and reterming them "split cord malformations" (43; 43). They are now referred to as split cord malformations type I SCM type 1, formerly diastematomyelia) and split cord malformations type II (SCM type 2, formerly diplomyelia).

Split cord malformations usually occur in the lower thoracic or upper lumbar area, although they have been reported in other locations. The resulting hemicords usually have intact pia mater and often separate dorsal and ventral horns. In SCM type 1, the hemicords are split by a midline osseocartilaginous septum and reside in separate (thus, double) dural sacs. In SCM type II the hemicords are separated by a nonrigid fibrous median septum within a single dural sac and often reunite caudally.

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

The clinical presentations of split cord malformations can be classified as asymptomatic or symptomatic. Asymptomatic presentations are similar to those of other forms of occult spinal dysraphism, the most prominent presentation being external cutaneous manifestations. The most predictive lesions for an underlying split cord malformation occur as hypertrichosis followed by capillary hemangiomas, often occurring together. Hypertrichosis is by far the most common manifestation of the split cord malformations, seen in over 50% of patients; the hypertrichosis includes a variety of presentations such as “faun’s tail,” “silky down,” or even just focal normal texture but excessive hair (15; 11; Giggisberg et al 2004; 20; 26). Common vertebral malformation such as spina bifida, butterfly vertebra, hemivertebra, and fused or absent ribs can also be seen (11; 48; 36). Other cutaneous markers include subcutaneous lipoma, dermal sinus, dimple or gluteal cleft abnormality, or hyperpigmented patch (Giggisberg et al 2004; 59; 26). Other associated manifestations include tethered cord, syringohydromyelia, and Chiari malformation (41; 52).

Symptomatic cases often present with progressive signs and symptoms. The most common presenting symptoms are scoliosis and tethered spinal cord syndrome (43; 48; 36). Progressive motor and sensory symptoms are especially common. Bladder and bowel symptoms are also common, although sometimes signs of neurogenic bladder may only be detected after urodynamic testing (29; 48; 36). Scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis and orthopedic lower-limb deformities (most commonly congenital talipes equinovarus, followed by shortening of one limb) are findings often seen in patients with split cord malformations (24; 48; 36). Finally, back and leg pain is often seen in this condition, particularly in adults (45; 05; 39). Pain is often initially described as dull and localized over the affected region of the back or as ill-localized dysesthetic pain diffusely involving both legs. Others have "boring" or "searing" pain in the perineal and anal regions. Most of these signs and symptoms are related to lesions in the lumbosacral area, the region most commonly involved in split cord malformation (45; 43; 48; 36). Rarely, split cord can occur in the cervical region, where the signs and symptoms affect the arms and hands in addition to the legs, bladder, and bowels (48; 36; 40). Also, it has been reported in association with other complex central nervous system malformations (46; 02).

In children, the clinical presentation is more likely to be scoliosis, weakness, or cutaneous, lower-limb abnormality, but pain is a rare complaint (Schijiman 2003; 17; 62). Furthermore, split cord malformation is commonly seen in children with congenital spine deformities, such as myelomeningocele and congenital scoliosis (43; 43; 30; 51; 19). Also, tethered cord is commonly found in children with split cord malformation or other congenital spinal malformations (01). Identification of these situations is important because of the real potential for neurologic deterioration that exists with split cord pathology, especially if the congenital spinal anomaly is corrected. This deterioration is likely secondary to traction on the cord and underlying tethered cord pathophysiology. Therefore, imaging of the entire neuroaxis is recommended for patients with congenital spine abnormalities (30; 18; 03; 35). Split cord malformation has also been reported with situs inversus (10; 60) and intraspinal teratomas (37).

In a retrospective report of 266 patients with congenital scoliosis and coexisting split cord malformations, 83.5% of cases presented with multiple malformations. As compared to the Type II group, patients in the Type I group showed higher prevalence of multiple malformations and mixed anomalies of vertebral deformations. Additionally, the length of spine involved was also longer in the Type I group patients. This study also showed a 62.8% prevalence of rib anomalies among patients with congenital scoliosis and spinal cord malformations. They also identified multiple intraspinal anomalies with high prevalence in association with congenital scoliosis with comorbid split cord malformations (13).

Clinical vignette

A 6-year-old female presented to a neurology clinic for a recent history of increased fatigue when walking more than a block. An area of hypertrichosis with a capillary hemangioma over the lumbosacral area was noted. She also was noted to have moderate scoliosis, and scoliosis films demonstrated a lumbar hemivertebra. No other problems were reported.

Her exam showed some weakness of both ankle dorsiflexors. She had difficulty toe walking. Her patellar deep tendon reflexes and ankle reflexes were hyperactive. Toes were upgoing bilaterally. The tone in her lower extremities was moderately increased. No sensory abnormalities were found. MRI of her spine demonstrated a thick filum terminale and a split cord malformation with an osseous septum in the lower lumbar area. Urodynamic study showed evidence of bladder instability with upper motor neuron findings.

She was referred to pediatric neurosurgery and underwent surgical exploration of the malformation, which demonstrated the site of tethering as the bony septum. The septum was excised, and the filum was divided. Her clinical course has remained stable. There has been neither increased neurologic impairment nor any improvement. Her urodynamics returned to normal after the surgery. She was diagnosed with split cord malformation type I with associated tethered cord.

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Diastematomyelia has been reported in sisters, suggesting a possible X-linked inheritance as the cause (04). It also has been reported in association with Angelman syndrome (38). It should be emphasized that split cord malformation is usually identified as a nonsyndromal, sporadic disorder.

The split cord malformation begins early in nervous system development. Formation of the spinal cord begins during the third week of development. The notochord develops from endoderm and constitutes the axis around which the other structures later form. The notochord induces the neuroplate to form from ectoderm, and this then invaginates to form the neural tube, the source of the spinal cord. The underlying defect has been proposed to be the formation of an accessory neurenteric canal (43). The normally present primitive neuroenteric canal forms between embryonic days 16 and 24 and provides a conduit of communication between the amnion and the yolk sac via the primitive knot. The accessory canal provides an abnormal fistula, enabling continued contact between ectoderm and endoderm within this space. The abnormal canal causes regional "splitting" of the notochord and overlying neural plate, allowing mesenchymal tissue to fill the gap, resulting in the endomesenchymal tract. The formation of the abnormal fistula is the critical step because it allows the multipotent mesenchymal tissue to permanently bisect the notochord, forcing each overlying hemineural plate to neurulate against its own hemicord. This tract can result in bony and cartilaginous clefts along with neuroenteric cysts in an area of split cord. The final appearance of the matured split cord malformation ultimately depends on the ability of the embryo to heal around the endomesenchymal tract, the variable extent to which the endomesenchymal tract persists, and the ultimate developmental fates of the dislocated midline mesenchyme and endoderm. The interposed septum derives from the mesenchymal tissue, resulting in either a bony (type I) or fibrous (type II) composition (43; 26). In reality, however, many patients have variations that do not fit either category exactly; thus, the process is likely much more complex and still not completely understood. Intermediate or overlapping split cord malformations have been reported, suggesting that the distinction between the 2 types of split cord malformation may be artificial and that they instead represent a spectrum of malformations due to an underlying ontogenetic error (36; 61; 21; 35; 28; 54).

Diagnostic workup

Diagnostic workup centers on the proper radiologic imaging of the underlying abnormal anatomy. Particular attention needs to be paid to identifying potential secondary tethering lesions. Plain x-ray studies of the spine can show the bony abnormalities within the spinal canal, but this is not always the case, and overall the diagnostic yield for detecting split cord malformations is low; however, plain films can be helpful for identifying other associated body abnormalities (59). MRI is a good screening study to identify the presence and extent of any split cord malformation and any associated lesions such as tethered cord or low-lying cord; also, it can identify non-adjacent abnormalities, such as syringohydromyelia and Chiari type 1 malformation (36). However, MRI does not always identify all of the pathologic anatomy of importance to anyone planning neurosurgical intervention, such as vertebral body abnormalities often present in this condition. It is particularly important to define the anatomy of any osseous or osseocartilaginous midline septa because the presence of a midline septa requires special surgical consideration. For this reason, CT myelography or 3-D spiral CT scans as a complementary study to MRI in the evaluation of split cord malformations is recommended. Firstly, CT allows the differentiation of split cord lesions into types I and II. A type I split cord malformation consists of 2 hemicords, each contained within its own dural tube and separated by a dura-sheathed rigid osseocartilaginous median septum. A type II split cord malformation consists of 2 hemicords housed in a single dural tube separated by a nonrigid, fibrous median septum. Secondly, CT is superior to MRI in delineating the size, shape, and configuration of bony septa as well as the delineation of hypertrophic neural arches and other vertebral body abnormalities. Some lesions, however, are not identified until the time of surgery, although as the quality of imaging continues to improve, this becomes less likely over time (41; 52).

It has become possible to diagnose split cord malformations prenatally by ultrasound, usually in the second and third trimester. There has been one case of diastematomyelia diagnosed in the first trimester (34). The main diagnostic clue for prenatal ultrasound is the presence of an extra echogenic focus in the midline between the posterior ossification centers of the spine.

Another important area of diagnostic workup is related to bladder function. Many authors stress the importance of a urodynamic study to determine whether or not the bladder is neurologically involved (29; 48; 36). Although many cases show such neurologic symptoms as incontinence, recurrent urinary tract infections, or renal deterioration, others have more subtle findings. These findings are present on urodynamic testing and do not correlate well with the neurologic examination. Nonetheless, these individuals have neuropathic bladder changes and may require urologic intervention because of a high risk for renal deterioration. Sometimes, urodynamic findings alone are the only sign of current neurologic involvement from split cord malformation and may be the only objective data available for helping to make decisions about whether or not to intervene surgically or to follow the patient, looking for deteriorations in symptoms or the neurologic examination (47).

The role of somatosensory evoked potentials is less clear. Some authors have advocated using the study to follow asymptomatic patients. Somatosensory evoked potentials testing may be helpful if performed in neurologically-normal patients at regular intervals (25). In this situation, the test would be used to give advanced warning of changes in nerve conduction before there is clinical evidence of neurologic deficit. This test, however, is not widely used for this purpose, and there are no clear data that it adds useful information.

Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of isolated diastematomyelia has been reported (56; 02; 32).

Management

State-of-the-art management of split cord malformation is similar to that of the tethered cord syndrome and includes early identification (particularly in high-risk individuals with external cutaneous manifestations of spinal dysraphism, those with congenital scoliosis or lower-extremity orthopedic malformations, or those with myelodysplasia), appropriate decisions concerning whom to operate on, and good postoperative follow-up. Clear indications for surgery include neurologic progression and scoliosis as well as congenital dysraphisms, such as myelomeningocele. Surgical treatment of asymptomatic individuals is more controversial, and the decision whether to operate is a balance between the skill of the surgeon and the risk of associated complications, such as meningitis, CSF leak, worsening of neurologic symptoms immediately after surgery, or late neurologic deterioration because of retethering in the future due to scar tissue, or incomplete removal or regrowth of the septum. Furthermore, many patients continue to have progression of their scoliosis after split cord repair and require later spinal fusion. In cases of split cord malformation manifesting in adults, surgery versus expectant management remains debatable given limited presentations and literature (63).

In terms of the surgical procedure, primary attention is paid to untethering the hemicords by resecting the midline bony or cartilaginous spur, the dural sleeves enwrapping the spur, and any soft tissue band or septum attaching any part of the hemicords to the surrounding dura or bone (43; 01). Split cord malformations are frequently associated with other tethering lesions. These other lesions, usually caudal to the split cord malformation, need to be released to relieve the symptomatically stretched spinal cord. The associated lesions include thickened filums, dermoids or dermal sinus tracts, intradural lipomas, and neuroenteric cysts that can be other causes of tethered cord and, thus, also need be surgically corrected. Myelomeningocele manque is an occult spinal cord lesion secondary to failed meningocele formation; it consists of taut fibrous bands admixed with dorsal paramedian nerve roots and blood vessels that tether the hemicords to where the fibroneurovascular stalk penetrates the dura. Myelomeningocele manque is commonly found and, because it contributes to cord tethering, necessitates repair. Hemicords sometimes occur in tandem in the same spinal cord (so-called composite split cord malformations). Also, hydrocephalus and syringohydromyelia can be associated, so care should be taken to image the entire neuraxis. These points are made to emphasize the importance of having a neurosurgeon with operative experience with split cord malformation involved in managing the case (01).

Most surgeons continue to advise surgery for all individuals with split cord pathologies. This is based on data that neurologic outcome worsens with age of the patient at time of surgery (11; 62). Furthermore, surgery during the asymptomatic period is advocated by some due to fears that neurologic symptoms may not improve after surgery (17; 62). Some others propose that split cord malformations may contribute to scoliosis progression and should be repaired before scoliosis surgery (35). Others advocate that split cord malformation type I may require surgical repair before scoliosis surgery, but that type II may not need corrective surgery (03; 50). Alternatively, some studies suggest that patients with congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation, regardless of split cord malformation type, can safely undergo spinal deformity correction without neurologic intervention or prophylactic tethering in patients with intact or stable neurologic status (12; 57). One 2019 study of 32 patients with congenital scoliosis and type 1 split cord malformation suggested that not resecting the bony spur prior to spinal curve correction may also achieve satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes with potentially fewer complications (64).

Use of endoscopic surgery may reduce complications and increase the benefit-to-risk ratio for surgical repair (08). One study found that 1-stage major spinal osteotomy, including simultaneous bony septum excision in patients with scoliosis with type I spinal cord malformation, and spinal osteotomy alone in patients with scoliosis and type II is effective for correction of severe, rigid scoliosis in split cord malformations without increasing the rate of surgical complications (07).

In high-risk surgical procedures, such as those patients with multiple spinal conditions, use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is advised. In the case of a female pediatric patient who underwent 12 operations for the correction of tethered cord, scoliosis, and split spinal cord, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was crucial because it detected sudden significant loss of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials, which caused cancellation of a surgical procedure. Had they performed the procedure without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, the patient may have experienced paraplegia (22).

Management also must address the potential deficits that may be present prior to operation. Often, these do not completely improve but, rather, stabilize after operation. The surgery should be considered prophylactic rather than curative. Orthopedic deformities such as rigid ankle deformities and scoliosis may require management and need to be followed. Also, neurogenic bladder should be managed aggressively as this condition can lead to life-threatening renal deterioration. Management includes treatment of urinary tract infections, clean intermittent catheterization, and the use of anticholinergic medications; furthermore, post-operative urodynamics are helpful for establishing a baseline. Patients should be followed closely by a multi-disciplinary team both before and after surgery (01).

Outcomes

Surgery is particularly effective for pain as well as neurologic deterioration; the majority of patients have improvement, and most of the rest have stabilization of symptoms (48; 36; 59). As an exception, pre-existing vertebral column anomalies can progress and require further surgery in the future. Also, some cases of later neurologic deterioration are seen, usually because of retethering due to scar tissue, although this also responds to surgical correction. The role for surgery in asymptomatic patients, however, is controversial, with some authors arguing for surgical intervention at the time of diagnosis (11; 36; 59) or before other corrective spinal surgeries (35) and others arguing for careful monitoring and surgery only if neurologic deterioration occurs (23; 02; 03). Although some series have demonstrated detrimental effects of delayed diagnosis and treatment in terms of neurologic and urologic function (55; 11; 47; 36), others have not (23; 02). Patients with split cord malformations associated with meningomyelocele may have worse outcome than those without meningomyelocele (30) although neurologic status may be stabilized following surgery for both conditions (19).

One retrospective, longitudinal study of 65 patients showed that in a subgroup of patients who underwent tethered spinal cord surgery with the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring at 12 years of age or younger exhibited a high rate of progressive scoliosis (09). It is unknown whether the progressive scoliosis is due to the tethered cord or other reasons; however, other studies have shown that patients with spinal dysraphism associated with tethering are predisposed to scoliosis (06).

References

01: Albright AL, Pollack IF, Adelson PD. Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. New York: Thieme, 2008:368, 386-89.
02: Andro C, Pecquery R, De Vries P, Forlodou P, Fenoll B. Split cervical spinal cord malformation and vertebral dysgenesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009;95:547-50. PMID 19837020
03: Ayvaz M, Akalan N, Yazici M, Alanay A, Acaroglu RE. Is it necessary to operate on all split cord malformations before corrective surgery for patients with congenital spinal deformities. Spine 2009;34(22):2413-18. PMID 19829255
04: Balci S, Caglar K, Eryilmaz M. Diastematomyelia in two sisters. Am J Med Genet 1999;86:180-2. PMID 10449657
05: Boussaadani Soubai R, Tahiri L, Sqalli Houssaini G, Mansouri S, Harzy T. Adult presentation of diastematomyelia: a case report. Joint Bone Spine 2011;78(5):529-30. PMID 21571568
06: Cardoso M, Keating R. Neurosurgical management of spinal dysraphism and neurogenic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(17):1775-82. PMID 19602995
07: Chen B, Yuan Z, Chang MS, et al. Safety and efficacy of one-stage spinal osteotomy for severe and rigid congenital scoliosis associated with split spinal cord malformation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40(18):E1005-13. PMID 26165211
08: Chern JJ, Gordon AS, Naftel RP, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ, Wellons JC 3rd. Intradural spinal endoscopy in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011;8(1):107-11. PMID 21721897
09: Dulfer SE, Drost G, Lange F, Journee HL, Wapstra FH, Hoving EW. Long-term evaluation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring-assisted tethered cord surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2017;33(11):1985-95. PMID 28676974
10: Dwarakanath S, Suri A, Garg A, Mahapatra AK, Mehta VS. Adult complex spinal dysraphism with situs inversus totalis: a rare association and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(8):E225-8. PMID 15834322
11: Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Kocaman S, Demirtas E. Split spinal cord malformations in children. J Neurosurg 1998;88:57-65. PMID 9420073
12: Feng F, Shen J, Zhang J, et al. Clinical outcomes of different surgical strategy for patients with congenital scoliosis and type I split cord malformation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41(16):1310-6. PMID 26913465
13: Feng F, Tan H, Li X, et al. Radiographic characteristics in congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation: a retrospective study of 266 surgical cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1):420. PMID 29058584
14: Goldberg C, Fenelon G, Blake NS, Dowling F, Regan BF. Diastematomyelia: a critical review of the natural history and treatment. Spine 1984;9(4):367-72. PMID 6474251
15: Gower DJ, Del CO, Kelly DL, Alexander E. Diastematomyelia—a 40-year experience. Pediatr Neurosci 1988;14(2):90-6. PMID 3251213
16: Guggisberg D, Hadj-Rabia S, Viney C, et al. Skin markers of occult spinal dysraphism in children: a review of 54 cases. Arch Dermatol 2004;140(9):1109-15. PMID 15381552
17: Gupta DK, Mahapatra AK. Proposal for a new clinicoradiological classification of type I split-cord malformations: a prospective study of 25 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 2006;42(6):341-6. PMID 17047413
18: Hajnovic L, Trnka J. Tethered spinal cord syndrome--the importance of time for outcomes. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2007;17:190-3. PMID 17638158
19: Higashida T, Sasano M, Sato H, Sekido K, Ito S. Myelomeningocele associated with split cord malformation type I: three case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50(5):426-30. PMID 20505305
20: Izci Y, Gonul M, Gonul E. The diagnostic value of skin lesions in split cord malformations. J Clin Neurosci 2007a;14(9):860-3. PMID 17591442
21: Izci Y, Gurkanlar D, Gonul E. An unusual type of split cord malformation. J Clin Neurosci 2007b;14(4):383-6. PMID 17267224
22: Jahangiri FR, Sayegh SA, Azzubi M, et al. Benefit of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in a pediatric patient with spinal dysmorphism, split cord malformation, and scoliosis. Neurodiagn J 2017;57(4):295-307. PMID 29236600
23: Jamil M, Bannister CM. A report of children with spinal dysraphism managed conservatively. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1992;1(suppl 2):26-8. PMID 1283336
24: James CC, Lassman LP. Spinal dysraphism. An orthopaedic syndrome in children accompanying occult forms. Arch Dis Child 1960;35:315-27. PMID 13789286
25: James CC, Lassman LP. Spina bifida occulta. London: Academic Pr, 1981.
26: Jankowitz BT, Albright L. Cutaneous manifestations of split cord malformations. J Neurosurg 2007;107(3 Suppl Pediatrics):240-3. PMID 17918534
27: Kaminker R, Fabry J, Midha R, Finkelstein JA. Split cord malformation with diastematomyelia presenting as neurogenic claudication in an adult: a case report. Spine 2000;25(17):2269-71. PMID 10973414
28: Khandelwal A, Tandon V, Mahapatra AK. An unusual case of 4 level spinal dysraphism: multiple composite type 1 and type 2 split cord malformation, dorsal myelocystocele and hydrocephalous. J Pediatr Neurosci 2011;6(1):58-61. PMID 21977092
29: Kothari MJ, Bauer SB. Urodynamic and neurophysiologic evaluation of patients with diastematomyelia. J Child Neurol 1997;12(2):97-100. PMID 9075018
30: Kumar R, Singh SN, Bansal KK, Singh V. Comparative study of complex spina bifida and split cord malformation. Indian J Pediatr 2005;72(2):109-15. PMID 15758531
31: Lewandrowski KU, Rachlin JR, Glazer PA. Diastematomyelia presenting as progressive weakness in an adult after spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;4(1):116-9. PMID 14749200
32: Li SL, Luo G, Norwitz ER, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia: a case report and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound 2012;40(5):301-5 PMID 21952985
33: Lichtenstein BW. Spinal dysraphism, spina bifida, and myelodysplasia. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1940;44:792-810.
34: Lituania M, Tonni G, Araujo Júnior E. First trimester diagnosis of cervico-thoracic diastematomyelia and diplomyelia using three-dimensional ultrasound. Childs Nerv Syst 2015;31(12):2245-8. PMID 26438550
35: Liu W, Zheng D, Chi S, et al. Characteristics of osseous septum of split cord malformation in patients presenting with scoliosis: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 2009;45:350-3. PMID 19907198
36: Mahapatra AK, Gupta DK. Split cord malformations: a clinical study of 254 patients and a proposal for a new clinical-imaging classification. J Neurosurg 2005;103:531-6. PMID 16383252
37: Maiti TK, Bhat DI, Devi BI, Sampath S, Mahadevan A, Shankar SK. Teratoma in split cord malformation: an unusual association: a report of two cases with a review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg 2010;46(3):238-41. PMID 21051924
38: Mastroyianni SD, Kontopoulos E. Split-cord malformation in a girl with Angelman syndrome: a mere coincidence. Am J Med Genet 2002;111:57-60. PMID 12124736
39: Morelli C, Schalick WO 3rd. Diastematomyelia presenting in adulthood as back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92(9):838. PMID 21904190
40: Muroi A, Fleming KL, McComb JG. Split medulla in association with multiple closed neural tube defects. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26(7):967-71. PMID 20179945
41: Musson RE, Warren DJ, Bickle I, Connolly DJ, Griffiths PD. Imaging in childhood scoliosis: a pictorial review. Postgrad Med 2010;86:419-27. PMID 20634252
42: Pallatroni HF, Ball PA, Duhaime AC. Split cord malformation as a cause of tethered cord syndrome in a 78-year-old female. Pediatr Neurosurg 2004;40(2):80-3. PMID 15292638
43: Pang D. Split cord malformation: part II: clinical syndrome. Neurosurgery 1992;31(3):481-500. PMID 1407429
44: Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M. Split cord malformation: part I: a unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations [review]. Neurosurgery 1992;31(3):451-80. PMID 1407428
45: Pang D, Wilberger JE. Tethered cord syndrome in adults. J Neurosurg 1982;57:32-47. PMID 7086498
46: Pettorini BL, Massimi L, Cianfoni A, Paternoster G, Tamburini G, Di Rocco C. Thoracic lipomeningocele associated with diastematomyelia, tethered spinal cord, and hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2007;106(5 Suppl Pediatrics):394-7. PMID 17566209
47: Proctor MR, Bauer SB, Scott RM. The effect of surgery for split spinal cord malformation on neurologic and urologic function. Pediatr Neurosurg 2000;32(1):13-9. PMID 10765133
48: Proctor MR, Scott RM. Long-term outcome for patients with split cord malformation. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10(1):e 5. PMID 16749757
49: Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gadkary CA, Mummaneni PV, Rosenberg WS. Split spinal cord malformation in an elderly patient: case report. Surg Neurol 2004;61(2):201-3; discussion 203. PMID 14751645
50: Qureshi MA, Asad A, Pasha IF, Malik AS, Arlet V. Staged corrective surgery for complex congenital scoliosis and split cord malformation. Eur Spine 2009;18(9):1249-54. PMID 19626347
51: Rowe DE, Jadhav AL. Care of the adolescent with spina bifida. Pediatr Clin North Am 2008;55(6):1359-74. PMID 19041463
52: Rufener SL, Ibrahim M, Raybaud CA, Parmar HA. Congenital spine and spinal cord malformations--a pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(3 Suppl):s26-37. PMID 20173174
53: Sack AM, Khan TW. Diastematomyelia. Anesthesiology 2016;125(2):397. PMID 26771912
54: Salunke P, Kovai P, Malik V, Sharma M. Mixed split cord malformation: are we missing something. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113(9):774-8. PMID 21885185
55: Satar N, Bauer SB, Shefner J, Kelly MD, Darbey MM. The effects of delayed diagnosis and treatment in patients with an occult spinal dysraphism. J Urol 1995;154(2):754-8. PMID 7609171
56: Sepulveda W, Kyle PM, Hassan J, Weiner E. Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia: case reports and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 1997;17(2):161-5. PMID 9061765
57: Shen J, Zhang J, Feng F, Wang Y, Qiu G, Li Z. Corrective surgery for congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation: it may be safe to leave diastematomyelia untreated in patients with intact or stable neurological status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98(11):926-36. PMID 27252437
58: Sheptak PE. Diastematomyelia-diplomyelia. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, editors. Handbook of clinical neurology. Vol. 32. Congenital malformations of the spine and spinal cord. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ, 1978:239-54.
59: Sinha S, Agarwal D, Mahapatra AK. Split cord malformations: an experience of 203 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22(1):3-7. PMID 15933885
60: Tubbs RS, Wellons JC 3rd, Oakes WJ. Split cord malformation and situs inversus totalis: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21(2):161-4. PMID 14745579
61: van Aalst J, Beuls EA, Vles JS, Cornips EM, van Straaten HW. The intermediate type split cord malformation: hypothesis and case report. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21(12):1020-4 PMID 15864598
62: Venkataramana. Split cord malformations. J Pediatr Neurosci 2006;1:5-9.
63: Viswanathan VK, Minnema AJ, Farhadi HF. Surgical management of adult type 1 split cord malformation. Report of two cases with literature review. J Clin Neurosci 2018;52:119-21. PMID 29602607
64: Yang N, Luo M, Yu Y, Wang J, Xia L, Wang W. Is it better to resect a bony spur before corrective surgery for congenital scoliosis with type I split cord malformation? World Neurosurg 2019;125:e1151-9. PMID 30790730

Contributors

All contributors' financial relationships have been reviewed and mitigated to ensure that this and every other article is free from commercial bias.

Authors

Justine Ker BA

Justine Ker of Tulane University School of Medicine has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile
Stephen L Nelson Jr MD PhD

Dr. Nelson of Tulane University School of Medicine received honorariums from BioMarin and LivaNova for speaking engagements.
See Profile

Editor

Michael V Johnston MD†

Dr. Johnston of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
See Profile

Former Authors

Stephen L Kinsman MD (original author) and Brittany Gerstein MS Candidate

Patient Profile

Age range of presentation: 0 month - 65+ years
Sex preponderance: female>male
Heredity: heredity may be a factor
Population groups selectively affected: none selectively affected
Occupation groups selectively affected: none selectively affected

ICD & OMIM codes

ICD-9: Other specified anomalies of the spinal cord: 742.5

Diastematomyelia: 742.51
ICD-10: Diastematomyelia: Q06.2

Congenital malformation of spinal cord, unspecified: Q06.9
OMIM: Diastematomyelia: 222500

Spina bifida: #182940

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Nearly 3,000 illustrations, including video clips of neurologic disorders.
Every article is reviewed by our esteemed Editorial Board for accuracy and currency.
Full spectrum of neurology in 1,200 comprehensive articles.
Listen to MedLink on the go with Audio versions of each article.

Questions or Comment?

MedLink®, LLC

3525 Del Mar Heights Rd, Ste 304
San Diego, CA 92130-2122

Toll Free (U.S. + Canada): 800-452-2400

US Number: +1-619-640-4660

Support: service@medlink.com

Editor: editor@medlink.com

ISSN: 2831-9125

Split cord malformation

Associated Disorders

Dermal sinus malformation
Myelomeningocele manque
Neurenteric cyst
SCM
Spina bifida occulta
- Spinal dysraphism
- Split cord malformations
- Tethered cord

Differential Diagnosis

tumors
infectious processes
demyelinating disorders
arachnoiditis
discitis
- rheumatoid disorders
- degenerative vertebral disease
- thickened filum terminalae
- terminal lipoma
- dorsal lipomas
- dermal sinuses with dermoid cysts
- dermal sinuses without dermoid cysts
- other forms of myelodysplasia
- scoliosis

Split cord malformation

Split cord malformation

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Clinical vignette

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Epidemiology

Prevention

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic workup

Management

Outcomes

Special considerations

Pregnancy

Anesthesia

References

Contributors

Authors

Editor

Former Authors

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Acute cerebellar ataxia in children

Zika virus: neurologic complications

Cerebral edema in childhood

CNS germinoma

Vein of Galen malformations

Patent foramen ovale

Epileptic lesions due to malformation of cortical development

Migraine in childhood

Split cord malformation

Introduction

Overview

Key points

Historical note and terminology

Clinical manifestations

Presentation and course

Clinical vignette

Biological basis

Etiology and pathogenesis

Epidemiology

Prevention

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic workup

Management

Outcomes

Special considerations

Pregnancy

Anesthesia

References

Contributors

Authors

Editor

Former Authors

Patient Profile

ICD & OMIM codes

This is an article preview. Start a Free Account to access the full version.

Questions or Comment?

Also in This Category

Acute cerebellar ataxia in children

Zika virus: neurologic complications

Cerebral edema in childhood

CNS germinoma

Vein of Galen malformations

Patent foramen ovale

Epileptic lesions due to malformation of cortical development

Migraine in childhood

This is an article preview.
Start a Free Account
to access the full version.